Thu Apr 10, 2014, 07:19 AM
n2doc (47,953 posts)
The case for Elizabeth Warren for president, in 7 minutes
BY CHRIS CILLIZZA
April 8 at 3:15 pm There's only one person in the Democratic party who has a credible path to beating Hillary Rodham Clinton in a 2016 Democratic primary. And her name is Elizabeth Warren. As we've written before, Warren has the national profile, the liberal icon status and the demonstrated fundraising capacity -- $40 million for a Senate race ain't too shabby -- that would, theoretically give her a chance to run as the liberal/non-establishment alternative to Clinton. Now, we don't think she's running. And, even if she did Clinton would be tough to beat. But, Warren went to Minnesota over the weekend to headline the Humphrey-Mondale dinner, a fundraiser for the state Democratic party, and showed why she would create some nervousness in the Clinton ranks if she did change her mind. The entire video runs just under 7 minutes and is worth watching. But, if you're a skimmer, just watch the first 15 seconds or so. video at link http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2014/04/08/the-case-for-elizabeth-warren-in-7-minutes/?tid=hpModule_ba0d4c2a-86a2-11e2-9d71-f0feafdd1394
|
27 replies, 3402 views
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
n2doc | Apr 2014 | OP |
VanillaRhapsody | Apr 2014 | #1 | |
n2doc | Apr 2014 | #2 | |
VanillaRhapsody | Apr 2014 | #3 | |
MannyGoldstein | Apr 2014 | #5 | |
VanillaRhapsody | Apr 2014 | #7 | |
Dawgs | Apr 2014 | #9 | |
VanillaRhapsody | Jun 2014 | #15 | |
Dawgs | Jun 2014 | #18 | |
VanillaRhapsody | Jun 2014 | #19 | |
Dawgs | Jun 2014 | #22 | |
VanillaRhapsody | Jun 2014 | #23 | |
Dawgs | Jun 2014 | #25 | |
VanillaRhapsody | Jun 2014 | #20 | |
Dawgs | Jun 2014 | #21 | |
VanillaRhapsody | Jun 2014 | #24 | |
Dawgs | Jun 2014 | #26 | |
MannyGoldstein | Apr 2014 | #4 | |
JDPriestly | Jun 2014 | #14 | |
VanillaRhapsody | Jun 2014 | #16 | |
scheming daemons | Apr 2014 | #6 | |
pscot | Apr 2014 | #8 | |
JDPriestly | May 2014 | #11 | |
VanillaRhapsody | Jun 2014 | #17 | |
Autumn | Apr 2014 | #10 | |
davidpdx | May 2014 | #12 | |
cascadiance | May 2014 | #13 | |
mylye2222 | Jun 2014 | #27 |
Response to n2doc (Original post)
Thu Apr 10, 2014, 07:27 AM
VanillaRhapsody (21,115 posts)
1. Unfortunately Elizabeth Warren supports Hillary Clinton
Elizabeth Warren 2022!!
|
Response to VanillaRhapsody (Reply #1)
Thu Apr 10, 2014, 07:28 AM
n2doc (47,953 posts)
2. HRC might not run n/t
Response to n2doc (Reply #2)
Thu Apr 10, 2014, 07:29 AM
VanillaRhapsody (21,115 posts)
3. Oh she's running....
which man would not run with the wind at their back the way HRC does?
|
Response to VanillaRhapsody (Reply #3)
Thu Apr 10, 2014, 07:55 AM
MannyGoldstein (34,589 posts)
5. Running from her record. nt
Response to MannyGoldstein (Reply #5)
Thu Apr 10, 2014, 08:49 AM
VanillaRhapsody (21,115 posts)
7. Oh no she isn't ....She is running for President and all signs point to her winning!
Response to VanillaRhapsody (Reply #7)
Thu Apr 10, 2014, 12:57 PM
Dawgs (14,755 posts)
9. Exactly.. just like in 2008. n/t
Response to Dawgs (Reply #9)
Tue Jun 3, 2014, 07:44 AM
VanillaRhapsody (21,115 posts)
15. And did she have the same favorabilities in 2008?
No she didnt....
