Tue Sep 1, 2015, 10:51 AM
calimary (78,167 posts)
I kept getting these Bernie Sanders emails...
Don't know why. I never signed up. So I just kinda let it go - not feeling one way or another about it. He's running for the Dem nomination, I'm a Dem, might as well hang onto 'em for reference. But yesterday I finally decided - hey, I'm a Hillary supporter. And I'm almost strangling under all the emails I get (from EVERYBODY AND EVERYWHERE and on loads of subjects from the bead world to the band world to politics to green living etc etc etc). I probably should thin things out a little. So I decided to unsubscribe.
And here's what I got: UNSUBSCRIBE We’re sad to see you’re endorsing the Koch Brothers’ agenda in 2016! Okay, we know you’re not doing that — you probably just don’t want to get so many emails from the campaign. Grassroots mobilization is how we’ll level the playing field against candidates with SuperPACs and wealthy donors. We hope you’ll reconsider leaving, make a contribution to the campaign, or join us on social media at: FACEBOOKTWITTERYOUTUBEINSTAGRAMTUMBLR You can also choose to receive fewer emails — we’ll only send you what we think are the most important messages from our campaign. "We’re sad to see you’re endorsing the Koch Brothers’ agenda in 2016!" Submitted without further comment.
|
81 replies, 7818 views
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
calimary | Sep 2015 | OP |
riversedge | Sep 2015 | #1 | |
virtualobserver | Sep 2015 | #4 | |
riversedge | Sep 2015 | #7 | |
virtualobserver | Sep 2015 | #8 | |
John Poet | Sep 2015 | #29 | |
Metric System | Sep 2015 | #39 | |
Duckhunter935 | Sep 2015 | #55 | |
HappyPlace | Sep 2015 | #74 | |
George II | Sep 2015 | #32 | |
virtualobserver | Sep 2015 | #47 | |
DisgustipatedinCA | Sep 2015 | #63 | |
aikoaiko | Sep 2015 | #6 | |
Cry | Sep 2015 | #12 | |
George II | Sep 2015 | #38 | |
cannabis_flower | Sep 2015 | #72 | |
Duckhunter935 | Sep 2015 | #57 | |
RoccoR5955 | Sep 2015 | #14 | |
arcane1 | Sep 2015 | #77 | |
msrizzo | Sep 2015 | #2 | |
virtualobserver | Sep 2015 | #3 | |
Cha | Sep 2015 | #5 | |
cali | Sep 2015 | #10 | |
Cry | Sep 2015 | #13 | |
MoveIt | Sep 2015 | #16 | |
George II | Sep 2015 | #33 | |
MoveIt | Sep 2015 | #40 | |
arcane1 | Sep 2015 | #78 | |
quickesst | Sep 2015 | #27 | |
seabeyond | Sep 2015 | #71 | |
cali | Sep 2015 | #9 | |
George II | Sep 2015 | #34 | |
TheFarS1de | Sep 2015 | #37 | |
DisgustipatedinCA | Sep 2015 | #65 | |
Le Taz Hot | Sep 2015 | #11 | |
MoveIt | Sep 2015 | #15 | |
brooklynite | Sep 2015 | #17 | |
Armstead | Sep 2015 | #18 | |
demwing | Sep 2015 | #20 | |
George II | Sep 2015 | #35 | |
JackInGreen | Sep 2015 | #42 | |
Armstead | Sep 2015 | #58 | |
Hekate | Sep 2015 | #45 | |
Armstead | Sep 2015 | #59 | |
StandingInLeftField | Sep 2015 | #76 | |
Hekate | Sep 2015 | #80 | |
StandingInLeftField | Sep 2015 | #81 | |
demwing | Sep 2015 | #19 | |
Hekate | Sep 2015 | #44 | |
demwing | Sep 2015 | #61 | |
hrmjustin | Sep 2015 | #21 | |
cyberswede | Sep 2015 | #23 | |
hrmjustin | Sep 2015 | #24 | |
George II | Sep 2015 | #48 | |
hrmjustin | Sep 2015 | #49 | |
arcane1 | Sep 2015 | #79 | |
George II | Sep 2015 | #36 | |
cali | Sep 2015 | #28 | |
hrmjustin | Sep 2015 | #30 | |
George II | Sep 2015 | #51 | |
cyberswede | Sep 2015 | #22 | |
Motown_Johnny | Sep 2015 | #25 | |
HappyPlace | Sep 2015 | #26 | |
Duckhunter935 | Sep 2015 | #60 | |
demmiblue | Sep 2015 | #73 | |
lunamagica | Sep 2015 | #31 | |
aidbo | Sep 2015 | #41 | |
Hekate | Sep 2015 | #43 | |
Trajan | Sep 2015 | #53 | |
ibegurpard | Sep 2015 | #56 | |
Rosa Luxemburg | Sep 2015 | #68 | |
Hekate | Sep 2015 | #70 | |
boston bean | Sep 2015 | #46 | |
ibegurpard | Sep 2015 | #50 | |
djean111 | Sep 2015 | #52 | |
ibegurpard | Sep 2015 | #54 | |
LWolf | Sep 2015 | #62 | |
Sancho | Sep 2015 | #64 | |
DisgustipatedinCA | Sep 2015 | #66 | |
BooScout | Sep 2015 | #67 | |
nadinbrzezinski | Sep 2015 | #69 | |
Amimnoch | Sep 2015 | #75 |
Response to calimary (Original post)
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 10:55 AM
riversedge (67,590 posts)
1. Scott Walker types get $$$ from KOCH-not Hillary. Does Sanders know or
approve of this Hillary smear?? I think Sanders supporters should personally email him and ask.
|
Response to riversedge (Reply #1)
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 10:59 AM
virtualobserver (8,760 posts)
4. no sense of humor? .....guess not
Hillary smear? no mention of Hillary in what was clearly a joke.
|
Response to virtualobserver (Reply #4)
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 11:05 AM
riversedge (67,590 posts)
7. saying the Hillary gets money from KOCH is a smear. Nothing funny about it.
What you be content to see Sanders getting accused of getting money from KOCH?? --coming from the Hillary camp??
|
Response to riversedge (Reply #7)
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 11:07 AM
virtualobserver (8,760 posts)
8. it didn't say anything about Hillary
Response to riversedge (Reply #7)
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 05:14 PM
John Poet (2,510 posts)
29. It isn't ALL ABOUT HILLARY.
And her name isn't mentioned.
Typical of how Hillary supporters on this site try to twist every little thing to "It's an attack on Hillary!" |
Response to John Poet (Reply #29)
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 06:20 PM
Metric System (6,048 posts)
39. ***deleted***
Response to riversedge (Reply #7)
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 08:17 PM
Duckhunter935 (16,974 posts)
55. It was a joke
And Hillary was never mentioned. for all they know about you it might have been to switch to O'M. Gee whiz, not everything is anti-Hillary.
|
Response to riversedge (Reply #7)
Wed Sep 2, 2015, 11:13 AM
HappyPlace (568 posts)
74. No, it doesn't. No Bernie = GOP in the white house.
Hillary has nothing to do with it, if she wins the primary we lose the general.
Ergo, pulling support from Bernie means the Koch Brothers get their way. https://go.berniesanders.com/page/unsubscribe/ Hillary is SO easy to defeat, that much is a no brainer. She can game the primary system with DWS and superdelegates (maybe, maybe not) but the GOP will BURY her in the general if we don't select Bernie. Come on, get on the Bernie Train with us! ![]() |
Response to virtualobserver (Reply #4)
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 05:58 PM
George II (67,782 posts)
32. There's a time and a place for jokes - that wasn't either.
Seems some around here will go to great lengths to defend the defenseless.
|
Response to George II (Reply #32)
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 08:05 PM
virtualobserver (8,760 posts)
47. a website unsubscribe page isn't "a time and a place for jokes"?
is that from "Miss Manners guide for the sensitive internet user?"
|
Response to George II (Reply #32)
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 08:56 PM
DisgustipatedinCA (12,530 posts)
63. $100 to DU if you can rationally explain how this joke was "defenseless"
loser pays.
