Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Trumpocalypse

(6,143 posts)
88. Nor were any of them on the Senate Judiciary Committee
Sat Jan 19, 2019, 03:14 PM
Jan 2019

at that time. Plus the Special Counsel was appointed in response to the firing of Comey, not Sessions recusal. Which is moot anyway since Sessions resigned.

"...by those that investigated them..."? manor321 Jan 2019 #1
+1000 hlthe2b Jan 2019 #4
Agree ananda Jan 2019 #11
Due process refers to criminal proceedings Trumpocalypse Jan 2019 #12
We lost a great Democratic senator dalton99a Jan 2019 #16
+ me. nt Baltimike Jan 2019 #44
Gillibrand blew an opportunity to expose that shithead Roger Stone & the GOPee suegeo Jan 2019 #99
"His decision was to resign...." BigmanPigman Jan 2019 #2
Ditto. Shrike47 Jan 2019 #6
Agreed 1000 percent!!! blueinredohio Jan 2019 #31
+me UpInArms Jan 2019 #32
+1000! nt USALiberal Jan 2019 #47
Me, either.....nt Heartstrings Jan 2019 #58
That's where I'm at too Rorey Jan 2019 #78
This. nt Doremus Jan 2019 #80
"His decision" -- after she started an avalanche. Qutzupalotl Jan 2019 #85
She blew the chance at a teachable moment: Republicans suck suegeo Jan 2019 #100
Me too. zentrum Jan 2019 #105
what did she say? nt msongs Jan 2019 #3
'Credible allegations?' Bullshit. Shrike47 Jan 2019 #5
This right here ornotna Jan 2019 #14
"And for me, that eighth allegation..." wellst0nev0ter Jan 2019 #39
I'll never support her. I'll never forgive her. I'll never trust her. NurseJackie Jan 2019 #52
That stuck out to me also DeminPennswoods Jan 2019 #90
Men are often assumed guilty until proven innocent. democratisphere Jan 2019 #7
He sure was......ugh.....and come on... a kennedy Jan 2019 #13
She won't last past the second primary. Liberal In Texas Jan 2019 #8
She won't last passed the first debate. She will sit at the kiddies table. I doubt she will wasupaloopa Jan 2019 #28
Agree. Opportunism cost her badly, and rightly so. Hortensis Apr 2019 #110
She set a standard that any Democrat, if accused, must resign without an investigation Clash City Rocker Jan 2019 #9
+1. Summary execution without investigation or trial dalton99a Jan 2019 #15
Then she flip-flopped by saying Kavanaugh wellst0nev0ter Jan 2019 #41
Ms. Big Tobacco 1990's should quit now. She sold her soul long ago. bitterross Jan 2019 #10
+100. How about her cosponsoring a senate bill that called for Hortensis Apr 2019 #111
Holy Crap! I didn't know about that bill. bitterross Apr 2019 #112
My reaction and thoughts also. Hortensis Apr 2019 #113
My take from that is.. Cha Jan 2019 #17
True Trumpocalypse Jan 2019 #20
And, the team lost UpInArms Jan 2019 #33
In the Senate Trumpocalypse Jan 2019 #36
I was merely referring to the loss of his powerful voice UpInArms Jan 2019 #38
There are other voices Trumpocalypse Jan 2019 #43
No way like Franken! Butterflylady Jan 2019 #66
True Trumpocalypse Jan 2019 #70
Nor were any of them able to embarrass Sessions into recusal. Qutzupalotl Jan 2019 #86
Nor were any of them on the Senate Judiciary Committee Trumpocalypse Jan 2019 #88
But certain people got exactly what they wanted... LakeSuperiorView Jan 2019 #106
I think this is accurate. NT WeekiWater Jan 2019 #21
Good point. Agree. That is Al. zentrum Jan 2019 #103
Regardless of what one thinks about Al Franken, Kirsten Gillibrand is a liar. StevieM Jan 2019 #18
No, she's not oberliner Jan 2019 #24
"8 credible allegations."??? BULLSHIT! Total LIE! They were NOT "credible." LBM20 Jan 2019 #26
Yes, she is! nt USALiberal Jan 2019 #49
Funny how all these accusers just vanished after he resigned. cwydro Jan 2019 #63
She just proved that she is. nt Doremus Jan 2019 #81
Pardon my French, but what a bunch of fucking shit. BlueStater Jan 2019 #19
Yes, exactly. It's innocent until proven guilty. LisaL Jan 2019 #35
her statement... quickesst Jan 2019 #22
