HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » laserhaas » Journal
Page: « Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next »


Profile Information

Name: Laser Haas
Gender: Do not display
Hometown: Anywhere USA
Home country: United States
Current location: NOMADIC
Member since: Mon Apr 21, 2008, 01:12 PM
Number of posts: 7,805

About Me

Love BB, Laser Tag, Poker (Tournaments only). Work with Occupy camps. Willing to help you in your fight for justice (let's discuss it).

Journal Archives

NY Times Burying Story of Goldman Sachs Crimes; Taibbi's Forgotten Vexing of Sorkin

You can Google/Bing about the Goldman Sachs Tapes and find articles by ProPublica.org, Reuters, NY Post, US Today; and on and on and on. However, add in the keywords New York Times and/or DealB%k and see if you come up with anything (much less an "Ah ha, we got'cha).

As it turns out, everyone else is now learning what this activist has known for more than a decade. Goldman Sachs is considered Above the Law; because our federal agents/agencies won't dare touch a hair on their nefarious head. An issue now made clear by the many discussions (and the pic below by the DailyBail.com); Goldman Sachs runs our federal agencies (right into the proverbial corruption grounds).

It doesn't matter how much evidence one has, when it is against political/financial powerhouses; unless those bad faith acts are reported by someone else significantly more important than the whistleblower (such as the New York Times, Wall Street Journal). In the recent reporting of Goldman Sachs tapes, it was first detailed by a Propublica.org; which has credibility due to the fact that its head guy was the former editor of the Wall Street Journal .

It is a fact that, if no one reported on Snowden and/or Assange; now one else would care.

But various outlets reported on such; and BOOM - changed happened!

I'm just sayin......

Rolling Stone's Matt Taibbi Scolds NYT DealB%k for ties to Goldman Sachs

Long before his departure from Rolling Stone, Matt Taibbi lambasted NY Times DealB%k's Andrew Ross Sorkin (key guy at NYT DealB%k) for taking money from the likes of Goldman Sachs . Now, it would seem, the NYT is continuing its protection of Goldman Sachs (though I did get some hint of relief from an OpEd by Joe Nocera in March 2013 "Rigging the I.P.O. Game".

As Taibbi stated in his June 2011 opine "Andrew Ross Sorkin gives Goldman Sachs a rubdown" -

Taibbi stipulated that;

Now I’m bummed to see that Sorkin has written an elaborate defense of Goldman in the New York Times "Dealbook" section, arguing among other things that Lloyd Blankfein probably did not commit perjury and that the bank did not have a huge directional bet against mortgages in 2007. As evidence, Sorkin cites unsubstantiated Goldman documents and Goldman sources who claim, among other things, that the bank had $5 billion worth of long bets on MBS "in other parts of the company," offsetting the now-notorious "Big Short."

The Sorkin piece reads like it was written by the bank's marketing department, which may not be an accident. In November of last year, the New York Times announced that "Dealbook" was entering into a sponsorship agreement with a variety of companies, including ... Goldman, Sachs. This is from that announcement last year:

DealBook will also feature news and insights on deal-related topics from Business Day's well-known roster of leading business reporters, which includes recent hires in addition to a veteran stable of Wall Street's most highly-regarded journalists.

Barclays Capital, Goldman Sachs, Sotheby's and Tata Consultancy Services are charter advertisers for the relaunch of DealBook.

This thing of a publication taking money from a (major) target of whom it would report upon; is an issue of "Conflict of Interest". Clear as the sky is blue Andrew Ross Sorkin exacerbated his "conflicted" position, by defending Goldman Sachs; without pointing out the fact that DealB%k is beholden to Goldman Sachs's financial support.

The NY Times continues to protect Goldman Sachs & its Wall Street cronies to this very day!


GOLDMAN SACHS eToys Fraud Schemes

Your truly sued Romney, Bain Capital and Goldman Sachs on October 18, 2013 - for Racketeering. For those of you who don't know (and most likely misunderstand), Congress created the RICO Act of 1970 (sardonically signed into Law by Nixon), to address the issues of "Prosecutorial Gaps". Much like the way Capone couldn't be brought down for his organized crimes, because no one in Illinois would touch him (City, State and/or Federal) and dear ole Al was brought down for tax evasion by an outsider; Congress designed the RICO Act to fill in the "Prosecutorial Gaps" - by making ordinary citizens into "Private Attorney Generals". (See U.S. Supreme Court Sedima v Imrex - HERE).

