General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Are we too dependent on our political parties? [View all]The Polack MSgt
(13,182 posts)and in Pennsylvania there was a corrupt state government led by Democrats which made it seem somewhat reasonable...
And it turns out that Reagan was a front man in a party that was only interested in dismantling the post war America -The America built on union rights, progressive tax rates and the Great Society laws of the mid 60s.
After him we got an "Evolution in Reverse" poster of Republican Presidents where the 1st guy is standing upright and they slouch into lower forms one after the other until finally a lungfish with an outrageous comb over is wriggling in the mud.
I'm sorry but you are two generations too late for this line of reasoning to BE AT ALL REASONABLE.
Let's stop the side who is only marginally opposed to Nazism - Let's do that first.
Until the GOP is stopped and soundly defeated they will continue to reach lower and lower into the filth they so enjoy.
Why is Merrick Garland not on the SCOTUS? Why is a perjurer and failed rapist so close to confirmation?
Why is the Congress' agenda a nonstop parade of ideas designed to make things shitty for women, young people and POC?
BECAUSE NOT ENOUGH FUCKING PEOPLE VOTE FOR DEMOCRATS.
(gets off soapbox, swigs a flask of liquor)