HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » laserhaas » Journal
Page: « Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next »


Profile Information

Name: Laser Haas
Gender: Do not display
Hometown: Anywhere USA
Home country: United States
Current location: NOMADIC
Member since: Mon Apr 21, 2008, 01:12 PM
Number of posts: 7,805

About Me

Love BB, Laser Tag, Poker (Tournaments only). Work with Occupy camps. Willing to help you in your fight for justice (let's discuss it).

Journal Archives

Justice Integrity Project/Legal Schnauzer: Siegelman's Corrupt Judge Stripped of Cases &;

BACKGROUND Judge Fuller & the Governor Siegelman Prosecution.

It has long been argued that Karl Rove, along with other special interest parties, worked to bring down a rising Democrat influence in the hard right wing state of Alabama. As a result of what is alleged as corrupt efforts, U.S. District Judge Mark Fuller (a multi-millionaire from Oil profits) put Democrat Governor Siegelman - in prison!

Reportedly, by the Justice-Integrity Project of Washington D.C., with reporter/activist Andrew Kreig at the helm - and - the Legal Schnauzer Blog Roger Shuler, Governor Siegelman is incarcerated by a bogus legal theory and a corrupt U.S. Attorney (Canary) whose husband is part of Commerce and a Karl Rove buddy.



Karl Rove Goes Off on Jill Simpson during Great Van Susteren Interview

It is well documented by Mr. Kreig & Legal Schnauzer that the allegations of a corrupt prosecutorial process have substantial merits. There's much corroboration, in great part due to the fact that Jill Simpson, was inside the system and witnessed how U.S. Attorney Canary feigned recusing herself from the case; but kept controlling the prosecution of Governor Siegelman secretly.

So much is going on - behind the scenes - that Karl Rove bounced off topic, during a Faux News Greta Van Susteren interview; as Rove went on a diatribe rant against Jill Simpson (pic above provided by 60 Minutes) and the Governor Siegelman case. This is a link (here) to the "Crooks & Liars" report on Rachael Maddow review of the bizarre tangents of Karl Rove.

It is rumored that Karl Rove went off; because his gay affair was outed during Romney POTUS run.
(See Roger Shuler's Legal Schnauzer piece on Salon - (here)) and a prior DU thread (here).

As to be expected, there are man rants & raves by Karl Rove, full of falsities, against Jill Simpson and Governor Siegelman. Karl Rove was pardoned by GW Bush; but can hope for no such blessing by the Obama Administration.

Here's Justice Integrity Project Fact Check on Rove's rant/lies - titled;


Wife Beating Arrest Results in Judge Fuller Being STRIPPED of Cases.

As (should) be expected, a U.S. District Court Judge is to be held to higher standards than those trodden by the crowd. However, such has not be true (heretofore) for His Honor {sic}. There are previous issues of domestic violence with Mark Fuller. This time, it being a public display, the Judge was (properly) arrested; and has now been stripped of his case load by the reviewing appeals court. For more details, we look to Andrew Kreig's story titled;


As reported by the Justice Integrity Project;

A federal appeals court in Atlanta took the rare step last week of reassigning all cases from a prominent judge who had been arrested on a charge of battery against his wife.

Separately, a Fulton County court forbade U.S. District Judge Mark E. Fuller, 55, from contact with his wife Kelli Gregg Fuller, 41, a former deputy court clerk for Fuller who phoned police late Aug. 9 from a luxury hotel to say her husband was beating her after she accused him of having an affair with a law clerk

As it is very important, the Justice Integrity Project focuses on Judge Fuller's spousal abuse history and sexual escapades; but there's one passage that is extremely import (in the question of - SINCE, Judge Fuller's cases are now yanked - Can Governor Siegelman finally get a fair shake).

As is reported by the Justice Integrity online article;

In October, Siegelman's attorneys will argue that his current convictions should be voided.

One reason, they say, is because Middle District U.S. Attorney Leura Canary failed to recuse as she promised verbally. Her husband, businessman William Canary, was campaign manager for Siegelman's gubernatorial opponent. That was two-term GOP Gov. Bob Riley (2003-2011), who succeeded Siegelman following a close re-election vote in 2002. Also, Siegelman argues on appeal that Fuller wrongly increased Siegelman's prison time by including offenses for which he had been acquitted.