Are you in? |
Response to riversedge (Reply #1)
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 11:04 AM
aikoaiko (33,829 posts)
6. How would Bernie's campaign know Calimary is a HRC fan?
It's a joke and not a callout of HRC. But maybe it's not funny to a HRC fan because of her close corporate and Wall Street relationships. |
Response to aikoaiko (Reply #6)
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 11:17 AM
Cry (65 posts)
12. Yup. They get Berned either way...
so it really doesn't matter.
I'm happy to get Bernie's emails. I have contributed 10 dollars here and there and planning a $50 drop on the moneybomb a week from today. |
Response to Cry (Reply #12)
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 06:18 PM
George II (67,782 posts)
38. Glad you're happy to get his emails. Obviously a lot of other people aren't....
...and if the Sanders campaign has no qualms about spamming potential voters, he doesn't deserve our nomination.
|
Response to George II (Reply #38)
Wed Sep 2, 2015, 09:29 AM
cannabis_flower (3,738 posts)
72. How do you know..
that the Sanders campaign has no qualms about spamming potential voters? For all we know one of your friends signed you up.
|
Response to aikoaiko (Reply #6)
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 08:20 PM
Duckhunter935 (16,974 posts)
57. Seems like Hillary fans
Are hypersensitive for some reason and can't take a joke aimed at no particular person. Why does everything have to revolve around Hillary, news for them, it does not.
|
Response to riversedge (Reply #1)
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 11:36 AM
RoccoR5955 (12,471 posts)
14. Where the hell is Hillary's name mentioned?
I didn't see it anywhere in the message. Do I need new glasses or something?
|
Response to riversedge (Reply #1)
Wed Sep 2, 2015, 01:15 PM
arcane1 (38,613 posts)
77. I guess you conveniently missed "Okay, we know you’re not doing that"
Manufacture that outrage. At least we're manufacturing something
![]() |
Response to calimary (Original post)
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 10:55 AM
msrizzo (796 posts)
2. Well alright tee.
No comment from me either.
![]() |
Response to calimary (Original post)
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 10:56 AM
virtualobserver (8,760 posts)
3. it's a joke!
Response to calimary (Original post)
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 11:00 AM
Cha (289,579 posts)
5. "We’re sad to see you’re endorsing the Koch Brothers’ agenda in 2016!" That's just weird.. HAR HAR
How about.. if you're unsubscribing you don't want to get ANY emails from them?!!!
|
Response to Cha (Reply #5)
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 11:13 AM
cali (114,904 posts)
10. it's not even a little weird. it may not appeal to your sense of humor
but it was obviously humor- and not the first time its been employed on his website.
And.you clinton fans harping on this? Irony. |
Response to cali (Reply #10)
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 11:19 AM
Cry (65 posts)
13. And this, if you go to http://www.berniesanders.com/IendorseClinton
Response to Cry (Reply #13)
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 12:32 PM
MoveIt (399 posts)
16. Desperate Clinton supporters, Bernie is ordering you to "Scoot Down" Next smear right here!!!
Response to MoveIt (Reply #16)
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 06:04 PM
George II (67,782 posts)
33. Desperate? The OP got an unsolicited email and when attempting to unsubscribe....
....got a response with a first sentence that was offensive.
And not only that, the response "doubled down" with this: "choose to receive fewer emails — we’ll only send you what we think are the most important messages"! How the fuck does the Sanders campaign determine what is "the most important messages" to people they're sending unsolicited emails to in the first place? I can't believe the reaction to that obnoxious response - some will defend it to the death, or at least until Super Tuesday. |
Response to George II (Reply #33)
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 06:23 PM
MoveIt (399 posts)
40. Cmon is that all the outrage you can muster? disappointing...
You clearly are part of the "Scoot Down" agenda!
![]() |
Response to George II (Reply #33)
Wed Sep 2, 2015, 01:16 PM
arcane1 (38,613 posts)
78. "Okay, we know you’re not doing that" n/t
Response to cali (Reply #10)
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 05:06 PM
quickesst (6,275 posts)
27. A little humor....
...from David Letterman. See how his DU supporters take it in stride, and laugh along with him. It's just swell!
