Bernie Sanders
Related: About this forumAre the first two states to go in the primary process outliers? Are they predictive of anything?
If they are not, then why do candidates work so hard to win them?
virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)it can pop the bubble of invincibility of a frontrunner
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)I figured winning early states is better than losing, but in the twilight zone that is other groups and even facebook, it counts for nothing, or more bizzaro, show that he is peaking too early.
virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)Hillary led Obama 45-27 in December 2007
Iowa changed everything
merrily
(45,251 posts)Very disappointed in Harkin. Last year, he expressed concern that Hillary was not left enough.
PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)Takes more effort to break the friction of not moving, once you are moving it is easier.
??
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)Finishing in the top can really give a boost to a campaign but finishing 2nd or 3rd isn't
that big a negative to a frontrunner.
emulatorloo
(44,072 posts)The Republican caucus goers are rather fundy. 2008 Iowa Dems went with Obama, Edwards in second place. Iowa Repubs went with Romney, Huckabee came in second.
So yeah winning in IA is a very good thing. And Bernie can definitely win here.
BillZBubb
(10,650 posts)Any candidate who cannot garner a respectable percentage of the vote in at least one of the states is pretty much finished. Their fundraising dries up.
A surprisingly good showing by a supposedly lesser candidate can propel him or her into the frontrunner group.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Bernie's in the pocket of Big Voter!
If he loses the first couple of primaries, I'll donate more than I do now.