In 1999, Goldman Sachs took eToys.com public, where the stock went to $85; but eToys.com only received less than $20. This is now known as a "Spinning" pump-n-dump stock scheme and was reported on (much belatedly) by Joe Nocera's New York Times OpEd of March 2013, in his article "Rigging the I.P.O. Game".

As is par for the course, I reached out to Joe Nocera (who has his direct email upon his own Blog); but there was never any answer. I wanted to point out to him the more serious crimes that he missed. How the law firm of MNAT.com lied under oath to become eToys bankruptcy Debtor's counsel and then destroyed eToys Books & Records. And/or how that crooked law firm hand picked a crony to prosecute Goldman Sachs in the New York Supreme Court case of eToys (renamed ebc1) v Goldman Sachs (case number 601805/2002).


Goldman Sachs arranges for a MNAT law firm partner to become U.S. Attorney

How Goldman Sachs has gotten away with rigging the eToys IPO, bankruptcy case and New York Supreme Court case (among other things like Petters Ponzi in MN & Fingerhut), is that Goldman Sachs knows how to even rig the Department of Justice.

If you look at the picture above, you will see Colm Connolly's face and MNAT. In the eToys bankruptcy case, we were able to compel MNAT to confess it lied about Goldman Sachs; but the judge in that case (illegally) permitted Goldman Sachs's law firm of MNAT to keep the keys to the vault it is fleecing.

Much didn't matter - in a weird sense; because - if the judge had referred the matter to the U.S. Attorney - she would have been referring it to Colm Connolly. As anyone can now see (thanks to some decent people in Washington D.C. permanently archiving his Resume); Colm Connolly was a partner of MNAT from 1999 to August 2001 (coincidentally the same exact period of time Mitt Romney claims to be "retroactively" retired from Bain Capital).

See Colm Connolly's Resume at the DOJ's Office of Legal Policy

It wasn't until 2007 that we learned of the corruption of the Delaware U.S. Attorney's office by Colm Connolly. I then reported it to the Public Corruption Task Force in Los Angeles (as that is where eToys was housed); but that issue too - became tainted by federal corruption refusing to prosecute.

I filed my complaint against the corruption on December 7, 2007;
and then in March 2008 - the Public Corruption Task Force was SHUT DOWN

and career federal agents were reportedly Threatened.
(see Los Angeles Times "Shake-up roils federal prosecutors"

Maybe now, after the report of Goldman Sachs controlling the Federal Reserve, we can get others to pay attention to the fact that Goldman Sachs is able to avoid federal revenue by any and all means possible. As anyone can see by my chart above; there's NO 6 degrees of separation between the bad faith parties. At the barest of minimums, I have to make the 9th Circuit aware of this recent evidence; which corroborates the fact there are "Prosecutorial Gaps" concerning Goldman Sachs.

And that is why I sued Romney, Bain Capital and Goldman Sachs for Racketeering!

As I was one of the sources for Matt Taibbi to look into Romney Stage Stores, Kay Bee and eToys issues, before he wrote the September 2012 Rolling Stone cover story "Greed and Debt"; I bombarded him with facts when he departed RS to start the new venture. He begged me to wait, as there's nothing he can do until he gets the new online magazine going.

If only he would fill in the gaps - NOW - of his Greed & Debt story; with the eToys questions that beg.

WOW! Will Senate and/or Conressional hearings occur?

Against the Republican, Al-Queda, very dark skinned, Tranny nominee

Because they will have to adapted (greatly) by 2052

I'm just sayin......

He He!

Equals Rights Amendment Never Ratified; due to Phylis Schlafly

One of the writers (Ann Werner) of the "Haas Sued Romney for RICO" story; has endeared herself to me. Ann Werner, who writes for the Samuel Ward online website Liberal's Unite; is about as pure as it gets to being a true Progressive. Just a week ago, Ann went to Washington D.C. for a women's rally - where her daughter (Kimberley A. Johnson) spoke.

