HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » bluestarone » Journal
Page: « Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Next »

bluestarone

Profile Information

Member since: Thu Apr 6, 2017, 08:20 PM
Number of posts: 9,651

Journal Archives

The REAL question i have is

Will the 80% that wants more witness's, REMEMBER this in NOVEMBER?

Senate impeachment question on Roberts

Wonder if Mcturtle has contacted Roberts about if he would vote or not to break the tie if that happens?

Jack McCall got a better trial

Than we did!

interesting read on 2016 electoral votes (not sure how to do this)

Number of intended faithless electors https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faithless_electors_in_the_2016_United_States_presidential_election

In the 2016 election cycle, the threshold of 270 electoral votes to win the presidency outright could have been thwarted by garnering a minimum of at least 12 percent of all Republican electors to become faithless, that is, 37 of 306 Republican electors. However, critics have noted, garnering this many electors would be extremely unlikely,[13][14] as electors vote more than 99 percent of the time as pledged.[15]

On November 16, 2016, journalist Bill Lichtenstein published an article entitled, "The Way Out of Trumpland: Hail Mary Pass to Save the Nation" in the Huffington Post, detailing the plans by presidential elector Micheal Baca to seek to derail Trump's assent to the presidency by convincing Democratic and Republican presidential electors to vote for a more moderate candidate on December 19, 2016, when the Electoral College voted. [16]Lichtenstein's article soon went viral, and on December 5, 2016, several members of the electoral college, seven from the Democratic Party[17] and one from the Republican Party,[18] publicly stated their intention to vote for a Republican other than the nominee Donald Trump at the Electoral College vote on December 19, 2016. Texas Republican elector Christopher Suprun publicly pledged to not cast his vote for Donald Trump as allowed by Texas state law.[19] Suprun indicated that he had also been in confidential contact with several Republican electors who planned to vote faithlessly, stating that they would be "discussing names specifically and see who meets the [fitness for president] test that we could all get behind."[20]

By December 5, 2016, two Republican electoral college members who publicly stated their intention to not vote for Trump had resigned. Texas Republican elector Art Sisneros willingly resigned in November rather than vote for Trump.[21][22] Georgia Republican elector Baoky Vu had resigned in August in the face of reaction to his public statement that he would not vote for Trump.[23] Both Sisneros and Vu served in states that lacked any laws preventing electors from voting their conscience.[24]

Although it is difficult to ascertain how many more electors, especially Republican electors, considered becoming faithless and voting for a Republican other than Trump, it was reported that at least an additional 20 Republican electors had already accepted the free-of-charge anonymous legal counsel and support provided for Republican faithless electors to assist them in voting against Trump.[25]

On December 13, 2016, Lawrence Lessig claimed that up to 20 Republican electors would be willing to vote against then President-elect Donald Trump,[26][27] or more.[28] However he did not provide evidence to corroborate this number.[29][30]

The Republican National Committee mounted an expansive whip operation to ensure that all those electors selected to vote for the Republican nominee indeed did so.[31]

On December 14, multiple Republican members of the electoral college stated under condition of anonymity that they were being coerced with "threats of political reprisal," adding "that the Donald Trump campaign is putting pressure on Republican electors to vote for him based on ... future political outcomes based on whether they vote for Donald Trump or not."[32][33]

One Democratic Colorado elector intended to cast a faithless vote for John Kasich but was replaced with an alternate in accordance with state law, and two others planning to also do so stayed faithful following the replacement.

Well took tRUMP 3 years to get his YES people inplace. NOW

If they win in 2020,NOTHING will stop them! 2020 most important time for America!!

Our managers have proved 1000000% beyond a doubt his GUILT!!

I'm sure THEY (house managers) are as shocked as we are, with the results of this mockery of a trial! The 2020 ELECTION is ALL we have left. (have my fears about this as well) Don't know how or what we can do to insure a fair election. Barr will be our biggest enemy!! We need to be very involved and work hard to get the vote out!

Wondering if future (after the trial) Senate subpoenas will

Be enforced? I say fuck the senate

If we had the possible underaged VIDEO (everyone is expecting to be true) These senate RETHUGS

Would absolutely refuse to watch it. NO SHAME!!

Kinda confused about Roberts power in the Senate.

Been said here that on every decision Roberts makes, it can be OVER RULED by senate majority vote. If that's true when the Democrats ask the witness question and Roberts rules FOR witness's, then the senate WILL over rule him right? So i'm worried the Senate COULD over rule him on the whistle blower name? How can this be stopped?

We have the HOUSE! i don't give a fuck if they go NO witness's

We have to DESTROY their ass's in the next 10 months! PUBLIC hearings, Good witness's. We CAN do this. Get the vote out! Hell we knew they would not remove the bastard. We Gotta get THEM ALL!! VOTE VOTE VOTE hearing after hearing, we can DO!!!
Go to Page: « Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Next »