HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » laserhaas » Journal
Page: « Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next »

laserhaas

Profile Information

Name: Laser Haas
Gender: Do not display
Hometown: Anywhere USA
Home country: United States
Current location: NOMADIC
Member since: Mon Apr 21, 2008, 12:12 PM
Number of posts: 7,805

About Me

Love BB, Laser Tag, Poker (Tournaments only). Work with Occupy camps. Willing to help you in your fight for justice (let's discuss it).

Journal Archives

Teen Sex, Dr. Phil, Bain Capital, Collide: Fed Lawsuit in Utah.

It is a tale of woe - due to a showman's show. As is par for the course, Dr. Phil rants upon a family; and offers to assist. Beyond the questions of (whether or not) Dr Phil's show does his "assisting" out of purity, or just to put on a show that he is the good guy. In this case, the end is not justified by the "means" (or meanies).

As reported by the Salt Lake Tribune (here);
[br]
Two teens having sex before witnessing a third partner’s murder. Hookups with older men arranged online. Parents berated on air by Dr. Phil and then one of the teen’s confinement in a youth treatment center in Utah, where she allegedly suffered physical abuse at the hands of staff.

[br]

The fact that Bain Capital is involved, in another scandal, is not so unusual to moi; but it is getting rather sickening, to see how Bain is everywhere you go. Turns out (in this case) Bain Capital's subsidy owns the facility where alleged abuses took place. The Myers lawsuit (here) - alleges the following, alarming, state of affairs about deceptive practices at the facilities begin with;

"Their extravagant fees suggest great expertise and cloak minimal credentials"


Additionally, the lawsuit alleges that Dr. Phil had veiled conflicts of interests concerning Island View and CRC compounds. Whereas the Myers litigation (via counsel) stipulates that;
[br]
"upon information and belief, either was paid in money or notoriety, or both,
for endorsing not only Island View, but also a raft of CRC compounds just as abusive"

[br]

There's no action in the case docket (yet), other than the filing of the case;
and attorneys putting in notice of appearances.

Will follow this one - and see how it shows!

[br]

You don't tell the truth. I had an expert read them (Law firm Local Rules Compliance officer)

You are so bogus on so many levels of incongruity.

No 1. Several lawyers took my case on contingency; and then abandoned me - AFTER - opponents confessed Perjury.

In what realm of reality would you hold steadfast that there's no merits to confessions?

No. 2 United States Trustee made a Motion to Disgorge Paul Traub's TBF for $1.6 million and concluded deliberate fraud

In what realm of reality do you hold steadfast the UST is a conspiracy nut?

No. 3 There are many lawyers who speak to me and encourage me; because they know I have a case.

Including a current federal judge who educated me on 18 U.S.C. 3057(a) complaint I filed with Corruption Task Force.

No 4. My contracts guarantee legal fees (drafted by MNAT - who was my court ordered counsel)

Does the fact that I learned MNAT is both Romney & Goldman Sachs counsel mean anything to you.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Here's my 2 best works to date (after receiving instruction on how to do better). If you would take the time to read them and then attempt to tell me (with a straight face) that it has no merit and makes no sense.

Then we should TALK about that....

http://petters-fraud.com/3rd_amended_complaint_v10.pdf

http://petters-fraud.com/plaintiff_may23_response_objection_to_goldmansachs_di_82_final_draft.pdf


[br][hr][br]

Finally, Paul Traub (who worked for Romney's Jumbo Sports and Stage Stores), was partners with Marc Dreier, Tom Petters and Okun 1031 Tax Group. Dreier doing 20 years, Petters doing 50 years and Okun doing 100.

Less than 25 feet away from me - during eToys works - sat Larry (Reservitz) Reynolds (who confessed laundering $12 billion dollars while living in Vegas, as partner of Petters and also in WISTEC {Witness Protection Program}).

The problem is not - whether or not - I have merits

It is that I've got TOO MUCH merits!

Against some of the most powerful persons and corporations on the planet.

In Chambers Order Dismiss Haas v Romney Racketeering Case!

Source: Los Angeles Federal Court PACER Records

Having reviewed the numerous documents filed by plaintiff {Laser Haas} over the course of the past seven months since this case was initiated, including four different versions of the massive and disjointed complaint, the Court concludes that the currently operative First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) must be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 8(a), 9(b), and 12(b)(6) for the reasons stated in the motions to dismiss filed by defendants Bain Capital and Goldman Sachs.

