HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » laserhaas » Journal
Page: 1 2 Next »

laserhaas

Profile Information

Name: Laser Haas
Gender: Do not display
Hometown: Anywhere USA
Home country: United States
Current location: NOMADIC
Member since: Mon Apr 21, 2008, 01:12 PM
Number of posts: 7,805

About Me

Love BB, Laser Tag, Poker (Tournaments only). Work with Occupy camps. Willing to help you in your fight for justice (let's discuss it).

Journal Archives

Gingrich, Livingston & Hastert Impeached Clinton for What?

Think Progress has a matter of fact piece that should be on LBN, if it were not for the 12 hour Rule. It is titled appropriately "What We Now Know About The Men Who Led The Impeachment Of Clinton" and it nails the Rethuglicans' for being the hypocrisy extraordinaire.
[br]






[br]

As is reflected by the Think Progress story ---

On December 19, 1998, the House of Representatives impeached Bill Clinton on two charges related to his extramarital affair with Monica Lewinsky. (The charges were for perjury and obstruction of justice.) The historic vote, and subsequent trial in the Senate, involved the work of three men who were elected Speaker of the House Of Representatives by the Republican majority, Newt Gingrich, Bob Livingston and Dennis Hastert.

Almost 17 years later, with the federal indictment of Hastert for illegally concealing up to $3.5 million in hush-money, we finally have a more complete understanding of the men who led this effort.


Turns out that

Gingrich was having affairs - while trying to bust Clinton for having an affair.


On the day of the impeach vote - Livingston resigned - being busted about his affairs.


As for Hastert - well, we all know now - so please don't get me started....

I'm just sayin......

[br]

Jon Stewart on Rep Hastings Calling Texas Bat Chit Crazy

Everyone has seen the absurdly inane Texas gather together its forces to stop the invasion by POTUS Obama. Just prior to this time, it seems that Texas was pissed off by Florida Representative Alcee Hastings.

Who told the Texas Representative his state was crazy.

That, if the Representative was offended, he could leave.

And that - when the Texas Representative would await Hastings apology....

it would come when "Hell freezes over"

As on Jon Stewart's show February this year.



Texas couldn't go to war with Florida - they'd have to go through Mississippi, Louisiana and Alabama.

Wonder what Alcee Hastings would say now... that Texas armed up against Obama

This is one cool Representative

PRESS RELEASE – Relkin Law Tackles Haas v Romney Racketeering & eToys cs

Some of you are aware that yours truly sued Willard Mitt Romney and a plethora of cohorts - including Bain Capital and Goldman Sachs - for Racketeering (see previous thread - HERE). Most have given up and (sad to say) many keep telling me to give up. That's a sad thing. This is why Wall Street fraudsters tend to always succeed in their chicanery; because the victims see the DOJ is protecting (instead of prosecuting) Wall Street Frauds.

But now comes David H. Relkin Law firm - to the rescue.

[center]

[/center]

It took moi a while to find counsel. For years many a naysayer tends to bellow "If Laser's case is so strong against Romney - why hasn't any attorney at law taken the case"? This is a remark by people who have never gone through losing everything you have to justice system protected crooks.

A more better question should have been "If Laser's case isn't correct against Romney - why hasn't Mitt and friends sued him for something"? At the barest of minimums, shouldn't some court have fined me by now? After all, I've filed over 100 briefs in many courts (DE Bankruptcy, District Courts, Circuit Courts, NY Supreme Court).

The answer is - Romney wouldn't dare sue me - and the courts wouldn't DARE fine me;

because everything I'm saying is true.

What moi really needed, is an attorney of top pedigree (David and his father were partners at Duane Morris and David's uncle is the wonderful former New York Supreme Court Chief Justice His Honor Charles Breitel - see Wikipedia - HERE).

Furthermore, every counsel that represented moi in the past - sold out.

As for big firms, it's too easy for them to move an associate out to another position and tell you that there's no one left to handle the case. For no one wants to piss off the possible future lucrative Goldman Sachs, Wells Fargo and/or Bain Capital. Much less the issue of getting to do a solid for the POTUS wannabe.

