Sanders Has Already Won Primaries!

[MineralMan]

http://www.newsyoushouldntbelieve.com

Bernie Sanders Has Won Secret Primary Elections

Exclusive News Release!
by H.A. Poorlooser

It's not well known yet, but the outcome of the Democratic primary races has already been decided, and Bernie Sanders has won. In all 50 states, online results show clearly that Sanders has won every primary election and will be nominated by acclamation at the Democratic President Nominating Committee next summer.

Hard to believe? It's true, and was first revealed on a prominent Democratic website. What that means is that the entire continuing campaign for the Democratic nomination is a sham and an exercise designed only to placate the useless and clueless majority of Democratic voters.

The MSM is not covering this story of Senator Sanders' remarkable surprise victory because there is too much money to be made in advertising revenues and increased readership and viewership. By keeping The American People™ in the dark about the secret primary election that has already taken place, the MSM is ensuring that they will profit from the sham primaries that are scheduled for 2016.

Supporters of Senator Sanders should relax and not be concerned about his campaign at this point. The nomination is in the bag for him. Going forward, I will not be writing further about the Democratic primary races, but will focus my journalistic acumen on helping Rand Paul continue his masterful service to the nation in the U.S. Senate.



I'd like to thank my loyal readers for informing me of this secret election, and hope they will continue to read my editorial comments about the real election for President in November of 2016. If that election has already occurred, I hope someone will notify me soon.

[NurseJackie]

1. Oh dear! (Thank you!)

Betty White thinks it's funny, too!

[MineralMan]

4. That website always has the latest poop

on elections and stuff, I find.

[lewebley3]

84. Agreed: Sanders supporters are always making things up

[daybranch]

92. could you provide examples?

I favor Bernie personally and we spend a lot of time in our group making sure our literature is accurate. So what is it we make up?

[roguevalley]

93. nothing like drivel to make the morning fly. don't ask for facts. they can only

ridicule, daybranch.

[Cha]

121. The OP is a shining example.

[polly7]

128. Really - "the 'LATEST' poop, I find"? (whoops .... truth) All 14 blog posts?

Last edited Sat Dec 5, 2015, 05:51 AM - Edit history (1)

On elections and stuff!

http://newsyoushouldntbelieve.blogspot.ca/

December - 1 pathetic (yes, seriously petty and pathetic) Hit Piece

November:

TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 24, 2015 - Why Candidates Should Avoid Eating in Public
Candidate's Photos While Eating Are Rarely Attractive


(little behind the times here, wouldn't ya say?)

MONDAY, NOVEMBER 23, 2015
NRA Proposes Exclusive New Gun Control Law
NRA Proposed Firearms Law Would Restrict Ownership
"In a closed news conference, Wayne LaPierre, of the National Rifle Association, today proposed a radical and exclusive firearms control law. After careful screening and passing through a metal detector and frisking, a select group of media reporters was admitted to the secure briefing room. LaPierre immediately launched into his remarks.

"The American People are shocked and dismayed at the recent violence in Paris and dangerous incidents within the United States. Firearms in the wrong hands are creating a dangerous world, and we are now proposing a federal law that would restrict firearms ownership to only those who deserve to own them. This law would impose strict limitations on who could own firearms by requiring NRA membership before a permit to own a firearm could be issued."

MONDAY, NOVEMBER 16, 2015
Bernie Sanders Announces Plan for Vermont Cabin on White House Grounds
As President, Sanders Will Live in Cabin - Turn WH into Homeless Shelter

Exclusive to NYSB by Anoo Ryder

In a surprising turn in the Democratic Primary race, Bernie Sanders, who has been flagging in the polls lately, made an announcement that he will forgo living in the luxurious White House quarters provided for Presidents if he is elected.



September's brilliant, cutting-edge 9 blog entries: http://newsyoushouldntbelieve.blogspot.ca/2015_09_01_archive.html

And the one that started it all!!!:

MONDAY, AUGUST 31, 2015
Monsanto's Secret GMO Pumpkin Seeds Threaten Competitions
Monsanto's Genetic Freak GMO Pumpkins Line Up to Overtake Competition
by
Jack O. Lanturn (Lanturn!!! - OMG, isn't that fuckin' hillarious!!!!)


