Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
16. The problem with this is, you don't know the subject matter and won't listen to the one person
Tue May 29, 2018, 12:42 AM
May 2018

responding here who does, jberryhill.

So you aren't up to anything on the top three layers here. In fact your responses to jberryhill are all on the bottom 5 layers which is about what one would expect from anyone who doesn't know a particular subject matter.

If you want to play lawyer so badly, why don't you go to law school? stevenleser May 2018 #1
That is because you don't know Jack crap about the law laserhaas May 2018 #3
According to whom? You? You have been declared a vexatious litigant in stevenleser May 2018 #4
And per jberryhills link below the judge told you pretty much what i did stevenleser May 2018 #6
Who cares what the clerk told you? jberryhill May 2018 #2
Nothing your negative (Trump/ Mitt support) argument laserhaas May 2018 #7
You haven't been to law school yet you opine on the merits of a judges opinion? stevenleser May 2018 #12
That order is dated May 5 jberryhill May 2018 #13
Btw did he accuse you of being "a Laser hater" stevenleser May 2018 #14
Dude, get a different hobby. The Velveteen Ocelot May 2018 #5
You have me mixed up with corrupt Federal agents and Wall Street crooks laserhaas May 2018 #8
Hey, they're your windmills. Tilt away. The Velveteen Ocelot May 2018 #9
Legal eagles tend to circle the wagon to protect lawyers laserhaas May 2018 #10
Graham has a pyramid of argument validity. laserhaas May 2018 #11
The problem with this is, you don't know the subject matter and won't listen to the one person stevenleser May 2018 #16
The naysayers are basically ignoring 100 crimes transpired laserhaas May 2018 #25
A recent case in point is Sup CT decision employees lack rights laserhaas May 2018 #26
How is the F-Deck hiding a case? n/t tammywammy May 2018 #15
I've filed tons of briefs, motions and such - over 17 years laserhaas May 2018 #17
So you don't know what F-Deck means. tammywammy May 2018 #19
I emailed the Clerk laserhaas May 2018 #20
It appears to be the DC district court's designation for "pro se general civil" litigation jberryhill May 2018 #21
Thanks. tammywammy May 2018 #22
"Crazy s--t filed by pro se litigants" Seems about right. nt stevenleser May 2018 #23
The Clerk didn't answer laserhaas May 2018 #24
Clerks are ministers of the courts - they have no rights to tamper laserhaas May 2018 #18
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why is Trump Obstructing ...»Reply #16