David H. Relkin IS the guy Laser Haas has been looking for. A man who believes in justice. He began as a prosecutor in New York and has worked his way through professional firms, arriving on his own - after 3 decades. He is a PRO in issues of fraudulent conveyances - and has even established case law thereof.

Mr. Relkin also teaches CLE classes of Law.

Here's my self explanatory


[center][font size=6] PRESS RELEASE[/font][/center]


New York 212-244-8722 (phone) RelkinLaw.com

PRESS RELEASE – Relkin Law Tackles Haas v Romney Racketeering & eToys



The New York firm of DAVID H. RELKIN Law Agrees to represent Laser Haas & his CLI entity: Concerning eToys massive frauds and HAAS v ROMNEY RICO



David H. Relkin agrees to be retained by Laser Haas to address the issues of fraudulent conveyances, conspiracy to defraud and intentional frauds on the courts issues in the New York Supreme Court case of eToys (ebc1) v. Goldman Sachs, the Kay Bee and eToys Bankruptcy cases in Delaware, The Learning Company merger with Mattel Toys (billions lost) and the HAAS v ROMNEY et., al. Racketeering case filed in Los Angeles (# 2:13-cv-7738)



Too Big to be Investigated; Much Less Prosecuted or Jailed

In 2001 Laser and his Collateral Logistics, Inc., (“CLI”) firm halted the sale of eToys.com to Bain Capital/ Kay Bee for $5.4 million; and did then compel bids of tens of millions. Laser was unaware the eToys.com Debtor & Creditor’s counsel and a hand-picked CEO, were secretly linked to Bain Capital and Goldman Sachs. This deception harmed Kay Bee and eToys bankruptcies in the hundreds of millions. And also corrupted the New York Supreme Court case of ebc1 (eToys) v Goldman Sachs.



Due to the Wall Street firms being too big to even investigate, much less prosecute, major frauds sprouted up and grew across the country. Including the Tom Petters Ponzi and Marc Dreier frauds that are directly linked to the eToys cases. Several parties confessed to bogus affidavits and got off easy!



David Relkin’s Legal Experience

In eToys, the “good ole boys” continue to lie and blame the whistle blower. Hence, it took Laser a while to find a counsel smart enough and honorable enough, with ample moxie. David H. Relkin began as a New York prosecutor who gained skills in RICO, complex commercial litigations, fraudulent conveyances and bankruptcies. Upon detailed review by Relkin Law, it appears that Laser and his Collateral Logistics, Inc. (CLI) are entitled to considerable compensation in the millions of dollars.

No sane person believes that those who confessed lying in court, are allowed to put for a forgery claiming CLI “waived” $3.7 million in fees. As a result of Laser Haas’s whistleblowing, he lost his rising career and the marketability of his companies.




Mitt may have quit (do you really think so) - and he certainly did throw in the towel against Holyfield...

But this fights the real deal - and Pitten's ain't gonna like the outcome!
[br]

Wife-Beating Fed Judge Mark Fuller, Who Railroaded Siegelman, Resigns

Source: Daily Kos via AL.com (Alabama)

United States District Court Judge Mark Fuller has given his resignation to the president and will step down from the bench Aug. 1.

Last August, Fuller was arrested in an Atlanta hotel room after a domestic dispute with his then-wife, Kelli Fuller. He was charged with misdemeanor battery, but he later entered into an agreement with the court there to have his record expunged upon receiving counseling and completing a domestic violence program.

A federal judge since 2002, Fuller presided over the public corruption trial of former Alabama governor Don Siegelman and former HealthSouth CEO Richard Scrushy.

Read more: http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/05/30/1389007/-Wife-Beating-Federal-Judge-Mark-Fuller-Who-Railroaded-Don-Siegelman-Resigns-Under-Pressure#



One of the people we have - to thank, for the ending of Judge Fuller - is Dana Jill Simpson. She is a lawyer, activist and expert witness who has appeared in Washington D.C. hearings. Her temerity and tenacity are inspiring (and that comes from a guy who has been fighting Mitt Romney for 14 years).

Here is a OpEd by Dana Jill Simpson, on the Judge Fuller wife beating issue - last year.


