Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LTG

(216 posts)
70. Unfortunately PR is all many voters will see or to which they will bother pay attention
Tue Jan 29, 2019, 05:03 PM
Jan 2019

Experiences and anecdotes will vary from area to area and store to store. I do not doubt your comments, nor that they are probably true on a wider national basis.

My own friendships and experience is in upscale stores in primarily upper middle class areas. Seldom a good place to look for a “typical” company wide representation. This is probably even more true in an area/store where a Starbucks corporate executive is likely one of your regulars.

My post was intended to present readily available information, whether accurate or not, that will be touted by a campaign, surrogates, press and PR people. That, and his being a “lifelong” Democrat, might look appealing to lower information center left, center and center right voters who are uncomfortable with the movement further left and right of the two major parties.

I think he may take more from both parties,and the independents, than either party believes. IIRC, Ross Perot got about 19% of the vote as a third party candidate. He might look just liberal enough, but not too liberal, for those who walk in either the right or left lane, but still between the lines of the main highway.

Agreed. No Schultz, No Bloomberg, No Dimon. sarcasmo Jan 2019 #1
Yes, though to be fair I will at least say this of Bloomberg Tom Rinaldo Jan 2019 #4
Well, I'm Anybody But Trump RobinA Jan 2019 #12
Bloomberg is an opportunist Revanchist Jan 2019 #56
Agreed. And this...FDR. brush Jan 2019 #34
This approach not only disqualifies FDR SCantiGOP Jan 2019 #48
Absolutely, the Kennedys also. brush Jan 2019 #50
Adjusted for inflation FDR's wealth peaked at about 60 Million dollars Tom Rinaldo Jan 2019 #63
Simple Solution--make all elections by tax payer funding only at140 Jan 2019 #2
I will gladly review my above opinion once we have accomplished what you suggest. n/t Tom Rinaldo Jan 2019 #6
How do you propose to stop certain Billionaires from running? at140 Jan 2019 #7
I like what "most democratic countries" are doing. That's not us now Tom Rinaldo Jan 2019 #8
Speaking of billionaires SCantiGOP Jan 2019 #20
LOL at140 Jan 2019 #47
There may not be anything we can do legally to prohibit it Proud Liberal Dem Jan 2019 #40
K&R bdamomma Jan 2019 #65
Agreed snort Jan 2019 #3
Wall Street Billionaires are most of the problem and sure as hell democratisphere Jan 2019 #5
Agreed! Agreed! Agreed! jrthin Jan 2019 #9
"We are in danger of allowing vast wealth to create a new political aristocracy in America" ProfessorPlum Jan 2019 #10
The Roosevelts and Kennedys come to mind. llmart Jan 2019 #22
I mean Sgent Jan 2019 #39
It's not a question of empathy. And the ship has left the dock but still is in the harbor... Tom Rinaldo Jan 2019 #41
"We are in danger of allowing vast wealth to create a new political aristocracy in America" volstork Jan 2019 #11
More bartenders, please. moondust Jan 2019 #13
People do not realize Starbucks is not a good employer...they don't have full time employees. Demsrule86 Jan 2019 #14
Things about Schultz that might get him votes LTG Jan 2019 #38
They recently agreed to pay for gender-affirming care for Transgender people Proud Liberal Dem Jan 2019 #42
Agreed, not the greatest employer ever, but LTG Jan 2019 #44
+1 Proud Liberal Dem Jan 2019 #45
If you vote for this guy who like Jill Stein won't win, you are voting for Trump. Demsrule86 Jan 2019 #68
Since they rig the system to dole out very little insurance...not much chance that will happen. Demsrule86 Jan 2019 #67
That is completely untrue...they deliberately keep workers part time so as not to allow them to Demsrule86 Jan 2019 #66
Unfortunately PR is all many voters will see or to which they will bother pay attention LTG Jan 2019 #70
If it were up to me I'd tax billionaires out of existence. hunter Jan 2019 #15
America prospered the most in the 50s and 60s when the marginal tax rates were highest OMGWTF Jan 2019 #16
Yep. hunter Jan 2019 #21
A Starbucks boycott would change his mind... lame54 Jan 2019 #17
Too bad it takes so much money to win treestar Jan 2019 #18
this is part of the problem of dems ignoring rw radio certainot Jan 2019 #19
Agree and disagree... zaj Jan 2019 #23
See post #4 above. I agree it's a meaningful difference. n/t Tom Rinaldo Jan 2019 #37
Billionaire says: T-r-u-u-u-u-u-u-u-u-s-t me... keithbvadu2 Jan 2019 #24
I'd dispute that Schultz is a good billionaire Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jan 2019 #25
No more businessmen/women! shanti Jan 2019 #26
Yep. n/t violetpastille Jan 2019 #27
They always claim to be fiscally conservative which should be a big, red flag. nt yaesu Jan 2019 #28
Pretty sure it would be unConstitutional to prevent ANY qualified citizen for running for President. BamaRefugee Jan 2019 #29
I addressed that in post #8 n/t Tom Rinaldo Jan 2019 #36
Ten Wealthiest Presidents by estimated net worth Locutusofborg Jan 2019 #30
A couple of observations Tom Rinaldo Jan 2019 #35
Yes, especially billionaires whose "contribution" to our country Bradshaw3 Jan 2019 #31
My mood as well. MBS Jan 2019 #32
Agreed. They need to find another hobby. Vinca Jan 2019 #33
K&R ZeroSomeBrains Jan 2019 #43
And anyone who says "Both parties" is a willfully ignorant, malicious, dishonest asshole. dalton99a Jan 2019 #46
We could repeal Citizens United and start taxing and regulating large corporations again. Initech Jan 2019 #49
FDR would have been a billionaire by today's standards still_one Jan 2019 #51
FDR would have been racist by today's standards. violetpastille Jan 2019 #52
You have just eliminated those in the Joseph P. Kennedy family. still_one Jan 2019 #53
I would have voted for JFK in 1960 in the GE violetpastille Jan 2019 #54
of course, but my point is we need to be careful with sweeping generalizations that the OP is making still_one Jan 2019 #57
You're absolutely correct about that. violetpastille Jan 2019 #60
How about millionaires? oberliner Jan 2019 #55
1 billion equals 1000 millions jalan48 Jan 2019 #58
Still - the vast majority of Americans are not millionaires oberliner Jan 2019 #62
Billionaires equal Stolen wages from their employees Yavin4 Jan 2019 #59
Plutocracy. jalan48 Jan 2019 #61
Billionaires bdamomma Jan 2019 #64
"I've spent my life learning how to make myself rich! Now you should make me President struggle4progress Jan 2019 #69
I like what AOC (or maybe one of her aides?) said: 'Every billionaire is a policy failure.' aidbo Jan 2019 #71
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»F*ck Billionaires running...»Reply #70