It was then that I learned that the ERA was never ratified;
due to the efforts to "STOP the ERA" by Phyllis Schlafly.

As per Women's History website - here's why Schlafly wanted to halt ratification of the ERA.

Why “Stop ERA”? Phyllis Schlafly traveled across the U.S. throughout the 1970s calling for opposition to the ERA because it would lead to:

  1. Homosexual marriages

  2. Women in combat

  3. Taxpayer-funded abortions

  4. Unisex bathrooms

  5. Elimination of Social Security benefits for widows



Per Wikipedia - this is the history of Schlafly (still alive and active today) - stopping ratification of the ERA.

Schlafly became an outspoken opponent of the Equal Rights Amendment during the 1970s as the organizer of the "STOP ERA" campaign. STOP is an acronym for "Stop Taking Our Privileges." Schlafly argued that the ERA would take away gender specific privileges currently enjoyed by women, including "dependent wife" benefits under Social Security and the exemption from Selective Service registration.[27]

In 1972, when Schlafly began her efforts against the Equal Rights Amendment, it had already been ratified by 28 of the necessary 38 states. She organized a campaign to oppose further ratification. Five more states ratified ERA after Schlafly began her opposition campaign; however, five states rescinded their ratifications. The last state to ratify was Indiana, where then State Senator Wayne Townsend cast the tie-breaking vote for ratification in January 1977. Schlafly argued that "the ERA would lead to women being drafted by the military and to public unisex bathrooms."[28] She was opposed by groups such as, National Organization for Women (NOW) and the ERAmerica coalition.[29] To counter Schlafly's Stop ERA campaign, the Homemakers' Equal Rights Association was formed.[30]

The Equal Rights Amendment was narrowly defeated, having only achieved ratification in 35 of the 38 states needed (30, subtracting the five that rescinded ratification)

Please watch the video and learn how Phyllis Schlafly, a Republican activist, halted ratification of the ERA.


Everyone here knows they are this devious (especially the trolls among U.S.); but care not too much

because they believe it isn't "directly" affecting them.

Apathy & laxity serve nefariousness - Well!

I'm just sayin.......

Lawyers seek fees of about $195 mln for LBO collusion settlements

Source: Reuters

(Reuters) - Lawyers who persuaded seven private equity firms to pay $590.5 million to settle lawsuits accusing them of conspiring to depress the prices of corporate buyouts before the financial crisis are seeking fees of about $195 million for their work.

According to a court filing on Friday, the three law firms that led the nearly seven years of litigation are requesting fees equal to 33 percent of the settlement fund, plus as much as $15 million to cover litigation costs.

It accused private equity firms of conspiring to reduce competition, refrain from bidding on each other's buyouts and not trying to outbid each other after buyouts were announced.

The seven firms that settled were Bain Capital Partners LLC, Blackstone Group LP, Carlyle Group LP, a Goldman Sachs Group Inc affiliate, KKR & Co, Silver Lake Partners LP and TPG Capital

Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/09/26/lbocollusion-settlement-idUSL2N0RR28U20140926?feedType=RSS&feedName=mergersNews

Bain Capital and Goldman Sachs are going to get another settlement going;
if the federal courts will stop protecting them from prosecution!

Romney's Attorney Responds "Haas v Romney" Racketeering 9th Circuit Case

On October 18, 2013, yours truly sued Romney & cohorts for Racketeering (see Addicting Info story "Romney Slapped Racketeering". In the lawsuit it is alleged that Romney "retroactively" retired, due to organized crimes of "The Learning Company", Stage Stores, Kay Bee and eToys; and that yours truly turned down being a partner with Pitten's.

Though this alarming coincidence of Colm Connolly (pic above - on right hand side - with pyramid) being an MNAT partner visibly documents a good motive for Romney's "retroactive" retirement lies during the 2012 election; no main stream media (or even a Progressive one online) - appears willing to report the issues.

