Agreed (Reply #16) - Democratic Underground

In the discussion thread: So is a Ron Paul win in Iowa good for President Obama or more dangerous than the other cons? [View all]

Response to Autumn (Reply #2)

Mon Jan 2, 2012, 11:41 AM

hayrow1 (198 posts)

16. Agreed

Obama has been a cooperative tool for the 1%, and there is really no reason to believe anything will change. The Iowa and New Hampshire sideshows really mean nothing, but they make it seem to the fooled that they have some influence, and allows them to let off steam arguing amongst themselves.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

30 replies	Author	Time	Post
So is a Ron Paul win in Iowa good for President Obama or more dangerous than the other cons? [View all]	sellitman	Jan 2012	OP
This guy is not going places...	catabryna	Jan 2012	#1
I hope you are right	sellitman	Jan 2012	#7
Do you remember 2000 and 2004?	Autumn	Jan 2012	#2
Thats an oversimplification IMHO	progressoid	Jan 2012	#15
Not even. Did you watch any debate between Gore and Bush?	Autumn	Jan 2012	#20
Agreed	hayrow1	Jan 2012	#16
This message was self-deleted by its author	sufrommich	Jan 2012	#17
None of these idiots can beat Obama. The concern and worry are just all for show. THese candidates	Pisces	Jan 2012	#3
I think the other issue that might peal some off	quinnox	Jan 2012	#4
He could win Iowa but honestly that is it. I don't think Iowa influencing the National election	southernyankeebelle	Jan 2012	#5
True, actually Iowa has a terrible track record of choosing nominees.	FarLeftFist	Jan 2012	#8
True. They keep picking people like the Huckster. Losers	southernyankeebelle	Jan 2012	#19
He would get trounced in debates against Obama because he lives in fantasyland and	FarLeftFist	Jan 2012	#6
I am looking forward to the real debates.	sellitman	Jan 2012	#10
If there truly were a "liberally-biased media" ... GOOD for Obama ...	zbdent	Jan 2012	#9
Actually, regardless of Paul and Obama,	sufrommich	Jan 2012	#11
Iowa's caucuses tell us NOTHING other than	MarkCharles	Jan 2012	#12
If Ron Paul wins Iowa..	surfdog	Jan 2012	#13
Some Context...	KharmaTrain	Jan 2012	#14
It's hard to say. I think he'd look just like McCain in the debates	ecstatic	Jan 2012	#18
It doesn't matter if Paul wins Iowa or not, he won't be the GOP nominee	WI_DEM	Jan 2012	#21
It would be fantastic. The only threat paul poses is to the GOP. n/t	deacon	Jan 2012	#22
Good, we want him to run 3rd party	Motown_Johnny	Jan 2012	#23
Its his last chance at age 76.....	Historic NY	Jan 2012	#24
I agree	sellitman	Jan 2012	#26
He can't win the nomination! Therefore he's dangerous!!!	napoleon_in_rags	Jan 2012	#25
Paul winning is good for Obama, Yes	cthulu2016	Jan 2012	#27
It would force a 2 front campaign.....probably worse for the GOP nominee.	Historic NY	Jan 2012	#28
I think it's meaningless overall	Renew Deal	Jan 2012	#29
mike huckabee won in 2008...it doesn't mean much	spanone	Jan 2012	#30

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.