Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

silvershadow

(10,336 posts)
Thu May 12, 2016, 03:31 AM May 2016

PSA: Pay No Attention to Articles Claiming Clinton Leads in Oregon!

Public Service Announcement:
New Articles Claiming Clinton Leads
in Oregon Are Lies

Greetings, my friends! This is just a quick Math Vs. Media Public Service announcement — please pay no attention to the flood of “news” that is claiming that Clinton leads in the Oregon polls. All of them are based off of the same crappy survey — a crappy survey of a mere 304 “likely voters,” 2 of which said they weren’t voting, knocking that down to 302 people.

The survey does not even state that these 302 are democrats (the only group that can vote in the Oregon democratic primaries) and, because they’re listing the surveyed people as “likely voters,” not “registered voters,” one can only assume that the company, “DHM Research,” which conducted this “survey,” either
a.) Knows that some of them aren’t registered
or
b.) Doesn’t know whether they are registered or not.

Furthermore, the survey does not reveal its methodology — I’ve searched their website and can’t even find information about whether it was a landline, cellphone, or internet survey! (In their FAQ, they state that they use internet surveys & cell-phone surveys).

At the very least, even if we assume that the 302 people are registered democratic voters and that it was’t an internet survey, we’re looking at about a 9-10% margin of error (±7% for the sample size and ±2-3% for using cell-phones), which is more than the survey says Clinton leads by. Therefore, the survey could potentially mean the opposite of what it says it means. I have called “DHM Research” repeatedly to inquire further but they have not picked up.

more: https://johnlaurits.com/2016/05/11/psa-pay-no-attention-to-articles-claiming-clinton-leads-in-oregon/

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
PSA: Pay No Attention to Articles Claiming Clinton Leads in Oregon! (Original Post) silvershadow May 2016 OP
John Laurits is a treasure. grasswire May 2016 #1
I absolutely agree! Appreciate your insights from Oregon, too. nt silvershadow May 2016 #2
I live here, I'll eat my fucking hat if she wins Oregon. Warren DeMontague May 2016 #3
Thank you for your comments. Gives me some perspective. nt silvershadow May 2016 #4
Sounds like one of those out-and-out-liar polls Art_from_Ark May 2016 #5
In 2008 Oregon went 59% for Obama Pastiche423 May 2016 #6

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
1. John Laurits is a treasure.
Thu May 12, 2016, 03:55 AM
May 2016

I, of course, know that story is BS because I live in Oregon, I was at the "birdie" rally, and I am seeing Bernie mania everywhere here. It's going to be a big, big night for Bernie!!

Pastiche423

(15,406 posts)
6. In 2008 Oregon went 59% for Obama
Fri May 13, 2016, 07:26 PM
May 2016

and 41% for her.

I'm listening to John Laurits. I am paying them no mind.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Bernie Sanders»PSA: Pay No Attention to ...