Fri Feb 12, 2016, 10:30 PM

I think a Clinton presidency would set the women's movement back,

not propel it further. She is still a bad candidate. She's running her second bad campaign. Luckily, with the Internet, we are informed and have choices beyond the establishment dribble they'd love to limit us to. It has been satisfying seeing everything being hurled by her campaign backfire over and over again. She gives women a bad name. Go Bernie. He's a people person. Luckily, corporations don't vote.

9 replies, 1490 views

Thread info Bookmark this thread Trash this thread

Reply to this thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

9 replies	Author	Time	Post
I think a Clinton presidency would set the women's movement back, (Original post)	DamnYankeeInHouston	Feb 2016	OP
My wife said very much the same thing.....	Capt.Rocky300	Feb 2016	#1
you will be alerted on	Duckhunter935	Feb 2016	#2
I think everything will be set back with Clinton.	Cassiopeia	Feb 2016	#3
Clinton's ascendancy	swilton	Feb 2016	#4
The Bill Problem	Dems to Win	Feb 2016	#5
So do I. Especially with the foot-in-mouth surrogates she uses!	CharlotteVale	Feb 2016	#6
I think her "I am a woman" campaign already does that.	Kalidurga	Feb 2016	#7
Hillary is proving that a woman can be just as corrupt as the worst of men	AZ Progressive	Feb 2016	#8
Hillary is actively tarnishing the image of women	AZ Progressive	Feb 2016	#9

Response to DamnYankeeInHouston (Original post)

Fri Feb 12, 2016, 10:36 PM

Capt.Rocky300 (1,005 posts)

1. My wife said very much the same thing.....

to her friend who is a HRC supporter.

Reply to this post

Response to DamnYankeeInHouston (Original post)

Fri Feb 12, 2016, 10:37 PM

Duckhunter935 (16,974 posts)

2. you will be alerted on

Can't say anything like that about her

Reply to this post

Response to DamnYankeeInHouston (Original post)

Fri Feb 12, 2016, 10:38 PM

Cassiopeia (2,603 posts)

3. I think everything will be set back with Clinton.

We'll reinforce the 1% at the expense of the 99% and the rights and needs we face.

Reply to this post

Response to DamnYankeeInHouston (Original post)

Fri Feb 12, 2016, 10:48 PM

swilton (5,069 posts)

4. Clinton's ascendancy

is due to cronyism and nepotism, not her talent. Yet the choreography would have us believe that Hillary is wonder woman....Once the façade is lifted one can see that she's nothing but a political hack.

Reply to this post

Response to DamnYankeeInHouston (Original post)

Fri Feb 12, 2016, 11:05 PM

Dems to Win (2,161 posts)

5. The Bill Problem

Hillary is famous because of Bill and Hillary had the nomination to the New York Senate seat handed to her because of Bill. It's kind of tough to think that Hillary, if she becomes president, will have been elected 100% in her own right.

As a feminist, I object to returning the Sexual Harasser in Chief to the White House in any capacity. The thought of Bill as First Gentleman is puke-worthy.

So many fundamental flaws to her candidacy. I honestly don't understand why prominent feminists have been supporting Hillary for President for so many years.

Reply to this post

Response to DamnYankeeInHouston (Original post)

Fri Feb 12, 2016, 11:18 PM

CharlotteVale (2,717 posts)