NYT's David Firestone: A Tax Plan That Defies the Rules of Math
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/12/opinion/sunday/romneys-tax-plan-defies-the-rules-of-math.html?_r=2&nl=todaysheadlines&emc=edit_th_20120812
For example, Mr. Romney wants to keep all the Bush tax cuts, then cut taxes much further, particularly for the rich, but he says the plan wont grow the deficit by a dime. He wont say how he will accomplish this there are no real numbers in his plan beyond a vague pledge to eliminate some loopholes. The Joint Committee would take one look at his substance-free plan and say, we cant work with this.
Mr. Romneys tax proposal is no different from any other aspect of his economic plan. He promises to cut nondefense spending by 5 percent, but wont tell voters what programs that will affect. He wants to repeal all of President Obamas regulations that burden the economy, but wont say which ones. And he pledges to eliminate health care reform, but wont discuss how or even whether he would replace it.
Earlier this month, a nonpartisan group of tax experts took matters into their own hands and tried to analyze the tax plan. What would happen, they asked, if you actually made all the cuts he has proposed? That would mean extending the Bush cuts, reducing income-tax rates by an additional 20 percent, and ending capital gains taxes for the middle class, the estate tax, the alternative minimum tax and the various taxes in health care reform, including the Medicare tax increase on high incomes. The experts at the Tax Policy Center estimated that this would cost $456 billion a year, starting in 2015.
But Mr. Romney said the cuts would be revenue neutral and cost nothing because they would be paid for by ending tax breaks and loopholes. He never identified those tax breaks, and now we know why the experts concluded that there arent enough loopholes in the tax code to balance out the cuts. Following Mr. Romneys plan would mean ending popular deductions for mortgage interest and charitable contributions, which would wind up raising taxes on the middle class, while the rich would still enjoy the benefits of an income-tax cut larger than the deductions they would lose.
He won't tell us, because he knows we won't like it.