Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
12. IMO the one thing we can be reasonably sure of is that
Sun Jul 29, 2012, 09:28 PM
Jul 2012

all sides want Holmes to get a complete psychiatric examination.

The primary things going against schizophrenia are 1) we don't have any evidence that dx was assigned and 2) few mass murderers have been determined to be psychotic. Neither of those 2 things would really be an argument that precludes Holmes from being dx'd psychotic, or from being in the minority of mass murderers who were psychotic.

With respect to seeing a psychiatrist...I'm not aware that a statement has been made about what diagnosis was the reason for Holmes seeing her. Maybe I missed it. If I did I'd appreciate being pointed to a link...

Psychiatrists are the members of an outpatient mental health clinic who get to prescribe, and various non MD therapists would refer patients with a variety of prescription needs to whatever psychiatrist(s) were working in the clinics.




Not necessarily. Bipolar disease also manifests paranoia Warpy Jul 2012 #1
I said "reasonable to suspect." That doesn't equate to certainty. pnwmom Jul 2012 #2
The mania associated with a breakdown.... AntiFascist Jul 2012 #6
Could be but I posted to point out the danger of Warpy Jul 2012 #17
I couldn't agree more... AntiFascist Jul 2012 #18
Interesting, I didn't notice the blinking. But a family member who has been diagnosed with sabrina 1 Jul 2012 #19
What's the danger, exactly? Being wrong. And I happen to think the people who pnwmom Jul 2012 #20
agreed-- I've been particularly disappointed in the rage and hatred expressed by many... mike_c Jul 2012 #3
I agree completely with you. Make it harder for people to obtain guns and make it easier to treat pnwmom Jul 2012 #8
THANK YOU. kestrel91316 Jul 2012 #11
I think he should be interviewed nebenaube Jul 2012 #4
Trigger code? pnwmom Jul 2012 #9
+ Brazillion nadinbrzezinski Jul 2012 #5
Agreed, and thanks for posting this. JohnnyLib2 Jul 2012 #7
You're welcome. I hope that if they do decide he's too ill to be tried, pnwmom Jul 2012 #10
IMO the one thing we can be reasonably sure of is that HereSince1628 Jul 2012 #12
I agree -- the main thing is, he needs a thorough psychiatric examination. pnwmom Jul 2012 #16
Schizophrenia was my first thought Merlot Jul 2012 #13
You mean it wasn't Mountain Dew...?! Earth_First Jul 2012 #14
Or even Fresca. n/t pnwmom Jul 2012 #15
I have the unfortunate experience of having a person mzmolly Jul 2012 #21
Each case is different. But the Mayo Clinic says paranoid schizophrenia pnwmom Jul 2012 #22
I've yet to meet a functional mzmolly Jul 2012 #23
Scizophrenia. chavron55 Aug 2012 #24
I think mzmolly Aug 2012 #25
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why it's reasonable to su...»Reply #12