HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » StrictlyRockers » Journal
Page: « Prev 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 ... 21 Next »

StrictlyRockers

Profile Information

Name: Christo
Gender: Male
Hometown: Santa Cruz, CA, USA
Home country: USA
Current location: Santa Cruz, CA
Member since: Thu Aug 31, 2006, 03:14 AM
Number of posts: 2,963

About Me

https://twitter.com/christoq https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCLtt5Rr-9uvI3oct2zxBR9A https://www.facebook.com/christo.purdin

Journal Archives

Trump Spox Katrina Pierson: We Weren’t in Afghanistan Until Obama Decided to Go In



#KatrinaPiersonHistory

AGAIN??

She's dumb.

Posted by StrictlyRockers | Sat Aug 13, 2016, 11:07 AM (80 replies)

First US Offshore Wind Farm Will Usher in New Era For Industry

http://customwire.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_OFFSHORE_WIND?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT

PROVIDENCE, R.I. (AP) -- The nation's first offshore wind farm is set to open off the coast of Rhode Island this fall, ushering in a new era in the U.S. for the industry.

Developers, federal regulators and industry experts say the opening will move the U.S. industry from a theory to reality, paving the way for the construction of many more wind farms that will eventually provide power for many Americans.

Deepwater Wind is building a five-turbine wind farm off Block Island, Rhode Island to power about 17,000 homes. The project costs about $300 million, according to the company.

CEO Jeffrey Grybowski said the Block Island wind farm enables larger projects because it proves that wind farms can be built along the nation's coast.

"I look at Block Island as sort of the key to unlocking the code of how to do offshore wind in the U.S.," he said.
...
__________________________________________________________________

Alternative energy seems to be taking off in the US. We have some catching up to do, but solar and wind power can help to mitigate the effects of global warming.
Posted by StrictlyRockers | Sat Aug 13, 2016, 09:12 AM (0 replies)

Astrud Gilberto & Stan Getz ◊ The Girl From Ipanema ◊ 1964



Posted by StrictlyRockers | Sat Aug 13, 2016, 09:04 AM (21 replies)

The Logic-Defying Double-Slit Experiment Is Even Weirder Than You Thought

The Logic-Defying Double-Slit Experiment Is Even Weirder Than You Thought

The idea behind the double-slit experiment is that even if the photons are sent through the slits one at a time, there's still a wave present to produce the interference pattern. The wave is a wave of probability, because the experiment is set up so that the scientists don't know which of the two slits any individual photon will pass through.

But if they try to find out by setting up detectors in front of each slit to determine which slit the photon really goes through, the interference pattern doesn't show up at all. This is true even if they try setting up the detectors behind the slits. No matter what the scientists do, if they try anything to observe the photons, the interference pattern fails to emerge.

It gets even weirder than that.

A group of scientists tried a variation on the double slit experiment, called the delayed choice experiment. The scientists placed a special crystal at each slit. The crystal splits any incoming photons into a pair of identical photons. One photon from this pair should go on to create the standard interference pattern, while the other travels to a detector. Perhaps with this setup, physicists might successfully find a way to observe the logic-defying behavior of photons.

But it still doesn't work. And here's the really weird part: It doesn't work regardless of when that detection happens. Even if the second photon is detected after the first photon hits the screen, it still ruins the interference pattern. This means that observing a photon can change events that have already happened.

<...>

http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/a22280/double-slit-experiment-even-weirder/
__________________________________________________________________

Spooky.

Posted by StrictlyRockers | Sat Aug 13, 2016, 08:40 AM (5 replies)

Textbook story of how early humans populated America is 'biologically unviable,' study finds

The established theory about the route by which Ice Age peoples first reached the present-day United States has been challenged by an unprecedented study which concludes that their supposed entry route was "biologically unviable".

The first people to reach the Americas crossed via an ancient land bridge between Siberia and Alaska but then, according to conventional wisdom, had to wait until two huge ice sheets that covered what is now Canada started to recede, creating the so-called "ice-free corridor" which enabled them to move south.