[center] [font size=4]



Will President Obama Maintain Zero Tolerance for Domestic Violence in the Case of Federal Judge Mark Fuller?[/font][/center]

Every October President Obama and Vice President Biden speak out against domestic violence and proclaim that they stand for "zero tolerance" regarding this crime. Their speeches often feature the statistic that one in three women in America are impacted by domestic violence. VP Biden, in his first year in office, announced long-time advocate Lynn Rosenthal would be the White House advisor on violence against women, a newly created position because, Biden claimed, his office and the President genuinely believe in zero tolerance for domestic violence. President Obama called on executive heads of federal agencies in 2012 to create policies against domestic violence in their workplaces. In the following years President Obama has signed further laws to protect women who are victims of domestic violence.

If President Obama and Vice President Biden are serious about domestic violence issues, they will lead the movement to impeach Judge Mark Fuller from office, or accept his resignation based on their request to Fuller to quit the bench. To leave him in office would be an affront to their proclamation of zero tolerance for domestic violence and would disgrace the federal judiciary.


No need to impeach (I guess) since Judge Fuller has resigned.

We thank you sincerely - Dana Jill Simpson - for staying on top of this abuser and seeing to his resignation.

Now, can we beseech you to focus your attention - on Fox's O'Reilly?

I'm just askin......

O'Reilly's Continues Gett'n Off 'Scot Free', Including Sexual Harassment.

Yesterday, upon DU's LBN forum, the facts about Fox News Bill O'Reilly physically assaulting his wife, was discussed, at some length. In that thread (as the title does state about O'Reilly's daughter being a witness) it was revealed to U.S. by RawStory via Gawker that "O’Reilly was accused of physically assaulting ex-wife in front of daughter".

From our thread about the daughter being an eye witness to O'Reilly's possible crime, the general consensus of the comment parties (including yours truly), is that O'Reilly is a tool (as if we needed any further proof).

It was also proffered, by various parties - that (unfortunately) O'Reilly the tyrant, will probably get away with it all 'Scot Free'. This shouldn't be the case of one, no matter how powerful, doing such, if there's a history of abuse. It is one thing to have a single aberrant act of behavior (a faux pas - so to speak). It is another to have a publicly documented history of abuses.

Question is - Do any New York City/ State authority have the chutzpah to investigate O'Reilly.

It is important to ask such a question - not only due to the fact that we despise Bill O'Reilly - but because he is unequivocally a menace to society. For, if the public sees that Faux Bully Bill can get away with physically mistreating his wife, then it is likely to embolden other ebol bullies to believe they can do the same.

And that ain't right!

Additionally, as moi's previous LBN thread (here) makes note of, Bill O'Reilly history includes him trying to get his wife excommunicated from the Catholic Church.

Then there's a prior case of O'Reilly sexually (reprehensibly) harassing a Fox producer.

Furthermore, while doing what is IMO possibly nefarious abuse of power and undue influence over the New York City Police, O'Reilly tried to have his wife's new cop boyfriend put under the microscope (possibly as an act of vengeance).

Below the ug mug pic of O'Reilly, let's take a look at the previous sexual harass by Bill the Abuser.
[br][hr][br]

[center] [/center]

[br]

[center][font size=5] O’Reilly Sexual Harassment Case Fox Wants You To Forget [/font][/center]

As you may have notice by the link within the title of this part, it is an actual piece from the 2014 actual AntiMedia story "The Bill O’Reilly Sexual Harassment Case Fox News Wants You To Forget About". The reason this issue is important, as noted above, is due to the fact that it clearly demonstrates that Bill O'Reilly is a possible menace to others.

More to the point, the story has purported details of tapes by the former Fox producer Andrea Mackris (pic above from New York Mag.com (here), who (reportedly) sued O'Reilly for $60,000,000.00; as a result of sexual harassment that began in 2002 and continued to 2004.

Of the many excerpts in the AntiMedia item, it provides details of O'Reilly's lewd repulsiveness. Like this one, where Andrea Mackris warned O'Reilly he should be careful of who he propositioned;

and then he threatened that O'Reilly and Fox News would abuse and destroy!