For the foregoing reasons, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

(1) All pending motions are suitable for determination without oral argument, and the hearings
previously scheduled for June 2, 2014, and June 9, 2014 are therefore VACATED.

(2) Plaintiff’s motions to amend the complaint {26, 67} and motion for reconsideration of the
order dismissing the MNAT defendants {77} are DENIED.

(3) Defendants motions to dismiss this case {59, 60, 61, 82} are GRANTED.

(4) The First Amended Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

(5) Plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this Court {69} is DENIED AS MOOT.

(6) The Clerk shall close the case.

Read more: http://petters-fraud.com/clocked_di_96_judges_order_dismissing_case_haas_v_romney_may22_2014.pdf
[br][hr][br]


[br]

We have more than one-hundred felony violations by the named defendants in the "Haas v Romney" for civil Racketeering case. But that appears to be unimportant to any federal agent, agency and/or court even in this USAG Holder age of "No One is Too Big to Jail". (See HuffPo, Reuters and other articles {here} on United States Attorney General Eric Holder's remarks that the Department of Justice will pursue actions - no matter where it leads).

You can see the background of the case at our new website "Romney the Racketeer" for information about the particular case crimes. And our very detailed much years in the making (cause Romney's RICO gang has done much) "Petters-Fraud/DOJ_Cover_Up" web pages.

I started a petition at MoveOn.org, concerning USAG Holder's remarks (here); but there's a much more active item at MoveOn.org titled "Attorney General Holder: You Said no bank is 'too big to jail'. Prove It, starting with Wells Fargo".

Here's a story at Addicting Info titled: "Romney Slapped with Racketeering"

Also, here's the story from Ann Werner at Liberals United "Romney Sued for RICO".

Then there's Rmuse at PoliticusUSA.com who did nearly a dozen stories
(Ron is great with pictures, as is the CORE pic below).
Rmuse has many stories including "Meet the Man Battling Romney & Bain 12 years".

Don't worry any; because we're NOT giving up.



I'm going to sue Eric Holder on his empty promise.


-------------------------------------------------------------------


Just remember - it ain't over - until I quit!

But - for now - Romney is smiling and saying;





In Chambers Order Dismissing ("Haas v Romney" Racketeering) with Prejudice!

Source: Los Angeles Federal Court PACER Records

Having reviewed the numerous documents filed by plaintiff {Laser Haas} over the course of the past seven months since this case was initiated, including four different versions of the massive and disjointed complaint, the Court concludes that the currently operative First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) [6] must be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 8(a), 9(b), and 12(b)(6) for the reasons stated in the motions to dismiss filed by defendants Bain Capital and Goldman Sachs.

For the foregoing reasons, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

(1) All pending motions are suitable for determination without oral argument, and the hearings
previously scheduled for June 2, 2014, and June 9, 2014 are therefore VACATED.

(2) Plaintiff’s motions to amend the complaint {26, 67} and motion for reconsideration of the
order dismissing the MNAT defendants {77} are DENIED.

(3) Defendants motions to dismiss this case {59, 60, 61, 82} are GRANTED.

(4) The First Amended Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

(5) Plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this Court {69} is DENIED AS MOOT.

(6) The Clerk shall close the case.

Read more: http://petters-fraud.com/clocked_di_96_judges_order_dismissing_case_haas_v_romney_may22_2014.pdf



[br][hr][br]

[br]





We have more than one-hundred felony violations by the named defendants in the "Haas v Romney" for civil Racketeering case. But that appears to be unimportant to any federal agent, agency and/or court even in this USAG Holder age of "No One is Too Big to Jail". (See HuffPo, Reuters and other articles {here} on United States Attorney General Eric Holder's remarks that the Department of Justice will pursue actions - no matter where it leads).

You can see the background of the case at our new website "Romney the Racketeer" for information about the particular case crimes. And our very detailed much years in the making (cause Romney's RICO gang has done much) "Petters-Fraud/DOJ_Cover_Up" web pages.

I started a petition at MoveOn.org, concerning USAG Holder's remarks (here); but there's a much more active item at MoveOn.org titled "Attorney General Holder: You Said no bank is 'too big to jail'. Prove It, starting with Wells Fargo".

