HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Retired » Retired Groups » Elizabeth Warren (Group) » The case for Elizabeth Wa...

Thu Apr 10, 2014, 07:19 AM

The case for Elizabeth Warren for president, in 7 minutes

BY CHRIS CILLIZZA
April 8 at 3:15 pm

There's only one person in the Democratic party who has a credible path to beating Hillary Rodham Clinton in a 2016 Democratic primary. And her name is Elizabeth Warren.

As we've written before, Warren has the national profile, the liberal icon status and the demonstrated fundraising capacity -- $40 million for a Senate race ain't too shabby -- that would, theoretically give her a chance to run as the liberal/non-establishment alternative to Clinton. Now, we don't think she's running. And, even if she did Clinton would be tough to beat. But, Warren went to Minnesota over the weekend to headline the Humphrey-Mondale dinner, a fundraiser for the state Democratic party, and showed why she would create some nervousness in the Clinton ranks if she did change her mind.


The entire video runs just under 7 minutes and is worth watching. But, if you're a skimmer, just watch the first 15 seconds or so.

video at link

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2014/04/08/the-case-for-elizabeth-warren-in-7-minutes/?tid=hpModule_ba0d4c2a-86a2-11e2-9d71-f0feafdd1394

27 replies, 3402 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 27 replies Author Time Post
Reply The case for Elizabeth Warren for president, in 7 minutes (Original post)
n2doc Apr 2014 OP
VanillaRhapsody Apr 2014 #1
n2doc Apr 2014 #2
VanillaRhapsody Apr 2014 #3
MannyGoldstein Apr 2014 #5
VanillaRhapsody Apr 2014 #7
Dawgs Apr 2014 #9
VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #15
Dawgs Jun 2014 #18
VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #19
Dawgs Jun 2014 #22
VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #23
Dawgs Jun 2014 #25
VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #20
Dawgs Jun 2014 #21
VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #24
Dawgs Jun 2014 #26
MannyGoldstein Apr 2014 #4
JDPriestly Jun 2014 #14
VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #16
scheming daemons Apr 2014 #6
pscot Apr 2014 #8
JDPriestly May 2014 #11
VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #17
Autumn Apr 2014 #10
davidpdx May 2014 #12
cascadiance May 2014 #13
mylye2222 Jun 2014 #27

Response to n2doc (Original post)

Thu Apr 10, 2014, 07:27 AM

1. Unfortunately Elizabeth Warren supports Hillary Clinton

 

Elizabeth Warren 2022!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to VanillaRhapsody (Reply #1)

Thu Apr 10, 2014, 07:28 AM

2. HRC might not run n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to n2doc (Reply #2)

Thu Apr 10, 2014, 07:29 AM

3. Oh she's running....

 

which man would not run with the wind at their back the way HRC does?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to VanillaRhapsody (Reply #3)

Thu Apr 10, 2014, 07:55 AM

5. Running from her record. nt

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MannyGoldstein (Reply #5)

Thu Apr 10, 2014, 08:49 AM

7. Oh no she isn't ....She is running for President and all signs point to her winning!

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to VanillaRhapsody (Reply #7)

Thu Apr 10, 2014, 12:57 PM

9. Exactly.. just like in 2008. n/t

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Dawgs (Reply #9)

Tue Jun 3, 2014, 07:44 AM

15. And did she have the same favorabilities in 2008?

 

No she didnt....