In a new study published in the journal Nature, however, an international team of researchers used ancient DNA extracted from a crucial pinch-point within this corridor to investigate how its ecosystem evolved as the glaciers began to retreat. They created a comprehensive picture showing how and when different flora and fauna emerged and the once ice-covered landscape became a viable passageway. No prehistoric reconstruction project like it has ever been attempted before.

The researchers conclude that while people may well have travelled this corridor after about 12,600 years ago, it would have been impassable earlier than that, as the corridor lacked crucial resources, such as wood for fuel and tools, and game animals which were essential to the hunter-gatherer lifestyle.

If this is true, then it means that the first Americans, who were present south of the ice sheets long before 12,600 years ago, must have made the journey south by another route. The study's authors suggest that they probably migrated along the Pacific coast.


Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2016-08-textbook-story-humans-populated-america.html#jCp
Posted by StrictlyRockers | Sat Aug 13, 2016, 08:25 AM (3 replies)

Why ISIS Fears Israel

http://nationalinterest.org/feature/why-isis-fears-israel-17286

A strategy of patient, vigilant deterrence works—and America should take note.

IN THE wake of the Orlando and Istanbul attacks, President Obama reiterated his determination to “destroy” ISIS by executing a strategy that combines air strikes, American special-operations units and support for local ground forces. Both of the candidates campaigning to succeed him insist that the United States must do more: Donald Trump advocates that Washington “bomb the hell out of” the group, while Hillary Clinton promises to “smash the would-be caliphate.” All three, however, are in violent agreement on one point: the overriding objective must be to destroy ISIS.

The insistence on the “destruction” of ISIS has become such a reflexive linchpin of America’s counterterrorism project that few pause to consider its strategic merit. But the nation with arguably the most experience and success combatting terrorism has considered it—and found it wanting.

Israelis live much closer to ISIS than do Americans. ISIS has pledged to conquer the Jewish state and incorporate it into its core caliphate. Yet surprisingly, the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) has rejected the option of taking the fight directly to ISIS. Instead, faced with an operational threat that could mean the death of hundreds of Israelis at any moment, it has embraced a strategy that has not even been on the U.S. policy menu. Adopting a page from the playbook the United States used to defeat revolutionary Soviet-led communism in the Cold War, Israel is preventing ISIS attacks through a strategy of patient, vigilant deterrence. Obviously, the United States cannot simply adopt the Israeli approach whole cloth. It operates in a different security environment than the Jewish state, which faces a multiplicity of terrorist threats on its borders. But there are important lessons that America can learn to enhance its national security.

Israel’s approach to ISIS is straightforward. Israel seeks to persuade ISIS not to attack it by credibly threatening to retaliate. If you attack us, the thinking goes, we will respond in ways that will impose pain that exceeds any gain you can hope to achieve. As Cold War strategists learned, making this work in practice is demanding. To be effective, deterrence requires three Cs: clarity, capability and credibility. Specifically, this means clarity about the red line that cannot be crossed, communicated in language the adversary understands; capability to impose costs that greatly exceed the benefits; and credibility about the willingness to do so. Failures occur when the deterrer falls short on any one of the three Cs. So, if I draw a red line, you cross it, and I respond with words rather than the decisive punishment threatened, I fail the third C. Whatever excuse I give for not executing my threat, and however earnest my claim that next time will be different, the blunt fact is that adversaries will find my threats less credible.

__________________________________________________________________

Is this article arguing that committing war-crimes like destroying terrorist's family's homes is ok? Because I don't think that's ok.
Posted by StrictlyRockers | Sat Aug 13, 2016, 08:21 AM (9 replies)

Our oceans aren’t just rising - they’re accelerating, and that’s even worse

It's been hidden from us for 25 years.
BEC CREW 11 AUG 2016

<...>
On 15 June 1991, Earth sustained the second-largest volcanic eruption of the century - Mount Pinatubo, in the Philippines.

