HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » LiberalArkie » Journal
Page: 1

LiberalArkie

Profile Information

Gender: Male
Home country: U.S.A.
Member since: Sun Aug 14, 2005, 03:19 PM
Number of posts: 10,938

Journal Archives

THE OTHER PROGRESSIVE CANDIDATES TAKING ON THE DEMOCRATIC ESTABLISHMENT



“TODAY,” BERNIE SANDERS BOOMS IN HIS MONOTONE SHOUT, “we begin a political revolution to transform our country—economically, politically, socially and environmentally.” He marks each beat with his right hand, as if conducting with an invisible baton. Behind him, a lone seagull flaps its wings as it flies across Lake Champlain. The crowd of 5,000 that has come to Burlington, Vt., on a sunny afternoon in May to witness Sanders’ official campaign announcement breaks into a cheer.

At the time, it was easy to dismiss talk of revolution as the rallying cry of a 74-year-old democratic socialist who clings too dearly to memories of the 1960s. Eleven months and more than six million votes later, Sanders’ call for revolution is harder to ignore.

But what, exactly, would this political revolution look like? It’s not hard to imagine Sanders marching in the streets with the masses—he’s walked plenty of picket lines, most recently alongside Verizon workers in New York City last October—but that’s not the revolution he’s calling for. For Sanders, political revolution means shifting control of American politics away from corporate interests, convincing non-voters to go to the polls and attracting white working-class voters back to the Democratic Party, all while moving the party left enough to embrace democratic socialist policies.

A political revolution of that kind is going to require two things: a wave of candidates committed to a bold set of progressive ideas and a mass of voters with the political will to elect them. There’s evidence both of these are already here.



Snip

http://inthesetimes.com/features/bernie_sanders_democrats_political_revolution_candidates.html


Note: This is a repost of http://www.democraticunderground.com/10027780217
This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by one_voice (a host of the General Discussion forum). If you believe this was done in error, please contact one_voice to appeal.

Skinner (61,494 posts)
1. If it mentions one of the primary candidates then it still belongs in GDP.

You are welcome to post about the general election in GD without reference to the primary candidates.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12599837#post1
Go to Page: 1