Under both the Bush and Obama administrations, the Justice Department has always fought Siegelman's trial and appellate arguments despite many protests by legal scholars and members of the public that he was being prosecuted for political reasons, as defense attorneys and multiple whistleblowers claimed.


It is a shame that corruption has become such a normal thing; our nations people simply accept the abuses and stand by idle. Fortunately, for U.S. neither Jill Simpson, Roger Schuler and/or Andrew Kreig are standing by idle. They continue their quests for justice, in spite of vast personal risks & losses (Roger Schuler recently lost his home, reportedly due to the corruption. He was put in jail, for an extended period of time, after he pointed out Governor Riley's political son, arguing against abortion, had a girlfriend obtain an abortion). You can see more of Roger Schuler's massive evidences at his Legal Schnauzer Blog (here).

HAT TIP to local Alabama Journalist Bob Martin

According to Andrew Kreig -

Longtime Alabama political writer Bob Martin, now editor of the Alabama's Montgomery Independent, is one of relatively few mainstream Alabama journalists to dig into these matters in recent years.


THANK YOU - Bob Martin - we certainly need more like you!

Please keep up the good words, Jill Simpson, Roger Schuler (and his dedicated stand by wife) and Andrew Kreig! Your dedication and sacrifices for the common good earns = one of my rare - 3 Smilely Awards.


WHO??? - Wants Gov. Perry to go Down?: WaPo Details Major Corruption Todd Willingham Case!

As for me, I'm less concerned whether its the Bush's, Romney and/or other powers that be, behind the efforts to bring down Governor Rick Perry. The issue is that he goes down; which is a good thing. As the Washington Post points out (seconded by the Los Angeles Times linking to WaPo's article); there's much splain'n to do in the Cameron Todd Willingham case.

Here's the Los Angeles Times OPINION
"Opinion Cameron Todd Willingham's ghost won't stop haunting Rick Perry"

NOTE: L.A. Times story is dated August 6; and it links to WaPo's story of August 3 - titled;

"Fresh Doubts Over a Texas Execution"

I've just, an hour ago, finished another thread, in GD, about Governor Perry Corruption in Willingham case titled;
"Proof Governor Perry Corruption/Cover Ups: Cameron Todd Willingham Debacle"

WaPo Details Prosecution Suborn of Perjury of Informant, to Nail Willingham

Prosecutor Jackson worked diligently with jailhouse informant Webb - as the WaPo article details new letter evidences;

“Mr. Pierce and I visit on a regular basis concerning your problems,” Jackson wrote to Webb in August 2000, eight years after the trial, when his former witness was threatening to recant. (Jackson misspelled the rancher’s last name.) “We worked for a long time on a number of different levels, including the Governor’s Office, to get you released early in the robbery case. . . . Please understand that I am not indifferent or insensitive to your difficulties.”


HOWEVER - during the trial, the following exchange between Prosecutor Jackson and informant Webb transpires;

Jackson emphasized that Webb was testifying at great personal risk. “My life has been threatened as well as my family’s life,” Webb said on the stand. “And if I make it to the penitentiary, then I’m going to be in deep trouble.”

Jackson concluded Webb’s direct testimony by asking,

“Johnny, have I ever promised you anything in return for your testimony in this case?”

“No, sir,” Webb replied. “You haven’t.”

“As a matter of fact, I told you there is nothing I can do for you,” Jackson said.

“You said there was nothing no one can do for me,” Webb said.


That's suborn of Perjury; which Governor Perry helped bury by rigging the investigating Commission!

Though the former wife (Stacy) of Cameron Todd Willingham - actually witnessed the execution and (apparently) came to believe Cameron was guilty; there's now a green light for her and Cameron's family to sue for Prosecutorial misconduct.

The most heinous kind - resulting in the death of victimized innocent!


There's no question that Governor Perry needs to go down;

------------------------------ The real question is; who's actually driving these stories & Perry's demise?

[center]N'est-ce pas![/center]

Proof Gov Perry Corruption/Cover Ups Occur: See Cameron Todd Willingham Execution Debacle

Cameron Todd Willingham's 3 young children were killed by a fire; which his local town and a wacko forensic expert stated was arson. Even though there were no documentation of motive - because Willingham had prior arrests for petty crimes - he was labeled a sociopath, homicidal murderer. Governor Perry made sure Cameron was executed and will engage in corruption to cover up the prosecution/ execution blunders of the state.