Meanwhile, yours truly also threatened Eric Holder's office;
but that now seems moot - as he is stepping down.

Many barked and bantered that this victim is a pee poor "pro se" attorney; and such is true. Even Abe Lincoln himself said those who represent themselves have a fool for a client. Be that as it may, due to the fact that Romney & his RICO gang have done so much wrong; this litigant is able to continue in the courts.

Except for that persistent pain in the butt issue of - Corruption!

A federal District Court judge has bowed down to Mitt Romney, after reading all the allegations; and said this plaintiff's case is frivolous. It is easy for people to buy into such obfuscating banter; because Romney ran for POTUS and yours truly, a homeless man, couldn't even make a run for lead janitor of City Hall.

It simply sucks being a victim of organized crimes by Mitt - the Pitts - Romney!

When the District Court judge utilized a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure to deny my poor man status; the Ninth Circuit Court of appeals agreed. An order was issued (here) on August 21, 2014 - that I had to come up with $505 within 21 days and "simultaneously" file a "Show Cause" Response as to why the entire case shouldn't be dismissed.

PLAINTIFF Laser Haas "Show Cause" Response

Here's the link to the Democratic Underground thread, concerning my "Show Cause" ordered response; which also contains various exhibits (for those of you who really do care to see the facts).



This is the link to the actual RESPONSE

Romney's 9th Circuit Reply via Attorney Ropes & Gray

Mitt Romney, with co-Defendants Michael Glazer and Bain Capital responded (here) to my "Show Cause" Response, on September 22, 2014. It's a very short brief and sweet - at least to me; because it actually helps make my case for me. Romney's counsel attempts to testify on some issues and I've objected to them. Outside of issues of timeliness, Mitt's counsel makes the following statement that is greatly germane;

Second, the four-year statute of limitations applicable to civil RICO claims bars Appellant’s claims against Appellees.

I ask you the simple question....

Can a person who has benefited from unjust enrichment, arrange for his lawyer to become U.S. Attorney;
and then claim there's a 4 year statute of limitations on the crimes that same attorney refused to prosecute?

I'm just sayin.......

BofA Poohs on CountryWide WhistleBlower; Making Sure He Doesn't Get a Dime of $3.8 Award.

Government Accountability Project (GAP) website has a 3 part series on CountryWide whistle-blower Winston; and how he was ostracized, retaliated upon - won a jury verdict of $3.8 million (which he will probably never see).

You can see my original DU thread on this, from last week - (here). It is titled "Whistleblower who 'Conquered' Countrywide, Being Retaliated Upon". In it, I point out the pains of being a whistleblower and corporation ostracizing; though SALON's David Dayen called Mr. Winston "Wall Streets Greatest Enemy".

The truth is - It ain't easy to take down big sleazies - and when you do; pooh pooh on you!

Whistleblower Winston Awarded $3.8 million that BofA is making sure he will never see
As Michael Winston details in his 2nd part, of the GAP Whistleblower.org 3 part series titled "Jury Decision"; he was awarded $3.8 million dollars by the jury. Unfortunately, the case didn't end there. As pointed out in the New York Times article "Countrywide Ex Exec Still Waiting on $3.8 million award", Countrywide lied during the case, punished/intimidated witnesses and did perjury about where other witnesses were.

As Mr. Winston puts it;

In early 2011, 12 jurors listened and watched for nearly one month, hearing about and seeing proof of more than 80 adverse employment actions taken against me by Countrywide over a two-year period, starting immediately after my alert to Cal-OSHA about dangerous conditions of a "sick building and ratcheting up again when I refused to lie on CFC’s behalf to Moody’s Investor Service." The jury heard and saw proof that dozens of people complained of difficulty breathing, headache and stomachache, a metallic taste in their mouths and dizziness. Many sought medical attention for these sudden conditions. The jury also saw proof that I had sought mitigation from every level internally at Countrywide before contacting OSHA. It was only when I saw proof of their intent to cover-up – not mitigate – the environmental hazards that I took action. Many witnesses testified that my team and I were retaliated against. The jury heard this. Such retaliation was blatant, relentless and done in plain sight.

