Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Are the first two states to go in the primary process outliers? Are they predictive of anything? (Original Post) Ed Suspicious Aug 2015 OP
momentum is everything virtualobserver Aug 2015 #1
Good because I keep reading threads where they are discounting Bernie's momentum. Ed Suspicious Aug 2015 #4
Hillary supporters hate this poll, but..... virtualobserver Aug 2015 #5
18 points. But that is nationwide. Right now, he really needs to worry about the first 3 primaries merrily Aug 2015 #9
Momentum PowerToThePeople Aug 2015 #2
I think they are more important to lesser known candidates. PoliticAverse Aug 2015 #3
I live in Iowa, in general Dem caucus is predictive. Republican not so much. emulatorloo Aug 2015 #6
+1 daleanime Aug 2015 #10
They are very important to thin the herd. BillZBubb Aug 2015 #7
But Bernie's funding is not going to dry up unless we dry it. merrily Aug 2015 #8

Ed Suspicious

(8,879 posts)
4. Good because I keep reading threads where they are discounting Bernie's momentum.
Sat Aug 15, 2015, 06:15 PM
Aug 2015

I figured winning early states is better than losing, but in the twilight zone that is other groups and even facebook, it counts for nothing, or more bizzaro, show that he is peaking too early.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
9. 18 points. But that is nationwide. Right now, he really needs to worry about the first 3 primaries
Sat Aug 15, 2015, 07:28 PM
Aug 2015

Very disappointed in Harkin. Last year, he expressed concern that Hillary was not left enough.

PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)
3. I think they are more important to lesser known candidates.
Sat Aug 15, 2015, 06:14 PM
Aug 2015

Finishing in the top can really give a boost to a campaign but finishing 2nd or 3rd isn't
that big a negative to a frontrunner.

emulatorloo

(44,072 posts)
6. I live in Iowa, in general Dem caucus is predictive. Republican not so much.
Sat Aug 15, 2015, 06:34 PM
Aug 2015

The Republican caucus goers are rather fundy. 2008 Iowa Dems went with Obama, Edwards in second place. Iowa Repubs went with Romney, Huckabee came in second.

So yeah winning in IA is a very good thing. And Bernie can definitely win here.

BillZBubb

(10,650 posts)
7. They are very important to thin the herd.
Sat Aug 15, 2015, 06:34 PM
Aug 2015

Any candidate who cannot garner a respectable percentage of the vote in at least one of the states is pretty much finished. Their fundraising dries up.

A surprisingly good showing by a supposedly lesser candidate can propel him or her into the frontrunner group.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
8. But Bernie's funding is not going to dry up unless we dry it.
Sat Aug 15, 2015, 07:24 PM
Aug 2015

Bernie's in the pocket of Big Voter!

If he loses the first couple of primaries, I'll donate more than I do now.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Bernie Sanders»Are the first two states ...