Governor Perry's hubris, is to be his downfall. Though there are many arguments throughout the web realm, on the the merits of prosecuting Governor Perry for abuse of power; there can be no debate that he hasn't done such heretofore. In the Cameron Todd Willingham case - Gov. Perry sanctioned the execution - in spite of exonerating evidence substantial.

Then, Governor Perry lied publicly - and he also "rigged" the Commission - to nix the report!

A Wikipedia discussion (here), seemingly biased toward giving Gov. Perry the benefit of the doubt; still provides the following candid reflection that;
The Texas Forensic Science Commission was scheduled to discuss the report by Beyler at a meeting on October 2, 2009, but two days before the meeting Texas Governor Rick Perry replaced the chair of the commission and two other members.

The new chair canceled the meeting – sparking accusations that Perry was interfering with the investigation and using it for his own political advantage

Here's a video of Governor Perry justifying the execution; and his lying to prove his point.
(Note: at 45 seconds into the video, Governor Perry's testimonial on what the wife said).



Murder/Execution by Junk Forensic Science - of Cameron Todd Willingham


A full length story documents, very well, the heart wrenching affairs of the Willingham saga. One investigative journalist, who began to research the case (actually interview CTW in prison); wound up paralyzed by an auto accident and credits Cameron for giving her the strength to make it through the ordeal.

I still weep, for the man, his children and a system of justice perversely killing for blood lust sake. Please take the time to read the New Yorker lengthy article that details the fire, deaths, arrest, conviction, false testimony, fake forensic science and corrupt cover up/rigging of the system (by Governor Perry).

As the video above details, Governor Perry claims that the wife stated Cameron confessed;
but here's what the New Yorker reported on the interview of Stacy (Willingham's wife).

Willingham had often not treated me [wife Stacy] well, she recalled, and after his incarceration she had left him for a man who did. But she [Stacy] didn’t think that her former husband should be on death row.

“I don’t think he did it,” she said, crying


Governor Perry has, long ago, needed to go down;
this prosecution is just a Capone-Tax Evasion way of getting the job done right!


11th Circuit Says - Prominent Attorney And Judge Acted Improperly, Reverses Bankruptcy Sale

Source: Daily Business Review

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit has reversed a bankruptcy sale, finding both U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Raymond Ray and prominent Fort Lauderdale bankruptcy attorney Chad Pugatch acted improperly.

The unanimous unsigned opinion Friday returned the case to of ordered a lower court to reverse an entire bankruptcy of a Deerfield Beach-based Global Energies LLC to bankruptcy court.

The panel said Pugatch of Rice Pugatch Robinson & Schiller knowingly provided false testimony in a deposition.

Lawyers involved in the case said emails provided by former Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler attorney Steven Lippman were crucial in reversing the case.

Read more: http://www.dailybusinessreview.com/id=1202667122155/11th-Circuit-Says-This-Prominent-Attorney-And-Judge-Acted-Improperly-Reverses-Bankruptcy-Sale-#

Rothstein, Vennes, Stanford, Tom Petters, Lancelot/ SkyBell, Palm Beach Links Capital, Marc Dreier and Okun 1031 Tax Group frauds - are all documented frauds, resulting in convictions; but most people (and main stream media) are totally obtuse to the fact that they are - actually - LINKED!

Senator Cornyn, in statements published by the Blog of Legal Times in an article titled "The Owe Us", stipulates that venality in the federal bankruptcy system is permitting people to chose a venue (assure a particular verdict). The Senator references issues raised by UCLA Law Professor Lynn LoPucki on "Courting Failure" How Competition for Large Bankruptcy Cases is Corrupting the Courts.

It is corruption by Romney, Bain Capital & Goldman Sachs, of the U.S. Courts;
which led to my suing them for Racketeering in case "Haas v Romney".

The article (and attention to it) Especially being front paged - denotes a true SAD state of affairs

Starbucks New ANTI-Homeless Person Policy

As if I don't have enough battles in my life already, having sued Mitt Romney for Racketeering: now I'm finding myself running out of places to go online with Starbucks new policy against "you people' (referring to my homeless status).