What I observed and felt during the trial was absolutely shocking. In my opinion, the judge and jury were subjected to a palpable and unending litany of lies, document alterations and total fabrication of documents. The manipulation of the facts was extreme, blatant and unrelenting. The number of misrepresentations strung together consecutively was startling.

These officers also, in my opinion, committed witness tampering by offering a job to a witness – after they saw her name on our witness list – to entice her not to testify. She was fired only weeks after offering what turned out to be supportive testimony for me. BofA defendants and their lawyers claimed that several other witnesses no longer worked for the company, but it was later proven they all did. Lastly, they falsely asserted that documents or parts of documents were mine. I had never seen them, let alone written them.


STUNNING REVERSAL - Appeals Court Overturns Jury Decision

In the final (3rd part) of the GAP story series titled "Stunning Reversal", whistleblower Michael Winston points out that the Appellate Court reversed the award and stated that there was no proper evidence against BofA; and that BofA wasn't culpable for Countrywides bad faith.

As corroboration of arrant logic by the Circuit Court, Mr. Winston actually has attorneys at law coming out in his favor; who are publicly stating the Appellate Court is acting contrary to law.

While such support is commendable; the fact of the matter is - it doesn't make a difference;
now Mr. Winston must appeal the Appellate Court's ruling.

Good luck with that!


Many Troubling Matters

Chances are most of you have no idea that one of the greatest writers and influence persons of our country (Thomas Paine) actually died a pauper and had less than a dozen people attend his funeral. The truth is the world cares little for the valiant nobles who are thrust by happenstance into troubling matters surreal. Apparently, most don't really give a dang what you lose in your battle against tyranny, cronyism and corruption; because gas is always threatening to go to $10 a gallon and people can't get a guarantee for $10 an hour (when it takes 2 gallons a day to go to work and back).

It sucks being a whistleblower/ fighter for justice - and it ALWAYS will be that way.

Whether or not you believe in g0d(s) and/or ying-yang, good v ebol; the fact of the matter is, glory comes from courage, strife and valiant efforts that are extraordinarily rare. We are endeared, for a few moments, by movie screen heroes and/or writers who point out David v Goliath struggles that most people would never even think to deal with.

As for me, I'm living the battles same as Mr. Winston; though doing so by different dynamics. In taking on Romney, Bain Cap and Goldman Sachs, I'm well aware of the long shots of even having a chance to win; and the fact that (should I succeed for a moment) the powers that be can't ever allowed me to be compensated.

Oligarch's and Eric Holders of the world, simply can't ever allow whistleblowing to become worthwhile!

Be that as it may, there are many people who were held accountable and/or halted from doing further skulduggery; due to Michael Winston's efforts. As in my eToys v Romney (actually "HAAS v ROMNEY" for Racketeering) cases; the fact is most warriors against injustice never get the credit they're due. If I were really in it for the money; I would have taken the bribe offer to become Romney's partner in 2001.

I encourage Mr. Winston to pursue the cause for justice; and pray it also encourages others to do so - too. Meanwhile, he'll have to take solace in the fact that many a crime hasn't occurred; because he stepped out of the normal lines - taking his sense of probity to the fore. The crimes that Countrywide and/or BofA are now forbidden to try, unfortunately can never be measured.

I'll just give Mr. Wintson a few examples of what he should be thankful for.

In our eToys case v Mitt Romney: Traub Bonacquist & Fox, Dewey LeBeouf (mostly due to efforts of BankruptcyMisconduct.com), Hutchins Wheeler and Dreier LLP law firms are no longer in business. Larry Reynolds, Mike Catain, Frank Vennes, White, Coleman, Bell, Dreier and Petters, along with more than a dozen cohorts - are all in jail. The number of people who quit the DOJ, were promoted off the case and those that took bribes are unfathomable. Homicides (at least currently) - in my related cases - have ceased since 2010. That is what we've done with just a few whistleblowers.

You - Michael Winston - have GAP and others with you; please don't squander this great opportunity on the fact that a corrupt court system - having no morals or ethics - engaged in corruption. For, many things can and do happen when David's sling a pebble toward tyranny, cronyism and corruption.