Direct from the AntiMedia story;
[br][center]

[/center][br]

NOPE, the redacted/ blacked out part is not under my control. They did it. (I'm just as curious as you are, as to what is being hidden). Be that as it may, there's much I'm not posting here that you can see for yourself from the (purportedly) recorded conversations of O'Reilly to Mackris.

This one is the cleanest - but shows Bill to be the mad sex hunter - using the phone as his key-way. As noted by Lou Colagiovanni of AntiMedia.org, of one of many of the purported conversations that was recorded by Andrea and allowed to be excerpted into the court record.

Bill O'Reilly reportedly said that;

[br][center]

[/center][br]

AntiMedia also provides a YouTube parody of Bill O'Reilly calling to have sex with Conan O'Brien;

[br]



[br][hr][br]

Of course vile pile Bill will say that he's just a target. That everyone's out to get him and these stories are all just fabrications. That his wife should be glad he sought out sex with others and gave her piece of mind.

He also may point out the fact that he paid off the former producer, just to spare his family any more shame and exposure, to the public. However, as I'm a former executive of a once biggie company, who also handled over 1000 other troubled companies - I know Bill's other secret.

Insurance!

When you're on top of the mountain, it is true that you "may" become a target. For most of us in the real world of doing the work that tools like O'Reilly faux'ly spin around, there's such thing as D&O insurance (Director's and Officers). This usually insulates both the company and parties from having to pay legal costs and settlements.

Sooner or later, Bill will have himself exposed more

----------------------------------- (if he hasn't gone somewhere and done such already).


I'm just sayin.........
[br][br]

O’Reilly accused of physically assaulting ex-wife in front of daughter

Source: Raw Story quoting additional source Gawker

A source said Maureen McPhilmy, who was recently awarded custody of the couple’s two children, testified during a New York family court hearing that O’Reilly attacked her at their Manhasset home, reported Gawker.

The source said a forensic examiner testified that O’Reilly’s 16-year-old daughter claimed she saw her father drag her mother down a staircase by the neck, unaware the girl was watching.

McPhilmy began dating a Nassau County police detective after the separation, and Gawker reported that O’Reilly called in a favor after raising money for the department and got an internal affairs investigation launched against the new boyfriend.

O’Reilly tried to have his former wife excommunicated from the Roman Catholic Church in 2013, according to another Gawker report.





Read more: http://www.rawstory.com/2015/05/bill-oreilly-accused-of-physically-assaulting-his-ex-wife-in-front-of-their-daughter/



[link:http://gawker.com/bill-o-reilly-accused-of-domestic-violence-in-custody-b-1705006992?utm_campaign=socialflow_gawker_twitter&utm_source=gawker_twitter&utm_medium=socialflow|
[br]
[center][font size=6 color=burnt]Will Fox News Protect O'Reilly Now[/font][/center]
[br]
In the Governor Siegelman case, the Alabama activists kept after the obvious wayward Judge Fuller = who was finally compelled to step down from the bench, for his assault upon his wife.

Will Fox News continue to protect their number jewel, even after this disgrace?

[br][hr][br]



Here's the Gawker story (with a much more apropos story title IMO) - that

"Bill O’Reilly Accused of Domestic Violence in Custody Battle"

[br]

[center][font size=5 color=navy] an acquaint on Facebook

already figured out the Fox Doth Spin[/font][/center]

They'll claim it was a new exercise for strengthening the neck.


Unlike · Reply · 1 · 1 hr

This picture immediately above, is from the Gawker and this (link here) pertains to the issue of O'Reilly seeking revenge against the police officer who dated O'Reilly's ex.

Can we blame her for dating an authority figure with some hopes of power against Bill?

just sayin.....
[br]
[hr][br]

It is worth putting up this Keith Olbermann piece (don't you just love his initials K.O. v O'Reilly - so apropos) - that was provided in the comment section by DU'r "spooky3" referencing a thread on Olbermann by DU'r "Fred Sanders" via The Grumpy Pundit video below.

