LaMouffette
LaMouffette's JournalMethinks Gavin Newsome is auditioning for "Candidate in Case Joe Biden Withdraws from the Race." Just seems odd that
Alex Wagner is spending so much time interviewing him.
JOE! STOP ANSWERING THE QUESTIONS! TRUMP HASN'T ANSWERED ANY OF THEM! ATTACK, ATTACK, ATTACK!
Sorry for the all caps! I'm just incensed that Trump is getting away with this shithow!
Trump is avoiding criticizing Putin, per usual! Joe needs to hammer Trump on his Putin worshipping!
A way to purge the Supreme Court of the radical extremists: Impose a retirement age of 70.
That would get rid of the following corrupt justices right off the bat:
Samuel Alito, 74 years old
Clarence Thomas, 75 years old
And get rid of John Roberts (69 years old) next year.
Sadly, this would also retire Justice Sotomayor (age 69), so maybe, since I'm dreaming here, for female justices, we could make the retirement age 75, since women tend to live longer than men.
This may seem like a radical idea (especially to Alito, Thomas, and Roberts), but the majority of US states have set a mandatory age of retirement for judges. Further, the constitutionality of mandatory retirement for judges was upheld by the Supreme Court itself. From the National Center for State Courts:
The U.S. Supreme Court held that the continued use of mandatory judicial retirement ages in Missouri did not violate either the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) or the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution given that “[t]he Missouri people rationally could conclude that the threat of deterioration at age 70 is sufficiently great, and the alternatives for removal from office sufficiently inadequate, that they will require all judges to step aside at that age.”
https://www.ncsc.org/information-and-resources/trending-topics/trending-topics-landing-pg/faq-which-states-have-mandatory-judicial-retirement-ages
What's good for the goose is good for those ganders on the Supreme Court who believe that they (and Donald Trump, too, natch') are above the law.
Here's a question on abortion for the Supreme Court: Could a woman in Florida who became pregnant as a result of
rape or incest, or who needs an abortion for medical reasons, get an abortion under Florida's "Stand Your Ground" law, which states:
“a person who is not engaged in an unlawful activity and who is attacked in any other place where he or she has a right to be has no duty to retreat and has the right to stand his or her ground and meet force with force, including deadly force, if he or she reasonably believes it is necessary to do so to prevent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another or to prevent the commission of a forcible felony.”
I'm sure anti-abortionists would say a woman has the right to kill a rapist but not an innocent fetus resulting from that rape.
But if, in a medical emergency situation, the fetus is endangering a woman's health or her very life, I wonder if this could apply. Shouldn't she be allowed to defend herself from this threat?
Greedflation: This looks like a job for . . . Katie Porter and her trusty whiteboard! Time to drag those greedy
corporate executives in to testify at a Congressional Hearing and have Katie wallop them over the head with facts. And find a way to get this particular Congressional hearing broadcast on the major networks so that there will be a greater chance of the don't-pay-attention-to-politics crowd actually seeing it.
Maybe the Congressional hearing could be held and then President Biden could give a televised speech and show recorded clips of the hearing with Katie bashing the corporate executives over their record profits at the expense of American consumers.
Because if nothing is done to expose greedflation, people will just keep on blaming Biden.
With many (most?) American voters, the presidential campaign is nothing but a popularity contest. Policy stances do not
matter. What a candidate has or has not accomplished does not matter. Whether a candidate will uphold the Constitution or shred it to little bits does not matter. Whether a candidate is a good, kind, intelligent person or an evil, cruel dumbass does not matter.
The diehard Trumpies love Donald Trump. That is all that matters to them and pretty much nothing can convince them that Trump is not their Jesus but is, in fact, the devil incarnate.
And they have been trained to hate Joe Biden and all other Democrats, especially Democrats who are strong, intelligent women, like Kamala Harris, Nancy Pelosi, Elizabeth Warren, Katie Porter, et al.
So, what to do? I'm just thinking out loud here. What . . . can . . . we . . . do?
We can talk ourselves blue in the face about Joe Biden's and the Democrats amazing accomplishments, and it won't move the needle one bit. They will still hate Joe and all Democrats.