Is this a site you read regularly MM to get the latest on elections and stuff? How did you come across such a gem, anyway?

MineralMan (78,360 posts)

5. If you're looking for the truth,
you can count on H.A. Poorlooser to deliver something.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251873778#post5


I'm pretty sure any elementary school child could have gotten you a bit more of the 'latest' in elections and stuff. Almost seems as though it might have been written by someone here with a really sad obsession with one of DU's most respected long-time posters, and wouldn't that be a hoot?!?! It's not like she doesn't have her 'followers' - riiiiiiight???

[MineralMan]

136. Yah, thanks.

The Internet is full of interesting websites, isn't it?

[polly7]

138. It sure is! This one ............ not really sure it's a good idea

to get your 'truths' from it, but you would know what your need for the latest poop is better than I do. (Petty, childish and vile to start a whole thread on slamming another DU'er, but that's jmhfo.)

Anything from FR you might want to share, I hear that's an interesting site too?

[MineralMan]

139. Haven't seen FR since 2006.

Sorry. I can't help you with that.

Hint: This wasn't about any DUer. It's about some random guy who writes for HuffPo. At least that's how I understand it.

[leftofcool]

2. OMG!

That is the funniest thing I have seen ever!

[MineralMan]

5. If you're looking for the truth,

you can count on H.A. Poorlooser to deliver something.

[leftofcool]

9. I just bookmarked this. Thanks for giving us the link.

[polly7]

130. LOL!!!

Seriously, are we reading the same site?

[Number23]

114. Yet ANOTHER proud, shimmering DU moment

from a poster who brings nothing but.

[immoderate]

3. Go Bernie!!

--imm

[DemocratSinceBirth]

6. I read it fast. I thought it was written by H.A. Goodloserman.

[leftofcool]

10. Bwhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

[MineralMan]

11. Oh, Hell no. Goodloserman writes

exclusively for another bogus website, as far as I know. When you want the genuine shit, you always look to H.A. Poorlooser on the website at the link.

[lunamagica]

7. K&R. Thank you for this!

[MoonRiver]

8. Fool me once, bwahahahaha!

[MineralMan]

13. You won't be fooled again, I'm sure.

[MoonRiver]

14. No siree Bob!

[bunnies]

12. Oh look. Some jerk went to another website to mock DUers again.

How cute.

[99Forever]

17. But that would a dishonestly jerk move to make.

What sort of person might do something like THAT?

[bunnies]

23. I cant imagine.

Certainly not a DUer though. A DUer would NEVER do that to one of our own.

[99Forever]

33. ....

[Historic NY]

21. Did your ever try google search of DU..........

probably not but for all the snark and shit posted here, it stays out there. Then of course people will access to the old DU can grab stuff from the past too.

What's posted on DU doesn't necessarily stay on DU.

[bunnies]

27. I know it doesnt stay here.

Freepers mock us on their site all the time. Freepers do that. This is freeper shit. Racking up the recs. Its disgusting.

[DemocratSinceBirth]

55. I was quoted at the Cave

Who is laughing now?



http://conservativecave.com/index.php?topic=101240.0

[bunnies]

59. I expect that shit from the RWNJ's. Not from one of our own.

And ewwww. Now I feel dirty. First time Ive ever been there.

[DemocratSinceBirth]

62. I google my name from time to time...

They should apologize to me as I was right about Walker.

[MineralMan]

63. Many DUers have been quoted over there.

That's their bag, I guess.

[DemocratSinceBirth]

71. I was goaded here into posting semi-biographical info that appeared elsewhere.

I will be more circumspect from here on out.

[MineralMan]

74. I gave up entirely on Internet anonymity long ago.

If someone really wants to know who someone is, it's never that hard to find out, really. Every so often, someone crows about figuring out who I am in real life. I've been doxed so many times that it's laughable. I finally gave up and made it impossibly easy, to help people avoid all that searching and stuff.