Epic fail!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to VanillaRhapsody (Reply #15)

Tue Jun 3, 2014, 08:29 AM

18. Favorabilities now are only slightly better than 2006, so not epic fail.

 

And, I feel sorry for you.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Dawgs (Reply #18)

Tue Jun 3, 2014, 09:03 AM

19. you said 2008.... so epic change fail

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to VanillaRhapsody (Reply #19)

Tue Jun 3, 2014, 01:04 PM

22. Her favoribilities were worse in 2008 than 2006, so even less of a fail.

 

Sorry.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Dawgs (Reply #22)

Tue Jun 3, 2014, 01:34 PM

23. then they are now? Hardly.....she is likely your next President and everyone including Republicans

 

know it. They have no one who can defeat her.....that is why they fear her. That just makes me support her all the more

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to VanillaRhapsody (Reply #23)

Tue Jun 3, 2014, 04:01 PM

25. I don't hear desperation at all in that post.

 

Not at all.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Dawgs (Reply #18)

Tue Jun 3, 2014, 09:06 AM

20. no need of your false pity....just got a 30 percent raise

 

At a new job and i am over the moon happy. Thanks for your fake and unwarranted concern!

Save your sorrow for someone who needs it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to VanillaRhapsody (Reply #20)

Tue Jun 3, 2014, 01:02 PM

21. Not false pity. I'm a liberal.

 

I always feel sorry for people that are ignorant and vote against their best interest.

It's in my nature.

BTW, congrats on the new raise.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Dawgs (Reply #21)

Tue Jun 3, 2014, 01:36 PM

24. havent voted against my interests at all Obamacares kept me insured until this job

 

so you are waaaaay off base. How dare YOU presume what my interests are!!! I am most certainly not ignorant.....but you are for being so presumptous

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to VanillaRhapsody (Reply #24)

Tue Jun 3, 2014, 04:02 PM

26. Okay. You're not ignorant.

 

And, sorry. Vote for whoever you want.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to VanillaRhapsody (Reply #1)

Thu Apr 10, 2014, 07:54 AM

4. Link please?

 

Thanks!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to VanillaRhapsody (Reply #1)

Tue Jun 3, 2014, 02:33 AM

14. Elizabeth Warren will run if we push her to.

Vanilla Rhapsody, have you read her book?

If you read her book, you may agree with me that she will run if we want her to.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JDPriestly (Reply #14)

Tue Jun 3, 2014, 07:45 AM

16. I have it on audio and I am listening to HER tell it!

 

she says she doesn't want to run and I think she tells the truth....why don't YOU?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to n2doc (Original post)

Thu Apr 10, 2014, 08:09 AM

6. the case against, in 10 seconds

 

She doesn't want the job.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to scheming daemons (Reply #6)

Thu Apr 10, 2014, 10:50 AM

8. One more reason she should get it

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to scheming daemons (Reply #6)

Tue May 6, 2014, 01:47 AM

11. She takes jobs when they are offered. Read her book and you will understand that

she is a person who takes opportunities when offered. Her life has been positively serendipitous. She doesn't think twice though when asked to do something. She usually says yes if saying yes will further a cause she believes in. Read her book and you may want her to run. It would not surprise me. It's a great book. It will rekindle your idealism and enthusiasm for the America we could have but don't thanks to all the corporatist jingoism in both parties over the past 50 years or so.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JDPriestly (Reply #11)

Tue Jun 3, 2014, 07:46 AM

17. I am listening to HER read it.....perhaps that is what YOU should do...instead of reading

 

into it like a mind reader!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to n2doc (Original post)

Mon Apr 21, 2014, 02:44 PM

10. She had me in 17 seconds.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to n2doc (Original post)

Tue May 27, 2014, 06:08 AM

12. She is great

and so funny as well.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to n2doc (Original post)

Wed May 28, 2014, 08:50 PM

13. And she's one of the few challengers that Clinton supporters can't play the "anti-woman" card...

 

... and then both candidates would have to focus on issues instead of trying to deflect to that kind of distraction of a "critique" of opposition.

And on issues, I think Warren still wins with the traditional Democratic party electorate. with her ideas that are far more in synch with what most of us the 99% want and not what a board member of Wal-Mart would and a supporter of H-1B program expansion wants.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to n2doc (Original post)

Wed Jun 4, 2014, 02:05 AM

27. E. Warren SHOULD REALLY RUN.

 

As I see her faaaar moooore liberal than Clinton I think we do need her as nominee and maybe next president.
With Sanders on ticket.

The Best alternative to Clinton .

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread