2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumThe people have spoken
From sea to shining sea
http://postonpolitics.blog.palmbeachpost.com/2015/12/19/poll-who-won-the-third-democratic-debate/
http://fox5sandiego.com/2015/12/19/poll-who-won-the-3rd-democratic-debate/
http://time.com/4154954/democratic-debate-third-poll/
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/democrats/12060328/Who-won-the-Democratic-debate-Read-our-verdicts-and-then-cast-your-vote.html
http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2015/12/19/democratic-presidential-debate-live-blog/
my mistake...edited out old link and inserted current links
updated - added one more
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)The media will straighten it all out tomorrow.
Matariki
(18,775 posts)Absolutely.
Segami
(14,923 posts)bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)Doesn't matter if it is not scientific...cannot be denied.
PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)Bigger than any other poll by a VERY large margin.
msongs
(67,395 posts)mythology
(9,527 posts)See the great thing about science is that it's true whether you believe it or not.
Docreed2003
(16,858 posts)Seriously though...the "real" polls will be up tomorrow proving that these "Online voters" are clearly mistaken, because, you know, "scientific polling"
Android3.14
(5,402 posts)Anything from tonight's debate?
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)angrychair
(8,695 posts)same results...Bernie wins
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Tarc
(10,476 posts)on a webpage will not win an election, I'm afraid.
artislife
(9,497 posts)Right on schedule.
Thanks for being predictable.
Renew Deal
(81,855 posts)valerief
(53,235 posts)ViseGrip
(3,133 posts)angrychair
(8,695 posts)Juicy_Bellows
(2,427 posts)angrychair
(8,695 posts)I fixed it. Thanks
Juicy_Bellows
(2,427 posts)I'm sure we'll be told that 'they don't do internet polls - tut tut' any minute now. Oh wait, they already did.
Cheers.
senz
(11,945 posts)Or is it supposed to be mysterious?
Juicy_Bellows
(2,427 posts)That would be Leadbelly.
An absolute bad ass American hero.
Oh... You probably meant the image - it was supposed to be one of those nervous collar yank things.
Obviously it fell flat!
Cheers.
senz
(11,945 posts)It's the avatar, I guess it's too small for me to make out. Didn't realize it was Leadbelly.
Thanks!
Juicy_Bellows
(2,427 posts)Cheers.
MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)The Telegraph was very strange to navigate and decide what to do, but had arrived already at their conclusions. Sort of like the DNC and HRC strategy.
angrychair
(8,695 posts)There is over 5 thousand votes for Bernie and only a couple of hundred for the other two
PatrickforO
(14,570 posts)rectal-cranial issue going on.
MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)I guess I DID!!!
brooklynite
(94,502 posts)Looks like some of "the people" didn't care to say anything.
PatrickforO
(14,570 posts)Christmas, it's really hard to think many people will watch it at all.
Which they did not.
Wasserman Schultz might end up losing us the election because of her ineptitude. She isn't just putting her thumb on the scale for Clinton - she's standing on it. But her single minded focus might well cost the Dems seats because I'm not thinking Clinton will have very long coat tails.
senz
(11,945 posts)The people like him and they need to get out and vote for him.
PatrickforO
(14,570 posts)It really is nice to know that Debbie Wasserman Schultz is ceaselessly working to get Clinton elected and that her muscle-minded approach may cost the Dems lots of seats.
Heck, it feels great to know that she's behind us all the way...with a knife to stab us in the back.
stevil
(1,537 posts)Took me two minutes to find:
https://www.reddit.com/r/SandersForPresident/comments/3xitwh/debate_megathread_democratic_debate_tonight_at/cy56f1i
And this one is even better:
https://www.reddit.com/r/SandersForPresident/comments/3xjl8g/third_democratic_debate_post_poll_links/
Scuba
(53,475 posts)firebrand80
(2,760 posts)Agony
(2,605 posts)for ya