Mon Aug 17, 2015, 11:49 PM
99th_Monkey (19,326 posts)
Hillary supporter: I hope she "bows out gracefully"
I’m a Hillary Clinton fan. But I hope she bows out with grace
by Mary Dejevsky * The Guardiqn * August 17, 2015 Hillary Clinton has a fundraising pot that is overflowing. She appears to be cruising to the 2016 Democratic presidential nomination: and then, if the stars align in her favour, on to a well-deserved place in history as the first female president of the United States. Her supporters have wished it for so long, it seems almost impossible that it might not come to pass. And I would count myself among those supporters, ever since – as a Washington-based correspondent – I watched the lobbyists gang up to defeat her health plan, and observed how she toughed out the sordid revelations about her husband and “that woman, Miss Lewinsky”. Clinton, as she showed then and has shown since, is not one to walk away. She embodies that all-American quip about the going getting tough and the tough getting going. But I just hope that there are those, somewhere in her entourage, who are even now begging her not to do it, and to bow out while there is still time to do so with grace. Reality must be looked in the eye. Clinton is a hugely divisive figure, including within her own party – and not primarily because she is a woman. There is the clan question. What does it say about the meritocratic credentials of the United States that two of the most favoured candidates for 2016 are closely related to recent presidents? Neither is to blame but in my book, this alone would be a reason for both Clinton and Jeb Bush to leave the field. It is also a reason why they may not be electable. Then there is the Bill question. A large section of the Republican party hates the Clinton name with the same venom that many Britons reserve for Margaret Thatcher, blaming Bill, as they see it, for defiling the presidency. This should not affect Hillary Clinton’s support – but it will limit her ability to appeal across parties. Nor do US voters need to be dragged all over again through the intricacies of the (loss-making) Whitewater land deal, the involvement of the Rose Law firm, or the suicide of a close aide, but they probably will. And if these Bill questions are not enough, there is another where she really does have some explaining to do: it concerns her involvement with his post-presidential charitable fundraising at a time when she held public office. Clinton’s chief liability, though, is the baggage she carries of her own... http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/aug/17/hillary-clinton-white-house-too-much-baggage
|
139 replies, 8986 views
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
99th_Monkey | Aug 2015 | OP |
Cali_Democrat | Aug 2015 | #1 | |
ibegurpard | Aug 2015 | #7 | |
mahina | Aug 2015 | #87 | |
KMOD | Aug 2015 | #2 | |
Cleita | Aug 2015 | #6 | |
KMOD | Aug 2015 | #9 | |
Cleita | Aug 2015 | #10 | |
NanceGreggs | Aug 2015 | #13 | |
DURHAM D | Aug 2015 | #14 | |
Cleita | Aug 2015 | #16 | |
DURHAM D | Aug 2015 | #17 | |
Cleita | Aug 2015 | #18 | |
KMOD | Aug 2015 | #19 | |
Cleita | Aug 2015 | #22 | |
Agschmid | Aug 2015 | #113 | |
NanceGreggs | Aug 2015 | #20 | |
Cleita | Aug 2015 | #24 | |
NanceGreggs | Aug 2015 | #30 | |
Cleita | Aug 2015 | #33 | |
NanceGreggs | Aug 2015 | #41 | |
Cleita | Aug 2015 | #43 | |
KMOD | Aug 2015 | #46 | |
Cleita | Aug 2015 | #50 | |
NanceGreggs | Aug 2015 | #47 | |
Cleita | Aug 2015 | #49 | |
NanceGreggs | Aug 2015 | #55 | |
Cleita | Aug 2015 | #59 | |
NanceGreggs | Aug 2015 | #65 | |
Cleita | Aug 2015 | #67 | |
NanceGreggs | Aug 2015 | #71 | |
Cleita | Aug 2015 | #72 | |
Fawke Em | Aug 2015 | #108 | |
DURHAM D | Aug 2015 | #27 | |
NanceGreggs | Aug 2015 | #32 | |
Cleita | Aug 2015 | #21 | |
NanceGreggs | Aug 2015 | #25 | |
Cleita | Aug 2015 | #28 | |
Agschmid | Aug 2015 | #114 | |
DURHAM D | Aug 2015 | #35 | |
Cleita | Aug 2015 | #36 | |
DURHAM D | Aug 2015 | #40 | |
NanceGreggs | Aug 2015 | #38 | |
sheshe2 | Aug 2015 | #31 | |
lunamagica | Aug 2015 | #57 | |
Cleita | Aug 2015 | #61 | |
sibelian | Aug 2015 | #139 | |
DesertFlower | Aug 2015 | #109 | |
Agschmid | Aug 2015 | #115 | |
DesertFlower | Aug 2015 | #117 | |
Chan790 | Aug 2015 | #127 | |
NCTraveler | Aug 2015 | #120 | |
pnwmom | Aug 2015 | #92 | |
MADem | Aug 2015 | #110 | |
mythology | Aug 2015 | #126 | |
JDPriestly | Aug 2015 | #77 | |
Fawke Em | Aug 2015 | #107 | |
KMOD | Aug 2015 | #135 | |
AtomicKitten | Aug 2015 | #3 | |
sheshe2 | Aug 2015 | #34 | |
Cleita | Aug 2015 | #37 | |
NanceGreggs | Aug 2015 | #44 | |
Cleita | Aug 2015 | #48 | |
sheshe2 | Aug 2015 | #85 | |
Comrade Grumpy | Aug 2015 | #133 | |
catnhatnh | Aug 2015 | #118 | |
sheshe2 | Aug 2015 | #52 | |
Cleita | Aug 2015 | #53 | |
KMOD | Aug 2015 | #60 | |
Cleita | Aug 2015 | #62 | |
KMOD | Aug 2015 | #63 | |
Cleita | Aug 2015 | #66 | |
KMOD | Aug 2015 | #74 | |
sheshe2 | Aug 2015 | #98 | |
Spitfire of ATJ | Aug 2015 | #111 | |
sheshe2 | Aug 2015 | #69 | |
Cleita | Aug 2015 | #70 | |
Agschmid | Aug 2015 | #116 | |