For nearly 2 years now, I go to one of 3 places on a daily basis. Panera, Starbucks and the Law Library. My job/career - that doesn't pay anything (yet) - is to bring down Mitt for his organized criminal efforts in " target="_blank">"Bust Outs" / "Bankruptcy Rings" public and private companies for Bain Capital, Sankaty & Solamere Capital gains.

Then, the Starbucks I attend very frequently and purchase multiple items daily, gets a new manager. From the very beginning the man's hostility to me is readily apparent. When mistakes are made of customer orders, the workers (whom are all very friendly), give out the mistakes. When one worker said "Laser, you want this"?; the new manager snatched it out of his hand and said "You give that to one of 'THEM' and we'll get flodded with street people".

How he happens to know that I'm homeless, is not by my appearance; but that security contacted them about my sleeping in a friends car - waiting for Starbucks to open at 5 a.m.; and the local storage company who is also a customer, has evicted me because we were in after 10 p.m. for more than 1 hour.

This store location's District Manager came in one day, thinking she would be cute, having a brand new employee coming over to me and telling me I had to buy something every 1/2 hour. She was a little miffed when I pointed out my receipt that was time stamped only 12 minutes prior.

Starbucks corporate office customer service center apologized and even credited my GOLD Card account with $10

Then, the manager, on another day (where we actually spent $36 and I also collected my freebie {12 bonus star frequent buyer} sandwich), comes up and says

"I'm here to talk to you about the item we discussed earlier. I know you spoke to customer service and I don't care, my manager backs me up on this. You people don't spend enough money and I'm aware you bought multiple items today; but that's not enough. Here's my District Manager's card, who supports me in this decision.

You are to leave quickly and never come back, or I'll have security remove you from premises".


Here's a funny thing. The guy Romney' is backing for Governor of California, (Neel Kashkari - a former Goldman Sachs guy who worked for Paulson), just did a stint with homeless people in Fresno that received some quirky press (here).

Wonder if he would have been evicted from Starbucks?

Starbucks has been sued for discrimination before. There's a well known case where they made fun out of handicap people (Here). There's another case where employees sued because managers were keeping their tips and a jobless man with one arm in San Diego who also sued for discrimination in seeking a job at Starbucks (here).

I'm homeless by choice. My family has lost everything and people are dead in my case. So those who offer me a place to stay, including my brother and other dear sweet heart persons, must first consider the risks of my case inherent. As we get closer to the date of going to trial (9th Cir. briefings start in October 2014), I have to worry about putting people in harms way. So I choose to be a vagabond, for safety's sake. This also makes me the less than favorable candidate of suing for the sake of homeless discrimination. But I am going to consider it.

If I do decide to sue Starbucks, it will be to stop them from doing such to others. I have to be convinced its not just Romney's gang using undue power and influence. Starbucks would have a hard time with the case because of the fact that I have an email from theirCorporate office that specifically stipulates they don't have a table rent policy.

PRESS Release: Laser Haas Warns Challenges USAG Holder's Remarks "No One's Too Big to Jail"

Some of you are aware that I sued Mitt Romney & his cohorts for Racketeering on October 18, 2013. You can see posted stories throughout the web (here) (here) and (here). Additionally, some of you may have paid attention to the fact that U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder has stated that "No one is too big to jail".

Would like to show you the video from the News websites; but they've redacted it already!
(This is where its located at - upon the DOJ's website - (here))

United States Attorney General Eric Holder's actual words

You can read about the remarks and reporting of it by Rachael Maddow (here), Washington Post (here) and then there's USA Today (here) that has this particular quote from USAG Eric Holder - that;

"Let me be very, very, very clear," Holder said in a subsequent congressional hearing."Banks are not too big to jail. If we find a bank or a financial institution that has done something wrong, if we can prove it beyond a reasonable doubt, those cases will be brought."

USA Today continues to remark therein that -

On May 5, Holder released a video in which he declared that the view that some banks are "too big to jail" is "mistaken." The caption below the Department of Justice (DOJ) video reads:
"He intends to reaffirm that principle in the weeks ahead."