My attorney has a standard cease and desist form letter on file to deal with it.

[DemocratSinceBirth]

78. I am not smart enough to dox anybody...

Actually I did dox some guy who posted a mug shot once.

[MineralMan]

83. Believe it or not, there are some websites where

people do that on a regular basis. The stuff gets stored in hidden areas where it can be accessed by certain members of the site. I know of a couple of such sites where info about me is stored like that. I see the same excerpts of it appear once in a while here and there. It's funny, really. I just ignore it unless someone tries to contact me directly. Then that cease and desist letter goes out.

Some people are easily amused, I suppose.

[Cha]

125. The OP owns it. They wrote it and didn't self-delete so they stand by it.. too bad BS fans can't

handle the truth.

I recall another OP's crap was out on a rwinger site that time.. he finally deleted his POSUCS

[merrily]

61. Jury Results: 2-5 to leave it

Calling the OP a "jerk" is unnecessary and a personal attack that is against the rules. This post and the pile-on ends up making D.U. unpleasant for everyone.

the Jury voted 2-5 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Rude, over the top, pointless, personal attack.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: The OP sustained a Hide attempt, and so should this response. Don't like it? Try arguing your point. Yet another frivolous alert.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: "Some jerk" is not necessarily the OP.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: It's not at all clear to who the poster is calling a jerk.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Using the term jerk is pretty much kindness overkill for the DU septic tank that is GD-P. Anybody that decides to post here can probably handle the word. sharp_stick.

[bunnies]

76. lol. Someone alerted over "jerk"?

Good thing I didnt use the words I wanted to use. Now they want protection for mocking us on other sites too?

[MineralMan]

91. 'Twasn't me. I never alert on replies to my posts.

I'd much rather they stand for all to see. I've been called much worse, anyhow.

[Sheepshank]

104. although I didn't alert, I do think it was a jerky thing to do to call someone a jerk

leaving personal insults alone would have been a betyter choice.

[Cha]

124. Oh look you're personally insulting another DUer again.

[polly7]

132. Can you say 'petty, sad and juvenile'? nt.

[ismnotwasm]

15. Ho-ly Shit!

We're famous! But not, you know, in a good way...

[Historic NY]

16. H.A. Poorloser............

I almost wet my pants....

[MineralMan]

19. That's PoorLOOSER, I'll have you know.

Watch it. He's very sensitive about the proper spelling of his name.

[Skidmore]

47. *snort*

We need a too.

[NurseJackie]

52. OMG ... I missed that!

[workinclasszero]

18. It's true...I swear it!

[MineralMan]

20. But of course!

It's on the interwebs, so it must be true.

[workinclasszero]

35. Facebook polls are always right but..don't quote me

[MineralMan]

36. Say! I was there when he gave that speech, you know.

Wait...what?

[workinclasszero]

37. Lolz

[lovemydog]

106. "That internet meme about Abraham Lincoln is hilarious."

- Socrates

[ismnotwasm]

113. You guys are killing me here

[workinclasszero]

115. Lolz!

[jamzrockz]

22. Jury result

On Fri Dec 4, 2015, 01:04 PM an alert was sent on the following post:

Sanders Has Already Won Primaries!
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251873778

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

Mean spirited spam.

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Fri Dec 4, 2015, 01:11 PM, and the Jury voted 1-6 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Really dumb alert.
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: we need to separate Spam from News, and this is nothing more than sarcasm with an attention grabbing false headline, aka spam.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.

[MineralMan]

25. Thanks! Very interesting.

There are few more trustworthy sites than that one, I find. I trust it at least as much as Huffington Post. Really...

[randys1]

40. While jury system prevented this RIDICULOUS alert to be successful, the very fact it could

have been hidden is insane.

Jesus christ.

[leftofcool]

41. +1

[MineralMan]

50. Many alerts are clicked. Few are hidden.

That's the truth, according to Skinner. Most alerts do not end in hidden posts.