DemocratSinceBirth | Aug 2015 | #131 | |
Agschmid | Aug 2015 | #138 | |
Cha | Aug 2015 | #89 | |
sheshe2 | Aug 2015 | #99 | |
Cha | Aug 2015 | #104 | |
Spitfire of ATJ | Aug 2015 | #94 | |
sheshe2 | Aug 2015 | #96 | |
Spitfire of ATJ | Aug 2015 | #100 | |
sheshe2 | Aug 2015 | #103 | |
Spitfire of ATJ | Aug 2015 | #106 | |
sheshe2 | Aug 2015 | #136 | |
Spitfire of ATJ | Aug 2015 | #137 | |
KMOD | Aug 2015 | #45 | |
Cleita | Aug 2015 | #73 | |
KMOD | Aug 2015 | #75 | |
Cleita | Aug 2015 | #79 | |
sheshe2 | Aug 2015 | #97 | |
Cha | Aug 2015 | #78 | |
KMOD | Aug 2015 | #81 | |
Cha | Aug 2015 | #84 | |
KMOD | Aug 2015 | #88 | |
Cha | Aug 2015 | #91 | |
hedda_foil | Aug 2015 | #123 | |
DemocratSinceBirth | Aug 2015 | #134 | |
InAbLuEsTaTe | Aug 2015 | #112 | |
still_one | Aug 2015 | #4 | |
blackspade | Aug 2015 | #82 | |
Cha | Aug 2015 | #86 | |
Juicy_Bellows | Aug 2015 | #5 | |
ibegurpard | Aug 2015 | #8 | |
Maedhros | Aug 2015 | #11 | |
ibegurpard | Aug 2015 | #29 | |
NanceGreggs | Aug 2015 | #12 | |
DURHAM D | Aug 2015 | #15 | |
KMOD | Aug 2015 | #23 | |
CountAllVotes | Aug 2015 | #26 | |
delrem | Aug 2015 | #39 | |
DonCoquixote | Aug 2015 | #42 | |
delrem | Aug 2015 | #51 | |
DonCoquixote | Aug 2015 | #54 | |
delrem | Aug 2015 | #56 | |
DonCoquixote | Aug 2015 | #58 | |
delrem | Aug 2015 | #64 | |
C Moon | Aug 2015 | #68 | |
Tierra_y_Libertad | Aug 2015 | #76 | |
Hekate | Aug 2015 | #80 | |
Cha | Aug 2015 | #90 | |
delrem | Aug 2015 | #105 | |
ericson00 | Aug 2015 | #83 | |
Cha | Aug 2015 | #93 | |
Betty Karlson | Aug 2015 | #95 | |
sheshe2 | Aug 2015 | #101 | |
DesertFlower | Aug 2015 | #102 | |
OKNancy | Aug 2015 | #119 | |
sufrommich | Aug 2015 | #121 | |
restorefreedom | Aug 2015 | #122 | |
Tierra_y_Libertad | Aug 2015 | #124 | |
Godhumor | Aug 2015 | #125 | |
obnoxiousdrunk | Aug 2015 | #128 | |
HassleCat | Aug 2015 | #129 | |
99th_Monkey | Aug 2015 | #132 | |
6chars | Aug 2015 | #130 |
Response to 99th_Monkey (Original post)
Mon Aug 17, 2015, 11:53 PM
Cali_Democrat (30,439 posts)
1. Yes...Hillary should quit right now while she's up over 30 points
Brilliant analysis.
|
Response to Cali_Democrat (Reply #1)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 12:01 AM
ibegurpard (16,402 posts)
7. 60 points a month sgo...
Response to Cali_Democrat (Reply #1)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 02:03 AM
mahina (12,796 posts)
87. The OP makes no sense at all. And I'm for Bernie.
Response to 99th_Monkey (Original post)
Mon Aug 17, 2015, 11:55 PM
KMOD (7,906 posts)
2. she's not going anywhere.
she is the overwhelming favorite among Democrats.
|
Response to KMOD (Reply #2)
Mon Aug 17, 2015, 11:59 PM
Cleita (75,480 posts)
6. You mean the overwhelming favorite who is lagging behind Bernie Sanders the last
believable poll I saw? Or the overwhelming favorite of the DNC that is flooding my mailbox with pleas for money just this week?
|
Response to Cleita (Reply #6)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 12:04 AM
KMOD (7,906 posts)
9. No.
Polls continually show that she has support among the vast majority of Democratic voters, and the vast majority of demographics within the party.
|
Response to KMOD (Reply #9)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 12:08 AM
Cleita (75,480 posts)
10. I am a registered Democrat and I don't think they are polling correctly.
I never in real life run into Democrats, and I do hang around a lot of them doing activism and attending clubs, who are very enthused about Hillary. Most don't like her at all. Of course, it might just be the conservative area I live in.
|
Response to Cleita (Reply #10)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 12:13 AM
NanceGreggs (26,141 posts)
13. Well, that settles it, then.
I don't know why politicians waste their money on pollsters when they can just call you, and ask what the "people you hang out with" think.
|
Response to NanceGreggs (Reply #13)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 12:17 AM
DURHAM D (29,869 posts)
14. LOL
They should call me - I now live in a deeply red state and everyone I talk to can't wait to vote for Hillary. I thought at first they were putting me on but turns out they are sick of the men running the country. Go figure.
|
Response to DURHAM D (Reply #14)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 12:20 AM
Cleita (75,480 posts)
16. That answers it. You live in a red state and they can't wait to vote for Hillary.
You just painted her as Republican Lite which we all knew.
|
Response to Cleita (Reply #16)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 12:23 AM
DURHAM D (29,869 posts)
17. It will be a really fun night when she turns some Red states Blue. nt
Response to DURHAM D (Reply #17)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 12:24 AM
Cleita (75,480 posts)
18. Are you sure she will be the candidate that turns that state blue? eom
Response to DURHAM D (Reply #17)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 12:25 AM
KMOD (7,906 posts)
19. Too true.
And it's gonna happen DURHAM D.
![]() |
Response to KMOD (Reply #19)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 12:27 AM
Cleita (75,480 posts)
22. No it isn't. You can take that to the bank. Save your money. eom
Response to Cleita (Reply #16)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 05:22 AM
Agschmid (28,721 posts)
113. Let me just repost your post...
10. I am a registered Democrat and I don't think they are polling correctly.
I never in real life run into Democrats, and I do hang around a lot of them doing activism and attending clubs, who are very enthused about Hillary. Most don't like her at all. Of course, it might just be the conservative area I live in. Right back at you... What a reficulous post. |
Response to DURHAM D (Reply #14)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 12:25 AM
NanceGreggs (26,141 posts)
20. Well, they'll change their tune ...
... the minute they read this "article" cited by the OP - and realize that those chemtrails really are the devilish work of the Clintons.
|
Response to NanceGreggs (Reply #20)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 12:29 AM
Cleita (75,480 posts)
24. Really, throwing out the red herrings now, chemtrails and all?
I thought you were a notch above the usual when you lost an argument.
|
Response to Cleita (Reply #24)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 12:38 AM
NanceGreggs (26,141 posts)
30. Uh, yeah.
I just lost the argument? HRC is still way ahead in the polls. Exactly which argument am I - and the rest of her supporters - losing?
And yeah, the chemtrails reference was a "red herring" - a herring that just swam past you when you weren't looking. ![]() |
Response to NanceGreggs (Reply #30)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 12:42 AM
Cleita (75,480 posts)
33. I guess you don't know what that is.
![]() |
Response to Cleita (Reply #33)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 12:51 AM
NanceGreggs (26,141 posts)
41. And I guess you don't know ...
... why that's even funnier than everything else you've posted in this thread.
Maybe someone will point it out to you eventually. |
Response to NanceGreggs (Reply #41)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 12:54 AM
Cleita (75,480 posts)
43. You lost. Admit it.
![]() |
Response to KMOD (Reply #46)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 01:04 AM
Cleita (75,480 posts)
50. Oh, the concern. How touching. eom
Response to Cleita (Reply #43)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 01:02 AM
NanceGreggs (26,141 posts)
47. Uh, lost what?
And you STILL don't get the joke - major loss on your part there.
Sometimes it's just fish-in-a-barrel season, and it now seems to be upon us - red herrings and all!!! |
Response to NanceGreggs (Reply #47)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 01:03 AM
Cleita (75,480 posts)
49. Oh, now it's a joke.
Well, that's face saving I suppose.
|
Response to Cleita (Reply #49)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 01:08 AM
NanceGreggs (26,141 posts)
55. It's been a running joke ...
... for a long time in this thread.
Sorry it's taking you so long to catch on. But I can understand why. |
Response to NanceGreggs (Reply #55)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 01:12 AM
Cleita (75,480 posts)
59. You lost it with the reference to chemtrails and whatever the little insider ha, ha you
and sir grain elevator were having, which is okay. That's what PMs are for. However, when you lose the argument and have to divert it to that kind of reference, you threw a red herring into the conversation because you didn't want to continue it.
|
Response to Cleita (Reply #59)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 01:19 AM
NanceGreggs (26,141 posts)
65. I don't know ...
... what argument you think was being debated here, or what you think I lost. Nor do I care.
But this thread has been amusing beyond all imagining. And it's people like you who keep the amusement coming on a regular basis. So thanks for that ![]() |
Response to NanceGreggs (Reply #65)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 01:22 AM
Cleita (75,480 posts)
67. I will be amusing you all the way to Bernie Sander's inauguration.
Good night.
|
Response to Cleita (Reply #67)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 01:30 AM
NanceGreggs (26,141 posts)
71. Yeah, let's meet up here on BS's inauguration day ... n/t
Response to NanceGreggs (Reply #71)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 01:31 AM
Cleita (75,480 posts)
72. It's a date. Trust me. It is unless you don't show up of course. eom
Response to NanceGreggs (Reply #30)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 03:49 AM
Fawke Em (11,366 posts)
108. Not tomorrow, sweetie.
Response to NanceGreggs (Reply #20)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 12:30 AM
DURHAM D (29,869 posts)
27. Absolutely no one I talk to even knows what a chemtrail is.
Reality based folks are so amazing.
![]() |
Response to DURHAM D (Reply #27)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 12:41 AM
NanceGreggs (26,141 posts)
32. Yes, those reality-based folks ...
... you've got to post pretty early in the morning to get a chemtrail past them.
![]() |
Response to NanceGreggs (Reply #13)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 12:25 AM
Cleita (75,480 posts)
21. Actually, they should call me and hang out with the people I hang out with.
They might get the truth. Instead of scanning their spread sheets and collecting their fees, they might figure out the people they are polling are about as useful as focus groups. I really don't understand why any company or otherwise wastes money on those. I used to do them for the money and lunch. I told them whatever they wanted to know.
|
Response to Cleita (Reply #21)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 12:29 AM
NanceGreggs (26,141 posts)
25. Oh, I hear ya!
No point in wasting money on that new-fangled scientific stuff and all. Better to call on "someone in the know", such as yourself, to find out what's really going on.
|
Response to NanceGreggs (Reply #25)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 12:32 AM
Cleita (75,480 posts)
28. You really think that corporate measuring bullshit is scientific?
I doubt if any honest, real scientists would agree.
|
Response to Cleita (Reply #28)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 05:26 AM
Agschmid (28,721 posts)
114. "Corporate Measuring Bullshit"
...
