Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Bernie Sanders' New Bill Would Wipe Out Union-Busting 'Right-to-Work' Laws [View all]ehrnst
(32,640 posts)49. Yep, what we could have had...
Both a strong social justice and economic justice POTUS.
Hillary Clinton has adjusted to the new economic realities
President Obama was caught in the middle of these changes. Though his presidency evolved to embrace much of them, the foundations of his approach were rooted in the old regime. Hillary Clinton is the first Democratic nominee to have to put forward a new agenda in light of the Great Recession and the policy revolution, and her agenda energetically incorporates these ideas.
On inequality, her proposals build on Dodd-Frank and seek to regulate financial activities more broadly. She would increase taxes on top earners, building on Obamas successful efforts to push back on after-tax inequality with his 2013 tax increases on the rich.
Somewhat under the radar is Clintons focus on "steps to stop corporate concentration in any industry where its unfairly limiting competition," while also preventing "concentration in the first place by beefing up the antitrust enforcement." She has specifically mentioned high-speed broadband, airlines, and pharmaceutical companies. In the aftermath of the EpiPen price hikes, Clinton announced an expansive plan to tackle rents unearned unjustifiable profits in drug prices.
When it comes to investment and full employment, Clinton herself has said that she will "also defend the Fed's so-called dual mandate," including full employment, with her appointments. Clinton has highlighted short-term financial pressures blocking long-term productive investment in innovation by calling out "quarterly capitalism," the obsessive focus on quarterly earnings reports.
President Obama was caught in the middle of these changes. Though his presidency evolved to embrace much of them, the foundations of his approach were rooted in the old regime. Hillary Clinton is the first Democratic nominee to have to put forward a new agenda in light of the Great Recession and the policy revolution, and her agenda energetically incorporates these ideas.
On inequality, her proposals build on Dodd-Frank and seek to regulate financial activities more broadly. She would increase taxes on top earners, building on Obamas successful efforts to push back on after-tax inequality with his 2013 tax increases on the rich.
Somewhat under the radar is Clintons focus on "steps to stop corporate concentration in any industry where its unfairly limiting competition," while also preventing "concentration in the first place by beefing up the antitrust enforcement." She has specifically mentioned high-speed broadband, airlines, and pharmaceutical companies. In the aftermath of the EpiPen price hikes, Clinton announced an expansive plan to tackle rents unearned unjustifiable profits in drug prices.
When it comes to investment and full employment, Clinton herself has said that she will "also defend the Fed's so-called dual mandate," including full employment, with her appointments. Clinton has highlighted short-term financial pressures blocking long-term productive investment in innovation by calling out "quarterly capitalism," the obsessive focus on quarterly earnings reports.
https://www.vox.com/the-big-idea/2016/9/15/12923528/liberal-economics-great-recession-policy-clinton
Good to see Bernie continuing in her footsteps.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
95 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Bernie Sanders' New Bill Would Wipe Out Union-Busting 'Right-to-Work' Laws [View all]
Hassin Bin Sober
May 2018
OP
But, but, but Bernie is not a registered Democrat!! Why bother listening to Bernie?!
InAbLuEsTaTe
May 2018
#8
Bull shit, Bernie has no laws passed. He's proposed things for years that never see the light of
wasupaloopa
May 2018
#62
It doesn't matter. It's a goal, an aspiration the Dems need to embrace...
First Speaker
May 2018
#16
The narrative that Democrats have "failed" to even speak about social & economic justice
ehrnst
May 2018
#73
I posted a link to the most recent platform, 2016, with excerpts. Please give it a read.
George II
May 2018
#50
Post #47. The platform presents the framework upon which ALL Democrats in a particular year.....
George II
May 2018
#55
You mean they haven't proposed any vanity bills that have no possibility of going anywhere?
Squinch
May 2018
#58
I "only cited the one from way back in 2000"? I provided the 2016 platform for your review....
George II
May 2018
#68
Say what? You responded to the post where I provided the 2016 platform with excerpts (#47)....
George II
May 2018
#79
The HATE that is allowed to be posted here about the Democratic Party astounds me.
Eliot Rosewater
May 2018
#43
Zero if we never talk about it or give voters a reason to vote for our side...
Hassin Bin Sober
May 2018
#18
That's the problem. Bernie is a visionary. He has a lot of great ideas, unfortunately he
smirkymonkey
May 2018
#39
That "joining of forces" isn't likely to happen. There aren't many who are likely to cozy-up...
NurseJackie
May 2018
#69
Zero because we don't have any power...earliest would be 2021...I just don't believe in putting up
Demsrule86
May 2018
#26
Good, so we can expect to see more bills in this vein. Its looking like a promising direction we're
JCanete
May 2018
#60
Personally, I don't think employers should have a say or allowed to take any actions.
LiberalFighter
May 2018
#54