General Discussion

Calista241

(5,586 posts)

24. If anyone ever goes to trial, Strzok and Page will be witnesses numero uno.

Thu Jun 14, 2018, 12:47 PM

Jun 2018

and they'll be talking about this text exchange, and if they planted evidence, or framed anyone. And everyone will be digging into their old cases to see if they ever did anything even slightly untoward.

Make no mistake, this is a giant clusterfuck for the FBI, the DOJ and Mueller's investigation.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

45 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

FBI agent texted 'We'll stop' Trump from becoming president, a disclosure that's included... [View all] DonViejo Jun 2018 OP

Well...just fuck! cynatnite Jun 2018 #1

Maybe not? imanamerican63 Jun 2018 #2

They are selective. They will use this part to perpetuate their "deep state" narrative. ooky Jun 2018 #17

Yes, but they're were going to rant about it anyway! imanamerican63 Jun 2018 #35

No doubt, but at least now we can ooky Jun 2018 #40

Between two agents, not the HEAD OF THE FBI, conversing. Inappropriate, yes, but hardly the same still_one Jun 2018 #3

Bullshit. B2G Jun 2018 #6

bullshit. Were you even aware of this when it first came out in 2017? It is what it is. still_one Jun 2018 #14

Of course I was. B2G Jun 2018 #18

no doubt. All I was saying was that I just copied and pasted what the NYTimes reported. I didn't still_one Jun 2018 #23

Since you provided a link in the subthread, B2G Jun 2018 #25

lol still_one Jun 2018 #27

You're confusing implication and inference again. LanternWaste Jun 2018 #32

Strzok is old news. ooky Jun 2018 #19

You certainly found some red meat for yourself on this topic. LanternWaste Jun 2018 #31

He was kicked off by Mueller a long time ago sarah FAILIN Jun 2018 #37

And they should. B2G Jun 2018 #4

This is old news B2G. Two agents inappropriately had a private conversation with each other about still_one Jun 2018 #8

Evidently they found more texts Lee-Lee Jun 2018 #29

It's the same texts sarah FAILIN Jun 2018 #38

Yup, of course they are. OliverQ Jun 2018 #11

This is old news sarah FAILIN Jun 2018 #5

Nope. B2G Jun 2018 #7

Here is a link Quixote1818 Jun 2018 #9

Nowhere in that link does it say he voted for Trump oberliner Jun 2018 #21

Excuse me, this is old news, and was reported by the NYTimes still_one Jun 2018 #10

Where does that say he voted for Trump? B2G Jun 2018 #12

I never asserted such a thing. I was just reporting that this was old news, and provided the NY still_one Jun 2018 #16

Directed at Sarah Fallin. B2G Jun 2018 #20

no problem, got confused there. Thanks for the clarification still_one Jun 2018 #26

Because I am at work.. sarah FAILIN Jun 2018 #36

These are in google sarah FAILIN Jun 2018 #39

I'm still looking for the actual texts sarah FAILIN Jun 2018 #45

They didn't. Nuff said. C_U_L8R Jun 2018 #13

Old news but now it's "official". DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2018 #15

Old news but it sounds like this report has previously unreported texts Lee-Lee Jun 2018 #22

If anyone ever goes to trial, Strzok and Page will be witnesses numero uno. Calista241 Jun 2018 #24

I don't give a damn... FarPoint Jun 2018 #28

Of course, cilla4progress Jun 2018 #30

If these FBI agents had such great power... dubyadiprecession Jun 2018 #33

Gee, two people that worked at FBI are known to have preferred not to have Trump as their President Freethinker65 Jun 2018 #34

Trying to give Drumpf ammunition? moondust Jun 2018 #41

THIS is CNN's Breaking News lead story... Baclava Jun 2018 #42

Stunning indeed. moondust Jun 2018 #43

That is suppose to be stunning standingtall Jun 2018 #44