Sad to say, just my opinion and nothing against Mrs. Clinton's supporters, I do not
think Bernie has a chance of winning the Democratic nomination. Omalley is way behind. Mrs. Clinton is inevitable! Even if you do not like her, she is better than any republican, republicans are not progressive.
You all have to vote for Hillary if she is the nominee, otherwise, there are stakes at the supreme court. Just my two cents from across the border. We got Justin Trudeau and we are proud!
= new reply since forum marked as read
that does not alter the truth about Bernie. Your experiences may alter your opinion about Bernie.
I can see there is no 'real' discussion here, as you've tried to impugn Bernie's sincerity and integrity, but have not offered a bit of evidence to back it up. Just your biased opinions. I have no opinions about Bernie other that those based on what I've read about his service, record, and history, which are all publically available (I'm not talking about biased web sources), which apparently are different than the sources you've read. Not surprising.
Bye! 
I suggest you keep your contact info private. A lot of people are thinking longingly of a possible flight across the border. 
Semi-serious jokes aside, be brave and believe that what you have accomplished up there is part of a large wave. Just hope it raises our boat too.
Clinton is not inevitable before a single vote has been cast. People can still make up their mind.
Until and not before Mrs. Clinton has the nomination we will continue to fight for Bernie because he best represents us. I care not a whit what other states' voters do: do you let your family members' voting preferences decide your vote for you? No, right? Then why much less would you let a bunch of Iowans and New Hampshirians (some of whom, I assume, are good people 
) decide your vote? I will be voting in the California primary for Bernie no matter what. And I will promote him until the very end (which will be November 2016 since he is going to win the nomination)
And if nothing else, I'll quote Mrs. Clinton herself on this:
"Hillary is the anointed one, has the super pacs." Totally bullshit all around.
Bernie Sanders will win by a land slide unseen before.
Bullshit.
Yet you admit that you can't even vote in our election. Enough from you akbacchus_BC
The word is anointed. OK
if so, you forgot to use the 
I remember a LOT of those. It wasn't expedient. It wasn't the time. No one was thinking about gay marriage. Advocating for gay marriage will hurt the Democratic Party. And much MUCH more. I remember well and the poster to which you are addressing was right out in front. It was all about political expediency, much like Clinton's vote to slaughter tens of thousands of Americans and a million Iraqis -- because she wanted to run for prezzy because, after all, it's her turn. 
[font size ="1"]President Bill Clinton with Al From, president of the Democratic Leadership Council, at a conference in 2000.[/font size]
New Democrats, in the politics of the United States, are an ideologically centrist faction within the Democratic Party that emerged after the victory of Republican George H. W. Bush in the 1988 presidential election. They are identified with centrist social/cultural/pluralist positions and neoliberal fiscal values. They are represented by organizations such as the Democratic Leadership Council (DLC), the New Democrat Network, and the Senate and House New Democrat Coalitions
After the landslide electoral losses to Ronald Reagan in the 1980s, a group of prominent Democrats began to believe their party was in need of a radical shift in economic policy and ideas of governance. The Democratic Leadership Council (DLC) was founded in 1985 by Al From and a group of like-minded politicians and strategists. They advocated a political "Third Way" as a method to achieve the electoral successes of Reaganism by adopting similar economic policies (Reagan Democrats and Moderate Republicans would provide burgeoning new constituencies after adding these new economic policies and politicians to our tent they contended) While hoping to retain, woman, minorities and other social issues allies with long ties to the party. Such would be their new Democratic coalition forged between fiscal right and social left under the "New" Democratic banner. The DLC disbanded in 2011 during an apparent re-branding of the New Democrat movement when money ties to the Koch bros. and Koch representatives placed on the DLC's board embarrassingly became common knowledge among the Democratic left. The DLC is survived by the Third Way, The New Democrat Coalition, and Al From's Progressive Policy Institute among other corporate funded groups that continue to sell their Economic-Right/Social-Left brand of "Centrism" to America.
The term Third Way refers to various political positions which try to reconcile right-wing and left-wing politics by advocating a varying synthesis of right-wing economic and left-wing social policies.
Third Way was created as a serious re-evaluation of political policies within various center-right progressive movements in response to international doubt regarding the economic viability of the state; economic interventionist policies that had previously been popularized by Keynesianism and contrasted with the corresponding rise of popularity for neo liberalism and the New Right. In a sense, 80s Moderate Republicans are almost identical to "Third Way" Democrats.
I strongly believe it's time for a serious re-evaluation of political policies within various center-left progressive movements in response to international doubt regarding the economic viability of the neoliberal corporate policies previously popularized by Reagan and Thatcher! For thirty years we have all but abandoned liberal solutions to economic problems, chasing instead the snake oil of supply side economics, austerity and neoliberal trade policy. These right wing policies have failed miserably, and rather than learn from the New Democrats failed experiments, the center-right faction of the democratic party has chosen instead to double down on failure with more free trade and austerity measures (to include cuts to Social Security).
In the face of a new gilded age of extreme wealth contrasted by an exponentially growing rate of poverty, a rapidly shrinking middle class and the emergence of an elite class of bankers, politicians and other predatory behemoths that are held firmly above the law and enabled to steal the remaining crumbs of wealth held by the masses without repercussion, it is not only time to return to Democratic principles of old that created the strongest most prosperous middle class in our history, it is time to reverse the damage done by the right thinking "New" Democrats and their failed policies with a new populism based on the needs of the people over the elite.
We do not need a "Fourth Way" to accomplish this, all we need is a return to the fundamentals of Keynesianism, a strong commitment to labor, increased spending on social programs (rather than cuts), progressive taxation, and an end to the cancer of privatization that would reduce the commons and the basic needs of the populace (such as health care and drinking water etc.) into the cash cows of profiteers of human suffering
Time to dump the "Third Way" for the unquestionably effective "Democratic way" made successful by the New Deal, The Great Society, and civil liberties. Our party can not serve two masters, the choice is clear, they must serve the financial elite, or the economically struggling populace
My choice has already been made.
Many of us don't have the negative thought process that you do. Sorry dude. You're out in left field on this one.
Now kindly move along. The next web site is just down the hall. 