Here's a story at Addicting Info titled: "Romney Slapped with Racketeering"

Also, here's the story from Ann Werner at Liberals United "Romney Sued for RICO".

Then there's Rmuse at PoliticusUSA.com who did nearly a dozen stories
(Ron is great with pictures, as is the CORE pic below).
Rmuse has many stories including "Meet the Man Battling Romney & Bain 12 years".



[br][hr][br]

[br]

[hr][br]
Don't worry any; because we're NOT giving up.


I'm going to sue Eric Holder on his empty promise.

[br]

Just remember - it ain't over - until I quit!

But - for now - Romney is smiling and saying;
[br]

[br[hr][br]

Will You Walk One Block Against Citizens United Corruption?: 99RISE Cressman & Kai - Defy!

Wooo Hooo - its early Saturday morning and yours truly is the first one to arrive at Los Angeles City Hall South Lawn to be part of the 99RISE movement's "March for Democracy" calling for attention/action against Citizens United.

OOPS, no one is here. Is it the wrong date? Am I in the wrong place?

I quickly call the number provided and there's no immediate answer. Then I look at my watch and go - oh {c}hit, it's only 6 a.m. - and I hang up quickly. A few moments later Kai Newkirk calls me back (pic just below). I quickly apologize - to the obvious rude awakened organizer. But Kai turned out to be oh so gracious as he thanked me for the good spirit and dedication of being the 1st to arrive.

It was a wonderful thing to see, reminding me of my days with Occupy in the beginning and Occupy Los Angeles, where I spend an entire month (before I was tipped off they were coming to arrest everyone - including yours truly).

On this day no police were present. The only thing odd was on gal who was working with a hoola-hoop for about 40 minutes during the speeches. Those speak outs against corruption weren't by people who just started getting into the fight against corruption fray - yesterday. Turns out that Derek Cressman (pic below Kai's - who is Democrat Candidate for California Secretary of State) is actually a scholar and long term activist against corruption in our elections. During Derek's speech he won my permanent attention as a Candidate for office who openly spoke out on the issues of corruption.

Did you know that, after Watergate, our elections laws were changed to "CAP" the maximum amount of money for all candidates to spend on their campaign and that the U.S. Supreme Court then ruled there's "NO such thing as fairness" in overturning the elections campaign funding cap as unconstitutional? (WOW)!

Derek Cressman knows that, educated me of that and more.


[br]



[br]
[hr][br]


[hr]

Southlawn Speech Events


There were many people, from all over the country. Even a group from Riverside titled the 28ers. There was wonderful musical performances too. It began with a great speech by California Congressional Candidate Marianne Williamson, followed by the enlightening speech of Candidate Derek Cressman bold stance/speakout on corruption of our election process and the passionate, almost Kennedy-esque speech of Kai.

They all instilled a great sense of hope of Yes We Can Defedant Citizens United!


[br][hr][br]
CALL TO ACTION


I realize everyone across the country and/or the State of California can't go and march to Sacramento, California; but I have an good idea what you can do.

Will You Walk One Block Against Citizens United Corruption?


Even if its just two of you, three, or four - Or More, you can help make this effort/event a national treasure and fight corruption from where ever you are. Once this near month long MARCH, or perhaps once, twice a week - and your even daily - simply get a sign, sheet of power and say "We're With You". It really isn't too much to ask. 99RISE and the MARCH have websites and Twitter accounts (here) and (here). You can send in a picture of your solidarity against Citizens United.

Please consider doing at least a one block walk and Tweet, Facebook - PIN IT!

Donations - too - are welcomed (here's the link to the March's website once more)

I know we all care passionately about the Koch brothers and their ilk, doing the Karl Rove dance of corruption upon our country and the election process. If this idea of just doing a one block (or more) walk takes hold, we can send a chill down their stalwart spines.

As for me, just the possibility of giving Karl Rove and the Koch brothers a bad night's sleep - gives me great joy!

[br]


[br][hr][br]



Romney the Racketeer website is up now - And "Haas v Romney" files to come

I debated about posting the website (that everyone has nagged me for so long to do); because I wondered if it would be bad form to do so during our trial process. Then I see the court dismiss the case against Mitt's attorneys utilizing a 130 year old draconian case (that doesn't apply to willful misconduct & gross negligence).

In the near future, I'm going to post every item filed on the court's docket.