"they were corroborated in real time" KelleyKramer Jan 2019 #23
Exactly. Gillibrand was duped by right-wing dirty tricksters. SMC22307 Jan 2019 #84
"8 credible allegations."??? BULL FUCKING SHIT! LBM20 Jan 2019 #25
And the last one was from a lady who claimed he squeezed her waist LisaL Jan 2019 #37
I like how every day she demands Twitler' s resignation. krispos42 Jan 2019 #27
Reality Newland56 Jan 2019 #29
Sorry Trumpocalypse Jan 2019 #53
The Washington Examiner Butterflylady Jan 2019 #68
Is there anything Trumpocalypse Jan 2019 #71
Well, Butterflylady Jan 2019 #101
What is fake? Trumpocalypse Jan 2019 #104
I don't think your timeline is accurate. MrsCoffee Jan 2019 #74
Sanders, Booker, Harris, and Warren all found the allegations credible madville Jan 2019 #30
Not sure that's true, they just jumped on the bandwagon DeminPennswoods Jan 2019 #91
That's even worse if they didn't believe it madville Jan 2019 #109
And my decision is not vote for her. LisaL Jan 2019 #34
Who the fuck "investigated" them? Autumn Jan 2019 #40
The media maybe Trumpocalypse Jan 2019 #46
The media doesn't investigate. They report talking points given to them. nt Autumn Jan 2019 #50
That's true of FAUX Trumpocalypse Jan 2019 #57
YMMV. If the media investigated anything our country would not be in the shape it is. nt Autumn Jan 2019 #59
While a nice thought Trumpocalypse Jan 2019 #61
That your opinion and I'm not buying . If the media reported fact and not just Autumn Jan 2019 #67
So the media can't be trusted Trumpocalypse Jan 2019 #73
Pure deflection. You can't refute my opinion that the media reports what gives them ratings Autumn Jan 2019 #76
That's not what you said. Trumpocalypse Jan 2019 #87
Whatever, they did a lot of investigative reporting on Trump, didn't they? If they had done any Autumn Jan 2019 #89
But in the case of Franken Trumpocalypse Jan 2019 #92
They reported what was told to them by the women. That was about it, not a lot of detail or proof Autumn Jan 2019 #93
And no one can just walk in off the street Trumpocalypse Jan 2019 #94
All they have to do is talk to a reporter, or someone like Roger Stone. nt Autumn Jan 2019 #95
And no reporter Trumpocalypse Jan 2019 #96
Dan Rather? Vetting doesn't always work and vetting is not investigative reporting. nt Autumn Jan 2019 #97
Well there were several women Trumpocalypse Jan 2019 #98
That answer is rather dishonest dsc Jan 2019 #42
Would there ever had been? Trumpocalypse Jan 2019 #45
I'll give you credit for trying. It's not working. nt USALiberal Jan 2019 #48
There are many of us who respect Al Franken more than Gillibrand will not vote for her. Stuart G Jan 2019 #51
I just can't trust her judgement. Honestly, I can't even stand to LISTEN to her. NurseJackie Jan 2019 #55
There was *no* investigation. There were anonymous allegations The Velveteen Ocelot Jan 2019 #54
Thank you!!! Butterflylady Jan 2019 #69
+1 dalton99a Jan 2019 #77
Michael Cohn was Hannity Attorney, passing cash suegeo Jan 2019 #107
Never. She blew it. riverwalker Jan 2019 #56
Kirsten Gillibrand is dead in the water...There are consequences when you destroy someone's career. Stuart G Jan 2019 #64
Well said. nt Doremus Jan 2019 #82
Yawn. n/t rzemanfl Jan 2019 #60
Next, please jberryhill Jan 2019 #62
No thanks. jalan48 Jan 2019 #65
BULL SHIT! She railroaded him out of office. MoonRiver Jan 2019 #72
Quit while you're ahead Kirsten MagickMuffin Jan 2019 #75
Where can I find Franken's response to the individual... LAS14 Jan 2019 #79
I feel Gillibrand did the bidding for Roger Stone. I don't care what she said dem4decades Jan 2019 #83
Love Franken. But if we want zero tolerance when a GOPer is charged, it's kind of Hoyt Jan 2019 #102
To hell with Gillibrand. Al Franken was the victim of a coordinated right-wing attack. VOX Jan 2019 #108
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Kirsten Gillibrand answer...»Reply #88