Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

David__77

(23,369 posts)
Wed Apr 25, 2018, 07:28 PM Apr 2018

The Evidence Is Not With Joy Reid [View all]

The new round of posts contain a lot of cliche gay jokes about Charlie Crist and others, concerns that “adult gay men tend to be attracted to very young, post-pubescent types, bringing them ‘into the lifestyle,’” and commentary like “part of the intrinsic nature of ‘straightness’ is that the idea of homosexual sex is ... well ... gross ... even if you think that gay people are perfectly lovely individuals.”

...

Among the implausible factors is that for Reid’s story to be correct, someone would have had to hack her blog back in the ’00s, but no one, including Reid herself, noticed the invalid posts.

...

The Internet rots faster than anyone could have guessed. Almost every word written on the web gets flushed down the memory hole, sinking into obscurity; it’s basically impossible to find any reference to the original Reid Report just using Google.

But, as Joy Reid is finding out, all it takes is one person to chisel electronic words into a more permanent form.

https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2018/04/the-evidence-is-not-with-joy-reid/558935/

71 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Supporters of a certain non-Dem also ran are salty about Joy. LexVegas Apr 2018 #1
Yes, that is interesting isn't it? JNelson6563 Apr 2018 #3
Perhaps more interesting than disparaging anti-gay comments. David__77 Apr 2018 #5
Gay men might not like being called sexual predators. David__77 Apr 2018 #4
Definitely this. NurseJackie Apr 2018 #46
I trust Joan Walsh here Gothmog Apr 2018 #2
Except that it is with her - actually. TheSmarterDog Apr 2018 #6
Let the facts on the alleged tampering be aired. This article seems CentralMass Apr 2018 #7
The Joy Reid Saga: The Wayback Machine cannot guarantee authenticity Gothmog Apr 2018 #8
If she didn't say those things, I hope evidence to that effect comes out as soon as possible. David__77 Apr 2018 #10
Isn't part of the evidence the very odd fact that the homophobic statements pnwmom Apr 2018 #48
That could very well be. David__77 Apr 2018 #50
See the Joan Walsh twitter thread re comments, posted in post 2. emulatorloo Apr 2018 #52
Where do you see no one responded? Hassin Bin Sober Apr 2018 #53
Joan Walsh says they didn't. I believe her. pnwmom Apr 2018 #58
I figured as much. Hassin Bin Sober Apr 2018 #59
Why are you so eager to believe she was posting homophobic comments over and over pnwmom Apr 2018 #61
She speaks out about a certain failed non-Dem. nt LexVegas Apr 2018 #63
Regardless of where she may have been yesterday, where is she today? marble falls Apr 2018 #9
This is total bullshit. trof Apr 2018 #11
Some claims about gay men may be total bullshit. David__77 Apr 2018 #13
The writer of the article, by his own admission, has not seen the evidence. lapucelle Apr 2018 #12
20 years ago I said as much, I regret the words but have you not said things that were ignorant? Demonaut Apr 2018 #14
This would be a false equivalency PDittie Apr 2018 #71
This isn't about anything other than silencing the voice of a powerful black woman. NightWatcher Apr 2018 #15
It's not about the statements made about gay men and homosexuality? David__77 Apr 2018 #16
Post removed Post removed Apr 2018 #17
Yeah we gay guys (including Glenn Greenwald) better STFU right?nt m-lekktor Apr 2018 #19
You just want a pony!!! QC Apr 2018 #38
If you don't they will send it to a jury. bahrbearian Apr 2018 #41
I don't care where she was so many peabody Apr 2018 #18
If she didn't make those comments, great! David__77 Apr 2018 #21
What story? And why would it matter now? peabody Apr 2018 #26
No it isn't. nt m-lekktor Apr 2018 #20
I'm sorry, I'm missing the point of your OP. Not being negative, just not sure where you're going. George II Apr 2018 #22
It is an article in a publication. David__77 Apr 2018 #23
Then I guess you agree with the article then? George II Apr 2018 #25
I do wonder who made the comments David__77 Apr 2018 #27
Where are her negative posts followed by responses calling her out? pnwmom Apr 2018 #24
From what I've read about this all day, not one comment calling her out pre-2006. That alone... George II Apr 2018 #28
Quite suspicious, George mcar Apr 2018 #33
"In December I learned that an unknown, external party accessed and manipulated material.." melman Apr 2018 #29
There were two completely different incidents. The one in December and now this one. George II Apr 2018 #31
No kidding melman Apr 2018 #40
No, apparently two different blogs but not sure. George II Apr 2018 #42
Given that she admitted the Crist posts were hers mythology Apr 2018 #55
Yes melman Apr 2018 #57
I generally believe where there's smoke, there's fire MaryMagdaline Apr 2018 #30
The Joy bashers are being trolled. TomSlick Apr 2018 #32
+1 uponit7771 Apr 2018 #35
NOBODY has read the supposed posts in real time, nor was there pushback in real time..... George II Apr 2018 #43
*** THERE ARE NO COMMENTS ON THESE POST IN QUESTION!!! *** uponit7771 Apr 2018 #34
From what I understand, according to the researcher representing Ms. Reid blogslut Apr 2018 #36
Yes they would and the LoC, any of the scrapers would archive the altered entries uponit7771 Apr 2018 #68
I confess that in my youth I was intolerant or worse Cary Apr 2018 #37
I was a Bill Buckley supporter back in the early 1960s when he ran for Mayor of NYC. George II Apr 2018 #44
My Civil Rights professor was Jules Gerard Cary Apr 2018 #47
And so it goes........... George II Apr 2018 #56
So true of many of us... Docreed2003 Apr 2018 #60
I can remember when President Obama was being labeled a homophobe. Scurrilous Apr 2018 #39
Breitbart is reposting this article from The Atlantic... musette_sf Apr 2018 #45
You're right, the evidence is not with her janterry Apr 2018 #49
To clarify, that is the article's position - not mine. David__77 Apr 2018 #51
Well, then I agree with the the IT folks janterry Apr 2018 #54
I've seen the altered post and there's no doubt ghosting around the text and the fact uponit7771 Apr 2018 #70
I know you hate her, but the issue has been investigated by MSNBC, and she was telling the truth ecstatic Apr 2018 #62
Well, Im not fond of the comments. David__77 Apr 2018 #64
When did MSNBC say that? melman Apr 2018 #65
Today. Here: ecstatic Apr 2018 #66
So, nowhere did MSNBC actually say melman Apr 2018 #67
They don't have to, all these people missing all of thoseg comments his highly improbable uponit7771 Apr 2018 #69
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Evidence Is Not With ...