K.O. knocks out O'Reilly for his bull Chit - starting at time stamp 2:39

[br]

[br][hr][br]
[center][font size=6 color=burnt]UPDATE - Sort of (retroactively)[/font][/center]

Turns out that Fox News that is always willing to Abuse (a neat little quip from a commenter below) - has other O'Reilly bad faith issues it would like you to forget about. Including sexual harassment of a former Fox Producer.

It seemed to lengthy to add to this LBN thread (let me know if the consensus is otherwise - please). So I posted a General Discussion piece that has some apparent proof of deviant behavior of O'Reilly. If, but for no other reason, you have to view the thread's ending Youtube video, where Conan O'Brien feigns he was sexually harassed by a Bill O'Buser phone call.

This is the link and thread title.

[center][font size=5] O'Reilly's Continues Gett'n Off 'Scot Free',
Including Sexual Harassment. [/font][/center]
[br][hr][br]

Haas v Romney v Holyfield: Friday Night Doubling Dinging

Willard Mitt Romney is displaying more reported likable charm in 2 minutes of air time, in his promo about fighting Evander Holyfield tonight - than during his entire POTUS campaigns. Be that as it may, I'm hoping Holyfield doesn't actually have a real ring "flash back"; which results in him knocking Pitten's out.

Cause the REAL dinging of Mitt Romney is coming from the deal I made today.


[br]

One has to remember that we came far to close to have oligarch, Robber Baron, Willard Mitt Romney for President of the United States. If he and Bain Capital had made it into the White House (on his white horse) - they would have made what Bush & Cheney did to U.S. - look like child's play.

Thankfully, Democrats showed up and voted President Barack Obama back in.



[center][font size=6 color=burnt]Romney's Real Friends and Fellow Fighters.[/font][/center]

This fight, as are most things in life with Mitt Romney, is rigged. He bribes his way out of trouble much. Heck, he may even bribe Holyfield to be knocked out (all in the good name of charity - of course).





His real chums are criminals. Polaroid was seized by the feds; but sold in a sham auction back to Paul Traub's clients (and then Traub was immediately made partner). Mitt's Bain Capital is partners with Goldman Sachs in loans to Fingerhut, just right before the FBI raided Tom Petters Ponzi (Petters is the little picture, immediately above). Then, in the way of all bribery issues, all of sudden dear old Fingerhut wasn't seized by the FBI or the Receiver. Strange this is, Paul Traub was involved, as Fingerhut used to be listed as home office of 655 Third Ave (attorney Paul Traub's law firm office for Traub Bonacquist & Fox).

From this link (here) - we get the follow details.

RETAILING/DISTRIBUTION Investment: $55.9 million Pct. of total: 43.3% Fingerhut Direct Marketing Inc., Eden Prairie Bain Capital Ventures, Battery Ventures, Brookside $55.9 million Provides private-label and brand-name International Inc., Goldman, Sachs & Co.,


Paul Traub was also partners with another fraudster (Marc Dreier of Dreier LLP law firm). That's Traub and Marc Dreier's picture above (Dreier on the left and Paul Traub on the right). Who all were part of the scheme, along with Goldman Sachs and Bain Capital - to steal and KILL our public company of eToys.

[center][font size=6 color=navy]PROOF Mitt is Linked to Frauds[/font][/center]

Just so you can read the above allegations from someone's pen, other than mine - here's the link to the Federal Receiver over the Tom Petters Ponzi, pointing out (after he knew Romney was going to lose) - in June 2012 - that Paul Traub was the controller of Tom Petters Ponzi, partners with Marc Dreier and that they were involved in eToys.

Petters Ponzi Federal Receiver Names Traub as Controller of the Ponzi



And here is the proof that Paul Traub worked for Mitt Romney's Stage Stores; just before they stole eToys
http://petters-fraud.com/Oct_2011_Exh5_TBF_StageStores206_Supplemental.pdf

[br][hr][br]

[center][font size=6 color=dark] Romney Knocking Himself Out [/font][/center]

Truth be told, Mitt has been the punching bag of yours truly, for over a dozen years now. It's not like moi has any power, it's just the hubris of the man knows no bounds.

Since 2001, Romney and his friends have left a paper trail of evidence that any 6th grade child could put Mitt in prison with. Problem is, when one has hundreds of millions of dollars and the potential for POTUS still lingering around your name, not many have the guts to through the knock out punch.

