2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumNate Silver's Sept 4 Update: *76% Chance of Obama Win*
Updated 10:59 PM ET on Sept. 4
ELECTORAL VOTE
OBAMA = 310.9
ROMNEY = 227.1
----
CHANCE OF WINNING
OBAMA = 76.3%
ROMNEY = 23.7%
----
POPULAR VOTE
OBAMA = 51.2%
ROMNEY = 47.7%
http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/
napi21
(45,806 posts)I know my own feelings, but I try very hard to be objective when I think about who's going to win. After watching the Pub convention last week, and the Dem Convention (only the opening day), I can't even imagine any sane human voting for Rob-me & whinein' Ryan!
Last week, I read an article about pollsters and which ones were worth paying attention to, and the first one mentioned was 538.
I sure hope they're right this time!
Nate's numbers seem almost too good to be true sometimes.
I hope he is right!
Doctor Jack
(3,072 posts)Is anyone else getting that impression?
TroyD
(4,551 posts)Denninmi
(6,581 posts)Dole just never "caught fire" in the minds of most people. Clinton was controversial and had issues already at that point, but he clearly was the better choice.
Of course, no 2 elections are the same, but Romney is running a poor campaign, has no real message, and is floundering much like Dole.
TroyD
(4,551 posts)The difference though is that Clinton had a huge lead over Dole all year.
Romney is much closer to Obama in the polls than Dole was to Clinton.
mikekohr
(2,312 posts)universe in which about 46-47% (The Republican base) of the American People live. The polls are so static because all but a tiny percentage have made up their minds. Romney can only win by lies, a massive cash advantage and voter suppression. Can this work? Yes. Is it likely? No.
Nate Silver's prognostication of a 76% probability of President Obama winning is probably dead on.