Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Rosa Luxemburg

(28,627 posts)
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 01:15 PM Jul 2012

Romney's problem of his own making (Washington Post)

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/eugene-robinson-romneys-problem-of-his-own-making/2012/07/16/gJQAKjBepW_story.html?hpid=z2

Mitt Romney has every right to cloak his personal and professional finances in secrecy — and voters have every right to assume he has something embarrassing to hide. If this seems unfair, Romney has only himself to blame.

Through a series of miscalculations, Romney has managed to turn what should have been a minor hiccup into what may be a defining moment, and not in a good way. Attacks by President Obama’s campaign serve mainly to draw attention to the train wreck.

more
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Romney's problem of his own making (Washington Post) (Original Post) Rosa Luxemburg Jul 2012 OP
I knew this was a Eugene Robinson piece even before I saw his name in the link rocktivity Jul 2012 #1
Eugene produce quality Rosa Luxemburg Jul 2012 #2
One way his refusal to release might make sense. Waiting For Everyman Jul 2012 #3

rocktivity

(44,571 posts)
1. I knew this was a Eugene Robinson piece even before I saw his name in the link
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 01:43 PM
Jul 2012

It's too sensible for WaPo. And there never could have been a "hiccup" to "cure" if Mitt had released his tax returns as a matter of course.


rocktivity

Waiting For Everyman

(9,385 posts)
3. One way his refusal to release might make sense.
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 04:04 AM
Jul 2012

If his returns show that he shafted his own "money people" in some way, then delaying disclosure until they have donated all he can get out of them would make sense. The later, the better, if that's true.

In addition to that, I also think there is going to be conflict between sworn statements he has made. That could ultimately be more important, but without getting all the money he can first, he wouldn't even be able to defend himself. If he continues to stonewall, I think it's likely that he has shafted some friends. It wouldn't be shocking, given his personality.

And if I were on the Obama team... I'd want to see that possible explanation of it being suggested in the media anyway. It might get some of his backers good and paranoid. Maybe paranoid enough to withhold some donations.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Romney's problem of his o...