General Discussion

Ikonoklast

(23,973 posts)

45. You got that right.

Reply to meow2u3 (Reply #40)

Mon Aug 6, 2012, 04:09 PM

Aug 2012

There would be a hue and cry to shoot them down on sight.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

67 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Can we call it stochastic terrorism now? [View all] backscatter712 Aug 2012 OP

Can you see the red queen? slackmaster Aug 2012 #1

Is the Pope Catholic? n/t backscatter712 Aug 2012 #2

I think they do, whenever they see someone not white and not serving them. tblue Aug 2012 #26

Raymond Shaw is the kindest, bravest, warmest, most wonderful human being I've ever known in my life SidDithers Aug 2012 #39

Certainly seems to fit. And not JUST the attack on the Sikh temple, either. calimary Aug 2012 #3

Way beyond that. Basically, the NRA issued a General Call for Preemptive Action.... Junkdrawer Aug 2012 #4

they are some paranoid mf'ers spanone Aug 2012 #8

Only to an extent krispos42 Aug 2012 #65

And this NRA release is itself stochastic terrorism. n/t backscatter712 Aug 2012 #15

The NRA are as much paranoid tin foil hat conspiracy theorists... Initech Aug 2012 #25

+1 uponit7771 Aug 2012 #31

So increasing gun violence is just part of a fiendish plan to take our guns away? Patiod Aug 2012 #33

Yup, you do nadinbrzezinski Aug 2012 #52

My gun-loving brother-in-law was saying that. backscatter712 Aug 2012 #55

How about this Wayne.... Junkdrawer Aug 2012 #57

I think that's also the NRA trying to Dash87 Aug 2012 #62

The local stochastic terrorists are named Mark Belling and Charlie Sykes. Scuba Aug 2012 #5

No kctim Aug 2012 #6

The whole point of using stochastic terrorism techniques is to make it hard to prove. backscatter712 Aug 2012 #7

It is ridiculous kctim Aug 2012 #21

It may or may not be intentional. lapislzi Aug 2012 #28

That's pretty convienent then kctim Aug 2012 #35

You are obviously not paying attention. nt docgee Aug 2012 #37

Disagree. lapislzi Aug 2012 #46

So what happens if someone listening to the stochastic terrorism debate Nuclear Unicorn Aug 2012 #59

I am not missing the point at all kctim Aug 2012 #61

"Once is a tragedy, twice is a coincidence, three times is enemy action". MissMarple Aug 2012 #50

Nice try, strawman ozsea1 Aug 2012 #36

how have these crimes infringed on their rights? barbtries Aug 2012 #42

You don't know how false flags work? kctim Aug 2012 #63

Glad to see you've got the skinhead/neonazi camp's back. kestrel91316 Aug 2012 #44

You're wrong lapislzi Aug 2012 #10

One more point - Stochastic Terrorism doesn't even have to be conscious. backscatter712 Aug 2012 #12

A Conspiracy so vast and pervasive that even its adherents don't know they're part of it slackmaster Aug 2012 #16

+1 uponit7771 Aug 2012 #30

So what do you suggest? Missycim Aug 2012 #34

Seriously? lapislzi Aug 2012 #48

Why would you be at pains to deny that stochastic terrorism applies in this instance?... truth2power Aug 2012 #17

As defined here, yes kctim Aug 2012 #38

Totally. Different. Animal. lapislzi Aug 2012 #49

Not any different at all kctim Aug 2012 #58

It's a non-falsifiable theory that seems to change as it needs to. Brickbat Aug 2012 #18

Then why aren't right-wing establishments getting shot up, people murdered? Ikonoklast Aug 2012 #19

If left-wing talk show hosts incited such incidents, they'd be summarily executed meow2u3 Aug 2012 #40

You got that right. Ikonoklast Aug 2012 #45

Which is little different from the right-wing's usual rhetoric. backscatter712 Aug 2012 #54

I love Alex Jones ,we're just not orpupilofnature57 Aug 2012 #53

does the Ursidae defecate in the sylvan glade? KG Aug 2012 #9

I would reply in the affirmative. lapislzi Aug 2012 #11

After Aurora, yes, we can nadinbrzezinski Aug 2012 #13

Yes, and it's just getting started. BeHereNow Aug 2012 #14

Time to put MORE stickers on our cars. Nostradammit Aug 2012 #24

no way barbtries Aug 2012 #43

Yes, when a member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee sees 'terrorists' sinkingfeeling Aug 2012 #20

There's a reason why it's called STOCHASTIC terrorism - it's random. backscatter712 Aug 2012 #22

Yes! malaise Aug 2012 #23

Shake the crazy tree frequently enough, and a NUT will fall out. JoePhilly Aug 2012 #27

Looking at the facts on its face? ***YES*** uponit7771 Aug 2012 #29

The speech from the right has become 'ELIMINATIONIST' LongTomH Aug 2012 #32

Looks like plain ol' hate to me...nt SidDithers Aug 2012 #41

Every time I read a Michelle Malkin piece I see it inciting the crazies. MissMarple Aug 2012 #47

That's what it is....so, Yes. (n/t) Iggo Aug 2012 #51

No not really RZM Aug 2012 #56

the idea that conservative pundits want to encourage people to shoot up temples is absurd arely staircase Aug 2012 #64

I'm not sure there's much overlap because the skinheads are so small in number RZM Aug 2012 #66

but who they make theor pitch too, which is the overlap im talking about arely staircase Aug 2012 #67

or a word people know nt arely staircase Aug 2012 #60