General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Kobach expert witness: Carlos Murguia sounds foreign. ACLU attorney: Thats a federal judge [View all]R B Garr
(16,950 posts)that much is very obvious. Nothing you mention is based on the reality of the actual events. It is strictly abstract and, as you state, an attempt to change reality so that what people think happened is really more important than what actually happened. What?? No thanks. That kind of deception should not be tolerated in any campaign ever again. That is exactly what the Russian trolls did -- have you read about their methods?? It is all over the news -- it is the essence of what the Mueller indictments are about. Altering facts and reality and phony abstract smear campaigns meant to turn people off Hillary as a candidate...sound familiar??
It is obvious that you cannot begin to blame super delegates on Hillary Clinton's huge victory in California, although that hasn't stopped people from trying to do that and even call California poll workers corrupt as your post seems to attempt. By riffing on abstract poll problems, you neglect to mention the vast press coverage that those so-called problems received, so the facts do not really back up the corruption claims. You even acknowledge that yourself. Your quote:
"A lot of the talk among Bernie supporters about unfairness or fraud at the polls was exaggerated and in my humble opinion, not true."
So you type multiple paragraphs about what you supposedly experienced, and then proceed to declare that all that wasn't really true. Those of us who saw it in real time also knew that it wasn't true.
If you just want to engage in generalized abstract riffing and smears on Democrats calling them corrupt, then you should maybe start another thread instead of trying to fuse actual events in with the abstract and unsubstantiated accusations against Democrats.
Hillary Clinton beat both her male opponents by millions -- so going on about super delegates is beyond abstract. It is just sour grapes that more people supported her because she was an active and loyal Democrat. It is not corrupt to be an active and loyal Democrat who enjoys widespread party support. You keep trying to make someone's popularity within the party about super delegates, so you continue to try and alter perception that they are corrupt, but they are not. Third party candidates are just that.