After reading his Win Every Argument, I'm convinced that Hasan's show (Sundays, 8PM ET on MSNBC) is a must watch.

The main point to Democrats: NAME THE THREAT. It is FASCISM VS FREEDOM.

Americans must know fascism when its tools campaign.


https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/jun/03/ron-desantis-heckler-fascist#:~:text=A%20South%20Carolina%20heckler%20called,DeSantis%20went%20on%20the%20attack.

by Andrew Weissmann, Ryan Goodman, Joyce Vance, Norman L. Eisen, Fred Wertheimer, Siven Watt, E. Danya Perry, Joshua Stanton and Joshua Kolb


This model prosecution memorandum assesses potential charges federal prosecutors may bring against former President Donald Trump. It focuses on those emanating from his handling of classified documents and other government records since leaving office on January 20, 2021. It includes crimes related to the removal and retention of national security information and obstruction of the investigation into his handling of these documents. The authors have decades of experience as federal prosecutors and defense lawyers, as well as other legal expertise. Based upon this experience and the analysis that follows, we conclude that Trump should–and likely will–be charged.

Before indicting a case, prosecutors prepare a prosecution memo (or “pros memo”) that lays out admissible evidence, possible charges, and legal issues. This document provides a basis for prosecutors and their supervisors to assess whether the case meets the standard set forth in the Federal Principles of Prosecution, which permit prosecution only when there is sufficient evidence to obtain and sustain a conviction. Before a decision is made about bringing charges against Trump (and co-conspirators, if any), prosecutors will prepare such a memo.

There is sufficient evidence to obtain and sustain a conviction here, if the information gleaned from government filings and statements and voluminous public reporting is accurate. Indeed, the DOJ is likely now, or shortly will be, internally circulating a pros memo of its own saying so. That DOJ memo will, however, be highly confidential, in part because it will contain information derived through the grand jury and attorney work product. Since it will not be publicly available, we offer this analysis. Ours is likely more detailed than what DOJ will prepare internally for explanatory purposes. But, given the gravity of the issues here, our memo provides a sense of how prosecutors will assemble and evaluate the considerations that they must assess before making a prosecution decision.

Our memo analyzes six federal crimes in depth:

Mishandling of Government Documents
1. Retention of National Defense Information (18 U.S.C. § 793(e))
2. Concealing Government Records (18 U.S.C. § 2071)
3. Conversion of Government Property (18 U.S.C. § 641)

Obstruction, Contempt, False Information

1. Obstruction of Justice (18 U.S.C. § 1519)
2. Criminal Contempt (18 U.S.C. § 402)
3. False Statements to Federal Investigators (18 U.S.C. § 1001)

In the course of discussing these statutes, we also touch upon others that may have been violated but where the factual predicate for applicability is less clear. For instance, additional charges could be appropriate–under 18 U.S.C. §§ 798 and 793(e) (dissemination)–if the public reporting regarding Trump’s having intentionally disseminated classified material to aides and others is accurate. Additional charges could also potentially be brought under 18 U.S.C. § 1924 if there is sufficient evidence that Trump unlawfully removed classified documents from the White House (see our discussion of DOJ precedents for past prosecutions under § 1924 in Part IV and in the Appendix). Based on the publicly available information to date, a powerful case exists for charging Trump under several federal criminal statutes, which we discuss in detail.


Just Security has much more about the authors and other sources:

https://www.justsecurity.org/86771/model-prosecution-memo-for-trump-classified-documents/

Happy Memorial Day. God save our troops.


Ann Elizabeth Dunwoody (born January 14, 1953)[2][3] is a retired general of the United States Army. She was the first woman in United States military and uniformed service history to achieve a four-star officer rank, receiving her fourth star on November 14, 2008.

https://www.theroot.com/a-funky-cookout-playlist-that-will-have-eveyone-dancing-1850481001

Here's a taste from The Roots' playlist.

&t=46s

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/xjzTJVhtGao


https://www.youtube.com/shorts/HUWb_urR6eY

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/26/opinion/student-debt-relief.html

Delightful dancing. h h

(start 00:30)

https://www.theatlantic.com/culture/archive/2023/05/tina-turner-obituary/674186/

"It's time for Republicans to face that there is no bipartisan deal to be made solely on their partisan terms." "I can't guarantee that Republicans wouldn't force a default...they said 'we will not default...' "