Epic fail! |
Response to VanillaRhapsody (Reply #15)
Tue Jun 3, 2014, 08:29 AM
Dawgs (14,755 posts)
18. Favorabilities now are only slightly better than 2006, so not epic fail.
And, I feel sorry for you.
|
Response to Dawgs (Reply #18)
Tue Jun 3, 2014, 09:03 AM
VanillaRhapsody (21,115 posts)
19. you said 2008.... so epic change fail
Response to VanillaRhapsody (Reply #19)
Tue Jun 3, 2014, 01:04 PM
Dawgs (14,755 posts)
22. Her favoribilities were worse in 2008 than 2006, so even less of a fail.
Sorry.
|
Response to Dawgs (Reply #22)
Tue Jun 3, 2014, 01:34 PM
VanillaRhapsody (21,115 posts)
23. then they are now? Hardly.....she is likely your next President and everyone including Republicans
know it. They have no one who can defeat her.....that is why they fear her. That just makes me support her all the more
|
Response to VanillaRhapsody (Reply #23)
Tue Jun 3, 2014, 04:01 PM
Dawgs (14,755 posts)
25. I don't hear desperation at all in that post.
Not at all.
|
Response to Dawgs (Reply #18)
Tue Jun 3, 2014, 09:06 AM
VanillaRhapsody (21,115 posts)
20. no need of your false pity....just got a 30 percent raise
At a new job and i am over the moon happy. Thanks for your fake and unwarranted concern!
Save your sorrow for someone who needs it. |
Response to VanillaRhapsody (Reply #20)
Tue Jun 3, 2014, 01:02 PM
Dawgs (14,755 posts)
21. Not false pity. I'm a liberal.
I always feel sorry for people that are ignorant and vote against their best interest.
It's in my nature. BTW, congrats on the new raise. |
Response to Dawgs (Reply #21)
Tue Jun 3, 2014, 01:36 PM
VanillaRhapsody (21,115 posts)
24. havent voted against my interests at all Obamacares kept me insured until this job
so you are waaaaay off base. How dare YOU presume what my interests are!!! I am most certainly not ignorant.....but you are for being so presumptous
|
Response to VanillaRhapsody (Reply #24)
Tue Jun 3, 2014, 04:02 PM
Dawgs (14,755 posts)
26. Okay. You're not ignorant.
And, sorry. Vote for whoever you want.
|
Response to VanillaRhapsody (Reply #1)
Thu Apr 10, 2014, 07:54 AM
MannyGoldstein (34,589 posts)
4. Link please?
Thanks!
![]() |
Response to VanillaRhapsody (Reply #1)
Tue Jun 3, 2014, 02:33 AM
JDPriestly (57,936 posts)
14. Elizabeth Warren will run if we push her to.
Vanilla Rhapsody, have you read her book?
If you read her book, you may agree with me that she will run if we want her to. |
Response to JDPriestly (Reply #14)
Tue Jun 3, 2014, 07:45 AM
VanillaRhapsody (21,115 posts)
16. I have it on audio and I am listening to HER tell it!
she says she doesn't want to run and I think she tells the truth....why don't YOU?
|
Response to n2doc (Original post)
Thu Apr 10, 2014, 08:09 AM
scheming daemons (25,487 posts)
6. the case against, in 10 seconds
She doesn't want the job.
|
Response to scheming daemons (Reply #6)
Thu Apr 10, 2014, 10:50 AM
pscot (21,006 posts)
8. One more reason she should get it
Response to scheming daemons (Reply #6)
Tue May 6, 2014, 01:47 AM
JDPriestly (57,936 posts)
11. She takes jobs when they are offered. Read her book and you will understand that
she is a person who takes opportunities when offered. Her life has been positively serendipitous. She doesn't think twice though when asked to do something. She usually says yes if saying yes will further a cause she believes in. Read her book and you may want her to run. It would not surprise me. It's a great book. It will rekindle your idealism and enthusiasm for the America we could have but don't thanks to all the corporatist jingoism in both parties over the past 50 years or so.
|
Response to JDPriestly (Reply #11)
Tue Jun 3, 2014, 07:46 AM
VanillaRhapsody (21,115 posts)
17. I am listening to HER read it.....perhaps that is what YOU should do...instead of reading
into it like a mind reader!
|
Response to n2doc (Original post)
Mon Apr 21, 2014, 02:44 PM
Autumn (42,593 posts)
10. She had me in 17 seconds.
![]() |
Response to n2doc (Original post)
Tue May 27, 2014, 06:08 AM
davidpdx (22,000 posts)
12. She is great
and so funny as well.
|
Response to n2doc (Original post)
Wed May 28, 2014, 08:50 PM
cascadiance (19,537 posts)
13. And she's one of the few challengers that Clinton supporters can't play the "anti-woman" card...
... and then both candidates would have to focus on issues instead of trying to deflect to that kind of distraction of a "critique" of opposition.
And on issues, I think Warren still wins with the traditional Democratic party electorate. with her ideas that are far more in synch with what most of us the 99% want and not what a board member of Wal-Mart would and a supporter of H-1B program expansion wants. |
Response to n2doc (Original post)
Wed Jun 4, 2014, 02:05 AM
mylye2222 (2,992 posts)
27. E. Warren SHOULD REALLY RUN.
As I see her faaaar moooore liberal than Clinton I think we do need her as nominee and maybe next president.
With Sanders on ticket. The Best alternative to Clinton . |