WTF DU. |
Response to NanceGreggs (Reply #25)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 12:43 AM
DURHAM D (29,869 posts)
35. I recently found my great grandmother's Weather Prophet (hygrometer)
Even though it has a missing part it is more accurate than the author of this OP.
PS - You can take that to the grain elevator. |
Response to DURHAM D (Reply #35)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 12:45 AM
Cleita (75,480 posts)
36. Are there red herrings there.
![]() |
Response to Cleita (Reply #36)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 12:49 AM
DURHAM D (29,869 posts)
40. No, just red or Russian wheat.
It is money in the bank so why are you laughing?
|
Response to DURHAM D (Reply #35)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 12:47 AM
NanceGreggs (26,141 posts)
38. Grain elevator going up ... n/t
Response to Cleita (Reply #10)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 01:09 AM
lunamagica (9,967 posts)
57. So how come if Sanders attract Republicans it is a wonderful thing, but a bad
sign if they do the same for Hillary?
I'd love it if Hillary turns your state blue |
Response to lunamagica (Reply #57)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 01:15 AM
Cleita (75,480 posts)
61. My state is blue. It has been for a long time.
Response to lunamagica (Reply #57)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 01:31 PM
sibelian (7,804 posts)
139. I suppose one could make the case
that Hilary will attract rich republicans and Bernie is more likely to attract libertarians...? ![]() |
Response to Cleita (Reply #10)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 03:52 AM
DesertFlower (11,648 posts)
109. aren't we all registered democrats? nt
Response to DesertFlower (Reply #109)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 05:27 AM
Agschmid (28,721 posts)
115. No, as it turns out.
Response to Agschmid (Reply #115)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 07:03 AM
DesertFlower (11,648 posts)
117. the only excuse for that would
be someone is not old enough to vote.
|
Response to DesertFlower (Reply #109)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 10:35 AM
Chan790 (20,176 posts)
127. I'm not.
That has more to do with holding appointed office here in CT though...we have partisan quotas for appointed boards of state and municipal commissions. There was an open unaffiliated seat on my town economic development council so I re-registered as unaffiliated, waited 90 days to be eligible to hold office as an unaffiliated and applied.
Usually only the GOP pulls that trick...but I'm all in favor of co-opting successful tactics, regardless whose playbook they're out of. Now progressives control my local EDC. ![]() |
Response to Cleita (Reply #10)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 08:00 AM
NCTraveler (30,481 posts)
120. Post 6, followed up by this one, leave me scratching my head.
It's as if they were written by two different people; the second not reading what the first wrote before responding. You could actually start an argument with yourself.
|
Response to Cleita (Reply #6)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 02:15 AM
pnwmom (104,113 posts)
92. What national poll has ever put her behind Bernie? Link, please.
Or are you talking about a poll in New Hampshire, that state next door to Vermont with FOUR electoral votes?
I could certainly find it believable that Bernie would get those votes. |
Response to pnwmom (Reply #92)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 03:58 AM
MADem (135,425 posts)
110. I think the source is the virulently right-wing, tabloid Boston Herald
poll of NH voters (who are pretty much white people and there are a ton of independent voters there--it's a good litmus test for GOP candidates but it's not as predictive for Democrats). Of course, the Herald thought Romney was a shoe-in, and Scott Brown would handily defeat Elizabeth Warren.
So much for their prognostication skills. I wouldn't extrapolate much from that. I also think they may have been pushing the MOE envelope to draw that conclusion. |
Response to Cleita (Reply #6)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 10:25 AM
mythology (9,527 posts)
126. It's convenient that the poll you find believable
Is the one that says what you want.
If you ask nicely, maybe you can get unskewthepolls.com from the guy who was convinced Romney was winning. |
Response to KMOD (Reply #2)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 01:38 AM
JDPriestly (57,936 posts)
77. You need to watch this video -- both parts, from RealNews.
The problem with the e-mails is not that they exist, but what they show about the State Department under Hillary, how closely linked to multinational corporations she is.
What good does it do to have a foundation that tries to help people in underdeveloped countries if at the same time you are supporting policies and strategizing to wrest from people in a poor country, control of their natural resources like oil and gas. See this video from ReakNews -- both parts. http://www.democraticunderground.com/1017286974 And the article in the Guardian is saying what I have been saying. Hillary is not going to get any cross-over votes or any new converts to the Democratic Party. Ot should I say very, very few of them. Fact is, that the Republicans have stirred up propaganda whether true or false makes no difference against her for years now. She will have a tough time overcoming that fact. The numbers of foreign countries and very wealthy people who have donated to the Clinton foundation also will at some point raise questions about the perception of conflicts of interest. The Clinton Foundation no doubt does wonderful work, but Hillary should have decided whether to raise funds for her Foundation or run for president. She should not be pursuing both at the same time. She may believe that she owes her foundation donors no favors, but do they? And what happens if she doesn't deliver what they expect? Hillary really should not be running. I agree with that. |
Response to KMOD (Reply #2)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 03:47 AM
Fawke Em (11,366 posts)
107. I don't have to register in my state
In fact, it's best not to at all.
Glad you got rid of the no fracking button. Made you look like a hypocrite. |
Response to Fawke Em (Reply #107)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 12:06 PM
KMOD (7,906 posts)
135. no fracking button?
did you mean to reply to someone else?
|
Response to 99th_Monkey (Original post)
Mon Aug 17, 2015, 11:55 PM
AtomicKitten (46,585 posts)
3. She won't and has never done anything gracefully.
She wouldn't concede the primary last time she ran even when there were no more contests to be had. It's all about her without a thought or care for the party or the country.
Clinton Refuses to Concede Nomination.
NEW YORK — Democrat Hillary Rodham Clinton Tuesday refused to bow out of the Democratic race Tuesday, hoping to maintain leverage as Barack Obama clinched the delegates needed to secure the party's nomination. Clinton told supporters in a rally at Baruch College that she would consult party leaders in coming days on how to move forward, but that, "I will be making no decisions tonight." "A lot of people are asking, 'What does Hillary want?'" Clinton said. "I want what I have always fought for: I want the nearly 18 million people who voted for me to be respected and heard." Clinton told the crowd she would consult in the coming days with advisers about the fate of her moribund candidacy. But her remarks came hours after she told congressional colleagues she would be open to joining Obama as his running mate. <<snip>> http://www.nbcnews.com/id/24953561/ns/politics-decision_08/t/clinton-refuses-concede-nomination Obama wins Democratic nomination, Hillary ignores reality Hillary Agonistes: Why Doesn't She Concede?
As the odds get longer and longer, the obvious question is: Why doesn't Hillary Clinton gracefully concede defeat and throw her support behind her party's defacto nominee, Barack Obama? As my colleague at Salon, Walter Shapiro puts it: "What motivates her? Is it ambition, pride, feminism, vindication, public service or ideology? Or is it some combination of all of them?" The decision, Peter Keating, former senior writer for politics at George who now covers sports business for ESPN, suggests is "how much she wants to hurt Obama. And when she equated 'white Americans' with 'hard-working Americans' in attacking Obama last week, she signaled that she's still willing to campaign destructively. As long as Hillary is playing with her knife collection, she can make Obama bleed." <<snip>> http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/05/13/hillary-agonistes-why-doe_n_101618.html |
Response to AtomicKitten (Reply #3)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 12:43 AM
sheshe2 (70,691 posts)
34. When is Bernie
Declaring himself a Democrat?
|
Response to sheshe2 (Reply #34)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 12:46 AM
Cleita (75,480 posts)
37. Bernie is an American first. He has declared himself as a socialist democrat for the past thirty
plus years.
|
Response to Cleita (Reply #37)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 12:56 AM
NanceGreggs (26,141 posts)
44. Well, that's a cute answer.
But seriously, when do you think Bernie will actually become a member of the Party he wants to support his political ambitions?
He wants our support, our money, and our votes. Do you think he'll ever think we're worthy of his being one of us? |
Response to NanceGreggs (Reply #44)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 01:02 AM
Cleita (75,480 posts)
48. He wants America for working Americans. So do I.
Response to NanceGreggs (Reply #44)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 02:01 AM
sheshe2 (70,691 posts)
85. Hey Nance...
Sorry to break in here.
What the hell does this mean????? Hillary is divisive because she is a woman? Did I read that right? WTF! Clinton is a hugely divisive figure, including within her own party – and not primarily because she is a woman. |
Response to sheshe2 (Reply #85)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 11:50 AM
Comrade Grumpy (13,184 posts)
133. You need new reading glasses.
Clinton is a hugely divisive figure, including within her own party – and not primarily because she is a woman.
|
Response to NanceGreggs (Reply #44)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 07:11 AM
catnhatnh (8,976 posts)
118. Who wants who's money and support???
here's the official DNC front page:https://www.democrats.org/
|
Response to Cleita (Reply #37)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 01:05 AM
sheshe2 (70,691 posts)
52. Of course he is an American, is someone questioning that?
He can say he is a socialist democrat all he wants, yet he is in fact an Independent and always was.
Wanted to primary President Obama for 2012. Hmmm, outstanding Democrat, oh wait he is not. |
Response to sheshe2 (Reply #52)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 01:07 AM
Cleita (75,480 posts)
53. Yes, it seems they are. Why does he have to declare his party when the party he
is running under has accepted him as a candidate?
|
Response to Cleita (Reply #53)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 01:15 AM
KMOD (7,906 posts)
60. state election laws. eom.
Response to KMOD (Reply #60)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 01:16 AM
Cleita (75,480 posts)
62. His state election laws say otherwise. eom
Response to Cleita (Reply #62)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 01:18 AM
KMOD (7,906 posts)
63. He's attempting to run nationally. eom.
Response to KMOD (Reply #63)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 01:21 AM
Cleita (75,480 posts)
66. He's been in politics more than three decades, in Washington almost 25 years, I'm sure
he has it figured out. Trust me all the other candidates, both Republican and Democratic, would be on this like wildfire if it was a real issue. Well, maybe the Donald might try some asshole stuff.
|
Response to Cleita (Reply #66)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 01:32 AM
KMOD (7,906 posts)
74. I don't think he does. eom
Response to Cleita (Reply #66)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 02:47 AM
sheshe2 (70,691 posts)
98. Good he has it figured out.
He's been in politics more than three decades, in Washington almost 25 years, I'm sure
he has it figured out. So when is he changing to the party he is running for! Hint....Democratic Candidate!!!!!! |
Response to sheshe2 (Reply #98)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 04:03 AM
Spitfire of ATJ (32,723 posts)
111. I suppose you think he needs an invitation.
Response to Cleita (Reply #53)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 01:25 AM
sheshe2 (70,691 posts)
69. The party maybe...
Voters no.
|
Response to sheshe2 (Reply #69)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 01:26 AM
Cleita (75,480 posts)
70. Everybody still has one vote. That is in the Constitution. eom
Response to Cleita (Reply #70)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 05:45 AM
Agschmid (28,721 posts)
116. It's in the constitution?
Are you sure?
|
Response to Agschmid (Reply #116)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 11:04 AM
DemocratSinceBirth (96,410 posts)
131. I don't believe the Constitution speaks to how parties can conduct their primaries.
The parties control how their candidates are nominated. In fact political parties aren't even mentioned in the Constitution.
|
Response to DemocratSinceBirth (Reply #131)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 12:26 PM
Agschmid (28,721 posts)
138. Correct.
And even when we get to the GE, in our American system one vote on person doesn't really exist.
|
Response to sheshe2 (Reply #34)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 02:05 AM
Cha (269,357 posts)
89. Hillary Clinton is all Grace.. I don't know what that poster is talking about.
The writer of the article couldn't be much of a "Hillary fan".. if she's talking about her "bowing out gracefully"... Now! What a silly thing to say. She has no clue what's going to happen between now and the GE Election.. she obviously has no clue what a fighter Hillary is.. but, oh yeah.. she's "a fan".. LOL
Hillary isn't going anywhere except to the White House on her own volition. And, yes I have no crystal ball either.. but, I know she won't quit. I swear.. the swill people come up with to make a deadline. ![]() ![]() |
Response to Cha (Reply #89)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 02:50 AM
sheshe2 (70,691 posts)
99. Late...
Yet
KnR what you said!!!!!! Hugs Cha |
Response to sheshe2 (Reply #99)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 03:10 AM
Cha (269,357 posts)
104. Yes, it's late.. but, I know
the feeling. Night Owls, baby!
![]() |
Response to sheshe2 (Reply #34)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 02:24 AM
Spitfire of ATJ (32,723 posts)
94. When are the Clintons going to declare they don't own the party?
Response to Spitfire of ATJ (Reply #94)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 02:30 AM
sheshe2 (70,691 posts)
96. When is Bernie going to declare himself a Democrat?
Response to sheshe2 (Reply #96)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 02:56 AM
Spitfire of ATJ (32,723 posts)
100. He already did. Did you miss it?
Response to Spitfire of ATJ (Reply #100)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 03:07 AM
sheshe2 (70,691 posts)
103. Send me the link that he declared.
Send me that link that he has switched parties. Link please, that he is now a registered Democrat.
TIA |
Response to sheshe2 (Reply #103)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 03:35 AM
Spitfire of ATJ (32,723 posts)
106. He filed papers with the Federal Elections Commission as a Democrat.
Response to Spitfire of ATJ (Reply #106)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 12:16 PM
sheshe2 (70,691 posts)
136. He is running on our ticket.
He is not a registered Democrat.
|
Response to sheshe2 (Reply #136)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 12:23 PM
Spitfire of ATJ (32,723 posts)
137. Do you believe he needs permission from the Clintons?
![]() |
Response to AtomicKitten (Reply #3)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 12:59 AM
KMOD (7,906 posts)
45. She conceded very gracefully, to President Obama in 2008
[youtube][/youtube]
|
Response to KMOD (Reply #45)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 01:32 AM
Cleita (75,480 posts)
73. And I'm sure she will to President Bernie Sanders as well. eom
Response to KMOD (Reply #45)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 01:41 AM
Cha (269,357 posts)
78. Yes, she did, K.. and that's when I started liking her again. She came together for the good of
Democracy and President Obama kept asking her to be his SOS and she finally relented.. and the rest is history.
I think it's given her invaluable experience for her future job as President. Thank you! |
Response to Cha (Reply #78)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 01:54 AM
KMOD (7,906 posts)
81. Yup.
and BS on the other hand wanted to primary a sitting President from his supposed party.
|
Response to KMOD (Reply #81)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 02:00 AM
Cha (269,357 posts)
84. Yeah, BS wanted to primary President Obama in 2012. I won't say what I think of him.. 'cause
BS fans would alert and with "85% Bernie supporters on DU".. there's a very good chance I would get a hide.
So suffice to say.. I **** **** *** **** *****! |
Response to Cha (Reply #84)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 02:05 AM
KMOD (7,906 posts)
88. I'm an asterisk decipherer
and I have to say, I agree 100% .
![]() |
Response to KMOD (Reply #88)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 02:09 AM
Cha (269,357 posts)
91. I knew you could do it! LOL
![]() |
Response to Cha (Reply #84)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 09:57 AM
hedda_foil (15,204 posts)
123. Cha, could you provide a link or two to support that claim?
I spend altogether too much time on DU and read a lot of political/news sources, but I've never encountered this before.
|
Response to hedda_foil (Reply #123)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 11:55 AM
DemocratSinceBirth (96,410 posts)
134. ...
SANDERS: Brian, believe me, I wish I had the answer to your question. Let me just suggest this. I think there are millions of Americans who are deeply disappointed in the president; who believe that, with regard to Social Security and a number of other issues, he said one thing as a candidate and is doing something very much else as a president; who cannot believe how weak he has been, for whatever reason, in negotiating with Republicans and there’s deep disappointment. So my suggestion is, I think one of the reasons the president has been able to move so far to the right is that there is no primary opposition to him and I think it would do this country a good deal of service if people started thinking about candidates out there to begin contrasting what is a progressive agenda as opposed to what Obama is doing. […] So I would say to Ryan [sic] discouragement is not an option. I think it would be a good idea if President Obama faced some primary opposition.
http://thinkprogress.org/special/2011/07/22/277124/bernie-sanders-primary-obama/ |
Response to KMOD (Reply #45)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 04:15 AM
InAbLuEsTaTe (23,141 posts)
112. I give Hillary credit for being gracious in defeat. Unfortunately, too many of her loyal supporters refused to follow her lead...