[Cha]

120. Tell that to my friends who are on timeout now because of frivilous alerts that were hidden.. and

I'm talking specifically about bravenak's last hide.

That just means there are too many stupid alerts not that there aren't too many that don't get hidden. The jury system sucks and is not fair on a democratic board.

[MineralMan]

141. You're right about that, yes.

There have been some unfortunate results recently.

[George II]

46. To think that someone alerted that! And probably one who posts nastiness in the name of.....

.....

[JustAnotherGen]

80. +1

[William769]

103. This is just as funny as the OP!

[ismnotwasm]

108. True that

[Cha]

122. HAHA.. they want the past covered up. Too bad.. it does come back to bite ya!

[Scootaloo]

26. Good thing Clinton don't need no stinkin' primaries!

Seeing as how her delegates can just declare her the winner against any and all vote results. besides, didn't you hear? She OWNS black and gay and latino and women voters! Has 'em in a binder, probably.

[Ed Suspicious]

29. Binders full of minorities!

They aught to get a filing cabinet.

[Scootaloo]

31. Naw. Filing cabinets are for the far more important "hardworking WHITE Americans"

No Iowans, though, Clinton doesn't approve of such extremists.

[artislife]

53. *chortle

I better check my name isn't there by mistake.

[MineralMan]

30. Well, see, then, it's good that it's already over, huh?

[Scootaloo]

44. Well, according to the Ever-Pious Church of Clinton, it's been "over" since 2007

This is why they have panic attacks every time Sanders gets 1% over her in a poll somewhere, and gripe about how caucuses are 'undemocratic" while announcing that primaries don't matter because of clinton's delegates.

I'm not worried, myself. I have it on good authority that Clinton is unfit to be president.

[MineralMan]

45. Her unfortunate RFK reference back in May of 2008

was stupid, wasn't it? It could well have been the thing that finally cost her the nomination. Maybe you don't remember that. As an Obama supporter at the time, it was facepalm time for me.

I didn't even know that site was still online.

[Scootaloo]

57. I remember a lot from 2008

That memory is a not-insubstantial part of my lack of support for Clinton now. She hasn't changed. Neither have her supporters, which is a really weird thing, as I haven't met one current clinton supporter who admits ot supporting her in 2008.

Wonder why that is.

[MineralMan]

60. I've met many, actually. Maybe we run in different circles.

I'm not one of them, though. I supported Obama and voted for him in my precinct caucus way back in February of 2008.

[NCTraveler]

28. Ohhh shit. H A Poorlooser!!!

That's funny.

And they truly linked to du. lol.

[zappaman]

32. jury results

AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service

On Fri Dec 4, 2015, 01:04 PM an alert was sent on the following post:

Sanders Has Already Won Primaries!
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251873778

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

Mean spirited spam.

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Fri Dec 4, 2015, 01:11 PM, and the Jury voted 1-6 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Really dumb alert.
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: we need to separate Spam from News, and this is nothing more than sarcasm with an attention grabbing false headline, aka spam.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.

[MineralMan]

34. Too funny... nt

[ronnykmarshall]

146. a lot of alerts ...

from peeps suffering from SUAS. Stick Up Ass Syndrome.

[mcar]

38. K&R

[Bobbie Jo]

39. !!!

OMG too funny.

Thanks, I needed the today.

[SMC22307]

42. Damn, that guy (or gal) is a regular Jonathan Swift!

[Skidmore]

43. That is such a great piece of

satire. Well done, whoever. I needed a giggle about now.

[Alfresco]

48. The New Media rules!

[MineralMan]

67. I hear New Media is replacing the MSM because it's always

factual and newsworthy. That's what I hear.

[Alfresco]

73. I have read the same thing right here on DU. Must be true.

[Capt. Obvious]

49. .

[MineralMan]

51. Didn't you post that yesterday in another thread?

What a lot of trouble you went to. An advanced search, screen cap and then uploading to an image upload site. BTW, I know of only one place where I have been called "MinimalMan." Interesting coincidence in that file name.

