HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Mike 03 » Journal
Page: « Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next »

Mike 03

Profile Information

Gender: Male
Hometown: Modesto California
Home country: United States
Current location: Arizona
Member since: Mon Oct 27, 2008, 05:14 PM
Number of posts: 15,903

Journal Archives

Incredibly cool. But I can't believe nobody's made a joke about

"betting on the Bull in the Heather."

Bull in the Heather was a racehorse that was expected to lose a race badly and had the worst odds, but won the race.

The Florida Derby threw the Kentucky Derby picture into total confusion today when the 29-to-1 long shot Bull Inthe Heather came storming through the muddy homestretch at Gulfstream Park to win by two lengths over the undefeated favorite Storm Tower.

Bull Inthe Heather, whose name looks like a typographical error, had won only once in six starts before winning the big one against a dozen of the prime colts in this year's wide-open 3-year-old division. But he is a son of Ferdinand, who won the Kentucky Derby in 1986, and today the son took some giant strides on the road that the sire traveled to Louisville seven years ago.


https://www.nytimes.com/1993/03/21/sports/horse-racing-bull-inthe-heather-not-a-mistake.html

Sonic Youth: Bull in the Heather



So this could be good luck for Bernie Sanders.

Yes.

Different mental health professionals have different theories, but Dr. Jerrold Post (psychiatrist and CIA political profiler, author of "Dangerous Charisma" argues both Trump and his followers are damaged, but in different ways, not in like ways. The followers are damaged in a way that makes them crave an authoritarian "father" figure who can make their psychic distress go away, usually by promising to alleviate real world "problems" that they mistakenly believe are the cause of their distress.

"The Dangerous Case of Donald Trump" contains many essays that basically say Trump was damaged very early. He could not tolerate the emotion of shame so he produced an arsenal of defense mechanisms that shield him from the truth and lead him to crave approval. His followers provide exactly the narcissistic fuel he requires to maintain his fantasies of unlimited success

Both of those books are quite extraordinarily, but IMO "Dangerous Case" covers far more ground and is the better of the two books.

PS: I don't know if either Trump or his supporters have enough insight to "hate themselves." I know Trump could never admit that to himself. Their grievances are external, but of course they are diversions from immense internal anxiety they cannot face.

This isn't going to be a feel-good movie from the 1980s

You know the one: Richard Gere plays a cynical, highly sought-after political consultant. The greatest ever. Few candidates can afford his services, but if you can, you win. Guaranteed. In the end, Richard Gere has a crisis of conscience and gives heartfelt advice to a young idealist, a penniless grass-roots candidate, urging him to reveal his soul humbly in a climactic speech and let the voters decide.

From Roger Ebert’s review:

Gere implores the man to forget all strategy and simply tell the truth, and there are echoes here of the famous moment in "Network" when the anchorman asks his viewers to shout out that they're fed up to here, and they aren't going to take it anymore. Unfortunately, the very idealism of the scene in "Power" is undermined by the movie's cool professionalism: We think we've learned enough about the campaign business to know that Gere's strategy won't work.


I don’t remember if the candidate wins or not.

My DU icon for months was Warren. I’ve been saying my heart is with her (my brain is with Biden, and my fascination is with Bloomberg), but last night I heard her through fresh ears. She was disparaging Bloomberg and Steyer, as you would expect, rejecting the role of big money, speaking from the heart in that irresistible way that makes you love her, and calling for a tsunami of grass roots support, appealing to “the little guy.”

It sincerely is touching. She means every word. It’s one of a dozen reasons I’ve been drawn to her.

Over the next nine months Donald Trump will spend at least a billion dollars to recapture the White House. Worse, he’s got the help of the Department of Justice, State Department, hundreds of judges who will rule in his favor on any election-related issue, and the probable help of hostile foreign countries. He will lie, he will cheat, he will destroy the lives of decent people and no one will stop him. He will burn it all down.