Today, yours truly sent a fax-letter to USAG Eric Holder, stating the current dire situation in my quest(s) for justice; and the fact that I'm intending to hold him to his words. Even if I have to sue him to do so. This is my Press Release on the item (here). And here's what it says;

Laser Haas Cautions USAG Holder to Affirm “No One’s Too Big to Jail”

By Collateral Logistic’s Inc., Owner
CEO Steven (“Laser”) Haas (laser@petters-fraud.com )
August 7, 2014

Washington, D.C. – Steven (“Laser”) Haas, who owns CLI and sued Mitt Romney on October 18, 2013 for Racketeering (Civil) in Los Angeles Federal Court 2:13-cv-7738 has faxed and is causing to be sent, a letter to U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder about the insincere May 2015 declaration of Eric Holder’s claim “No One’s Too Big to Jail”.

Nature of Proceedings includes Federal Corruption of the DOJ

For 14 years, Haas has been seeking justice in the case of The Learning Company, Kay Bee, Stage Stores and eToys. When repeated efforts resulted in what Laser claims is willful blindness by the Department of Justice (due {in part} to major conflicts of interest of Department of Justice personnel).

Whereas Department of Justice federal archives now document that Colm Connolly (former DE U.S. Attorney) was a partner of the MNAT law firm from 1999 to August 2001 (the specific period of time Mitt Romney claims to be “retroactively” retired from). Additionally, Marty Lackner was involved in the Tom Petters Ponzi; but (reportedly) committed suicide before being indicted. Marty was the brother of J. Lackner who is a Minnesota Assistant U.S. Attorney and former head of the Criminal Division.

Upon information of federal venality being sent to the Los Angeles Public Corruption Task Force; it was subsequently Shut Down and (reportedly) career federal personnel were threatened to keep their mouths shut. (See “Shake-up roils federal prosecutors”)

Haas then sued Mitt Romney, Bain Capital and Goldman Sachs and cohorts, on October 18, 2013 for racketeering crimes that are (reportedly) confessed (in part) – already. He can do this because Congress and the U.S. Supreme Ct. affirm the fact that an ordinary citizen can become a “Private Attorney General” to fill in the “Prosecutorial Gaps”.

Laser’s Fax/letter to US Attorney General Eric Holder

Though the “Haas v Romney” case is now before the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals (case #14-55784) and Laser feels confident that the panel review will rule in his favor, the DE Bankruptcy Court is rushing to shut down the eToys bankruptcy case (01-706) and Haas claim the alleged offenders are blatantly absconding with the monies they are stealing.

Laser said this would amount to irreversible harm to the eToys shareholders whose stock would be destroyed and claims have been damaged by Goldman Sachs (in essence) suing itself in New York Supreme Court and settling the billion dollar fraud for only $7 million (that the purported bad faith parties like Paul Traub have paid each other). Hence, Haas has demanded immediate action from USAG Holder; or he’s going to sue USAG Holder!


FAX LETTER to United States Attorney General Eric Holder

This is the link to the actual Fax-letter sent (here) and here's the actual wording;

August 7, 2014

Via Facsimile

Eric Holder
United States Attorney General
U.S. Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20530

Dear U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder:

Time and again, to no avail, I’ve beseeched your office and sub units to address the troubling matters of organized criminal activities and the “busting out”/ “Bankruptcy Rings” who are looting major companies of America’s interstate commerce.

In our eToys case, confessions to lying under oath at least 33 times are archived. Congressional mandates for offending parties of MNAT & Paul Traub’s law firms, along with Barry Gold, to be removed are ignored (disqualification per Section 327(a) has been ubiquitously affirmed by In re Middleton Arms (6th Cir 1994)). Your Department of Justice staff continue to treat the offenders as if they’re Above the Law. Matt Taibbi (admittedly being prodded by me) addressed 2 of the cases of Stage Stores and Kay Bee Toys. MNAT represents Kay Bee of the $83 million that Michael Glazer paid Bain Capital; and Paul Traub asked to be Michael Glazer/Bain’s prosecutor.

DOJ attorney Mark Kenney had evidences of fraud stricken from Kay Bee’s case record!

It wasn’t until 2007 that we learned that the United States Attorney in Delaware (Colm Connolly) was a former partner of the MNAT law firm (that represents both Bain Capital and Goldman Sachs). When we then reported this obvious conflict to the Los Angeles Public Corruption Task Force, career federal agents were (reportedly) threatened and the corruption unit was Shut Down! (See “Shake-up roils federal prosecutors”).