Doesn't matter who gets the credit (history remembers very few issues of Generals winning the war - only that the war was won); all that matters is cause your engaged in and "if" your efforts have any effects (visible or otherwise).

Rolling Stone Taibbi gave me zero credit for his "Greed and Debt" story. And though RS intentionally left out the eToys part (which ties it all into racketeering); the fact of the matter is the story went viral and the effect is awesome. Similarly, the NY Times took my constant badgering resulting in an eToys piece (that wasn't titled eToys) as Joe Nocera posted a March 2013 OpEd story "Rigging the I.P.O. Game"; which resulted in Bain Cap. cancelling the IPO of Toys R Us (just a few weeks thereafter).

And there's the biggie - of course - that no one will ever give credit where it is due; but the fact of the matter is, in 2012

Pitten's didn't make it!


Carry on Michael Winston you are entitled to your money and have the right to fight for it (wonder if SEC David Weber was ever paid his award {which wasn't a whistleblower case in name - but in Reality). No matter who gets the credit, your works are making a difference.; and you need not worry about knowing who I am or ever coming to my funeral

---------------------------- The way you have lived and are living your life is all the attention to things any of U.S. needs![br]

For what it's worth - you have my heart felt adoration and deep respect!

Experts Will Point Out Tainting of Warren Commission Report During 3-Day Forum in D.C.

Not much yanks at my heart as does the times when an invoking of a JFK remark, quote or even Freudian slip. The man, the legend, the womanizer, the line in the sand against the military machines push about Cuba; is the John Fitzgerald Kennedy I remember. Just a few rungs of the ladder below Jesus, various holinesses, MLK and the recent Mandella. They simply don't get much greater and awe inspiring.

So, it is, with much aplomb that I announce the upcoming forum in Washington, D.C. and the experts thereof who are finding fault with Warren Commission during the 50th Anniversary of the Report. As it turns out, my fellow activist, associate, former Hillary campaign worker and all around good friend (Andrew Kreig) was engaged by the Committee, to arrange the Washington, D.C. conference.


As Mr. Kreig (who runs the Justice Integrity Project) - points out of his picture (above) of the Warren Commission; one of the key parties to that panel is former CIA Director Allen Dulles; whom President Kennedy had forced to resign, as noted by attorney at law activist Andrew Kreig - of the picture;

U.S. Supreme Court Justice Earl Warren, fifth from the left, presents President Lyndon Johnson the Warren Commission's report on the 1963 assassination of President John F. Kennedy. Smiling at second to the left is General Counsel Lee Rankin. Third from the right is former CIA Director Allen Dulles, forced out by Kennedy in late November, 1961.


Assassination Archives and Records President James Lesar notes

-------------------------------------------------No One Takes the Warren Commission Report as serious

As noted by Mr. Kreig's Justice Integrity Project Blog "Experts to Reveal Secrets" - Andrew points out that the Forum will be held September 26 to 28; and that the following expert panel will be there - including former parties from the House Committee that concluded President Kennedy was killed by unknown persons (at that time).


Prof. Robert Blakey, Ed Lopez and Dan Hardway of the House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA), which concluded in 1979 that JFK fell victim to a conspiracy by unspecified parties.

Assassination experts claim to have proof of who did what, where and when. The diagrams and such, including death bed confessions of interested parties; are compelling. Other key speakers, for the 3 day Forum, at the Hyatt Regency in D.C. - include; Among others are: Dr. Gary Aguilar, Russ Baker, Brenda Brody, Rex Bradford, Jim DiEugenio, Eric Hamburg, Dr. Peter Kornbluh, Robert Groden, Prof. Joan Mellen, Jefferson Morley, Prof. John Newman, Jerry Policoff, Dr. Randolph Robertson, Prof. Peter Dale Scott, Dr. Wayne Smith, Pat Speer, Anthony Summers, David Talbot, Dr. Donald Thomas, Dr. Cyril H. Wecht, Lamar Waldron, and Dr. David Wrone..

