Mon Dec 14, 2015, 12:33 PM
CajunBlazer (5,648 posts)
(Updated 12/14) Latest Democratic nomination poll results - courtesy of RealClearPolitics.comLast edited Mon Dec 14, 2015, 02:38 PM - Edit history (1)
Monday, December 14
2016 Democratic Presidential Nomination (NBC/WSJ) Clinton 56, Sanders 37, O'Malley 4 Clinton +19 Iowa Democratic Presidential Caucus (DMR/Bloomberg) Clinton 48, Sanders 39, O'Malley 4 Clinton +9 Sunday, December 13 Iowa Democratic Presidential Caucus (FOX News) Clinton 50, Sanders 36, O'Malley 5 Clinton +14 Saturday, December 12 (No new Democratic primary polls) Friday, December 11 (No new Democratic primary polls) Thursday, 12/10/15 2016 Democratic Presidential Nomination (CBS/NYTimes) Clinton 52, Sanders 32, O'Malley 2 Clinton +20 Wednesday, 12/9/15: New Hampshire 2016 Democratic Primary (CNN/WMUR) Sanders 50, Clinton 40, O'Malley 1 Sanders +10 Tuesday, 12/8/15: Iowa Democratic Presidential Caucus (Monmouth) Clinton 55, Sanders 33, O'Malley 6 Clinton +22 North Carolina Democratic Presidential Primary (PPP) Clinton 60, Sanders 21, O'Malley 10 Clinton +39 Monday, 12/7/15: Iowa Democratic Presidential Caucus (CNN/ORC) Clinton 54, Sanders 36, O'Malley 4 Clinton +18 2016 Democratic Presidential Nomination (IBD/TIPP) Clinton 51, Sanders 33, O'Malley 1 Clinton +18 Friday, 12/4/15 2016 Democratic Presidential Nomination (CNN/ORC) Clinton 58, Sanders 30, O'Malley 2 Clinton +28 Thursday, 12/3/15: New Hampshire 2016 Democratic Primary (PPP) Sanders 42, Clinton 44, O'Malley 8 Clinton +2 Wednesday, 12/2/15: 2016 Democratic Presidential Nomination (Quinnipiac) Clinton 60, Sanders 30, O'Malley 2 Clinton +30
|
6 replies, 940 views
Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
CajunBlazer | Dec 2015 | OP |
NurseJackie | Dec 2015 | #1 | |
artislife | Dec 2015 | #2 | |
NurseJackie | Dec 2015 | #3 | |
artislife | Dec 2015 | #4 | |
CajunBlazer | Dec 2015 | #5 | |
artislife | Dec 2015 | #6 |
Response to CajunBlazer (Original post)
Mon Dec 14, 2015, 01:43 PM
NurseJackie (42,862 posts)
1. Truly impressive!
![]() |
Response to NurseJackie (Reply #1)
Mon Dec 14, 2015, 01:52 PM
artislife (9,497 posts)
2. courtesy
My courtesy to you.
Too bad I have no faith in the archaic polling system. |
Response to artislife (Reply #2)
Mon Dec 14, 2015, 01:57 PM
NurseJackie (42,862 posts)
3. That's okay.
Response to NurseJackie (Reply #3)
Mon Dec 14, 2015, 02:16 PM
artislife (9,497 posts)
4. yes.it is right!
|
Response to artislife (Reply #4)
Mon Dec 14, 2015, 02:43 PM
CajunBlazer (5,648 posts)
5. It's funny how people believe the polls when they say what they want them to say
And disbelieve them when they don't.
Polls are something I know a bit about. Trust me when I say there is nothing "archaic" about them. National polling companies employ experts in their fields to ensure that each segment of the voting population is properly represented. They put in enormous efforts into producing the most accurate, predictive results, because their futures as viable businesses are always on the line. |
Response to CajunBlazer (Reply #5)
Mon Dec 14, 2015, 03:32 PM
artislife (9,497 posts)
6. Not me
I have said many times that I think it is an archaic method.
Too many people have caller id. |