2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumElizabeth Warren shows support for Hillary's Wall Street Financial Plan
http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2015/12/07/elizabeth-warren-shows-support-for-hillary-clintons-wall-street-plan/Secretary Clinton is right to fight back against Republicans trying to sneak Wall Street giveaways into the must-pass government funding bill, Ms. Warren, the liberal senator from Massachusetts, wrote on Facebook after Mrs. Clinton published an Op-Ed article in The New York Times with her proposals to regulate Wall Street.
In the Op-Ed, Mrs. Clinton specifically called for Republicans not to defund the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, which Ms. Warren previously oversaw. Whether its attacking the C.F.P.B., undermining new rules to rein in unscrupulous retirement advisers, or rolling back any part of the hard-fought progress weve made on financial reform, Ms. Warren wrote, she and I agree.
As high-profile Democratic elected officials line up to support Mrs. Clintons candidacy, Ms. Warren has remained neutral. This month, 13 of the 14 Democratic female United States senators attended a fund-raiser and rally in Washington for Mrs. Clinton, but the headlines from the event mostly focused on Ms. Warrens absence.
On Monday, Ms. Warren stopped short of endorsing Mrs. Clinton, but her message of support for the candidates Wall Street plan could do much to ease concerns that Mrs. Clintons deep donor base of financial executives would make her reluctant to install tough regulations.
How I'd Rein In Wall Street, Op Ed by Hillary Clinton:
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/07/opinion/hillary-clinton-how-id-rein-in-wall-street.html
My plan would strengthen the Volcker Rule by closing the loopholes that still allow banks to make speculative gambles with taxpayer-backed deposits. And I would fight to reinstate the rules governing risky credit swaps and derivatives at taxpayer-backed banks, which were repealed during last years budget negotiations after a determined lobbying campaign by the banks.
My plan also goes beyond the biggest banks to include the whole financial sector. Some have urged the return of a Depression-era rule called Glass-Steagall, which separated traditional banking from investment banking. But many of the firms that contributed to the crash in 2008, like A.I.G. and Lehman Brothers, werent traditional banks, so Glass-Steagall wouldnt have limited their reckless behavior. Nor would restoring Glass-Steagall help contain other parts of the shadow banking sector, including certain activities of hedge funds, investment banks and other non-bank institutions. My plan would strengthen oversight of these activities, too increasing leverage and liquidity requirements for broker-dealers and imposing strict margin requirements on the kinds of short-term borrowing that also played a major role in spurring the financial crisis. We need to tackle excessive risk wherever it lurks, not just in the banks.
Second, I would appoint tough, independent regulators and ensure that both the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission are independently funded as other critical regulators are now so that they can do their jobs without political interference. I would seek to impose a tax on harmful high-frequency trading, which makes markets less stable and less fair. And we need to reform stock market rules to ensure equal access to information, increase transparency and minimize conflicts of interest.
Finally, executives need to be held more accountable. No one should be too big to jail. I would seek to extend the statute of limitations for major financial crimes to 10 years from five and enhance rewards for whistle-blowers. I would work to ensure that financial firms admit wrongdoing as part of settlements in instances of egregious misconduct, and increase transparency about the terms of settlement and the fines actually paid to the government. Fines should be more than just the cost of doing business to these companies they should be an effective disincentive for illegal behavior.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)Hillary doesn't....
but Bernie does.
I'm pretty sure I can guess which way Warren leans.
pnwmom
(108,955 posts)Elizabeth Warren has also spoken about the need to regulate shadow banking.
NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)sure that would be great, just not sure for WHO. I think I'll stick with Bernie's plan for Wall St. and reinstating Glass-Steagall.
pnwmom
(108,955 posts)How will simply reinstating Glass-Stegall fix that?
NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)tomorrow at 2PM when Bernie gives his talk on it and I'm sure you will be able to find out how. I can tell you from his site that is doesn't SOLELY revolve around reinstating Glass-Steagall, but that is a major component of the reform.
pnwmom
(108,955 posts)is a much better idea than reinstating the original bill. The shadow banking system came into being after the original bill was passed, so G-S doesn't deal with it.
rbrnmw
(7,160 posts)It's a good plan. I have no idea why any Progressive would find fault with it.
NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)of it is "trust".
rbrnmw
(7,160 posts)pnwmom
(108,955 posts)CONGRESS.
Which is the only body with the power to pass legislation.
Too bad all the candidates aren't helping to elect more Dems to Congress, because that's where the legislative action will be. Or not be.
Bleacher Creature
(11,252 posts)Words absolutely fail.
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)pnwmom
(108,955 posts)JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)Depends on one's perspective.
MrWendel
(1,881 posts)The New York times is a fraudulent paper in 5,4,3,2,...
Hekate
(90,556 posts)(I hope those two like looking at the undercarriage of public transportation conveyances.)
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)rbrnmw
(7,160 posts)oasis
(49,327 posts)That fizzing sound you hear is the air slowly leaving the balloon that's been keeping the pie up in the sky.
Fearless
(18,421 posts)Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)And, just prior to this story, Warren skipped a Senate women Clinton event.
http://www.cnn.com/2015/11/30/politics/hillary-clinton-elizabeth-warren-fundraiser/
I actually think Warren isn't going to endorse until there's a nominee.
But, she has and does work with Bernie on many good bills. A couple:
Sanders, Warren introduce bill to hike Social Security checks
Liberals Roar As Bernie Sanders Joins Elizabeth Warren On Bill To Reinstate Glass-Steagall
pnwmom
(108,955 posts)And it underlines the fact that Hillary wants to EXPAND Glass-Segel, not just reinstate it. And that is a major thing she and Warren agree on, in addition to others (for example ,Hillary's strong support of the Consumer Protection Agency.)
ljm2002
(10,751 posts)...why would you be posting them now as if it's news?
Oh yeah, Bernie's giving a speech about his Wall Street proposals tomorrow. Gotta get in front of it dontcha know...
pnwmom
(108,955 posts)ljm2002
(10,751 posts)...both URLs show 2015/12/07 in them and when I clicked through to the first article it had a big fat DEC 7 right at the top of the page.
So you're saying that Hillary's plan just came out this week? I thought she was supposed to be way, way ahead of Bernie on that score.
None of this is very clear.
pnwmom
(108,955 posts)that he's announcing his plan a month after hers.
ljm2002
(10,751 posts)...I see you edited your post to remove YOUR statement that her actual plan just came out this week, while what came out a month ago was just a draft.
Nice move if a little, um, dishonest.
pnwmom
(108,955 posts)ljm2002
(10,751 posts)...I guess it was a little inconvenient to mention that one month ago, all Clinton had was a DRAFT of a plan. Her actual PLAN just came out a week ago. So, like I said, I guess she really isn't that far ahead of Sanders in the Wall Street policy department.
pnwmom
(108,955 posts)You seem to want to have it both ways.
ljm2002
(10,751 posts)...what I said was that it wasn't clear to me.
Which it was not.
Editing your post to remove relevant information made it even less clear.
Vattel
(9,289 posts)No one is saying that the only thing that should be done to reign in Wall Street is to return to Glass-Steagall. So Clinton mostly attacks a straw man here. And she doesn't explain why she thinks that returning to Glass-Seagall shouldn't be part of the solution. She might have good reasons, but it's hard to know because she doesn't say what her reasons are. Does she address this elsewhere?