Dr. Wecht(pic above by Justice Integrity Project) specializes in assassination model study and events of key political figures. Dr. Wecht, it turns out, is an equal to Dr. Baden of OJ fame. The good Doctor Wecht is a leading forensic pathologist, medical consultant and former county coroner. Thus, Dr. Wecht has expertise in all the fields of study necessary to give a true expert opinion on many issues/angles about the JFK autopsy and more.

As Andrew Kreig reflects;

The consultant, medical school professor and former county coroner has authored or co-authored more than 40 books and 575 professional articles, including pioneering studies disputing the Warren Commission medical findings. He is former president of both the American Academy of Forensic Science and the American College of Legal Medicine, and currently leads the board of trustees of the American Board of Legal Medicine. The former coroner of Allegheny County based in Pittsburgh has performed more than 14,000 autopsies. In contrast, those performing the JFK autopsy under the eyes of fellow military men had never performed an autopsy of a gunshot victim, and kept no notes of their findings regarding JFK.


As for me, my adoration for JFK knows little bounds. As a person living a real conspiracy by big gov to let criminals get away with crimes, corruption and murder; I'm all for seeing the evidences that this Forum stipulates it will produce. Anyone interested in attending the 3 day conference, can get additional information at the Assassination Archives and Research Center Library website (here).

Let the Warren Games Begin!

UPDATE "Haas v Romney" Racketeering: 9th Cir Appeal Show Cause Response

On October 18, 2013, yours truly sued Willard Mitt Romney, Bain Capital, Goldman Sachs and a plethora of cohorts for civil racketeering. Various versions of the Complaint were updated; and (of course) Defendants made Motions to dismiss (under FRCP 12(b)(6)). The District Court in Los Angles, ruled that the case is frivolous as an excuse to block my poor man status (where I'm homeless).

Subsequently, the 9th Circuit ruled that it concurred with the District Court - of the appeal being frivolous; because the parties are immune from prosecution due to the bankruptcy Barton doctrine (a U.S. Supreme Court case from 1881 of Barton v Barbor). The 9th Circuit said that I could pay the filing fee of $505 and file a simultaneous "Show Cause" Response as to why the the case isn't frivolous.

It's NOT frivolous; because I'm blessed with confessions to intentional Frauds on the Court!



Thus, the question remains (as the picture above from Davidicke.com queries) - is Willard Mitt Romney a criminal; and can an indigent, armed with all the evidence anyone would ever ask for (including confessions) - ever have a chance to bring such a oligarch Robber Baron to justice.

The District Court dismissed the First Amended Complaint (FAC) with prejudice (meaning I'm not permitted to file any amendments). But to the contrary of that posturing (of protecting Mitt from prosecution) the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) filing of a 12(b)(6) Motion by the Defendants (especially one full of lies/frauds); automatically grants a petitioner the right to amend.

Hence - I've supplied my 3rd Amended Complaint (3AC) - (here)

The District Court argues that I've failed to state any colorful claims whatsoever; and that I could never improve on the drafting of my complaints. Anyone who looks at what I filed years ago and the filings now, would most certainly see that even a pro se poor guy can read, grow, learn and do better.


9th Circuit Order Laser Haas pay $505 and Supply a "Show Cause" Response


Per the 9th Circuit's Order of August 21, 2001 (here), I had to pay the $505 filing fee by September 11, 2014 and file proof of payment with a Response, immediately thereafter.

Believe it or not, 5 different Republicans gifted me the $505 to pay the fee!

Here's my response that I argue, as before, the Defendants are perpetrating frauds on the court; and still continuous in covering up other criminal conspiracies (such as eToys being sold to Bain/Kay Bee for discounted prices; because the attorneys for eToys were secretly working for Bain Cap/Kay Bee).

