Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHillary Clinton Backs Bill That Would Ban 'Golden Parachutes' For Wall Street Bankers
http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/55e44f14e4b0b7a9633974eb
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 2598 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hillary Clinton Backs Bill That Would Ban 'Golden Parachutes' For Wall Street Bankers (Original Post)
VanillaRhapsody
Sep 2015
OP
Romulox
(25,960 posts)1. Isn't the bigger problem the revolving door between Ms. Clinton's staff and the big banks?
The groups note that during Clinton's tenure as secretary of state, two of her aides -- former Deputy Secretary Tom Nides and former undersecretary Robert Hormats -- received large bonuses, or "golden parachutes," from their Wall Street employers when they left to join Clinton's staff. Nides worked at Morgan Stanley before he joined the State Department, and has since returned; Hormats worked at Goldman Sachs.
Surely the problem isn't the bonuses. It's that Ms. Clinton rewards the banks by installing their lackeys at the highest levels of government.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)3. And here is your answer..
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)2. Perhaps. Start an OP about it..
This is about stopping the incentive for it....remove the incentive...remove the problem.
Amimnoch
(4,558 posts)4. K&R!!