Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

MaryMagdaline

(6,853 posts)

26. Real gem.

Reply to DemocratSinceBirth (Reply #25)

Mon Apr 16, 2018, 07:40 PM

Apr 2018

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

35 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

DU atty please explain what it means that Cohen gets to review first or not [View all] Eliot Rosewater Apr 2018 OP

I could be wrong manor321 Apr 2018 #1

I dont care who sees them first, I do care if some arbiter decides something isnt Eliot Rosewater Apr 2018 #3

I'm Jumping in Late But as Litigator I Got an Idea Stallion Apr 2018 #2

Explanation on Ari just now: this is a warrant not a subpoena MaryMagdaline Apr 2018 #5

If The Feds did a no knock search on John Gotti would he get to see the seized evidence DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2018 #12

Exactly. That's why she needs to avoid bad precedent MaryMagdaline Apr 2018 #15

If she allows the defendant to see the seized evidence before the government DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2018 #16

She won't. Government sees first or GM MaryMagdaline Apr 2018 #21

Do you think there's inculpatory evidence on Trump ? DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2018 #22

Yes. I believe they already know what they are looking for MaryMagdaline Apr 2018 #23

That lawyer was sanctioned twice DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2018 #25

Real gem. MaryMagdaline Apr 2018 #26

If I understand it correctly he got a 40% contingency in the Broidy case. DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2018 #28

John Gotti was not a lawyer. marybourg Apr 2018 #29

" And no one, not even the president, can exploit the attorney-client privilege to engage in..." DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2018 #30

So the "scope" of the action here could eliminate documents not direclty related to Stormy? Eliot Rosewater Apr 2018 #6

No if the Document is Relevant to Crime/Fraud Exception then Justice Will Be able to Meet its Burden Stallion Apr 2018 #9

So if there was a document that he paid another person to be quiet about something, which is not a Eliot Rosewater Apr 2018 #10

Yep Sooner or Later, regardless of the method used to classify the documents, Judge is going to... Stallion Apr 2018 #13

Notice Hannity is saying "I have never been 'invoiced' by Cohen?" Eliot Rosewater Apr 2018 #14

Usually there would be discovery More_Cowbell Apr 2018 #4

And so a document that might outright prove Rump is guilty of any number of crimes including Eliot Rosewater Apr 2018 #7

I'm a little confused by this, but I think.... Adrahil Apr 2018 #17

The no knock search warrant had little to do with Stormy Daniels csziggy Apr 2018 #31

...with a reputable attorney...a reputable attorney...a...a reputable attorney? Leghorn21 Apr 2018 #19

This message was self-deleted by its author DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2018 #8

The DOJ manual provides for a "taint team" to review Gothmog Apr 2018 #11

Per CNN: Judge orders government to turn over evidence to Cohen's legal team spanone Apr 2018 #18

So they get to see what they already knew was there, it was seized from him. Eliot Rosewater Apr 2018 #20

i've seen two articles that have a different take on this....so I'm not sure what's going on. spanone Apr 2018 #24

Regardless Cohen is gonna get to see what he already knows exists cuz it was in his office Eliot Rosewater Apr 2018 #27

Not an attorney, but I think the question is obviously: struggle4progress Apr 2018 #32

You're on the Right Tract--but Attorney-Client Privilege and Relevancy/Materiality are Separate ... Stallion Apr 2018 #33

I expect Cohen can claim communications with any clients, unrelated to this prosecution, struggle4progress Apr 2018 #35

It is discovery...my take is that Cohen ET AL will get the documents but not for ten days Demsrule86 Apr 2018 #34

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»DU atty please explain wh...»Reply #26