Though some of these events have transpired prior to your arrival, the continuous sophisticated, material adverse harms proceed without remorse or relent currently. In the same manner the parties perverted the Delaware bankruptcy cases of FAO Schwartz, Kay Bee and eToys; MNAT surreptitiously hand-pick its cohort in crime (Paul Traub’s firm) to prosecute Goldman Sachs in the New York Supreme Court case 601805/2002. This case has now closed with the bandits handing the millions of dollars remaining to one another – celebrating their criminal enterprising success!

Your more recent statement in May 2014 that you “intend to reaffirm the principle that no individual or entity that does harm to our economy is ever above the law” did then conclude with the remarks “There is no such thing as ‘too big to jail’”;

Concerning the issues Romney, Bain Cap. & Goldman Sachs – your promise fails!

Page 2

Wherefore, I’m compelled to put your office on notice that willful blindness, be it issues of ineptitude or arbitrary/capricious efforts, Civil Right violations by “Color of Law”; they are violating the sacrosanct mandates of justice inexplicably and intolerably.

Robert Alber, an eToys shareholder, had to shoot/kill career criminal Michael Sesseyoff, in Kingman, Arizona, in 2010 (after his life was threatened – when he turned down a bribe to let the RICO gang get away with it all). Larry Reynolds laundered $12 Billion, in Vegas, while being under various federal investigations; and also inside the Witness Protect Program. As alarming as these issues are, the fact that Marty Lackner was involved in the Tom Petters Ponzi and he was the brother of J. Lackner, is even more disturbing.

J. Lackner was the Minnesota Assistant U.S. Attorney former head of the Crime Division!

Now I’m warned that they will never let these cases go to trial and told I should know that – if John (Jack) Wheeler isn’t safe; then no one is. Though that may be true and the reality is that yours truly is insignificant no one will likely miss. The issue germane is the manifest injustice laying waste to integrity of judicial & federal process!

Please reaffirm your promise as valid; and take the silver platter of proof I’m providing?

Otherwise, if you don’t do the job – immediately, by first acknowledging receipt of this faxed letter and that you’ve engaged adequate personnel to address these serious, nationally significant, troubling matters of racketeering and federal corruption;

then, my only other choice, is to seek to have the courts ORDER you to do so!

Our nation was deprived of a legitimate election process when Mitt Romney stole the Republican nomination (as admitted in his film) and lied upon his Federal Election Campaign OGE 278 Finance Form. His need for “retroactivity” coincides to racketeering of The Learning Company, Stage Stores, Kay Bee & eToys. Colm Connolly was an MNAT partner from 1999 to August 2001; then Connolly became the U.S. Attorney in Delaware. He buried the cases investigations and /or prosecution for seven years.

These are facts, true and matters that I’ve testified to, many times before, and do affirm Under Penalty of Perjury before you here – today. Thus the gravity of my remarks are established. All that remains is – whether or not – you care about the gravamen. Are parties such as Mitt Romney, Bain Capital & Goldman Sachs – too big to jail?

Sincerely yours,

/s/ Laser S. Haas (Victim of Racketeering)

Legal Question: If there's no SOL on Murder - is there any SOL and civil remedies thereof?

Can a case begin today;
by the family side scorned - yet denied justice for decades?

Master List of Federal Cases Romney's RICO is Allegedly Connected to.

Mitt Romney
= Bain Capital and Stage Stores and Sankaty.

Bain Capital = Clear Channel, Kay Bee, Toys R Us, Fingerhut, The Learning Company, eToys

Clear Channel = Red McCombs = Blackwater (quaintly renamed Academi)

Working for Romney at Stage Stores was

Jack Bush (Dallas, TX) who was co-director with Michael Glazer.

Michael Glazer is now CEO of Stage Stores and (was) CEO of Kay Bee Toys until (at least) end of 2005

Barry Gold was the director's Assistant at Stage Stores.

Stage Stores Bankruptcy was also Co-Debtor with Liquidity Solutions

Traub Bonacquist & Fox (TBF) law firm was owned by Paul Traub;
and Barry Gold was partners with Paul Traub (such as in Asset Disposition Advisors {ADA}).

Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnel (MNAT) law firm
- handled the merger of Romney's "The Learning Company" with Mattel.
and (at that time) the merger was in Delaware - when Colm Connolly was Assistant United States Attorney.

Colm Connolly clerked for 3rd Circuit Justice Walter K. Stapleton;
and Judge WKS was an MNAT law firm partner.

In 1999 - Colm Connolly left the Dept of Justice and became a MNAT partner.

Romney's The Learning Company Merger with Mattel by MNAT Losses $3 Billion

NO Investigation and/or prosecution of "The Learning Company" merger $3 Billion loss to Mattel Investors

(PLease Take NOTE: How all the links are losing their connections - another crooked way to be)

Romney committed PERJURY on his Federal Election Form

Mitt lied (well documented) on his federal election Campaign Finance OGE 278 Form; stating he had nothing to do with Bain Capital in any way after February 11, 1999. He now claims to have "retroactively" retired from Bain Capital in August 2001 - back to February 11, 1999.

Specific Frauds of Romney's "Retroactive" Period of Time (Feb 1999 to August 2001)

The Learning Co. fraud = 1999
Stage Stores Bankruptcy Fraud 2000 (where Glazer, Barry Gold and Paul Traub worked for Stage Stores)
Kay Bee Toys is acquired by Bain Capital in 2000 - then
MNAT lies to become eToys counsel, Traub lies to become eToys creditors counsel;
and they put in Barry Gold (Traub's partner in ADA) as CEO of the bankrupt eToys.

eToys Bankruptcy Fraud.

It is announced Bain/Kay Bee are acquiring eToys for $5.4 million (See NY Times article history of eToys - here)

But the Parent Company, which is considering selling some or all of its businesses, was not simply a victim of the recession. The company’s history of troubles is deeper than the grandest of toy chests. EToys filed for bankruptcy protection in 2001 and its assets were bought by KB Toys, one of the nation’s biggest toy retailers, for more than $5 million. KB Toys, which filed for bankruptcy in 2004, filed again this month. It has already begun going-out-of-business sales.


Problem with all of this is - yours truly is named as Liquidation Consultant of eToys;
and my CLI company sold eToys to Bain/Kay Bee for tens of millions.

Reducing prices in a rigged "Bankruptcy Ring" sale of eToys to Bain/Kay Bee - is Bankruptcy Fraud;
and is also a part of the "predicate acts" of RICO under Title 18 United States Code 1961.

But you'll never see anything about that (unless we can force a trial to transpire);
because the MNAT partner - Colm Connolly - became the United States Attorney

on August 2, 2001 (and has buried the investigation and/or prosecutions from occurring).

Public Corruption Task Force was SHUT DOWN;

and career federal prosecutors were threatened to keep their mouths shut - Or Else!

See Los Angeles Times article "Shake-up roils federal prosecutors"

Nixon Signed Racketeering Prosecutions Require Proof of Predicate Acts

Some find it quaint that President Nixon is the one who signed RICO into Law.

As noted at Wikipedia (here) - it specifically states that;

RICO was enacted by section 901(a) of the Organized Crime Control Act of 1970 (Pub.L. 91–452, 84 Stat. 922, enacted October 15, 1970). RICO is codified as Chapter 96 of Title 18 of the United States Code, 18 U.S.C. § 1961–1968. Under the close supervision of Senator John Little McClellan, the Chairman of the Committee for which he worked, G. Robert Blakey drafted the "RICO Act," Title IX of the Organized Crime Control Act of 1970, signed into law by Richard M. Nixon. While its original use in the 1970s was to prosecute the Mafia as well as others who were actively engaged in organized crime, its later application has been more widespread.


What yours truly is doing - is "more widespread" application of RICO vs Romney & Gang.