[artislife]

54. busy busy.

[MineralMan]

58. Idle hands are the devil's workshop, I understand.

A guy's gotta stay busy to stay out of trouble.

[artislife]

86. Don't forget quality time. nt

[NCTraveler]

56. Could you tell me what I am looking at there? Thanks MM. Love the op. nt.

[MineralMan]

64. It looks like a DU advanced search for OPs by me

for the month of November onward. I do post one or two a day, on average here. I find it amusing that someone would go to that trouble to be able to post something I'm happy to admit to. I post here, and have for years. You could search for any month since November of 2008 and find OPs I had posted.

I'm not sure what the point was supposed to be.

The reference to MinimalMan was based on the file name of that image, which I found by right clicking the image, which is stored at an anonymous image dump:

http:// s16.postimg.org/widd8g2wl/Minimal.jpg

[NCTraveler]

68. Thanks MM.

I have no clue why they would do that. Truly makes no sense(to me). Does show you start a lot of discussions on topics pertinent to the primaries combined with a little fun. Either way you get people talking.

[MineralMan]

70. I think it was an attempt to demonstrate that I post a lot.

Oddly, compared to some other DUers, I don't post a lot of OPs at all. It puzzled me yesterday, too.

[Cha]

123. WTF did he post all that for? Is he making some point? or just has nothing better to do?

[MineralMan]

140. I'm guessing that the latter is probably it.

I don't know for sure, though.

[msanthrope]

144. Ironically, using "minimal" was rather, well, obvious, no? nt

[merrily]

65. How can I help but take someone with the screen name H.A. Poorlooser seriously?

[MineralMan]

66. Well, of course.

Looks like a play on words, doesn't it?

[merrily]

69. Looks to me more like a spelling problem, but whatever.

It was the first clue to an unimpressive piece.

[MineralMan]

72. A lot of Internet political writing is unimpressive, I find.

But, there's so much of it. I guess that makes up for it.

[merrily]

79. I would not have made an OP of anything I found unimpressive. Then again, I don't make many OPs. nt

[MineralMan]

81. Thanks for kicking this thread again, merrily.

You're doing a great job of keeping it alive. I appreciate that.

[merrily]

82. You're welcome. I agree that people should see it for what it is.

[MineralMan]

85. It is exactly what it appears to be.

There are lots of people who write political satire. You can find it almost everywhere. It's all part of the fun of politics. I'm always happy to pass it along when I find it. Some is better than others, though, I'll grant you. But even weak satire has its place. It shows that people are paying attention.

[merrily]

87. We disagree about weak anti sanders satire being worth an OP--and we disagree so rarely, too!

OK, I think I've kicked this enough now.

[MineralMan]

88. Thanks again.

[rbrnmw]

110. hahaha

it's satire I thought it was funny

[freedom fighter jh]

75. What spelling problem?

Clearly it refers to some poor person who, unfortunately, is looser than, um, someone else.

I feel sorry for loose people. Or I might, if I knew what it meant to be loose.

[merrily]

77. Personally, I feel sorriest for the looser cannon people.

[freedom fighter jh]

99. good one!

[Agnosticsherbet]

89. You made my day.I needed a laugh

And between your OP and the renarks, I'm good.

[MineralMan]

90. "Laughter," as Art Linkletter said, "is the best medicine."

"A laugh a day keeps the shrink away." I said that, just now.

[Alfresco]

94. This is a Hall of Fame worthy post.

Maybe an added feature for DU?

[Duval]

95. Too funny!!

[MannyGoldstein]

96. Some people help start wars for no reason that create millions of casualties

Some people think those people should wield unlimited power. Other people think otherwise.

There are many people in this world, and most make decisions. We are fortunate to live in country where we can make decisions, a country where some people are basically OK with even horrifically stupid and/or sociopathic decisions allegedly because another person's supporters drive Volvos or some such bull@#$&. Because that is the nature of freedom.

Your choices may vary, of course.