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026552832 |
Response to cali (Reply #10)
Wed Sep 2, 2015, 09:20 AM
seabeyond (110,159 posts)
71. harping cali. tis interesting how we pick specific words for people. it implied vote otherwise, for
koch. just like posts on du. vote for other, against progressive, not true dem, not for the left.
you would be outraged if clinton joked. fuck, she joked about wipin with a clothe the hard drive to a obnoxious FOX news reporter and we had thread after thread and endless comments that she dare to not take question seriously |
Response to calimary (Original post)
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 11:08 AM
cali (114,904 posts)
9. uh, it couldn't be any clearer that this was humor. period.
And you know that perfectly well.
|
Response to cali (Reply #9)
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 06:07 PM
George II (67,782 posts)
34. Humor? It was a tasteless response to a request to unsubscribe from unsolicted emails.
Pretty sad that some will defend what others would call SPAM!
|
Response to George II (Reply #34)
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 06:13 PM
TheFarS1de (1,017 posts)
37. oh good
yet another reason concocted to feign outrage . Any sexism in that statement we can ruffle our feathers over ?
|
Response to George II (Reply #34)
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 09:01 PM
DisgustipatedinCA (12,530 posts)
65. I love coming home after a long day to find you've been posting all day.
You're my go-to guy when I'm not feeling sufficiently outraged by ridiculous bullshit that means less than nothing to the vast majority of people. Thanks for the valuable service.
|
Response to calimary (Original post)
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 11:16 AM
Le Taz Hot (22,271 posts)
11. Obviously, "Bernie Sanders emails"
are not always going to be from the Bernie Sanders campaign. Pretty easy, actually, just look at who sent it. If it's not from BernieSanders.com it's not coming from the Sanders campaign.
But you knew that. |
Response to calimary (Original post)
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 11:38 AM
MoveIt (399 posts)
15. Humor shortage reported
I'm more worried about the (obviously satanic) magical invocation :
FACEBOOKTWITTERYOUTUBEINSTAGRAMTUMBLR |
Response to calimary (Original post)
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 12:37 PM
brooklynite (89,798 posts)
17. I think this is reflective of another issue...
...partly by design and partly by budget limits, Sanders is running with limited staff. I suspect that gives some people, especially volunteers "free reign" to tweak thing the way they want without checking with higher ups.
|
Response to calimary (Original post)
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 12:37 PM
Armstead (47,803 posts)
18. Heck President Obama and the DNC won't let me unsubscribe
After getting tired of receiving about 20 e-mails a day from President Obama and other leaders and a bunch of individual names, I tried to stop and unsubscribe.
To no avail. I still keep getting stuff. |
Response to Armstead (Reply #18)
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 01:07 PM
demwing (16,916 posts)
20. Create a new yahoo.email
and switch your White House email address--don't cancel. It's easy, and your inbox will thank you!
|
Response to Armstead (Reply #18)
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 06:08 PM
George II (67,782 posts)
35. Do they respond with tasteless "humor" or something like this.....
"we’ll only send you what we think are the most important messages"?
|
Response to George II (Reply #35)
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 07:18 PM
JackInGreen (2,975 posts)
42. No george
The most tasteless humor they could find were your poutrage posts, but they could get through the self righteousness to ask your permission.
|
Response to George II (Reply #35)
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 08:22 PM
Armstead (47,803 posts)
58. No because they'e not a bunch of asshioles like the Sanders campaign
![]() |
Response to Armstead (Reply #18)
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 07:35 PM
Hekate (86,595 posts)
45. I spent several nights at the end of last year unsubscribing to nearly everything. It worked.
What I learned is never to sign a petition again, unless I used a Yahoo account, because once they have your email address they've gotcha. There had to have been at least 50 different senders and at its worst I was getting 100 emails a day.
