Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

grahamhgreen

grahamhgreen's Journal
grahamhgreen's Journal
June 30, 2014

If you give in before you fight, you always lose. We can beat this Congress. Stop giving in to them

by arguing that "we can't get it past this Congress".

It's a loser mentality that I see all over this board.

You want to win? Pick a popular position and fight for it. Get your message out to the American people. Let them know what bills you are pushing.

June 28, 2014

Bernie: You already owe $35,000 for the last Iraq war!


WAR OR JOBS

The Bush administration’s war in Iraq will end up costing the United States some $3 trillion — all with deficit spending. Meanwhile, serious efforts to rebuild our crumbling infrastructure and create millions of desperately-needed jobs keep running into Republican roadblocks. “In other words, for most Republicans in Congress it is okay to spend unlimited sums on a war we should never have gotten into but it’s wrong to rebuild our bridges, roads, rail and water systems, wastewater plants, dams, culverts and airports — and make our country more productive,” Bernie said.

June 26, 2014

"Me against my brothers,...

me and my brothers against my cousins, me and my brother and my cousins against the world"

انا على أخوي وأنا وأخوي على ابن عمي وأنا وابن عمي على الغريب""



Got it?

This is why its a FOOL'S ERRAND to involve ourselves further in Iraq.

Be it one troop, bomb, or drone.

Unless, of course, your goal is to sell arms at great cost to the distressed American public, and to steal other countries oil.

At least, that's how I see it!




EDIT: Fixed Title!

June 26, 2014

Guess What? USA Funded ISIS From the Start (Can we PLEASE GTFO now?):

“ISIS (which ISIL is also referred to as) was able to infiltrate Iraqi government ministries and has the support of members of Saddam Hussein's Baath party, the Islamic Front (originally formed in 2004 as a resistance group to the U.S. occupation) and other Sunni groups,” Emran El-Badawi, director of the Arabic program at the University of Houston, said in an email.

The relationship between ISIL — an Al-Qaeda breakaway group — and other Sunni groups goes back to the beginning of the Iraq war. In the 2005 surge in Iraq, local tribes with U.S. funding built a coalition (known as the “Sunni Awakening Movement” or “Sons of Iraq”) that began combatting Al-Qaeda and other extreme groups to restore security and calm sectarianism. The program met with some success.

"These 90,000 ‘Sons of Iraq’ made a significant contribution to the reported 90% drop in sectarian violence in 2007-2008," said an op-ed co-written by Derek Harvey, a former senior intelligence official, and Michael Pregent, a former U.S. Army officer and onetime senior intelligence analyst.

But all that changed after U.S. forces withdrew and Maliki refused to integrate the Sunni tribes into the government. Off the payroll and pushed aside, the Sunnis were at a disadvantage and felt abandoned — while the Shias had full control of Baghdad and the south, and the Kurds had control of much of the north.

http://america.aljazeera.com/articles/2014/6/19/isil-thousands-fighters.html



More blowback from the brainiacs determining US foreign policy. Meantime, the war profits and oil money keep going to the well connected.

It's not about anything noble. Let's leave before we create another 9-11. At least, that's my view.

June 26, 2014

MAP: The Sunni - Shia Divide




The Sunni-Shia divide

The story of Islam's division between Sunni and Shia started with the Prophet Mohammed's death in 632.

There was a power struggle over who would succeed him in ruling the Islamic Caliphate, with most Muslims wanting to elect the next leader but some arguing that power should go by divine birthright to Mohammed's son-in-law, Ali.

That pro-Ali faction was known as the "Partisans of Ali," or "Shi'atu Ali" in Arabic, hence "Shia."

Ali's eventual ascension to the throne sparked a civil war, which he and his partisans lost.

The Shia held on to the idea that Ali was the rightful successor, and grew into an entirely separate branch of Islam.

Today about 10 to 15 percent of Muslims worldwide are Shia — they are the majority group in Iran and Iraq only — while most Muslims are Sunni.

"Sunni" roughly means "tradition."

Today, that religious division is again a political one as well: it's a struggle for regional influence between Shia political powers, led by Iran, versus Sunni political powers, led by Saudi Arabia.

This struggle looks an awful lot like a regional cold war, with proxy battles in Syria and elsewhere.

June 26, 2014

Love

Profile Information

Member since: Thu Dec 30, 2004, 02:05 PM
Number of posts: 15,741
Latest Discussions»grahamhgreen's Journal