General Discussion

ancianita

(35,908 posts)

16. Strzok didn't say anything to correct her because, consistent with his support of the FBI investiga-

Reply to Honeycombe8 (Reply #11)

Thu Jul 12, 2018, 09:43 PM

Jul 2018

tion, he shouldn't reveal. Period.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

39 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Did Handel say Trump was a target of the investigation? [View all] mercuryblues Jul 2018 OP

Very nice catch. K&R. N/T lapucelle Jul 2018 #1

We had just sat down to eat dinner mercuryblues Jul 2018 #4

Great find! H2O Man Jul 2018 #10

How can the target of a criminal investigation appoint someone doc03 Jul 2018 #2

More picks and shovels, please. safeinOhio Jul 2018 #6

I wouldn't put much stock in it RandomAccess Jul 2018 #3

I heard that and thought he should argue he wasn't a target per Comey's reply when Trump asked. chowder66 Jul 2018 #5

I thought the same thing. Trump himself was not the "target" of an investigation... Honeycombe8 Jul 2018 #9

I watched the hearing from beginning to end, didn't catch that one.... George II Jul 2018 #7

Please explain how she is in a position to really know, when the FBI hasn't announced. ancianita Jul 2018 #8

I think people generally think of "Trump team" and "Trump" as the same thing. Honeycombe8 Jul 2018 #11

Strzok seems sharper that that but then again maybe he had a lapse. triron Jul 2018 #13

Strzok didn't say anything to correct her because, consistent with his support of the FBI investiga- ancianita Jul 2018 #16

Yes let's be cautious, but optimistic. triron Jul 2018 #12

What committee(s) does she sit on? Mr.Bill Jul 2018 #14

There IS no security clearance for that info, or Schiff would have told us. ancianita Jul 2018 #17

Told us what? That there is a "security clearance..."? triron Jul 2018 #19

Reread the OP. That's what I'm referring to. It takes FBI leakage to know this. "Clearance" is moot. ancianita Jul 2018 #20

The FBI can't H2O Man Jul 2018 #15

Seriously? Do you know that for a fact? If you do, then you have to say she just leaked. ancianita Jul 2018 #18

I do not H2O Man Jul 2018 #21

"I do know for a fact, that if"...this is how we lose our way. You admit you cannot know for a fact. ancianita Jul 2018 #22

We don't need absolutism I think to post. triron Jul 2018 #24

In terms of national security & FBI intel, we do, if we want the Constitution to survive this prez. ancianita Jul 2018 #27

To post on DU??? triron Jul 2018 #29

Incorrect. H2O Man Jul 2018 #30

OP says: "She sure did. not once but twice " The OP is wrong. ancianita Jul 2018 #33

She quoted the republican. H2O Man Jul 2018 #35

Fine. I'll agree in the spirit of understanding. Lately, I'm thinking it's a lost cause. The spirit ancianita Jul 2018 #37

That was killing me. I was wishing he'd called her on it. Does that mean they know something pnwmom Jul 2018 #23

They're NOT admitting. They don't know, and CAN'T know the classification of the FBI's suspects. ancianita Jul 2018 #25

Are you sure? That's a pretty strong assertion it seems.. triron Jul 2018 #28

The FBI owes them no info, so no, given the history of NO LEAKS, they can't know. ancianita Jul 2018 #34

Stzrok had to have clearly heard that. She said it twice. Yet he denied it NOT! triron Jul 2018 #26

Right. He didn't. He saw the interests of the House investigation, and knew that she was FISHING. ancianita Jul 2018 #31

OK but he made no attempt to correct or qualify what she said. I find that revealing. triron Jul 2018 #32

What does it reveal? Do you realize they tried to get him to reveal more than they knew? ancianita Jul 2018 #36

Comey mercuryblues Jul 2018 #38

This message was self-deleted by its author mercuryblues Jul 2018 #39