That's okay, I'm here to finish the job. Even if he gives all his money away (that really is in the billions - which is the REAL reason he won't show his taxes) - sooner or later - the knock out punch of Willard Mitt (the pits) Romney, is going to come.

He hasn't been in the ring with me yet; but I just made a deal that means more fights are coming.

[center][/font]Ding - DING[/font][/center]
[br][hr][br]

Obama 1995: POTUS To Be - Activist Eternally

There are many problems in America. We have a brutal police state with racism a core issue. Also, there's Wall Street Fraud and the 90 Day Deadline of Eric Holder looming large, with justice most likely remaining unrequited. Then there's the military complex refusing to downsize, attacks on privacy, Social Security and worse. It is hard to look upon President Barack Obama for resolution, as we Liberals showed some displeasure at the man; and let the Republicans take over both the Senate and the House.

However, believe it or not, President Obama is our lord and can be our savior!

In the video below, there's 55 minutes of the real man. You will see a calm, confident guy who made a career, from long ago, on doing political activism as he grasped for hope and believed America can change.

Obama was granted the privilege to discover who he was, as head of the Harvard Law Review; which resulted in a book that forced Michele Obama to sacrifice the first 2 years of her marriage to a most absent husband.

The results of who he was and what he was doing, couldn't have possibly been known to him, at that time. President Obama displayed his charm, his consistency and his keen intellect, long before he would become one of THE most powerful men in the world.

He is real, his activism is real. He was a Civil Rights attorney, when there was no money in it. And, believe it or not, way back then, Barack Obama had faith in America and the possibility that things might change for the better.

Caucasian Americans are established at forgiving themselves
(having the most practice at such)!

Then not yet even as Senator Obama, he spoke of his knowledge of Malcom X, Doctor Martin Luther King and how it was, growing up as a mix breed. How the publisher paid for his visit Africa and Kenya, Of his taking Michele there, to his father's village, where the kids pointed at Michele saying;

"Look - there's a white woman"!

You have before you, 55 minutes of the realm man. One who wasn't seeking any election. Just a guy trying to look at racism in America and address his multicultural roots.

Soft spoken, considerate, engaging and very smart, this was President Barack Obama in the making; and hopefully he will return to his Civil Rights activism in 2017. For he will always be President Barack Obama. And, like Jimmy Carter doing his projects, the POTUS can utilize who he is to continue to make a difference.

I believe he will and adore him even more, after seeing this video of the real guy.

Who, by the way, at time stamp 54:59, sees the real America way too!
(you'll have to watch the entire video, to grasp what is so apropos of the time stamp).

As he said so candidly, he has a thing that rhymes with bucket list;
and for one, I hope that is to arrest racism in America.

Many mornings, I'm ashamed to wake up white......


[br]
Youtube video above - is by City View 22 - station.
[br]
For those of the Caucasian kind, who (unlike moi) have no hopes of ever giving up their belief in white supremacy.... here's a pic for you - everlasting...

Brought to you by "A Womyn's Worth" Blog linking to the apropos
"Whitepeoplearedisgusting.tumblr.com"

Nothing hurts the ruling WASP society more - than a POTUS Obama
(who, by the very success of his 2 elections as President - Helped beat down racism

[center]N'est-ce pas! )[/center]

?w=300&h=300
[br][hr][br]

We all have a right -- indeed a duty -- to question smelly "official" narratives

One of the key teachings to any Detective, is that you go straight and hard after anything labeled a "coincidence".

Too many in the Bin Laden saga - to ignore.

-----------------------------------------------------------

Let's say, arguendo, all the reports of how Osama Bin Laden was killed are true. That Seal Team 6 flew in and wammo bamo - the job was done.

Amazing how they then claim to bury Osama at sea - with no proof to you or me.

-----------------------------------------------------------

Then, wammo bamo - suddenly Seal Team 6 is dead - TOO!

Placed in a shoddy helicopter and (purportedly) brought down by lucky Q'dy shot.

Are your "coincidence" alarm bells going off yet?

NO>?

REALLY!

-------------------------------------------------------------

Then how about this glaring coincidence.

