Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

disalitervisum

disalitervisum's Journal
disalitervisum's Journal
July 12, 2017

because they are afraid

They are always afraid of something, that is what defines a conservative: fear. Fear of change, fear of differences, fear of the future. But most of all, fear of freedom.

They are lost without someone to tell them what to do. They are afraid they will be punished for making a mistake.

July 12, 2017

Close-up of a Clone of the Con-In-Chief

Ambitious bitch, isn't he?

June 7, 2017

Reality Winner--It's right in front of our faces

She's being given a cover for her contribution.

Speaks three rare languages, a previous intel operative in the Air Force.

Didn't cover her tracks to the Intercept (lol)

She's a contractor, not NSA. I guess they want her.

April 3, 2017

He does care about it that's why he's doing it

They want to destroy the career federal workforce, which stands as an informal check on unbridled executive power. This is one of their stated campaign goals. What better way than to just not fill the positions.

March 24, 2017

When there's no vote at all

no one has to be accountable for anything.

March 24, 2017

It's just what they wanted because now they don't have to commit

to anything. that's what having no vote at all means. Not one single congressman has to go on the record.

I think that's a problem for our form of government. I think more voting, not less, is the answer.

March 24, 2017

That's very interesting, I'm reading

Dark Money by Jane Mayer right now. The Koch Brothers certainly need more attention. Don't you think they ordered the bill to be pulled so their members wouldn't have to commit themselves?

March 24, 2017

true, and will that make a difference

in the gerrymandered districts? And heres' trump on tv denigrating everything again.

March 24, 2017

yes I agree, but how

do we get the message across that the "whole" is the problem? and do you think that the individual commitment is unimportant come election time?

March 24, 2017

It's just what they wanted, no vote means not one

single congressman has to go on record or commit to anything. Wonderful.

Profile Information

Member since: Tue Jan 10, 2017, 07:24 PM
Number of posts: 470
Latest Discussions»disalitervisum's Journal