Bernie Sanders
Related: About this forumIf you should see a post entitled
"B3rnie S@nders describes 'rape fantasy' in bizarre 1972 essay"*
may I suggest that you just let it sink without comment. I think the sane Hillary people willdo their job with no need of interference from us.
It's the old concept of the "extinction program" that you may remember from those boring lectures about BF Skinner.
*Avoiding popularizing a phrase on search engines per advice below
Mr. Robot
(39 posts)so it's dismissed.
I hold no grudges for something done 40 years ago.
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)on that thread right after I posted here about it. It was zapped before the vote was even completed.
That was quick and gratifying. In general, I have been encouraging people to just let these nonsense posts die. The same for nonsense Hillary posts.
marym625
(17,997 posts)I'm glad she deleted it. I like KMOD and was surprised by her posts tonight. Especially after this http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1280&pid=9200
Man, if people posted in retaliation all the time, this place would be. I don't even want to think about it.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)That it's possible some might want there to be as many references as possible, so that it will start showing up on search engines.
And of course here I am kicking another reference Hmm, maybe placing an asterisk in place of the first "a" in your post might be a good idea?
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)I never even think of stuff like that.
I'll edit.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)Paranoids and people who really do have someone out to get them.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)"Perceptive"
I think Woody Allen came up with that.
marym625
(17,997 posts)edgineered
(2,101 posts)eta: Keefer meaning the poster in this case.
Chathamization
(1,638 posts)So, Keefer wrote another story, did he?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1280&pid=10817
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
nasty and pointless name calling....when will du stop doing this?
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Tue Jun 2, 2015, 12:10 AM, and the Jury voted 2-5 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: meh
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Dont believe that was nasty or name calling, on the other hand if all you have as your argument is to compare someone to a different person then you dont have an argument at all.
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: There was no name calling in the post. I think the alerter misread it or something.
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
marym625
(17,997 posts)And it was a piece that women here have defended as an accurate portrayal of what women coming of age went through at the time. It wasn't badly written (not worthy of any awards ( but the spoke to what men seemed to want to believe all women thought.
Bernie Sanders has nothing to try to excuse or apologize for
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)The problem of course is that it takes some capacity for complex thought to get it that Bernie was attempting a satire.
Rhiannon12866
(205,074 posts)I met him back when I was in college, gave his last lecture ever at my school since it was his alma mater. The Psych majors had a meetup with him beforehand, were allowed to ask him questions. He was very entertaining, had quite the sense of humor, and I understand young "Fred" was quite a cutup in his undergraduate days. I rarely get a chance to share that...
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)were boring. At least some found them so. (Not me, actually. Operant conditioning theory works within its own realm and is useful for a lot of purposes, including keeping me fed at one point in my career).
Rhiannon12866
(205,074 posts)He took the opportunity to clear up some misconceptions, that he hadn't kept his baby daughter in a "Skinner Box," and that she grew up just fine, and that he and Carl Rogers were lifelong close personal friends.
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)studies of cats in "puzzle boxes." Skinner fleshed out a lot of detail.
2 things you might want to read to put Skinner in perspective. The first is Harry Harlow's 1950 (I think) APA Presidential Address entitled Mice, Monkeys, Men & Motives. It was printed in the American Psychologist in about 1952 & probably abailable as a pdf online.
The other "assigned reading" is Noam Chomsky's review of Skinner's Verbal Behavior. I think it appeared in 1959 in the journal Language, but all of this is from at least 30 year-old memory, which is how long it's been since I taught learning theory.
Rhiannon12866
(205,074 posts)I'm very interested. And you have quite a memory! LOL. I became a big fan of Behaviorism when I saw it work. We senior psych majors all had "patients," under supervision, of course. I worked with an institutionalized autistic boy and an agoraphobic woman who both made remarkable progress. Of course, I was also an admirer of Carl Rogers, so think the "unconditional positive regard" didn't hurt...
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)I either worked as the staff psychologist at or consulted to several facilities for the developmentally disabled, an acute psych hospital, and a number of nursing homes that housed large populations of chronically mentally ill people. This was an era when such places were under the gun of Federal inspectors to reduce psychotropic medications & replace them with behavioral & environmental interventions. I was very busy all over N. Central & Western WI.
I always viewed a behavior program as a feedback mechanism that informs the patient about their behavior & provides them a reason for caring. My theoretical position is very different from Skinner's.
One thing I will mention is that I always thought there were some interesting and useful ideas in Walden II; the idea of an "experimental society" that focuses on improving its own functioning struck me as a great idea. For example, if a "welfare" system is implemented & doesn't accomplish its goals (e.g. improving the lot of the recipients & restoring them to meaningful lives), then the solution will come not from scrapping the whole idea along with its goals, but from tinkering with it until it works.
Paka
(2,760 posts)she allowed him good leeway to expand on that very issue. It's a non-starter when looked at in perspective, but I'm sure that won't stop the Hillary folks.