Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

The Polack MSgt

(13,182 posts)
7. 40 years ago this was the line of thinking that folks used to elect Reagan
Wed Sep 19, 2018, 02:58 PM
Sep 2018

and in Pennsylvania there was a corrupt state government led by Democrats which made it seem somewhat reasonable...

And it turns out that Reagan was a front man in a party that was only interested in dismantling the post war America -The America built on union rights, progressive tax rates and the Great Society laws of the mid 60s.

After him we got an "Evolution in Reverse" poster of Republican Presidents where the 1st guy is standing upright and they slouch into lower forms one after the other until finally a lungfish with an outrageous comb over is wriggling in the mud.

I'm sorry but you are two generations too late for this line of reasoning to BE AT ALL REASONABLE.

Let's stop the side who is only marginally opposed to Nazism - Let's do that first.

Until the GOP is stopped and soundly defeated they will continue to reach lower and lower into the filth they so enjoy.

Why is Merrick Garland not on the SCOTUS? Why is a perjurer and failed rapist so close to confirmation?

Why is the Congress' agenda a nonstop parade of ideas designed to make things shitty for women, young people and POC?

BECAUSE NOT ENOUGH FUCKING PEOPLE VOTE FOR DEMOCRATS.

(gets off soapbox, swigs a flask of liquor)


Oh, you. n/t demmiblue Sep 2018 #1
:-) grumpyduck Sep 2018 #3
Lol... demmiblue Sep 2018 #5
I'm a local Democratic Committee Member so for me? JustAnotherGen Sep 2018 #2
If you are saying vote for the person instead of the party Frances Sep 2018 #4
I'm one of those straight party voters. flamin lib Sep 2018 #6
40 years ago this was the line of thinking that folks used to elect Reagan The Polack MSgt Sep 2018 #7
"I'm sorry but you are two generations too late for this line of reasoning to BE AT ALL REASONABLE." grumpyduck Sep 2018 #8
Always glad to share The Polack MSgt Sep 2018 #11
righteous post :) JHan Sep 2018 #9
+++ brer cat Sep 2018 #10
Hear, hear! (nt) ehrnst Sep 2018 #13
Fabulous! betsuni Sep 2018 #21
If you are on DU, and wish to remain on DU, then you support Democrats and the Democratic party. ehrnst Sep 2018 #12
Are you saying I bashed the party? grumpyduck Sep 2018 #15
Clearly, I didn't say that. ehrnst Sep 2018 #16
I was going by what you said grumpyduck Sep 2018 #17
Apology accepted.(nt) ehrnst Sep 2018 #18
+1000 sheshe2 Sep 2018 #25
In this case.. where the other party is lead by a wannabe dictator.. honest.abe Sep 2018 #14
I vehemently disagree with the GOP position on every issue. Garrett78 Sep 2018 #19
We're too dependent on just two parties icaria Sep 2018 #20
I would prefer to have a billion dollars , a yacht and own the Seattle Mariners. Eliot Rosewater Sep 2018 #22
. ismnotwasm Sep 2018 #23
But the Republican Party isn't even a regular political party anymore. betsuni Sep 2018 #24
Bravo!!! Kilgore Sep 2018 #26
There isn't a single John Fante Sep 2018 #27
In 2016, too many Democrats went against the Party, unfortunately. Hoyt Sep 2018 #28
Proud straight D party voter here, and fuck anybody who has a problem with it. Tarheel_Dem Sep 2018 #29
Since voting straight ticket Democratic Party is required on DU GulfCoast66 Sep 2018 #30
I asked a simple, legitimate question. grumpyduck Sep 2018 #31
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Are we too dependent on o...»Reply #7