PREDICATE Acts of RICO under United States Code Title 18 Section 1961

Basically, any Law that carries more than 1 year of prison time - either State and/or Federal - is considered a crime under RICO. That being said, Congress took the additional step of specifically naming "Predicate Acts" of RICO under 18 U.S.C. $ 1961 - that Cornell School of Law states as follows (upon its online website) - that;

(1) “racketeering activity” means (A) any act or threat involving murder, kidnapping, gambling, arson, robbery, bribery, extortion, dealing in obscene matter, or dealing in a controlled substance or listed chemical (as defined in section 102 of the Controlled Substances Act), which is chargeable under State law and punishable by imprisonment for more than one year; (B) any act which is indictable under any of the following provisions of title 18, United States Code: Section 201 (relating to bribery), section 224 (relating to sports bribery), sections 471, 472, and 473 (relating to counterfeiting), section 659 (relating to theft from interstate shipment) if the act indictable under section 659 is felonious, section 664 (relating to embezzlement from pension and welfare funds), sections 891–894 (relating to extortionate credit transactions), section 1028 (relating to fraud and related activity in connection with identification documents), section 1029 (relating to fraud and related activity in connection with access devices), section 1084 (relating to the transmission of gambling information), section 1341 (relating to mail fraud), section 1343 (relating to wire fraud), section 1344 (relating to financial institution fraud), section 1351 (relating to fraud in foreign labor contracting), section 1425 (relating to the procurement of citizenship or nationalization unlawfully), section 1426 (relating to the reproduction of naturalization or citizenship papers), section 1427 (relating to the sale of naturalization or citizenship papers), sections 1461–1465 (relating to obscene matter), section 1503 (relating to obstruction of justice), section 1510 (relating to obstruction of criminal investigations), section 1511 (relating to the obstruction of State or local law enforcement), section 1512 (relating to tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant), section 1513 (relating to retaliating against a witness, victim, or an informant), section 1542 (relating to false statement in application and use of passport), section 1543 (relating to forgery or false use of passport), section 1544 (relating to misuse of passport), section 1546 (relating to fraud and misuse of visas, permits, and other documents), sections 1581–1592 (relating to peonage, slavery, and trafficking in persons)., [1] section 1951 (relating to interference with commerce, robbery, or extortion), section 1952 (relating to racketeering), section 1953 (relating to interstate transportation of wagering paraphernalia), section 1954 (relating to unlawful welfare fund payments), section 1955 (relating to the prohibition of illegal gambling businesses), section 1956 (relating to the laundering of monetary instruments), section 1957 (relating to engaging in monetary transactions in property derived from specified unlawful activity), section 1958 (relating to use of interstate commerce facilities in the commission of murder-for-hire), section 1960 (relating to illegal money transmitters), sections 2251, 2251A, 2252, and 2260 (relating to sexual exploitation of children), sections 2312 and 2313 (relating to interstate transportation of stolen motor vehicles), sections 2314 and 2315 (relating to interstate transportation of stolen property), section 2318 (relating to trafficking in counterfeit labels for phonorecords, computer programs or computer program documentation or packaging and copies of motion pictures or other audiovisual works), section 2319 (relating to criminal infringement of a copyright), section 2319A (relating to unauthorized fixation of and trafficking in sound recordings and music videos of live musical performances), section 2320 (relating to trafficking in goods or services bearing counterfeit marks), section 2321 (relating to trafficking in certain motor vehicles or motor vehicle parts), sections 2341–2346 (relating to trafficking in contraband cigarettes), sections 2421–24 (relating to white slave traffic), sections 175–178 (relating to biological weapons), sections 229–229F (relating to chemical weapons), section 831 (relating to nuclear materials), (C) any act which is indictable under title 29, United States Code, section 186 (dealing with restrictions on payments and loans to labor organizations) or section 501 (c) (relating to embezzlement from union funds), (D) any offense involving fraud connected with a case under title 11 (except a case under section 157 of this title), fraud in the sale of securities, or the felonious manufacture, importation, receiving, concealment, buying, selling, or otherwise dealing in a controlled substance or listed chemical (as defined in section 102 of the Controlled Substances Act), punishable under any law of the United States, (E) any act which is indictable under the Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act, (F) any act which is indictable under the Immigration and Nationality Act, section 274 (relating to bringing in and harboring certain aliens), section 277 (relating to aiding or assisting certain aliens to enter the United States), or section 278 (relating to importation of alien for immoral purpose) if the act indictable under such section of such Act was committed for the purpose of financial gain, or (G) any act that is indictable under any provision listed in section 2332b (g)(5)(B);


As one can clearly see, there are many criminal statutes that Congress has already stipulated are RICO "predicate acts".

What I'm going to provide you of - in my next posting - are the list of "predicate acts" of Romney's RICO Gang.
Go to Page: « Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next »