General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: 'It's not just one district': Ocasio-Cortez pushes back on Pelosi [View all]JCanete
(5,272 posts)"corporate dems" does have a connotation that implies corruption. But the problem we have here is that you can almost never
prove somebody was bought and paid for anyway. It is nearly unprovable except for in explicit examples of quid pro quo. . I think that people fighting this fight need to make it clear, as I have done with you, that taking money in itself doesn't have to mean that you are personally corrupt, but as I have also said here, it doesn't really matter, because that money has the same impact on an election whether a candidate is sincere or corrupt.
So it is an entirely valid aspect of a candidate to focus on. If you want to suggest a better way of focusing on that aspect, I'm all ears. Instead, what I'm getting from you is that even touching that is dirty pool, which obviously, I cannot accept.