Meanwhile - please feel free to tell me what you think (and what I may need);
for this website "Romney the Racketeer".

http://www.romney-the-racketeer.com/

By the way - there's a poll on the front page - asking this question;

"Are Goldman Sachs, Bain Capital and Mitt Romney Above the Law"

What say ye?



It's about time that USAG Holder did something I can agree with.

May these girls/women come back home - where they belong

ASAP!

Citizens Arrest Attempt Results in Murder of Heroic Effort of Troy Cansler (Turley Blog)

Troy Cansler {47 years old}, in Cherry Valley, California, made a an effort to do a citizens arrest of armed robber Vincent Alex DeLeon (age 26); after DeLeon stabbed/robbed a woman who had a baby in a stroller.

According to News stories posted online, Troy witnessed the stabbing robbery and told the mother "I'll get him for you".

News show accounts report that Troy caught up with DeLeon; resulting in a scuffle and fatal stabbing of Cansler.
[br]


[br]
Some comment parties are being critical of the effort of Troy Cansler (see Professor Jonathan Turley's blog posting of "California Man Dies in Pursuit of Suspect Who Stabbed Mother in Parking Lot" and United Kingdoms "Daily Mail article titled "Good Samaritan Slain Chasing Robbery Suspect".
[br]
[hr][br]
In this day and age where too many people sit idle by, it bugs me that a person sacrificed his life;
and the cheap seats find fault with him for trying to do a good thing.

Can you imagine the victim, widow and Troy's daughter reading all the condescending banter!

R.I.P. Troy Cansler

[br]

WOW - Romney in 2016 - Who'd of thunk, after MoveOn.org asks DOJ to Investigate?

In the land of opportunity, even a "boss" has a 2nd and now possibly a 3rd chance (given enough vote rigging and media buying) to run (again) in the race to become President of the United States of America ("POTUS". As I've been telling everyone - all along - if Mitt can openly break the law once, he can do so again. MoveOn.org documented, expertly - what yours truly has been saying all along. That Romney lied and continued to lie in his quest to become POTUS.

Will Mitt Romney run again in 2016?


[br][hr][br]

[br]

Aside from the fact that Mitt lied on his federal election campaign finance form (see MoveOn.org legal analysis - here) and (letter by MoveOn.org to the DOJ - here). Compounded by the speciousness of the facts that Mitt never (properly) disclosed his tax records. Along with the issues of his claims of "retroactive" retirement (after Romney's campaign finally admitted Mitt DID have something to do with Bain {after February 11, 1999}). On top of all of those things, Mitt Romney also confessed (in his very own documentary) that "we kind of - had to steal the {GOP} nomination". This, with the fact that his Bain Capital entity owns 800 stations with 100 million listeners under Clear Channel (Rush Lameblaugh and Jerk Hand'nity); and Romney's ties to voting machines (see Forbes article - here).

AND - in spite of the fact that Romney claims he wish he never ran, didn't want to run. Now rumors are swimming out there - EveryWhere - that MitTwit is thinking about running again. Here's Bob Schieffer's take on the issue - (here) - that;

But, on Sunday morning, CBS' Bob Schieffer said not to write off the idea of a 2016 campaign by Romney so quickly. "I have a source that told me that if Jeb Bush decides not to run, that Mitt Romney may actually try it again," Schieffer said.

During a political panel discussion, the "Face the Nation" host said that he has been told that Romney will consider seeking the Republican nomination for the presidency in 2016 if former Florida governor Jeb Bush chooses to sit the race out.

[br]
There's the Examiner piece "Increasing evidence Romney might run"

AND

Though there are many more articles; here's a Facebook "Mitt Romney for President 2016".
[br][hr][br]

What say ye? - WILL Mitt (the pitts) Romney run again?



Update: "Haas v Romney" Racketeering Lawsuit. Grim Reaper Coming

On October 18, 2013, yours truly filed a lawsuit in Los Angeles federal court (Central Division) against Willard Mitt Romney, Bain Capital, Goldman Sachs and cohort attorneys/executives. The case evidence chiefly arises from public docket records and federal archives that are beyond contestation. Be that as it may, it matters Not, how much proof one has, when you are an insignificant and they are some of THE most powerful persons and entities on the planet.

As was foretold by naysayers and supporters alike;
the powers that be would come to bare to shut down this case.