Let's hope, this time around, when Bernie wins
the nomination, things will be different. |
Response to 99th_Monkey (Original post)
Mon Aug 17, 2015, 11:55 PM
still_one (77,021 posts)
4. Great, a tit for tat. A thread is started quoted someone I never heard of saying that "Bernie
disavows being a Democrat, then why should we as Democrats have him forced on us", of course it is a gross misrepresentation of the facts, so I guess it is only fair to start a thread quoting someone I never heard of saying that "As a Hillary supporter, I hope Hillary bows out with grace"
bullshit meets bullshit excellent What we need is more Donald Trump threads while we are at it This is the DU member formerly known as still_one.
|
Response to still_one (Reply #4)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 02:01 AM
Cha (269,357 posts)
86. More quotes from "ann coulter", chuckie todd, rush limbaugh pushing crap, too!
Response to 99th_Monkey (Original post)
Mon Aug 17, 2015, 11:58 PM
Juicy_Bellows (2,427 posts)
5. She digs some old bones in the fifth paragraph.
I too hope she bows out with grace but I can't fathom it. She certainly won't anytime soon, she is leading.
|
Response to 99th_Monkey (Original post)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 12:04 AM
ibegurpard (16,402 posts)
8. as much as I want to believe her sincerity
I dont for a second believe this author ever supported Hilllary. She makes some good points though.
|
Response to ibegurpard (Reply #8)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 12:10 AM
Maedhros (10,007 posts)
11. There is a plethora of "I support (candidate) BUT...." nonsense flying all over these days...[n/t]
Response to Maedhros (Reply #11)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 12:34 AM
ibegurpard (16,402 posts)
29. Yes it's insultingly stupid
When I see a "I used to support Bernie but" statement and this is just as dumb. People that are paying attention enough to be hanging out here and have made a choice already aren't going to jump ship that easily.
|
Response to 99th_Monkey (Original post)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 12:10 AM
NanceGreggs (26,141 posts)
12. I realize that the competition is steep ...
... but this is absolutely, hands-down, without qualification and/or hesitation, one of the most ridiculous things I have ever seen posted on this site.
I'm not saying it's the lamest attempt at serious political analysis - but it's definitely in the Top Ten. "Reality must be looked at in the eye." And the reality is that HRC is still the Dem frontrunner, and that's not about to change. That now-famous "baggage" she carries is the support of millions of voters - and, Jesus Hussein Christ, I hope she can handle the load, because it's pretty damned heavy. I don't know who's dumber - the author of this bullshit, or the people who buy it. |
Response to NanceGreggs (Reply #12)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 12:18 AM
DURHAM D (29,869 posts)
15. What... you aren't 1 of the 4 Recs?
![]() |
Response to NanceGreggs (Reply #12)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 12:28 AM
KMOD (7,906 posts)
23. Oh, that's easy,
both.
![]() |
Response to 99th_Monkey (Original post)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 12:30 AM
CountAllVotes (19,333 posts)
26. That is what was said about Bill
After the intern episode -- he should "step down" I heard more than once but it didn't seem to affect him at all.
As for Hillary ... *sigh* ![]() |
Response to 99th_Monkey (Original post)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 12:48 AM
delrem (9,688 posts)
39. This is a kind of tit-for-tat "I'm a Hillary supporter, but ....."
kind of piece, mirroring the all too many OPs on DU that begin "I'm a Bernie supporter, but ....", which anyone who actually supports Bernie Sanders know are fucking trolls.
A difference is the amazing deference the article gives to Hillary Clinton in the opening paragraphs. Empty fawning. The article doesn't examine any *issue* that Hillary Clinton actually handled, in government. It just vaguely points at the plethora of sex and money scandals associated with the name. Which, yah, is an issue all right. But e.g. Bernie Sanders supporters don't support Bernie because of Clinton scandals. They support Bernie on the fucking ISSUES. So I wouldn't even throw Dejevsky a bone for this piece. |
Response to 99th_Monkey (Original post)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 12:54 AM
DonCoquixote (13,172 posts)
42. we know that train left a while ago
especially after Bernie's self inflicted wounds at the hands of BLM. However, that does not mean that Hillary's friends do not need to tell her to stop acting like the person whose words seem chosen to offend the least amount of people and give the least amount of information. I actually blame her apparatchiks more than her, but the fact that they cost her the election in 2008 makes we wonder if Hillary learned anything.
AS far as her History though, this author proves that the British still have problem understanding us. If the GOP tries to play their 90's greatest hits package, they will find that people just do not care. It does not hurt that George Bush left a stink that still foul the air, and that the Koches cannot help but be painted as the arrogant aristocrats they are. If the GOP starts shooting with spent ammo, we have fresh ammo. If trump goes down, then Hillary can use the GOP's own base. Yes they hate her, but they hate the GOP too, especially as their machines also weed out popular candidates in favor of the person who acts centrist and will not trouble any power brokers. Multiply this by two if, despite being a mediocre campaigner, Jeb emerges. |
Response to DonCoquixote (Reply #42)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 01:04 AM
delrem (9,688 posts)
51. Please list "Bernie's self inflicted wounds at the hands of BLM"
I saw a lot of despicable race-baiting trolling of "white progressive" Bernie supporters on DU, saying that we're racists. But that's hardly proof of anything except the leadership of the Hillary Clinton faction on DU, since all that trolling came from that faction. We were trolled "just because", as eg. from the start just because we want to discuss Bernie Sanders' platform of economic reform.
