grahamhgreen
grahamhgreen's JournalTop .1% of wealth about to exceed bottom 90% :
http://www.economist.com/blogs/graphicdetail/2014/11/daily-chart-2?fsrc=scn/fb/te/bl/ed/somearemoreequalthanothers
Darrel Issa (R-CA) on 'This Week': Iraqi's say they only have 8,000 troops who will fight.
ISSA: Iraqis should fight for their country. There's no question at all. They've been trained and they should do it.
The fact is the Kurds are willing to do it. I have no doubt whatsoever that the Kurds will fight. And all they need is our air support and our technical know how and they will do it.
When it comes to the Sunni-Shia divide that the Maliki government created, it makes it very, very hard to put together the kind of military units that they should have. That remains to be seen of whether or not the substantial portion of that 800,000 people we trained are willing to fight.
The fact is by the time they started fleeing, we were down to a quarter of a million. And when I met with the government they said, well, we have about 8,000 who will fight. I think they have to do better.
http://abcnews.go.com/ThisWeek/week-transcript-rep-darrell-issa-sen-elect-cory/story?id=26778694
Question for 3rd way/Libertarians: How can anyone be free, if everything is privatized? (Expanded)
Seriously, how does that work?
If a child is born into a world and everything he sees or touches is the property of a private individual, or corporation, what is there to be free in?
Can he drink the water? No, it has been privatized, he must pay.
Can he sleep in the hospital? No, it has been privatized, he must pay.
Can he walk in the street? No, it has been privatized, he must pay.
Can he go to the forest and make wooden bowls for sale? No, it has been privatized, he must pay.
Can he sell goods by the side of the road? No, it has been privatized, he must pay.
Only in a world where there are many elements owned by all, can we exist as free individuals.
It seems to me that 3rd way/Libertarians are looking to create a world in which freedom itself is impossible, quite contrary to their stated love of freedom.
Any of you folks care to address?
Endless War: Obama calls U.S. troop boost in Iraq 'new phase
Obama, in an interview on CBS' "Face the Nation" broadcast on Sunday, said the first phase was getting an Iraqi government in place that was inclusive and credible.
He said sending in 1,500 additional American troops also signified a shift from a defensive strategy to an offensive one. The decision was announced on Friday.
"The air strikes have been very effective in degrading ISIL's capabilities and slowing the advance that they were making," Obama said, according to a CBS transcript. "Now what we need is ground troops, Iraqi ground troops, that can start pushing them back."
http://news.yahoo.com/obama-calls-u-troop-boost-iraq-phase-cbs-153507197.html
Does anyone think that Obama's not escalating the Iraq war now????
You know, Iraq will forever be remembered now as Obama's war. Bush's war was a success, they will claim (are claiming), and O messed it up. What a legacy.
When do we stop?
Who pays for his war?
NYT: U.S. to Send 1,500 More Troops to Iraq
........
In addition, the White House Budget Office said it would ask Congress for $5.6 billion for overseas contingency operations, including $1.6 billion to train and equip Iraqi troops.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/08/world/middleeast/us-to-send-1500-more-troops-to-iraq.html?_r=2
.........
Those who said we wouldn't escalate, please retract now.
Remember, we just had to cut 8.6 billion from starving children in this country just last February.
And some wonder why we lost the election... and what the agenda will be.... In a word, neo-con.
The war in the Middle East has been raging for 1400 years. We can't win.
The war is draining our treasury and a detriment to our troops.
Call your Rep's to get us out of this quagmire.
IBT: Birthplace Of ISIS Traced To US Prison Camp Bucca; Top ISIS Leaders Once Inmates
The birthplace of the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria has been identified as Camp Bucca, a detention centre run by the United States during the Iraq war. In a report by the Washington Post, March 2009 may have been the beginning of ISIS when it released hundreds of detainees who were some of most radical fighters in the Iraq War. The sprawling detention centre in the southern town of Garma has released its prisoners of war. Many families had rejoiced as their sons, brothers and fathers were finally coming home to them after many years.
............
Mahmoud's fears about the prisoners of Camp Bucca may have come true. Reports said the camp represents the "opening chapter" in the historic rise of ISIS. Many of its leaders, including Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, were imprisoned in the camp and possibly met one another there. Based on the accounts of former prison commanders, soldiers and analysts, Camp Bucca may have provided the environment for the radicalisation and collaboration of prisoners that has helped shape the development of ISIS.
