Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search


seabeyond's Journal
seabeyond's Journal
May 15, 2015

you started a thread, to diss me. my mra pals came in to bathe in the stink with you. not the first

time, by a long shot.

you really are not getting away with much, creating an OP to diss me, cali. i am pretty sure you get that, too. i imagine you are comfortable with a thread ridiculing, mocking, insulting me. i am probably the only one here on du, that can be dissed to this extent and nothing is done. repeatedly. OP's of dissing. ATA.

hosts wont lock these threads but man did they lock one quick that was saying something nice about me. you know, my patience with this juvenile shit. juries wont hide it. further, jurors will diss me in their 'explanation' comment. calling me a bitch and more. all kinds of stuff. a violent, vulgar, rape porn fantasy from at least one. personal threats thru pms.

one OP about a shriveled old uterus that cant 'bare no fruit'.

i was told the poster was drunk and having a bad night. give him a break. leave him alone. why cant you be sympathetic to his needs....

i had an x wife sign up to pm me, and tell me to watch out for a poster. in real life.

i challenge anyone to show, where i have 'earned, deserved' that. i challenge anyone, to show me where i have been nasty to a single one of you.

i cannot tell you the number of times a poster in this thread has called me out in threads and subthreads that were purely about insulting me, mouthing off about me, saying nasty shit. taunting, insulting, ridiculing threads. when this poster is called out on it? he says i deserve it because i have done so much worse to him. he has said it a number of times. he gets to be nasty to me because i have been much worse in the past. i have yet to reply or challenge any of these posts. i have stayed quiet and allow the insult. i do not reply to most of these people that are allowed to be as nasty to me as they want to be, and du is ok with it. as are administrators. and hosts.

this poster, in this very thread, cannot even find one post i have been mean to him. disagree? ya. and often. mean? never. not one. but he is allowed to continually say how mean i am. that i deserve an op like yours. and posters thru out your op saying nasty shit to me.

not one person can find history where i was mean. focused, aggressive, blunt in conversation? ya. yup. and that is what pisses you and others off, so. but, i am allowed to civilly be blunt, focused, aggressive. that, is not against the rules. be smarter than me, and you have my ass. it is really simple. you do not need insult, if you beat me in debate. you won. oh.... or, start a thread to diss me.

now, how many times have you called me a liar in the last couple three weeks?

and it stands.

you do not have to prove it. as a matter of fact, you have my words. you say i am lying. cause you just know better. you have no evidence. further, what i post does show absolute support of sanders campaign. yet you say you can call me a liar because it is so obvious to you and you just know better. so, you create an OP to diss me. and have my mra pals help you out here. quite a high road for you.

how many times have you called me a liar?

when i have yours or others agenda's ass, and you and others cannot fuckin wiggle out, you start with the insults. the same ole, predictable, .... try to get me locked or hidden to shut me up. insult me. ridicule me. tell me what i type does not matter, cause you 'know' better. and it is allowed.

it does not matter if it is sanders, clinton, politics or gender issues (and for most? it is the feminism that pisses them off. these are the people you align yourself with).

we have this message board, that i have contributed to, worked for, participated on, for over a decade.

i stand by what i post. and i stand by my integrity, too. prove me wrong. other than hyperbole, fabricated accusations, or you just know, or just slinging shit to see what sticks....

you have a thread to be as nasty as you all choose, here on du. and yet, ... i am the one that deserves it. i am the meanie. i am the one picking on you all.

this has happened for three years. it is pretty damn clear.

what part of this post are you not understanding, cali? cause all you have to do is ask, and i will clarify it for you. (see what a meanie i am?) seeing how you and most of these other people are reading my words well, ... knowing damn well what i am saying, then start your word salad shit to insult me, what do you not understand? where are you confused? you are predictable in that you often address me merely with insults. gasp, like this OP. it is a tool used, here on du, for the last couple years. same people. too many du members are able to understand what i say, especially if they are following the conversation. we talk about it often enough. generally when the guys start their attacks in this manner. different du'ers thru pms. people that are not participating may be clueless. those of us in the same threads, clearly know what each of us are saying.

like the poster above playing at the feigned ignorance. playing a damn game. is this seabeyonds second language? she is coming from a second language! mental deficit.... oh that is it. well. she has learning disabilities. (see, now someone who does not understand the conversation will not get my comment. word salad to them. the poster that said i had learning disabilities totally gets what i am saying). no mystery. and we know it.

that poster saying i must have learning disabilities is toying with another poster that thinks he is speaking to someone who is sincere. just a nice guy that chats wit me often, who steps on no ones toes. saying, gosh, you guys are being mean. you know, a sincere poster.

ya, whoever you are above, it is the learning disabilities. along with being emotionally damaged (mens group insult) and so much more. telling me who i am. giggle giggle, right cali? cause i deserve it.

prove it. prove i deserve OPs dissing me. and posters allowed to diss me. and jurors able to diss me. host, actively working against, and ATA threads dissing me.

out of all the posters on du. i am the one. that is that mean.

i deserve it.

how seriously do you think i should really take this, cali?

May 3, 2015

social/economic justice

The current context of economic globalization, increasing militarization of the society and armed conflicts, the retrenchment of the social welfare system and growing social and economic inequality between, and within, countries underscores the importance of an approach to social work practice based on social justice and human rights. In this article, we examine the concepts of social and economic justice and address some of the dilemmas and challenges facing social workers in both Canada and the USA as they promote the fulfilment of human needs and address human rights in exploitative situations. The concepts of social and economic jus-tice and human rights are interconnected yet distinct.

Social justice is defined in this article according to
The Social Work Dictionary
(Barker, 2003: 404–5) as: ‘An ideal condition in which all members of a society have the same basic rights, protection, opportunities,obligations, and social benefits A key social work value, social justice entails advocacy to confront discrimination, oppression,and institutional inequities.

’Economic justice is a narrower concept, referring to the standard of living that ideally should be equitable. All persons ought to have opportunities for meaningful work and an income that provides them with adequate food, shelter and a level of living that contri-butes to good health. Whereas social and economic justice is a general term that relates to society in general, human rights is a term that, from the point of view of the people, refers to specific universal standards relevant to freedom and well-being, personal and collective right


maybe it is a misunderstanding in conversation and definition. when i talk about social justice, and when referencing it with sanders, this is what i am discussing. to see him fall short in this area, in the campaign, is not unfair, as far as i see.

just like when discussing clinton, i have no problems at all talking about how i feel she falls short with corporate and wallstreet.

i do not get nearly the flack from clinton supporters (nary a word) when discussing that, then when i discuss the social issue with sanders.

now. i am not doing the same ole battle. just put this OP out for clarity. if anyone chooses to be interested in why i say what i do.

Profile Information

Gender: Do not display
Member since: Thu Feb 19, 2004, 07:23 PM
Number of posts: 110,159

Journal Entries

Latest Discussions»seabeyond's Journal