HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » usedtobedemgurl » Journal
Page: 1


Profile Information

Member since: Sat Feb 13, 2016, 08:27 AM
Number of posts: 407

Journal Archives

Pardoning Scooter and Obstruction

I have yet to hear any of the pundits talk about this but if Trump is really sending a message, that he will pardon anyone who has lied, how is this not obstruction? Can this simple act not be added to all the others and used against him in a court of law? Is this not an act that just proves all the others? I do not get why everyone is not crying obstruction over this twits latest action.
Posted by usedtobedemgurl | Sat Apr 14, 2018, 08:33 AM (0 replies)

They Are NOT Putting Party Over Country

If they were, they would not be screwing over the party for the 2018 elections. They are simply selfish. They want what they want and will put up with whatever they have to to get it. If they were putting party first, they would not be destroying it! This is a grab and go situation all the way around. That is why so many of the rats are abandoning ship. It is every man for himself and party and country be damned.
Posted by usedtobedemgurl | Fri Feb 2, 2018, 11:24 AM (1 replies)

Why He Should Not Get The Wall

There should be no wall because of the cost. Sure it is a pittance compared to the budget but they will use it against us. When they get that debt up, they will turn around and say they have to balance the budget and they will go for the security nets! They want a huge deficit so they can go after those 'entitlements'. We cannot help them try to get rid of the things our country treasures the most.

There are many reasons we should not give in about the wall but protection for our most vulnerable is the most important. Do not give them a reason to go after everything that enables people to have some sort of a life.
Posted by usedtobedemgurl | Tue Jan 23, 2018, 10:15 PM (4 replies)

Could The Government Be Sued For The Muslim Ban?

I was just reading the writing from the Independent (http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/fire-and-fury-donald-trump-book-steve-bannon-muslim-ban-anger-us-president-white-house-a8143541.html) about the way the Muslim ban came about. The Independent reports:

"But the new book suggests that it was specifically decided it would be signed on a Friday so that it would cause the most possible disruption at airports. The order was hastily signed in such a way that it even affected people who were flying into the country who were then detained as they arrived, with little clarity on what would happen to them, on one of the most popular days for travelling."

This makes it sound like they purposely wanted people detained at airports and unable to enter the country. If it did happen, in this way, could the people who were detained for days not sue the government for their malicious actions against them?

I thought the whole thing was sloppily done due to no one having a clue as to what they were doing but it would seem, according to Bannon, they knew exactly what they were doing. What horrible people.
Posted by usedtobedemgurl | Fri Jan 5, 2018, 08:16 AM (1 replies)
Go to Page: 1