Soufan Group, a terrorist research organisation, said all the nine members of ISIS' top command had been imprisoned in Camp Bucca. Aside from Baghdadi, who reportedly spent five years in the camp, his number two man, Abu Muslim al-Turkmani, and senior leader, Haji Bakr, now dead, also came from Camp Bucca.
http://au.ibtimes.com/articles/571953/20141106/isis-islamic-state-camp-bucca.htm
How special. We brutalize, they radicalize, they brutalize, we radicalize..... the never ending cycle of violence that is the Sand Box.
We can't win by violence.
Way past time to come home.
I hope the Congress has enough sense to end this stupidity. I'm calling mine to vote against this perpetual war dream of the neo-cons.
Some more comments by the President yesterday, good and bad:
I think we can hone in on a way to pay for it through tax reform that closes loopholes and makes it more attractive for companies to create jobs here in the United States.
GOOD! Infrastructure jobs are good (assuming we don't buy our bridges from China like we did with the SF Bay bridge).
VERY VERY BAD! This means the TPP, and other costly trade agreements

GOOD! Assuming this does not mean more money to privateers.
GOOD! I think.... what are these 'common ideas'?
And in the five states where a minimum wage increase was on the ballot last night, voters went five for five to increase it. That will give about 325,000 Americans a raise in states where Republican candidates prevailed. So that should give us new reason to get it done for everybody with a national increase in the minimum wage.
GOOD!
BAD! Perhaps EVIL! (I posted this yesterday as an OP)
From: http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/transcript-president-obamas-remarks-on-midterm-election-results/2014/11/05/491a02b2-6524-11e4-9fdc-d43b053ecb4d_story.html
If millennials had Had Voted
If Millennials Had Voted, Last Night Would Have Looked Very different
And that valley made a huge difference for Democrats, because younger voters have been trending blue. Some 55 percent of young people who did turn up voted for Dems compared to 45 percent of those over 60.
An interactive predictor on the Fusion, the news site targeted at millennials, indicated how Democrats could have gained if young people had shown in greater numbers. Using 2010 vote totals and 2014 polling data, the tool lets users calculate the effect of greater turnout among voters under 30 in several key states.
On Tuesday, according to preliminary exit polls, young voters in Iowa favored Democrats by a slight margin51 percentbut they made up only 12 percent of the total vote, leaving conservative Republican Joni Ernst the winner. In Georgia, 58 percent of young voters went for Democrat Michelle Nunn, but they made up 10 percent of the total who showed up to cast their ballots. In Colorado, where a sophisticated political machine delivered Democratic wins in 2010, the calculator shows that a full 71 percent of young people voted for Dems in 2010; exit polls indicate that young voters made up 14 percent of the final tally, leaving Mark Udall out in the cold.
http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2014/11/if-millennials-had-voted-last-night-would-have-looked-very-different
53% Think Neither Political Party Represents the American People
http://m.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/general_politics/april_2014/53_think_neither_political_party_represents_the_american_peopleVoters continue to believe Democrats have more of a plan for the future than Republicans do, but most again say neither party represents the public.
A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 53% of Likely U.S. Voters think it is fair to say that neither party in Congress is the party of the American people. Thats up six points from 47% last October and matches the previous high found in June 2012 during the last national election cycle. Just 28% disagree, while 19% are not sure. (To see survey question wording, click here.)
But a plurality (47%) believes the Democratic Party has a plan for where it wants to take the nation. Thats up slightly from the low 40s in prior surveys back to February 2010. Thirty percent (30%) think President Obamas party does not have a plan for the future. Twenty-three percent (23%) are undecided.
By contrast, 38% think the Republican Party has a plan for where it wants to take the nation, but slightly more (40%) disagree. Twenty-two percent (22%) are not sure. This is generally in line with past surveys. Belief that the GOP has a plan for the future jumped to a high of 54% in June 2012 but fell back to previous levels after that.
........
How did we let that happen?
Obama today: "Keystone, I just consider as one small aspect of a broader trend that’s really positiv
In Full: "Keystone, I just consider as one small aspect of a broader trend thats really positive for the American people."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/transcript-president-obamas-remarks-on-midterm-election-results/2014/11/05/491a02b2-6524-11e4-9fdc-d43b053ecb4d_story.html
Profile Information
Member since: Thu Dec 30, 2004, 03:05 PMNumber of posts: 15,741