When the military gathered the next of kin together (bad idea big gov - your goal is to keep U.S. apart - as easy to muster/ corner) - they told the families of the Heroes that;

"Your sons are not coming home - we made the decision to cremate them"

The official (utter Bull Chit story) is that the bodies were burned beyond recognition.

http://www.presstv.com/detail/2013/12/24/341678/seal-team-6--the-ultimate-burn/

================================

But one parent was shown a picture of his son on the ground - with NO burns

Facts vs. Fiction: Assange Never Raped Anyone

As a victim of sexual abuse when young, where no one would listen to me and those I trusted with the details called me "punk" (in the most demeaning way) I'm well versed on the side of the vex upon victims. One can even argue that it's worse for a boy to talk about being raped - than it is for a girl by a guy.

Too often, unrequited sexual abuse sagas leads to cases of suicide (see Tree Climbers - here).

That being said, nothing gets in the craw of victims of sexual abuse, more than someone making up fabrications of being abused, in order to gain some selfish advantage. Where there are cases of people making up crap against rich guys, just to get over. Or a team of players at a school. And the girl who stayed out all night long and blamed her bo (who didn't satisfy her) or someone not even involved, so she wouldn't be punished.

All falsehoods make it harder for REAL victims to achieve justice and closure!

[br][hr][br]
IF You really want to see the facts in print and such compared to the propaganda, then the best place is the website "EXTRADITING ASSANGE".

This particular website can be labeled bias, if you so choose to say, as it details the falsities by David Allen Green and the political prosecution of Julian Assange - in Detail.

At the very bottom of the Justice for Julian Assange - EXTRADITING web page (lengthy) - it has a fact by fiction comparison that should put to rest all the manure out there.

That is, of course, unless you're hell bent to condemn a man!

[br][hr][br]
[center][font size=6 color=navy]
The 2 Swedish Girls in Question[/font]
-[font size=6 color=burnt] NEVER[/font] -
[font size=6 color=navy]accused Julian Assange of Rape
[/font][/center]

That's right, ladies and gentlemen, most of U.S. (and the world actually) are being duped by main stream (lame) media; chiefly propagandized by David Allen Green. For it is a fact that this whole case was started, when one of the girls went to the police and asked if she could compel Julian Assange to give a blood test (to check for STD's).

You can, if you care about the facts, even if you, arguendo, ignore the glaring Rove issues and that the U.S. Government is after Julian Assange in connection with Private Manning (or have you totally bought into the B.S. that big gov doesn't desire to nail Assange - being totally obtuse to what has happened to Manning) - simply look at the Swedish public records (that our main stream never reports).

PLEASE TAKE NOTE THAT;

The original prosecutor closed the Julian Assange case and a politico (Claes Borgström) and others took the case away from the original prosecutor and launched a campaign to "Q U E S T I O N" Julian Assange.

That's right, this whole case is about "questioning" - Assange is NOT charged any crime!

Asked on various occasions how an investigation could be restarted even though the complainants did not allege rape, Claes Borgström stated that neither woman is a lawyer, therefore neither woman can tell whether she was raped or not.

REALLY!

I don't know about you - but I sure as hell know when I've been violated!

Here's the verbatim from (this) Swedish source;


Interviewer: But [the complainant] did not at first say that she had been raped.

Borgström: Yes, but she is not a lawyer.



Despite Assange's efforts to comply with the inquiry, the prosecutor delayed the progression of the investigation. Then many strange things began to occur, including the stealing of Julian Assange's personal computers = AFTER = Sweden granted Assange permission to leave the country.

THAT's RIGHT - Julian didn't RUN away - he was granted permission!

Then - this event took place;

Assange's discussion on the phone (which happened in my presence): "They could not do this before? I have been in Sweden for six weeks. " In the journey to Berlin, Assange took four computers and his own personal baggage. The baggage and three of his computers disappeared, although his was a direct flight. Assange arrived to meet with Espresso in Berlin in the late evening (around 11 pm) without luggage, and with only one computer: a laptop which he never parts from and which travels with him on his shoulders. The episode made Assange suspicious. The three computers were never recovered. Twenty days after these events, WikiLeaks released documents on the war in Iraq (Iraq War Logs). Meanwhile, the Swedish case went on.