[MisterP]

98. hey now, sometimes she benefits Latinos

[MineralMan]

109. Somewhere, I'm missing the connection to the

original post, Manny.

[polly7]

131. I'm sure you are, if that's your go-to place for the truth on elections and 'stuff'.

MineralMan (78,360 posts)

5. If you're looking for the truth,
you can count on H.A. Poorlooser to deliver something.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251873778#post5

Probably hasn't even heard of the horrors in the ME and NA or, at the very least, hasn't had time to make a petty mockery of suffering children yet.

[frylock]

97. Pure projection coming from Hillary supporter.

You have to be fucking shitting me with this twaddle.

[font color="white"]Thanks for kicking the thread.[/font]

[stupidicus]

100. that's prolly real funny stuff to the "looser" crowd

to the rest of us it's just more juvenile and dishonest exaggerations used to mock, etc, that a thanks for the kicking/bump cannot hope to obscure.

[Cha]

127. Nah.. "Wow! Latest ISideWith Results Show Sanders Winning in All 50 States" needs to be mocked.

It's ridiculous.

[postatomic]

101. Does this mean I won't get any more 'Hillary Shill' checks?

Excuse me..... I need to cancel a purchase of a vacation home in Aspen.

[William769]

102. OMFG!

MineralMan you win the internets today! Great job!

[Cha]

119. Definitely!.. Somebody had to say this..

"Supporters of Senator Sanders should relax and not be concerned about his campaign at this point. The nomination is in the bag for him. Going forward, I will not be writing further about the Democratic primary races, but will focus my journalistic acumen on helping Rand Paul continue his masterful service to the nation in the U.S. Senate."

[polly7]

129. He sure did - for the lamest thing many here have seen in a long, long time.

Apart from the site that stalks other DU'ers of course. I wonder if Sabrina's been on that to-do list for awhile, or if this was just a like totally new 'find'?

[Sheepshank]

105. That's a truly unfortunate broadcast.... of a poor choice of postings

That post has been the butt of many a joke here since it's original airing. But dammit, it's a DU joke and should stay here.

[riversedge]

107. By H.A. Poorlooser [aka H. A. Goodman} This article sounds so much like

what I read on this board. It gave me a belly laugh

[moobu2]

111. H.A. Poorlooser...LOL

[MeNMyVolt]

112. K and R!

[MaggieD]

116. That's hilarious!

Thanks for posting it!

[Fearless]

117. Nice meta. Too bad it's still here.

[seabeyond]

118. OMG.... That is too fuckin' funny. Nt.

[Cha]

126. It made our website look stupid.. 122 Recs.. Good that H.A. Poorlooser brought it to light and made

fun of it. It was ridiculous.

Shouldn't Rec stuff like that if you can't be proud of it.

[stevenleser]

145. It really did make DU look stupid. The linked OP and those who recc'ed it should be ashamed.

Its a clear signal of how over the top way too many Sanders supporters are here. And you can see posts by some of them here objecting to the article.

If you don't like the article, then don't post or rec something so blindingly stupid it begs to be ridiculed. After we all have denounced the efficacy of online polls for years, don't start claiming they are accurate because you would like to believe the conclusions of a few of them. Don't ridicule and throw everything including the kitchen sink at a civil rights activist group (BLM) and then several months later claim you never said those things and that BLM is great because one of its leaders likes Sanders.

And don't alert on and vote to hide stuff just because its against your candidate or points out inconvenient truths.

[Cha]

147. Right.. and then try to deny this..

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1107&pid=28945

[leftofcool]

133. Kicking this to the top

[Alfresco]

134. Can't stop laughing...kick

[Gothmog]

135. That on-line poll was so very silly when posted

That poll was on the same level as the university mock election that had Sanders winning most of the Texas delegates in Texas primary http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251780772 BTW, Sanders will get most of the delegates from Texas

[MineralMan]

137. There are all sorts of polling strategies.

Here's another interesting poll that produced fascinating results:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251876182

[treestar]

143. a prominent democratic web site you say?

All 50 states!