I upgraded my spam filters too. I still get stuff, but not nearly in those quantities. I left my local Democratic Party stuff in place, and OFA, and Obama. It's been a huge improvement. My advice is to do the same, and don't give up. With many of the accounts there was some lag time before they updated their records, and meanwhile I kept going through the unsubscribe routine with every new email they sent. Feel the relief. |
Response to Hekate (Reply #45)
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 08:23 PM
Armstead (47,803 posts)
59. Yeah, I kind of feel like my email has gotten passed around
Response to Hekate (Reply #45)
Wed Sep 2, 2015, 12:59 PM
StandingInLeftField (972 posts)
76. I'm fairly certain that calimary...
...is not concerned one whit about spam emails flooding her inbox.
|
Response to StandingInLeftField (Reply #76)
Wed Sep 2, 2015, 03:31 PM
Hekate (86,595 posts)
80. So you really know her that well, do you
Response to Hekate (Reply #80)
Thu Sep 3, 2015, 01:48 PM
StandingInLeftField (972 posts)
81. It's not that hard to parse.
As a well-seasoned DU'er you've seen it all before, I'm sure.
|
Response to calimary (Original post)
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 01:01 PM
demwing (16,916 posts)
19. I love the smell of desperation in the morning
it smells like victory
|
Response to demwing (Reply #19)
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 07:26 PM
Hekate (86,595 posts)
44. Smells like some people are painting themselves into a corner by ...
... trashing everyone who is Not Bernie so badly that they could never vote for another than him. I mean, I wouldn't vote for a Murderer -- would you?
|
Response to Hekate (Reply #44)
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 08:42 PM
demwing (16,916 posts)
61. No... smells exactly like victory
Response to calimary (Original post)
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 01:10 PM
hrmjustin (71,265 posts)
21. "We’re sad to see you’re endorsing the Koch Brothers’ agenda in 2016!"
Poor humor on their part.
|
Response to hrmjustin (Reply #21)
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 03:39 PM
cyberswede (26,117 posts)
23. It's like when DUers say "Why do you hate America?" to other DUers, as a joke.
I think it's mildly amusing. They're probably naive to think everyone would get it, though.
|
Response to cyberswede (Reply #23)
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 03:44 PM
hrmjustin (71,265 posts)
24. Yes you and I would get it but some might not like it.
But no big deal.
|
Response to hrmjustin (Reply #24)
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 08:06 PM
George II (67,782 posts)
48. Some might not even get past the first sentence.
Response to George II (Reply #48)
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 08:07 PM
hrmjustin (71,265 posts)
49. It was hard for me to get past it.
Response to George II (Reply #48)
Wed Sep 2, 2015, 01:18 PM
arcane1 (38,613 posts)
79. Too bad, because the 2nd sentence admits it's a joke.
Gasp and swoon!
![]() |
Response to cyberswede (Reply #23)
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 06:09 PM
George II (67,782 posts)
36. And some of those posts are hidden.
Response to hrmjustin (Reply #21)
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 05:12 PM
cali (114,904 posts)
28. you're absurdly partisan
Response to cali (Reply #28)
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 08:11 PM
George II (67,782 posts)
51. Not appreciating an obnoxious response to a request of a political campaign is "partisan"?
I wonder what it would be like if the tables were turned. No doubt we'd see all sorts of complaining about Clinton's "corporatist surrogates" who don't know how to treat people if they're not part of the 1%.
|
Response to calimary (Original post)
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 03:37 PM
cyberswede (26,117 posts)
22. Bernie is the nemesis of the Koch Brothers. So it's a joke.
![]() |
Response to calimary (Original post)
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 04:40 PM
Motown_Johnny (22,308 posts)
25. Clearly a joke, from the next line
It says that they know you're not doing that.
|
Response to calimary (Original post)
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 04:48 PM
HappyPlace (568 posts)
26. Here is a link to that very page. It's very funny that they say that!!!
Response to HappyPlace (Reply #26)
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 08:26 PM
Duckhunter935 (16,974 posts)
60. And read the part that is in bold
Wow, the outrage.
I like how they also give you the CHOICE of receiving far fewer emails. Bet Hillary will not do that. |
Response to HappyPlace (Reply #26)
Wed Sep 2, 2015, 10:52 AM
demmiblue (36,210 posts)
73. All the hullabaloo over that?!
Get off my lawn, you whippersnappers!
|
Response to calimary (Original post)
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 05:28 PM
lunamagica (9,967 posts)
31. I'm getting those emails too. Never subscribed...
I just ignore them, but they are starting to annoy me.
