When in fact she had said that it was a non-sequitor because it was “not resolved by this case”.

I think pretty much the same thing is going on here. Since no one has even seen the report, who can say that Mueller’s report really said that here was no collusion?

I just saw him on MTP Daily. Just like the other several times I have seen him interviewed, the interviewer tries to hold his feet to the fire and discuss the specifics of what he will do to change the party. His answers are non answers, nervously delivered. He stutters and stammers and never gives any real solutions. Chuck Todd asked him why he hasn't done more for someone (dont remember his name think he is in Oklahoma or Alabama) who is in an election next week, and all Tom could come up with was that he met with him.

Chuck Todd seems genuinely frustrated, and I am beginning to wonder if Perez represents any new direction for our party????

Do most people here realize that? No one ever talks about it.

When the media tell the story of President Clinton firing William Sessions due to tax cheating and use of public resources for private gain, I keep waiting for them to make a link to Pete Sessions, but they never do. Do you really think they are unaware of it?