Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

eilen

(4,950 posts)
15. Actually, it didn't really cost that much compared to ICU costs.
Thu Aug 2, 2012, 02:21 PM
Aug 2012

She was in a sub-acute/chronic care facility, breathing on her own and had a feeding tube. She didn't require constant monitoring, just turn and position every 2 hours, basic adls, and, of course, the tube feedings and whatever meds she was on. No injections, iv's, breathing support etc. She wasn't receiving chemotherapy, wearing a life vest, on a heart monitor, etc. Her care was managed by an RN, supervised by a doctor but most of her care was performed by nurse's aides. She did not appear to be a behavioral/psych/dementia type patient that acted out. The largest burden on the staff was probably the family and their issues. There are lots of people just like her in nursing homes. They are DNR/DNI and are usually treated for infections like aspiration pneumonia, bed sores etc. If they have a heart attack though, they are not coded. The entire situation was high drama about a interfamily feud with a brain-dead girl in the middle of it. I suspect money was at the heart of it.

Old news. Care in end-of-life situations is expensive. Think what it cost to keep Terry Schaivo .. Scuba Aug 2012 #1
When you slice up the age demographics, the same percentages hold eridani Aug 2012 #2
It's not necessarily the same people though. We take turns pnwmom Aug 2012 #14
This shouldn't come as a surprise to anyone Major Nikon Aug 2012 #3
Simplistic...most elderly and those who have serious illness can still function joeybee12 Aug 2012 #4
I did not mean to imply that "the costs are only used to keep them alive"... Scuba Aug 2012 #5
just shine up the crystal ball, and cull the losers? mopinko Aug 2012 #10
I'm not into death panels. I would promote hospice care among other things... Scuba Aug 2012 #11
DNR does not mean Do Not Treat eilen Aug 2012 #16
People with terminal illnesses who choose hospice care over eridani Aug 2012 #17
The capitalist solution: let the elderly die Zalatix Aug 2012 #7
Actually, it didn't really cost that much compared to ICU costs. eilen Aug 2012 #15
At some point in our lives, we will all pass through that 5 percent needing intensive care. geckosfeet Aug 2012 #6
Not really doohnibor Aug 2012 #9
BS. Carlin had serious health problems - heart attack in 1978 related to his drug abuse. geckosfeet Aug 2012 #20
You "cherry picked" the example, with your sig line. doohnibor Aug 2012 #21
So - is it everyone who doesn't see it coming? geckosfeet Aug 2012 #22
Only one of my grandparents (and neither of my parents) eridani Aug 2012 #18
Take 1% times 80-90-100 years of life. Festivito Aug 2012 #8
The fact is, we have Universal Healthcare for those who use the most. The rest of us must pay up Romulox Aug 2012 #12
That is otherwise known as risk spreading eridani Aug 2012 #19
So we can call these heavy users the health care 1%? AngryAmish Aug 2012 #13
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A comparatively small num...»Reply #15