For those who care to look at the evidence, it is easy to gain their support for the cause and instill outrage. However, that's not easy to do; because they (Romney & gang) have done much wrong and yours truly is not an attorney at law who failed English )(and hence, can't tell the story as it must be told). So, here we are, more than 180 days into the heretofore civil war that has turned into a RICO case. Where the insignificant amoeba versus a horde of tyrannical Goliath's tries as he may, to seek justice. Unfortunately (said to say) the case has begun to fray.

As was documented by PoliticusUSA.com's Rmuse - Romney fled Bain Capital to avoid prosecution. You can see the details of the story concerning Rmuse's pic below, titled "Public Records Reveal Romney Profited from Fraud, Corruption and Racketeering at Bain".

Rmuse also has other articles about this subject, like;

"Tell the DoJ to Investigate Romney's Serial Frauds"

AND

"Post Election Romney & Bain Face Federal Corruption Perjury Probe"

Remaining a troubling matter is the fact that there's NEVER any investigation into Romney & Bain. If they did, those two would go down rather swiftly. Evidence abounds of Mitt Romney's bad faith and his desire to be "retroactively" retired from Bain Capital in August 2001 - back to February 11, 1999. Mitt lied on his federal election Campaign finance 278 OGE Form.

But it is okay to lie, if your Mitt RMoney guy!
[br]



[br]
[hr]

Right now, a hearing is scheduled for June 2, 2012, on - whether or not - the court will dismiss the case against Romney and gang. Meanwhile, yours truly has filed a Motion to Reconsider
; because the Judge (for now) has dismissed the case against Romney/Bain law firm and executives, MNAT, Greg Werkheiser and Barry Gold.

It's a simple fact that Romney & his gang can never permit this case to go to trial (nor can Goldman Sachs); because they've done everything I've alleged. There's even no question of culpability. MNAT law firm and Paul Traub's law firm, already confessed supplication of erroneous affidavits to the court.

There's only the question of accountability.

You can read more about the cases intertwined in this at Wall Street Journal 2005 (here), Rolling Stone Taibbi 2012 (here), New York Times 2013 (here), Rmuse's "Meet the Man Battling Romney Bain 12 years" (here). Addicting Info Nathan's (well researched) story "Romney Slapped with Racketeering".

Plus, Ann Werner of Liberals Unite stories;

"Mitt Romney Sued for Racketeering in Federal Court"

and Ann Werner's followup story (updates)

"Update Federal Racketeering Lawsuit Mitt Romney"

Ann Werner has the following quotes of my saga - that;

{Laser} Haas owns Collateral Logistics, Inc. (CLI) and was assigned to handle the liquidation of eToys and asserts that in that capacity he discovered evidence of perjury and multiple frauds. As an executive of eToys, Haas was required to report what he found to the estate managers and attorneys. Failure to do so would have been punishable by being fined and/or imprisoned for up to three years. In his affidavit, Haas states that not only were the misdeeds he reported ignored but “the bad faith parties were given the keys to the vaults they were fleecing and the promise by the police to be willfully blind.”


[br]
And Ann Werner points out my affidavit states to the court that;

[br]
His {Laser Haas's} affidavit goes on to say:


As wind down coordinator of the eToys liquidations, my company, Collateral Logistics, Inc., and I were the court appointed fiduciaries to keep everything kosher and “maximize returns with minimum expense” in eToys. When Bain Capital had announced they were buying the entire estate of eToys for $5.4 million, we halted the auction and forced them to pay tens of millions of dollars more.

That is when they offered me an $850,000 bribe and I told them no! This caused a panic in their ranks, because I reported the bribe to the Delaware Department of Justice. Who informed this layman that it was not really a bribe – until accepted.

[br][hr][br]

As yours truly keeps telling Romney's counsels - "you guys need everyone to be on bended knee to the lord"

"and Laser Haas only needs 1 honorable public servant willing - To Do Their Job"


Here's my Motion to Reconsider the Court's decision to give Romney, Bain, Goldman Sachs crony attorney's a walk.

It clearly was an error to dismiss the case against them;
based upon the 1881 case of Barton v Barbour

http://petters-fraud.com/clocked_april21_di_77_motion_to_reconsider_mnat_gold_dismissal.pdf


Please Stay Tuned.
Go to Page: « Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next »