General Discussion

Yonnie3

(17,427 posts)

2. Thank you for taking the time to make this post. nt

Reply to jberryhill (Original post)

Sun May 6, 2018, 09:42 PM

May 2018

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

52 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

A few observations on the Manafort hearing transcript [View all] jberryhill May 2018 OP

Wow! DUgosh May 2018 #1

Yes 2nd that. triron May 2018 #13

Thank you for taking the time to make this post. nt Yonnie3 May 2018 #2

So the press said the judge lost his temper GusBob May 2018 #3

It's usually impossible to tell where a judge will end up from the hearing jberryhill May 2018 #7

Thanks for sharing your insight on this. Very much appreciated. writes3000 May 2018 #4

Thanks for digging through this! unblock May 2018 #5

Agreed. Sophia4 May 2018 #6

Yep jberryhill May 2018 #9

This message was self-deleted by its author sharedvalues May 2018 #21

On that note sharedvalues May 2018 #23

One time here...🤔, 🇾 🇪 🇸 sprinkleeninow May 2018 #36

Absolutely correct. Sophia4 May 2018 #52

K&R canetoad May 2018 #8

Excellent OP! Thanks for posting this! skylucy May 2018 #10

Your post got a lot of recs during the time I spent reading it and adding mine. rzemanfl May 2018 #11

That is some granular detail! Facinating. FailureToCommunicate May 2018 #12

TY bluestarone May 2018 #14

Double WOW!!! JoeOtterbein May 2018 #15

Thank you Leighbythesea May 2018 #16

Thanks for taking the time to sort all this out. The Velveteen Ocelot May 2018 #17

Also to add- Dreeben is perhaps the most famous attorney in DOJ sharedvalues May 2018 #18

Next time, here....🤔, 🇾 🇪 🇸 sprinkleeninow May 2018 #37

Thank you for posting that! It clarifies a lot. nt CaptainTruth May 2018 #19

If I tell you how fantastic this OP is, am I going to get billed? grantcart May 2018 #20

K & R bookmarked FakeNoose May 2018 #22

Very much appreciate your analysis and the time you took preparing this. Bookmarked . . .nt Bernardo de La Paz May 2018 #24

Damn, that was fascinating, thanks so much nt. Pluvious May 2018 #25

thank You MarkEzra May 2018 #26

Would you mind giving me a non-DU link on that transcript? I want to send it to someone pnwmom May 2018 #27

here jberryhill May 2018 #32

Is there any truth to the rumor that the judge was appointed by Trump? rainin May 2018 #28

He's been on the bench for a zillion years and is actually retired - The Velveteen Ocelot May 2018 #30

He occasionally sits by appointment on the Fourth jberryhill May 2018 #33

Thanks very much for putting the time in emulatorloo May 2018 #29

Simply magnificent RandomAccess May 2018 #31

My take was that the judge was being the devil's advocate, trying to seem impartial.... George II May 2018 #34

Superb Post, jberry!!! DDySiegs May 2018 #35

Kick grantcart May 2018 #38

This judge tends to be hard on everyone Gothmog May 2018 #39

K & R and many thanks PJMcK May 2018 #40

Thanks for laying that all out. nt yonder May 2018 #41

I always enjoy your posts, John... SidDithers May 2018 #42

Manafort should have hired Cohen jberryhill May 2018 #43

I don't know... SidDithers May 2018 #45

Thank you for posting this. My understanding of arthritisR_US May 2018 #44

I've learned lawyering and US legalities more through DU than through my many encounters and friends erronis May 2018 #46

Thank you Achilleaze May 2018 #47

jberryhill: Thank you for taking the time Nictuku May 2018 #48

Excellent job. Oral argument rarely sways a judge's decision. In a vast majority of of motions, the Pepsidog May 2018 #49

I would like to add my great appreciation to the applause above. BobTheSubgenius May 2018 #50

Oh, yes. BobTheSubgenius May 2018 #51