Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)
245 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sounds like she's saying the opposite -- that her candidate is more likely to win with low turnout.
pnwmom
Aug 2018
#77
What an odd choice of words she used if that is what she intended to say. She managed
Ninsianna
Aug 2018
#208
That isn't what she said. And she's explained it well before. She's said that candidates who
JCanete
Aug 2018
#14
She didnt' say at any point that the vote should be suppressed. Wehre did she say we should
JCanete
Aug 2018
#60
Okay, so what EXACTLY did she say? Apparently you heard/read something different.
George II
Aug 2018
#36
Hoping turnout is low due to excitement level for a candidate is not the same thing as advocating
JCanete
Aug 2018
#62
First, did she say that votes should be suppressed? Show me you're serious about this conversation
JCanete
Aug 2018
#75
I'll try again. Prove you are being sincere and accept that she did not say votes should be
JCanete
Aug 2018
#94
She is not advocating for low turnout and that shit doesn't even make sense...advocating to who,
JCanete
Aug 2018
#89
She said that her candidate has a majority of votes AS LONG AS the majority of voters don't vote.
pnwmom
Aug 2018
#82
and is that the same thing as hoping that voter suppression occurs, or advocating for it?
JCanete
Aug 2018
#87
The OP didn't say she hoped or advocated for voter suppression, and neither do I.
pnwmom
Aug 2018
#93
my original post had to do with Me's claim, correct? Everyting that came after, presumably
JCanete
Aug 2018
#107
what? your point makes no sense. If you excite the voters that you reach but if you can't
JCanete
Aug 2018
#143
She is literally a democrat. You don't get to decide which of us who are registered as democrats
JCanete
Aug 2018
#85
What party did she run in? How is she registered? What's the point of trying to be cute? nt
JCanete
Aug 2018
#191
You don't get to decide what we as a party want, unilaterally. PLenty of us in the democratic party
JCanete
Aug 2018
#241
That's not entirely true. Voters in NY were expecting a primary in September....
George II
Aug 2018
#24
That is something that needs to change. That's how Ted Cruz won his primary in 2012.
OnDoutside
Aug 2018
#31
It was 11%, and she got 6% of the vote of registered Democrats in the district.
George II
Aug 2018
#30
No problem - the turnout was about 27,000 in a district with 245,000 registered Democrats.
George II
Aug 2018
#34
Yes, in a low turnout primary - getting out your voters will have an enormous impact
oberliner
Aug 2018
#6
Um, tell people not to get out and vote. Which is essentially what it seems she's doing.
George II
Aug 2018
#25
That's one of the first rules of republican campaign strategy - suppress the vote.
George II
Aug 2018
#26
This is almost as troubling as the "crossover vote in the open primary" strategy.
lapucelle
Aug 2018
#22
She has yet to actively campaign against a republican, all of her campaigning efforts....
George II
Aug 2018
#32
I know of only two candidates who have been actively campaigning outside their district....
George II
Aug 2018
#38
All she's "attacked" (i.e., campaigned against) so far this year is Democrats, in her district.....
George II
Aug 2018
#44
Again, okay. So look forward to her attacks in the coming days. Cheers to that. n/t
theaocp
Aug 2018
#46
she's running a smart campaign. Talking about her republican opponent just gives him a platform
bigtree
Aug 2018
#98
She also endorsed Nixon over Cuomo in the Democratic state governor's primary.
lapucelle
Aug 2018
#133
Its a primary in 2018. And you still don't get that this is different from every other primary we
Squinch
Aug 2018
#83
No, intelligent people understand that, unlike what you have just said, this is not like every
Squinch
Aug 2018
#110
Regardless if we do or do not like the outcome, we should encourage everyone to vote.
LonePirate
Aug 2018
#29
Are you advocating people don't support the Democratic candidate, as she irritates you?
theaocp
Aug 2018
#53
Ratfuckery is in the eye of the beholder. Did you see the clip of her on income inequality?
brush
Aug 2018
#91
I've never used the term "that woman". My issue is her campaigning against Dem incumbents.
brush
Aug 2018
#104
I really did like her when I first saw her, and I thought she was great for Brooklyn. Now
Squinch
Aug 2018
#49
Then why didn't she say that? That's entirely different than what she actually said.
kcr
Aug 2018
#111
Be fair. AOC has campaigned against more than one Dem incumbent. Not a good thing.
brush
Aug 2018
#96
How many candidates are traveling all over the country participating in OTHERS' primaries?
George II
Aug 2018
#175
I've been called that by that person several times in these discussions. I just....
George II
Aug 2018
#188
Progressive Derangement at DU???? She never said she was hoping for low turn out.
doxyluv13
Aug 2018
#134
I did not say you were lying. I was just pointing out how her claim can be totally legit.
Blue_true
Aug 2018
#165
In the 70s there was a different bloc of voters the age of today's Millenials. You think....
George II
Aug 2018
#240
Cynthia Nixon is young? Maybe compared to me but she's only a few years younger than Cuomo.
George II
Aug 2018
#239