[br]
About Wikileaks purportedly exposing the girls

EEEEAAANNNNTTTT! - Buzz a big NO on that one too....


On the 23rd of August, at 16:40, the police released the casefile for AA's report under Freedom of Information on the Assange case. AA's name was supposed to be redacted throughout the document, and it was, throughout the body of the document. But the police failed to redact her name from the title of the document. The police are therefore the sole and effective reason that AA's privacy as an alleged victim was breached, and that her identity is known publicly.

[br]

AA gave an interview to the Swedish newspaper Aftonbladet, in which she stated that Assange is not violent, and that neither she nor SW are afraid of him. She gave this interview anonymously, and yet, when the interview was reproduced in The New York Times her full name was given out. The New York Times is therefore the effective reason that AA's name became known all over the world. From Aftonbladet:

It is completely false that we are afraid of Assange and therefore didn’t want to file a complaint. He is not violent and I do not feel threatened by him.

[br][hr][br]

[center][font size=6 color=burnt]SUMMING IT ALL UP[/font][/center]

We know our country went to war in Iraq based upon GWB's Administration lying out their butts - massively. We also know that the tapes given out by Private Manning, through Julian Assange's Wikileaks organization, deeply embarrassed the American warring machine - Greatly!

To say that big gov and the corporate military industrial complex doesn't have an axe to grind against Julian Assange - is just plain Bull C H I T!

Of the 2 Swedish girls in question, Julian Assange was never accused of rape. One girl went to the police to ask for a blood test issue and they went "AH HAH - we got him"!

Since then, there has been mass millions of dollars (over 3 million alone, for British police to surround the Embassy) to go after Julian Assange and Wikileaks; because bad faith acts do not like being exposed...

especially by an outsider!

Here's a link with the vast, Chronological details of the Julian Assange case. Including the issues of what he reported with Wikileaks hacking and how the rape case has been a fabrication from the start.

[center] Justice for Julian Assange [/center]

If you care about the facts and justice, you will see that this website has links upon links backing up each and every remark. This case is a fabrication by the powers that be - who are going after the person - who points out they are "corrupt" powers that be.

It is easy to get the world all in a tizzy - as is remarked/noted by the facts - that;

But the original privacy blunder by the police had happened much earlier: a matter of hours after the women visited the police on the 20th of August. Within two hours of the issuance of the arrest warrant, a reporter at the tabloid Expressen had been tipped off by SMS. The duty prosecutor, Maria Kjellstrand, was called, who illegally confirmed that there was an arrest warrant out for Julian Assange. Expressen then ran the story, and Kjellstrand was quoted in it. Within a matter of hours, the news had travelled around the world, was reported by every major English-language news outlet, and had associated Julian Assange's name with the word "rape" in over 3 million Google search results.

The arrest warrant had been issued by Kjellstrand during the interview with SW. The Chief Prosecutor Eva Finne was on holiday at the time. When she read SW's interview the next day, she canceled the arrest warrant, saying "I don't think there is reason to suspect that he has committed rape." It has been reported by Aftonbladet that, internally, Finne has been extremely critical of the police conduct in the issuance of the warrant.

[br]

[br]

[center][font size=5 color=navy]YOKO ONO AWARD to Julian Assange in 2013[/font][/center]
[br]

Nothing tells the tale better than Yoko Ono's granting Julian Assange (poetically apropos - in absentia) 'The Courage Award'. These pictures are from Yoko Ono's tribute website to her husband John Lennon - titled

[center][font size=6]"Imagine Peace"[/font][/center]


[br]

The 2 girls are a victim, of being caught up in the wheels of injustice that thrust them into a losing position. No matter how this case turns out, they will always have to hide from the public's scrutiny.

And that's a Dam Shame!

Believe what you want to believe. As for me, being a real victim of sexual abuse who fights such and other bad faith acts (including big gov and Mitt Romney), I know how justice REALLY works in this country...

I'm just sayin....

--------and sayin.......

------------------------ And Sayin.................

[br][br]
Go to Page: 1 2 Next »