Described by the US Geological Survey as "cataclysmic", the eruption spewed forth more than 5 cubic km (1 cubic mile) of debris, and the resulting ash cloud rose some 35 km (22 miles) into the air above.

<...>

"The scientists estimate as a result that sea level not only fell between 5 and 7 millimetres due to a major ocean cooling event in the eruption’s wake, but then experienced a rebound, or bounce back, of the same magnitude once the influence of the eruption had passed," Chris Mooney reports for the The Washington Post.

This rebound made it look like sea levels experienced a sharp increase, followed by a decline, and then ultimately, it appeared to even itself out, but in reality, the results were completely distorted.

Thanks to the new, more accurate models of what’s actually been going on, we now have the first real evidence that global sea levels have been rising at an accelerating rate - something that scientists have been expecting, given the warming of our planet, but the records have said the opposite.

<...>

http://www.sciencealert.com/our-oceans-aren-t-just-rising-they-re-accelerating-and-that-s-even-worse

http://www.sciencealert.com/this-animation-shows-what-earth-would-look-like-if-all-the-ice-melted
Posted by StrictlyRockers | Sat Aug 13, 2016, 02:25 AM (3 replies)

Washington Post - Why the DEA just said ‘no’ to loosening marijuana restrictions

The Washington Post
Christopher Ingraham
August 11

For the fourth consecutive time, the Drug Enforcement Administration has denied a petition to lessen federal restrictions on the use of marijuana.

While recreational marijuana use is legal in four states and D.C., and medical applications of the drug have been approved in many more, under federal law, it remains a Schedule 1 controlled substance, which means it's considered to have "no currently accepted medical use" and a "high potential for abuse."

The gap between permissive state laws and a restrictive federal policy has become increasingly untenable in the minds of many doctors, patients, researchers, business owners and legislators.

For instance, last fall, a Brookings Institution report slammed the federal government for "stifling medical research" in the area of marijuana policy. As a Schedule 1 drug, it's much harder for researchers to work with marijuana than with many other controlled substances. The American Academy of Pediatrics has called on the government to move marijuana into Schedule 2 to facilitate more research into medical uses.

The current federal status of marijuana makes it impossible for state-legal marijuana businesses to take the same tax deductions afforded to other business, with some marijuana operations complaining that their effective tax rates are in the range of 60 percent to 90 percent, according to a Denver accountant who works with such businesses, Jordan Cornelius. Federal restrictions also make banks reluctant to work with marijuana businesses, leading many of them to become all-cash operations — with all the risks that entails.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/08/11/the-deas-latest-stance-on-marijuana-explained/
Posted by StrictlyRockers | Sat Aug 13, 2016, 01:25 AM (14 replies)

President Obama and Malia Just Went for a Walk — We Know What That Was All About

President Obama and Malia Just Went for a Walk — We Know What That Was All About

https://mic.com/articles/151335/president-obama-and-malia-just-went-for-a-walk-we-know-what-that-was-all-about#.CC13VVPnE

According to a dispatch from the White House pool, earlier in the day President Barack Obama and his eldest daughter, Malia, went "for a short walk on a trail near their residence."


Kate Bennett ✔ @KateBennett_DC

ruh-roh

8:44 AM - 11 Aug 2016
481 481 Retweets 755 755 likes

This could be just your average I'm-bored-you're-bored-it's-nice-out-let's-walk walk, because of course, our POTUS probably doesn't have anything better to do than stroll around the grounds.

We don't think strolling is what this walk is about. Given recent events, we have some theories about the discussion Obama and his eldest are currently having.








My caption:
"Can you help me out, Malia? I lost my connection eight years ago."





Source: I read his autobiography.
Posted by StrictlyRockers | Sat Aug 13, 2016, 01:19 AM (16 replies)

Mad Ravens

Posted by StrictlyRockers | Fri Aug 12, 2016, 10:34 PM (3 replies)
Go to Page: « Prev 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 ... 21 Next »