Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Blue_true

(31,261 posts)
78. Did you read the summary of their concerns?
Fri Dec 7, 2018, 12:16 PM
Dec 2018

The orientation is a big business, 1% affair. No people that work with the poor is there to give their advice, no labor leaders, no civil justice leaders. A lot is wrong with it.

What don't they like about it? vlyons Dec 2018 #1
... shanny Dec 2018 #5
Corporate right wing indoctrination before they are even sworn in. watoos Dec 2018 #15
A little about the program before we kick the shit out of it bottomofthehill Dec 2018 #67
Neutral environment? Caliman73 Dec 2018 #86
Agree Red Oak Dec 2018 #91
same here n/t orleans Dec 2018 #142
Lol. The American Enterprise Institute? They are almost solely responsible for inventing Tea Baggers Hassin Bin Sober Dec 2018 #99
Somebody forgot to mention lobbyists in their promotion literature. GeorgeGist Dec 2018 #135
Did you read the summary of their concerns? Blue_true Dec 2018 #78
Did you read who the speakers are keeping in mind that there are both D's and R's Members-elect bottomofthehill Dec 2018 #140
Ok, you proved your point. There are many very strong democrats in the speaker lineup. Blue_true Dec 2018 #166
I have been lucky in my life to talk to many Freshman Members of Congress bottomofthehill Dec 2018 #167
I'm glad they are asking the questions Bettie Dec 2018 #2
WHY? Surely you jest.. :))))) pangaia Dec 2018 #8
WTF? Congressional orientation has been privatized? That's apalling! lagomorph777 Dec 2018 #12
Freshmen orientation was in Washington in November Hangingon Dec 2018 #40
That list does not look Democratic True Blue American Dec 2018 #149
Excellent! ananda Dec 2018 #3
Yup California_Republic Dec 2018 #33
Good move on their part. n/t delisen Dec 2018 #4
Whose bad idea was it to corporate force-feed AOC, Pressley, Tlaib et al? BeyondGeography Dec 2018 #6
They signed up to go, no one was forced bottomofthehill Dec 2018 #168
Excellent! Sherman A1 Dec 2018 #7
The change of "status quo" must start somewhere. Why not HERE? Ferrets are Cool Dec 2018 #9
I think it is great! True Blue American Dec 2018 #150
"Millennials are destroying the congressional orientation industry" Dopers_Greed Dec 2018 #10
I'm guessing this editorial might interest you ... eppur_se_muova Dec 2018 #45
Gotta start somewhere... N_E_1 for Tennis Dec 2018 #11
I had no idea that corporate interests were involved from the get-go. Honeycombe8 Dec 2018 #13
+1! Nothing like fresh, un-compromised, un-indoctrinated minds to question the status quo! flibbitygiblets Dec 2018 #27
Great observation. KPN Dec 2018 #85
AND WHERE ARE THE 21st CENTURY UNIONS???? DemocracyMouse Dec 2018 #139
Mary Barro? True Blue American Dec 2018 #154
So proud of these young women for shaking up the boat. lark Dec 2018 #14
Fantastic! Equinox Moon Dec 2018 #16
We need more of this. And i think we're going to get it! n/t Tom Rinaldo Dec 2018 #17
Corporate lobbyists are crapping their linen kairos12 Dec 2018 #18
I'd prefer the headline not read ""AOC and others ..." EffieBlack Dec 2018 #19
This headline was actually better than most in that regard, but I generally agree. Tom Rinaldo Dec 2018 #23
I agree EffieBlack Dec 2018 #26
Doesn't look like she's keeping her head down, and I don't think she should. Cuthbert Allgood Dec 2018 #41
+1000 this is not the time in our history to be quiet and keep ones head down! Canoe52 Dec 2018 #73
She needs to find a balance EffieBlack Dec 2018 #75
Members of the House have a unique role Tom Rinaldo Dec 2018 #107
We agree EffieBlack Dec 2018 #120
"She needs to find a balance" hueymahl Dec 2018 #112
I am also proud of her for speaking out - she is definitely a social media person womanofthehills Dec 2018 #116
If I had meant "she needs to know her place," I would have said that EffieBlack Dec 2018 #118
I know the difference hueymahl Dec 2018 #119
Surely you're not including me in the category of people you think are "attacking" her EffieBlack Dec 2018 #123
Maybe attack is too strong a word hueymahl Dec 2018 #124
Where did I find fault with her? EffieBlack Dec 2018 #126
Ok. Whatever you say hueymahl Dec 2018 #128
I Believe That AOC Started Out In Constituent Services Progressive2020 Dec 2018 #137
Balance! True Blue American Dec 2018 #151
Generally agree. Some of the other freshwomen should take turns being the leader flibbitygiblets Dec 2018 #30
What would have been your headline? oberliner Dec 2018 #160
Perspective: 6 (?) out of 100 new members. The rest are inside Hortensis Dec 2018 #20
Six is five more than one BeyondGeography Dec 2018 #21