And the joke? Not funny. |
Response to calimary (Original post)
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 07:09 PM
aidbo (2,328 posts)
41. I AM OFFENDED
JK
But I think I've decided on a signature, at least for now. |
Response to calimary (Original post)
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 07:23 PM
Hekate (86,595 posts)
43. Sanders seems like such a mensch. Does he have any idea what some of his supporters are saying?
No further comment.
|
Response to Hekate (Reply #43)
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 08:16 PM
Trajan (19,089 posts)
53. What exactly are those supporters saying?
I'm curious ...
|
Response to Trajan (Reply #53)
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 08:18 PM
ibegurpard (16,685 posts)
56. They are very mean
And won't let anyone support anyone other than Sanders...or something.
|
Response to ibegurpard (Reply #56)
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 10:07 PM
Rosa Luxemburg (28,627 posts)
68. yes it was just the same with our Obama
we were very mean in 2007
|
Response to Trajan (Reply #53)
Wed Sep 2, 2015, 01:02 AM
Hekate (86,595 posts)
70. Visit his namesake group for your edification...
Words like murderer and traitor have recently been bandied about freely, which rather surprised me. The good Dr. Dean is currently examining the undercarriage of a mode of public transport there.
I only visited by accident and shall not do so again, but the group's posts are prominent on the home page, so I need not go further for the news. Enjoy. |
Response to calimary (Original post)
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 07:38 PM
boston bean (35,817 posts)
46. How obnoxious!!
Response to calimary (Original post)
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 08:09 PM
ibegurpard (16,685 posts)
50. I keep getting emails from the DNC saying basically the same
I find them annoying but just delete them and go about my day.
|
Response to ibegurpard (Reply #50)
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 08:13 PM
djean111 (14,255 posts)
52. Yep. And don't for get all the SAY HELLO TO PRESIDENT TRUMP/FIORINA/WALKER/BUSH stuff.
I guess the difference is the sense of humor.
Oh well, not like those sniffling about it were going to vote for Bernie anyway. |
Response to djean111 (Reply #52)
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 08:17 PM
ibegurpard (16,685 posts)
54. "if you don't send us money you can kiss everything goodbye"
Yeah after the 2014 election disaster I'm pretty sure money isn't the primary thing hindering Democrats' electoral fortunes.
|
Response to calimary (Original post)
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 08:48 PM
LWolf (46,179 posts)
62. Maybe I should add that quote
to the next email I return to the DNC. I've tried, repeatedly, to tag them as junk so they won't land in my inbox, but it never works.
That inbox, with 100 or so new emails every day, 99% that I have to delete to get to those I actually want to read... If you don't want the emails, it's a simple thing. Unsubscribe. It's nice that there's an option. Interestingly, I don't get that many emails from the Sanders campaign, and I AM subscribed. I get more from the POTUS, and I never subscribed to the WH, lol. |
Response to calimary (Original post)
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 08:58 PM
Sancho (9,021 posts)
64. For goodness sake, don't erase them!!!
It's very important that you save all emails in a secure location.
|
Response to calimary (Original post)
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 09:06 PM
DisgustipatedinCA (12,530 posts)
66. I'm trying to get a socialist prayer circle together to address this travesty.
But, you know, socialism and prayer is a rare combination. Give me some time, and just hang in there.
|
Response to calimary (Original post)
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 10:01 PM
BooScout (10,406 posts)
67. Sounds like....
...they need a few lessons in how not to lose friends and supporters by alienating people with insults.
![]() |
Response to calimary (Original post)
Tue Sep 1, 2015, 10:10 PM
nadinbrzezinski (154,021 posts)
69. For information only
have you ever subscribed to ANY donor list? I mean ANY? You could end up on it becuase you donated for the local guy\gal running for dog catcher.
These lists are bought and sold in bundles to campaigns. This is how I ended up in the Michelle Bachman list, and a few others that just make me smile. And she did a no-no at one point that got her in hot water... donor lists are supposed to be sacrosanct and separate from media lists... ooops somebody in her staff forgot that rule... but that is a story for another day. Some of the people who send me email are left, some are center, some are far, far, far right. None are even in my state! As a reporter I don't unsubscribe, but that is how you ended in the list. Somebody at some point bought a list from somebody else. a list that might have been bought and sold a few times incidentally. |