Hmm . . . getting what they wished for on abortion has moved the needle for more moderate, more educated Republican voters. So has the ethical pickle the Republican politicians have found themselves in regarding IVF: "Life begins at conception! Embryos are children! I support IVF! Wait, what's that? IVF involves destroying unneeded embryos? Well, er, um . . . Hunter's laptop! Hillary's emails!"
I'm thinking the only thing that might do the trick is to let the Republicans be the dog catching the car again and let them destroy three things that would hurt their voters tremendously: 1. social security; 2. Medicare; and 3. Obamacare. Let them break these things, too, and make them own it. That might, just might, open the Trumpies' eyes and see just where voting for Trump and Republicans in general will get them. Maybe.
And then, as usual, we Democrats can come in and clean up their mess, restoring social security, Medicare, and Obamacare.
The problem with this, of course, is the Republicans' uncanny ability to shift the blame to Democrats. This would have to be done somehow so that they can't slither their way out from under the blame.
Plus, allowing them to destroy these things would hurt millions of people until the Dems were able to restore them, so really, not a good plan. Not a good plan at all.
So, I'm stumped and despairing. Think I had better go take a long walk somewhere beautiful and try not to think about our democracy being on the edge of destruction for an hour or so.
Thank you for my hearts, DU! SO happy I found this forum. Happy Valentine's Day to everyone!
If there are any serious and patriotic Republican politicians left, the most courageous, patriotic thing for them to do
would be to form a third party, maybe call it the New Conservatives, and run their own candidate in November to siphon off votes from Trump.
They will not win the presidency, but they will prevent Trump from winning it. They OWE us this much after subjecting us to the nightmare that is Trump for the past eight years.
Even if they lose the next four presidencies, it would be the only way to salvage the remnants of the party formerly known as "Republican."
Trump: "Even if you vote and pass away, it's worth it." You would think weather-conscious Iowans would bristle
at Trump's urging them to go out and caucus in the subzero temperatures, even if it means putting their lives at risk, but no.
Former President Trump encouraged his Iowa supporters to caucus for him at any cost, joking that due to extreme winter weather, “even if you vote and then pass away, it’s worth it.”
Meteorologists warned of “life-threatening” conditions in Iowa for the weekend as the state prepares to caucus. Trump canceled three of his four in-person Iowa events Sunday due to the freezing cold and snow.
Windchill is projected to be as low as -40 degrees in parts of the state Monday, with temperatures also in the negative. The Hawkeye State is also recovering from a blizzard that rocked the region Friday and Saturday, icing roads.
“You can’t sit home. If you’re sick as a dog, you say, ‘Darling, I gotta make it,’” Trump said at an Indianola rally on Sunday. “Even if you vote and then pass away, it’s worth it, remember.”
https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4408566-trump-on-iowas-subzero-temps-even-if-you-vote-and-then-pass-away-its-worth-it/
Do they not realize that this is just more proof that he literally could not give a shit if even his own supporters live or die?
They should also be reminded that in November 2020, he left thousands of people stranded in freezing temperatures at two different rallies by his campaign's effed-up attempts to shuttle people by bus to and from his clown shows.
Supporters of President Donald Trump were left stranded for hours Sunday night in cold weather after a campaign rally at Richard B. Russell Regional Airport in Rome, Georgia due to transportation issues, making it the third such incident in the past seven days. ...
The president’s supporters had been ferried to the event location on shuttle buses arranged by the campaign after leaving their cars in distant parking lots.
Many were left stranded after the event, waiting for hours, as the buses failed to take them back to their cars. ...
After a similar incident took place in Omaha last week, Democratic nominee Joe Biden compared Trump’s handling of his supporters with his handling of the pandemic, stating that the incident "captures President Trump's whole approach to this crisis." Biden then added: "He gets his photo op and he gets out. He leaves everyone else to suffer the consequence of his failure to make a responsible plan."
https://www.forbes.com/sites/siladityaray/2020/11/02/trump-leaves-supporters-stranded-in-cold-weather-after-campaign-rally-once-again/?sh=5cc61247169a
Profile Information
Member since: Thu Jan 23, 2020, 02:36 PMNumber of posts: 2,343