Yes, but either McConnell or Putin could easily Hortensis Dec 2018 #25
On the contrary, they're speaking up because they know very well what they're up against BeyondGeography Dec 2018 #28
2016, Beyond. If that reminder doesn't scare you, Hortensis Dec 2018 #37
Ever watch Dylan Ratigan, 4 PM on msnbc? watoos Dec 2018 #46
Yes, well, WHEN and IF we gain majorities in DC Hortensis Dec 2018 #54
I loved Dylan! True Blue American Dec 2018 #152
I'm having a hard time understanding your point? You seem to be saying these rookies would be KPN Dec 2018 #64
No, I want them to continue speaking up, exciting Hortensis Dec 2018 #80
Thanks for the clarification. Good to know as I respect your insight. KPN Dec 2018 #97
:) Same right back. Here's a reminder for anyone Hortensis Dec 2018 #101
Yes, and they're implying that there are existing members who don't want the same things they do. LisaM Dec 2018 #103
"I know you've heard this a million times before, but..." probably isn't the best way Cuthbert Allgood Dec 2018 #106
Why should I have to be schooled on Pelosi by someone in her 20s? LisaM Dec 2018 #110
You said she needs to recognize those who have done what she is doing. I showed she did. Cuthbert Allgood Dec 2018 #125
To be fair, our party still includes some conservatives Hortensis Dec 2018 #109
You are absolutely Correct! We do not have to shut up because the RW Media True Blue American Dec 2018 #153
I'm pretty sure these newly elected people watoos Dec 2018 #29
Because these new people are savvy but the others are clueless idiots? EffieBlack Dec 2018 #89
Nice straw-man (straw-woman?) there hueymahl Dec 2018 #113
I guess the words "the larger group who don't understand they are being fed right wing propaganda" EffieBlack Dec 2018 #127
WTF melman Dec 2018 #42
"They" are the Republican leadership and Russia. Hortensis Dec 2018 #48
Bullshit melman Dec 2018 #53
We're all on the same team, Melman. Hortensis Dec 2018 #62
I understood perfectly well melman Dec 2018 #74
"Can it Happen Here? I'm not the enemy, Melman. Hortensis Dec 2018 #93
the complainer is the squeaky wheel who always treestar Dec 2018 #72
I'm tired of people not complaining about injustice hueymahl Dec 2018 #114
This isn't a particularly grand injustice treestar Dec 2018 #132
So, the question should be.. disillusioned73 Dec 2018 #90
The Discussion was called "A Discussion with Business Leaders" bottomofthehill Dec 2018 #169
You might be ok with David Cohen disillusioned73 Dec 2018 #179
See post 140, a list of some but not all speakers bottomofthehill Dec 2018 #180
Malala spoke. seaglass Dec 2018 #22
Nice of the former head of Goldman Sachs to clue them in on who really runs things... PoliticAverse Dec 2018 #24
Way to shine a spotlight on where corruption starts! Way to ACTUALLY drain a fucking swamp, ladies! flibbitygiblets Dec 2018 #32
Love this. We are building a wall. JudyM Dec 2018 #39
Sorry, but this is bullshit. If they really wanted to make an impact, they should attend the still_one Dec 2018 #31
I think after the 4th CEO came in to tell me how to do my job, I'd tell others too, and then leave flibbitygiblets Dec 2018 #34
I got the impression that they didn't even attend the orientation? Is that correct? still_one Dec 2018 #35
"Lobbyists are here. Goldman Sachs is here." From the use of the words "is here" and "are here" Autumn Dec 2018 #43
OK, but I would like to know if they at least attended the event initially. I can understand them still_one Dec 2018 #47
Sounds like they attended some and left other events. Autumn Dec 2018 #51
Then I am cool with that. My disdain toward Elaine Chao go back to the bush administration where still_one Dec 2018 #69
Look who she's married to crazycatlady Dec 2018 #122
++++++++++++++++++++++++ still_one Dec 2018 #129
I do not believe my Rep Lori Trahan would refuse to attend and not listen. Anything I've heard seaglass Dec 2018 #50
That is fine, I just was curious if they had at least initially attended the orientation, or did still_one Dec 2018 #57
You could have read the article, instead of assuming certain things. nt. Mariana Dec 2018 #104
Why should she listen to Goldman Sachs spout their bullshit? Cuthbert Allgood Dec 2018 #44
You are going to go real far only listening to people you agree with. still_one Dec 2018 #49
So what do you think Goldman Sachs was going to tell them that was worthwhile? Cuthbert Allgood Dec 2018 #55
Don't throw nonesense at me implying that I agree that lobbyists should be at the orientation, I still_one Dec 2018 #65
Goldman Sachs has a shit ton of financial expertise Loki Liesmith Dec 2018 #87