Below are paraphrases of statements by two candidates given over the last 24 hours:

#1. “We are on a wartime footing with an incompetent, dangerous and corrupt president. We’ll spend at least a billion dollars, and we’ve hired two thousand five hundred soldiers in this fight, and are looking at hiring more, and we’re opening six new offices this week in Texas, sending 900 more people to California, and doubling our spending on advertising. We know what we have to do; let’s just get it done.”

#2 “We appeal to the Little Guy, we need to inspire a grassroots movement, Americans giving five dollars here, ten dollars there, Americans need to rise up, and say 'We reject this president' and say ‘No’ to big money, we say ‘No’ to millionaires and billionaires…”

This is a conundrum. Who doesn’t want Warren’s vision? Who doesn’t want to kick Trump’s ass in November?

I will admit this: Statement #1 makes me want to fight like my life and nation are in existential peril and, this morning at least, Statement #2 makes me want to go back to bed and resign myself to failure in November.

At the very, very least, I would plead with Elizabeth Warren (or any other candidate, for that matter) not to be so short sighted in her wholesale rejection of the enormous assistance Bloomberg can bring to bear on our ultimate objective.

Let's not throw the baby out with the bathwater.


I would argue "Yes"

Yesterday, this senator of an opposing party embodied the "moral courage" Adam Schiff asks us all to embody. He did so at considerable risk, which I don't think is being fully appreciated by everybody.

Secondly, we are the party of compassion. This person who did the right thing, for the right reasons, is going to suffer. His entire family is going to suffer. That is what Senator Blumenthal likely appreciated when he almost burst into tears in the middle of a live interview on CNN last night. That is a moment I'll remember for a long time. It made me really proud to be a Democrat, to see one of the leaders of our party shed tears for the leader of our adversarial party for a rare act of courage.

Thirdly, even if you cannot muster compassion for Mitt Romney, one might be able to appreciate the strategic favor he did us by denying Trump the right to claim there was a bipartisan acquittal; he gave us just the opposite: a bipartisan non-acquittal.

That's my two cents.



Good observation.

When he speaks of others' pain, there's a lightheartedness, some laughter, some undercutting. When he speaks about his own pain, he's deadly serious.

During the Jodi Arias trial, she only cried once: when she was watching video of herself crying in a police interview. It was like the only pain that she could relate to was her own suffering.

I totally get this.

My heart is mostly with Warren (and before that, Kamala Harris), but I've been preparing myself for the strong possibility I'll have to support another candidate, which I happily will do because my priority is to get Trump out. I thought it would be Biden, who I strongly like too. I'm also increasingly interested in Bloomberg, who I think could demolish Trump. But whoever can decisively beat the orange trash bag, that's who I'm supporting.

LOL. Bloomberg tweet on Trump's Climate Policy

https://twitter.com/MikeBloomberg/status/1224892586286047238

Expect the best psyops from Bloomberg.

Although Joe Biden gets a lot of credit for his "foreign leaders laughing at Trump" ad. Other than ridiculing Bloomberg's height, Trump's got no way of retaliating against Mike Bloomberg. And Bloomberg's pose of "complete indifference" to Trump's attacks only makes Trump angrier.

Bring it!

I hope the Bernie people don't piss Bloomberg off so much that he reneges on his

pledge to give his campaign machinery to the nominee if it's Bernie. I mean, how much abuse is he supposed to gracefully swallow?

Indeed, those poll results are shocking when you see them.

A few quick points:

1. That poll question isn't, "Do you love Michael Bloomberg?"
2. Many of those of us who voted Bloomberg in that particular poll (as did I) tried to explain why we voted as we did.
3. My takeaway of that poll is that it illustrates the extreme risk-aversion many of us have to even the possibility of four more years of this president.

I will support ANY Democratic nominee.
I strongly supported Bernie in the 2016 primaries, but see things differently now.
Bloomberg is not my first choice.
Bloomberg can beat Trump.
Go to Page: « Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next »