This is my Show Cause Response

It names Attachment A - the 3rd Amended Complaint

Attachment B - TBF Stage Stores Supplement (a 7 page proof Paul Traub lies a lot)

Attachment C - US Trustee Motion to Disgorge Traub's TBF for $1.6 million
(and proof that Traub was forewarned NOT to do the crimes he did - which was deliberate fraud on the court)

Attachment D - eToys counsel (MNAT) Destroying evidence (Books & Records) to help MNAT's client Goldman Sachs

Attachment E - Creditors Committee Chairman Affidavit testifying his own attorney (Traub) deceived him

Attachment F - Time Stamp proof I told the DOJ Public Corruption Task Force about federal corruption
(and then they Shut it down SEE "Shake-up roils federal prosecutors" L.A. Times March 2008)

Attachment G - Transcript PROOF that the eToys bankruptcy court said we could see the bad guys

Attachment H - eToys attorney (MNAT) who was also my court approved filer - Forgery saying I waived $3.7 million
(if anyone reads the item - it is a pee poor forgery - because it states ITEMS 10 & 11 - that I can get paid)

Attachment i - Both of my court approved contracts that contain indemnification clauses against willful misconduct in eToys

For anyone, especially sophisticated justices (who are supposed to give pro se parties some latitude) - to say that there's NO case whatsoever and that all the items are frivolous; simply isn't true. At the end of the day, they can rubber stamp Mitt Romney, Bain Capital and Goldman Sachs getting away 'Scot Free' with their organized crimes and retaliation against victim/witness;

But they can't call such - Justice!


Whistleblower Who "Conquered" Countrwide, Being Retaliated Upon (GAP 3pt series).

Whistleblower.org (a/k/a Government Accountability Project), is permitting the executive Michael Winston, who blew he whistle on CountryWide (and was labeled by New York Times Pulitzer-Prize winning journalist Gretchen Morgenson as conqueror of CountryWide{here} ) to do a 3 part story on his {Michael's} ordeal of telling the truth about shaky situations to ratings agencies like Moody's. Michael Winston was repeately harassed by upper management, to lie and refused.

Mr. Winston (labeled as Wall Street's greatest enemy) continues to be victimized/retaliated upon; instead of being rewarded.

Story background by SALON.com


Michael Winston's (pic above from Salon.com) surreal story is getting much praise (as it should), by activist online. In SALON.com's August 2013 article "Wall Street's greatest enemy: The man who knows too much", Salon's online journalist David Dayen details how Michael Winston continues to be assaulted by the ones who gained unjust enrichment.

As verbatim by David Dayen;

So now, a successful high-level executive for 30 years, he has been embroiled in seven years of lawsuits with Countrywide and the company that bought it, Bank of America. His determination to speak out against multiple violations of law at Countrywide earned him retaliation, and eventually, he was frozen out of corporate boardrooms, unable to find a new job. He won a jury verdict in his case, but after two and a half more years of fighting, an appellate court reversed the ruling in highly unusual circumstances.

I keep hearing about whistle-blower protections,” he {Winston} tells Salon, exasperatedly. “It certainly didn’t happen for me.


For those of you who have followed our battle against Goldman Sachs, Bain Capital and Romney; you are well aware that the courts bend over backwards, to help make sure whistleblowers aren't encouraged to do the right thing. From Snowden, to Assaunge, to myself and many others like Mr. Winston; the powers that be - simply don't want an David v Goliath victories.

As concluded by Salon's David Dayen;
The lesson is clear: If you object to the corrupt practices at financial giants like Countrywide and Bank of America, you will be marginalized and financially ruined. And even if you think you’ve won, over time you will lose. “No one who receives a jury verdict can feel safe,” Winston said. His actions – filing a health and safety complaint and refusing to misrepresent material facts for the company – are supposed to be protected by law. None of that mattered. Says Winston, “If I can’t get this case heard, why would any whistle-blower speak up?”


I've got some good news in my case against Romney & gang;
because (believe it or not - due to Republican's helping) - the case is continuing.

As for me, I'm well aware that - even if any court ever permits the evidences to be entered - chances are the powers that be will make sure I never get back what they stole from me and many victims. Be that as it may, I'm extremely well pleased to see that Michael Winston did the right thing; and hope/pray others - too - may tell their tales of woe, in bringing down illegal corporate (white collar fraud) wrong doings.

Please take the time to read GAP's Whistleblower.org Michael Winston's 3 part series "A Whistleblowers Story" (part 1)!

Go to Page: « Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next »