If you are fighting for a specific Agenda, it helps to know what you are dealing with still_one Dec 2018 #130
They certainly know how to cheat people... PoliticAverse Dec 2018 #147
I am slamming you for this comment ProfessorPlum Dec 2018 #59
I NEVER said one should be polite and silent. All I said is it would serve their interests to at still_one Dec 2018 #77
you said you were sure you were going to get slammed ProfessorPlum Dec 2018 #102
I want her to continue to speak out. Marrah_Goodman Dec 2018 #63
I'm trying to understand your rationale for saying this is BS. It seems to be nothing more than KPN Dec 2018 #83
+1 n/t Devil Child Dec 2018 #146
Goldman Sach Snackshack Dec 2018 #36
giving their marching orders to their servants, of course ProfessorPlum Dec 2018 #58
The network evening news often includes a regular business report, but PoindexterOglethorpe Dec 2018 #38
The newspapers have the Jobs Section ... aggiesal Dec 2018 #94
Jobs section as in Help Wanted? PoindexterOglethorpe Dec 2018 #96
Okay, I'm game... jmowreader Dec 2018 #143
Information about wages, about job training, about jobs that are available, PoindexterOglethorpe Dec 2018 #148
Good for them! nt jrthin Dec 2018 #52
This is excellent ellie Dec 2018 #56
Good. dchill Dec 2018 #60
This is good news... ConnorMarc Dec 2018 #61
"I was not sent to Washington to play nice." Hotler Dec 2018 #66
That is a good statement from AOC. Caliman73 Dec 2018 #92
"cosponsored by the American Enterprise Institute..."? Grins Dec 2018 #68
Good news for modern man! This is exactly what AOC was elected to do. Kudos to her and KPN Dec 2018 #70
Is that why she was elected? EffieBlack Dec 2018 #81
As far as I can tell, yes. She has been consistent in her messaging, including in KPN Dec 2018 #100
Yes, but this is the kind of thing she ran on. Giving power back to the people. Fighting JCanete Dec 2018 #105
Why are they getting orientation at all, this is not a school treestar Dec 2018 #71
Goldman Sachs again, just trying to help make government work better? AOC is never going jalan48 Dec 2018 #76
You forgot the sarcasm thingee ... aggiesal Dec 2018 #95
Thanks. I forgot it again! jalan48 Dec 2018 #98
LOOK AT ME!!!!!!!!!!!!!! MyNameGoesHere Dec 2018 #79
This is not an attendance mandatory program. I think the Members-Elect actually pay to attend bottomofthehill Dec 2018 #82
No thanks. I would rather look at AOC and her group of six. hueymahl Dec 2018 #115
No! LOOK AT ME!!!!!!!!!! MyNameGoesHere Dec 2018 #121
Good going! whathehell Dec 2018 #84
As they should.. disillusioned73 Dec 2018 #88
Sounds like "Play the game our way and give up your backbone" orientation. ooky Dec 2018 #108
I like her style at shaking things up. It's Mr. Smith... NNadir Dec 2018 #111
Great Analogy! hueymahl Dec 2018 #117
God I love her. pdsimdars Dec 2018 #131
It's bipartisan. Of course the Republicans ruin everything. betsuni Dec 2018 #133
I agree they should add in a labor portion. tammywammy Dec 2018 #134
It looks like she did. sl8 Dec 2018 #136
God Bless AOC, Pressley, and The New Progressive Members Of Congress. Progressive2020 Dec 2018 #138
God bless Adam Schiff and Ted Lieu, two brilliant fighters R B Garr Dec 2018 #141
I read no such insinuation in the post you replied to Devil Child Dec 2018 #144
You don't have to read an "insinuation", since the meaning R B Garr Dec 2018 #157
Strange Progressive2020 Dec 2018 #172
I just said there was no insinuation. LOL R B Garr Dec 2018 #173
Not Insinuating That Progressive2020 Dec 2018 #171
Maxine Waters is also great. There are so many GREAT Democrats. R B Garr Dec 2018 #174
Who Is Running Other Democrats Down? Progressive2020 Dec 2018 #178
I'm loving our new freshman representatives! Some real fighters in this group Devil Child Dec 2018 #145
Yes, looks like we got an especially good crop this year. :) Hortensis Dec 2018 #155
And the right wing True Blue American Dec 2018 #156
:) Oh,and they will! The house just became what Hortensis Dec 2018 #158
Of course True Blue American Dec 2018 #161
Scalise's actions pretty much epitomized what they're doing, Hortensis Dec 2018 #164
Great summation, Hortensis! True Blue American Dec 2018 #165
Adam Schiff and Ted Lieu are highly visible every day and R B Garr Dec 2018 #159
Along with Swalwell True Blue American Dec 2018 #162
And Maxine Waters. So many hard working Democrats very R B Garr Dec 2018 #175
Yes! True Blue American Dec 2018 #163
Good! bluecollar2 Dec 2018 #170
im getting bored..... samnsara Dec 2018 #176
Rep. Barbara Lee, our new 2nd ranking woman in top leadership, Hortensis Dec 2018 #177
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»AOC and other new House p...»Reply #78