I mean, WTF is with people like you, who accuse people like that? |
Response to delrem (Reply #51)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 01:08 AM
DonCoquixote (13,172 posts)
54. he should have had a plan
That addressed Black people's situation from the get go. He could have had people like Cornell West help him, but he got idngnanant and said he did not offer the apology to BLM himself.
|
Response to DonCoquixote (Reply #54)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 01:09 AM
delrem (9,688 posts)
56. That's no answer. It's a whine.
Response to delrem (Reply #56)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 01:09 AM
DonCoquixote (13,172 posts)
58. no answer and a whine
was all Bernie offered until BLm made him whip up a plan in a hurry, a plan that should have been prepped long before.
|
Response to DonCoquixote (Reply #58)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 01:18 AM
delrem (9,688 posts)
64. The Waste Land
I. The Burial of the Dead
April is the cruellest month, breeding Lilacs out of the dead land, mixing Memory and desire, stirring Dull roots with spring rain. Winter kept us warm, covering Earth in forgetful snow, feeding A little life with dried tubers. Summer surprised us, coming over the Starnbergersee With a shower of rain; we stopped in the colonnade, And went on in sunlight, into the Hofgarten, And drank coffee, and talked for an hour. Bin gar keine Russin, stamm’ aus Litauen, echt deutsch. And when we were children, staying at the arch-duke’s, My cousin’s, he took me out on a sled, And I was frightened. He said, Marie, Marie, hold on tight. And down we went. In the mountains, there you feel free. I read, much of the night, and go south in the winter. What are the roots that clutch, what branches grow Out of this stony rubbish? Son of man, You cannot say, or guess, for you know only A heap of broken images, where the sun beats, And the dead tree gives no shelter, the cricket no relief, And the dry stone no sound of water. Only There is shadow under this red rock, (Come in under the shadow of this red rock), And I will show you something different from either Your shadow at morning striding behind you Or your shadow at evening rising to meet you; I will show you fear in a handful of dust. T. S. Eliot |
Response to 99th_Monkey (Original post)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 01:23 AM
C Moon (9,320 posts)
68. I've always wanted to use this smiley....
![]() |
Response to 99th_Monkey (Original post)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 01:34 AM
Tierra_y_Libertad (50,414 posts)
76. Well, you know that the Guardian is a notorious right wing rag.
![]() |
Response to 99th_Monkey (Original post)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 01:48 AM
Hekate (67,214 posts)
80. Suuuure you're a supporter, Mary. Hillary is going to keep on keeping on. nt
Response to Hekate (Reply #80)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 02:06 AM
Cha (269,357 posts)
90. Similar thoughts, Hekate..
Response to Hekate (Reply #80)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 03:26 AM
delrem (9,688 posts)
105. Now you know what it's like to be at the receiving end of that kind of dissembling.
On my side, it's been the "I'm a Bernie supporter, but..." followed by slander after slander. Esp. suggesting that Bernie Sanders and supporters are somehow racist and --- "eeeeyeugh! I can't associate with flat out white supremacists."
The best are by DUers who fly a Bernie avatar. Oh, they're GOOD! Of the good ones the most excellent are the ones that explain just how despicable Bernie Sanders supporters are. So for sure I know how low this editorial comment goes. More interesting yet, that kind of no-brainer sloppy thinking is run by "comment is free" at The Guardian. |
Response to 99th_Monkey (Original post)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 01:55 AM
ericson00 (2,707 posts)
83. yes, I really give a fuck what someone who lives 5000 miles away, who's attacked Democrats before,
thinks.
|
Response to ericson00 (Reply #83)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 02:18 AM
Cha (269,357 posts)
93. Yeah, I have NMFTG, either, ericson.
Response to 99th_Monkey (Original post)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 02:27 AM
Betty Karlson (7,231 posts)
95. She won't. n/t
Response to 99th_Monkey (Original post)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 03:06 AM
DesertFlower (11,648 posts)
102. that's insane. hillary knew what she
was facing when he decided to run. even though i'm a bernie supporter i want her to stay in the race.
|
Response to 99th_Monkey (Original post)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 07:54 AM
OKNancy (41,827 posts)
119. Checked out some of this author's other work....
She is a crap writer. She is no "fan" of Hillary's. She is a fan of Putin however.
"the suicide of a close aide" - yeah right Mary, keep on with the right-wing-nut-job bullshit. This is the DU member formerly known as OKNancy.
|
Response to OKNancy (Reply #119)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 08:03 AM
sufrommich (22,871 posts)
121. Color me shocked.Not. nt
Response to 99th_Monkey (Original post)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 08:03 AM
restorefreedom (12,655 posts)
122. i always look articles that start with
"i am a (name) supporter, but....."
that said, a couple of good points were raised the country has bush/clinton fatigue hillary has too much baggage to win a ge a revolution is happening which she can't appropriately represent because of her corporate ties and support |
Response to 99th_Monkey (Original post)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 10:15 AM
Tierra_y_Libertad (50,414 posts)
124. I just hopes she bows out. Gracefully would be nice.
Response to 99th_Monkey (Original post)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 10:23 AM
Godhumor (6,437 posts)
125. "As the frontrunner by a massive plurality, I feel I have no choice but to step down"
That would be an interesting speech, for sure.
|
Response to 99th_Monkey (Original post)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 10:38 AM
obnoxiousdrunk (2,526 posts)
128. Yawn ...
Response to 99th_Monkey (Original post)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 10:54 AM
HassleCat (6,409 posts)
129. I can see your point
I should vote for a candidate who will not inspire hatred from Republicans, a candidate who carries no baggage the GOP can exploit. So I should vote for.... um... a Republican!
|
Response to HassleCat (Reply #129)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 11:06 AM
99th_Monkey (19,326 posts)
132. Yes, let's elect a Democratic Socialist "who carries no baggage"
![]() |
Response to 99th_Monkey (Original post)
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 10:56 AM
6chars (3,967 posts)
130. She will bow out if her funding dries up and she is way behind in the polls
Until then
![]() |